Translate

Monday, April 30, 2007

Frank agrees...

Some people lay shit on Frank White, after all he has had a few…erm…‘retirements’ and made more comebacks than Lazarus, but we like him. He has his own inimitable style and is clearly the most intelligent member of Stormfront Downunder and not just because he sometimes says nice things about us…

Good ON yer Frank old son and keep up the good work!

Frank White wrote:

“Sadly, one of the greatest lies told by numerous Australian "anti-fascist" activists is that the Aussie ANZACs fought against the Nazis for ideological reasons and for a Multiculturalist Australian State.

One such Australian 'antifa' group that will remain nameless (FDB, that’s YOU girls! Ed) believes that they are honouring the ANZAC spirit by fighting the "ideology of racism" and ‘Nazism’ the ANZACS battled!

Well they could not be more mistaken...

The ANZACS by are certainly amongst the bravest troops God placed on this world. I respect ANZACS of all races, creeds and nationalities, but the truth is not what the "anti-fascists" would have us believe. Yes, the ANZACS fought the Nazis--but certainly not for ideological reasons. Consider the following:

1) Prime Minister Menzies declared war on Nazi Germany because the United Kingdom did so. In fact, when Britain declared war Menzies himself stated that Australia was at war as well…

It is my melancholy duty to inform you officially that in consequence of a persistence by Germany and her invasion of Poland, Great Britain has declared war upon her and that, as a result, Australia is also at war

No harder task can fall to the lot of a democratic leader than to make such an announcement.

Great Britain and France with the cooperation of the British Dominions have struggled to avoid this tragedy. They have, as I firmly believe, been patient. They have kept the door of negotiation open. They have given no cause for aggression.

But in the result their efforts have failed and we are therefore, as a great family of nations, involved in a struggle which we must at all costs win and which we believe in our hearts we will win."

Menzies did not declare war out of some ideological opposition to Nazism but as a direct result of Australia’s homeland of the United Kingdom doing so themselves! In fact he conceded that Australia and the rest of the Commonwealth tried to resolve the problems with ‘fascist’ and Nazi Germany through negotiation when the Nazi platforms were quite well known to these powers!

Think about it seriously, Australia did not seem to object to Nazi expansion at least to the point that they cared enough to fight to stop it! Australia did not go to war against Germany when the Nazis annexed Austria and the Sudetenland in 1938, nor did Australia declare war when they invaded the Czech Republic in early 1939. In fact they were willing to continue negotiations until the invasion of Poland after all of the above events took place! They only declared war when their motherland declared war.

Australia was a British Nation, a territory and dominion of the empire. The Statute of Westminster that ended the constitutional links between Australia and the United Kingdom was not adopted and ratified by Australia until 1942. The Statute was invalid unless adopted and ratified by the parliaments of the nations involved, which included Australia's. This means simply that the Statute of Westminster did not come into effect for Australia until 1942, though it was "backdated" to the day Australia declared war in 1939. But at the time war was declared, Australia was effectively and legally a part of the United Kingdom.

So in reality Australia did not declare war on Germany out of some ideological dispute with the racial policies of the Nationalsozialistische Deutsche Arbeiterpartei, but out of a desire to serve the nation of Britain, which effectively included Australia.

In 1939 Australians were British and subjects of Britain. The Australian's going to war had much to do with loyalty to the homeland and I have yet to see a shred of evidence that they went to war out of any objection to German National Socialist policy.

2) Australia was a White nationalist state when the Aussie ANZACS went to fight for the British/Australian homeland. In 1939 the Immigration Restriction Act of 1901 and the unofficial 'White Australia policy' were in full swing.

At the beginning of World War Two John Curtin, who would become Prime Minister in 1941, stated:

"This country shall remain forever the home of the descendants of those people who came here in peace in order to establish in the South Seas an outpost of the British race"

As a matter of fact, when the Japanese tried to include a racial equality clause in the League of Nations charter at the 1919 Paris Conference, Australian Prime Minister Billy Hughes opposed it and when the Japanese measure failed, he spoke the following words to Australia's parliament:

The White Australia is yours. You may do with it what you please, but at any rate, the soldiers have achieved the victory, and my colleagues and I have brought that great principle back to you from the conference, as safe as it was on the day when it was first adopted."

Even Australia's first Prime Minister Edmund Barton made this telling statement:

"The doctrine of the equality of man was never intended to apply to the equality of the Englishman and the Chinaman."

So John Curtin described Australia as an outpost of the British race! Edmund Barton said equality did not exist between races, and Billy Hughes proclaimed a "WHITE Australia" as having been what the ANZACs of the First World War had fought for! These do not strike me as multiculturalism friendly sentiments...

In fact, to further illustrate my point, in 1949 immigration minister Arthur Calwell pushed for deportation of all non-White refugees from Australia. One must also remember that while the Anzacs fought in WWII, the changes in the unofficial White Australia policy did not come until after the war...

-It was not until after the war, in 1947, that non-Europeans were allowed to settle in Australia for business reasons.

-It was not until 1950 that students from Asian nations were permitted to study at Australian universities.

-It was not until 1957 that non-Whites with 15 years of residency were eligible for Australian citizenship.

-It was not until 1959 that Australians were permitted to sponsor non-European spouses for citizenship.

-It was not until 1964 that conditions of entry for people of mixed race-descent were relaxed.

The simple fact is that when WWII took place, the Aussie ANZACS were not fighting for diversity and multiracialism. These ‘values’ were alien to the values and the official policies of their nation. The Aussie ANZACS fought for a White nationalist state that was a province, a dominion of the United Kingdom.

The same antifa group makes an issue out of a small number of minorities serving with the Aussie ANZACS! This is an extremely weak argument as blacks served with the Confederacy in the U.S. civil war, the National Party-era South African forces and the Rhodesian Defence Forces under the Ian Smith government! How many would say those nations, entities were champions of multiracialism?

Even though I am not in favour of the label white supremacist even in the above cases I would like to use a quote from Jean Raspail's The Camp of the Saints that illustrates the point I am trying to make:

"Every white supremacist cause - no matter where or when - has had blacks on its side"

Merely having a small collection of minorities in a white nationalist Australian state defence force does not negate the nationalistic nature of the state or any state like it as illustrated above!

It is intellectually dishonest of "anti-fascists" to take the position they have taken. Australia was a White nationalist state in 1939 and it was for that state that the ANZACs fought. They did not fight for ideology, but for the defence of a British homeland whose people were perfectly happy to be a White society.”


Hey, FDB, you remember Frankie don’t ya? He was that Canadian bloke you libelled, slandered and defamed all on the ‘evidence’ of some drug addled faggot Anarchists. You know, the bloke you tried to get physically assaulted or even murdered in his own home.
Oh, come on, you MUST remember Frankie!
Jeezus you blokes have a short memory…