Translate

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

The Infamous Milgram Experiment and its relevance to the AntiFa


The experimenter (E) orders the teacher (T) the subject of the experiment, to give what the latter believes are painful electric shocks to a learner (L), who is actually an actor and confederate. The subject believes that for each wrong answer, the learner was receiving actual electric shocks, though in reality there were no such punishments. Being separated from the subject, the confederate set up a tape recorder integrated with the electro-shock generator, which played pre-recorded sounds for each shock level. The Milgram experiment was a series of social psychology experiments conducted by Yale University psychologist Stanley Milgram, which measured the willingness of study participants to obey an authority figure who instructed them to perform acts that conflicted with their personal conscience. Milgram first described his research in 1963 in an article published in the ‘Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology’ and later discussed his findings in greater depth in his 1974 book, Obedience to Authority: An Experimental View.

Writing in an article in 1974 entitled “The Perils of Obedience” Milgram summarised the experiment with these observations:

“The legal and philosophic aspects of obedience are of enormous importance, but they say very little about how most people behave in concrete situations. I set up a simple experiment at Yale University to test how much pain an ordinary citizen would inflict on another person simply because he was ordered to by an experimental scientist. Stark authority was pitted against the subjects' (participants') strongest moral imperatives against hurting others, and, with the subjects' (participants') ears ringing with the screams of the victims, authority won more often than not. The extreme willingness of adults to go to almost any lengths on the command of an authority constitutes the chief finding of the study and the fact most urgently demanding explanation. Ordinary people, simply doing their jobs, and without any particular hostility on their part, can become agents in a terrible, destructive process. Moreover, even when the destructive effects of their work become patently clear, and they are asked to carry out actions incompatible with fundamental standards of morality, relatively few people have the resources needed to resist authority.”
(Taken From A Wikipedia Article)
This is precisely how the filthy evil of Communism works. Exploiting people's fears of authority and of standing out as a dissident and turning them into obedient drones of the State just like FDB and Co.

Further to the subject of how socio-political programming can condition some to suppress intrinsic ethical resistance to commit cruel or immoral acts. This is how George Orwell’s main character, Winston Smith, explained the concept/act of ‘Doublethink’ in the novel ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’

“To know and not to know, to be conscious of complete truthfulness while telling carefully constructed lies, to hold simultaneously two opinions which cancelled out, knowing them to be contradictory and believing in both of them, to use logic against logic, to repudiate morality while laying claim to it, to believe that democracy was impossible and that the Party was the guardian of democracy, to forget whatever it was necessary to forget, then to draw it back into memory again at the moment when it was needed, and then promptly to forget it again: and above all, to apply the same process to the process itself. That was the ultimate subtlety: consciously to induce unconsciousness, and then, once again, to become unconscious of the act of hypnosis you had just performed. Even to understand the word 'doublethink' involved the use of doublethink.”
The highlighted phrase “to repudiate morality while laying claim to it” could so easily have been written with the Fight Dem Back Gangsters like @ndy slackbastard in mind. It so perfectly describes their psychotic mindset it is exquisite in its accuracy.

The ‘Answers.com’ online definition is more succinct:

“Thought marked by the acceptance of gross contradictions and falsehoods, especially when used as a technique of self-indoctrination.”

This may go some way to explaining the arrogant hypocrisy of the so-called AntiFa and Anti-Racists and the manner in which they have appropriated, refined and perfected the Orwellian concept of ‘Doublethink’.

The sociopathic disease of Leftism in its many and varied manifestations including Soviet Bolshevism, Communism, Socialism, Anarchism, Nihilism, Fabianism, Liberalism, Humanism, Feminism etc has brutally murdered approximately 150 Million people globally, so far. Feminism and its less obvious twin Humanism are responsible for the murder, in their own right, of millions of unborn people through the promotion of abortion!

When Whitelaw Towers shines the bright and cleansing light of truth upon the filthy cockroaches of the Red Left like FDB, @ndy, Darp, Weezil, Darp etc and expose the outrageous hypocrisy of these Leftist prigs we are also providing a tough though valuable lesson in the twisted psychology of Leftism.

FDB and @ndy’s slavish obsequiousness to the Global conspirators of the New World Order is more than simple fandom or cheerleading for fellow One Worlders. There is a hard streak of ruthless authoritarianism that runs through these creatures masquerading as good natured ‘progressive’, ‘tolerant’, ‘inclusive’ and egalitarian libertarians. There is a bitterness and resentment evident in their personas that, in our view, makes them excellent ‘Commissar’ material.

Pulling the trigger, pushing the button, pulling the lever or pumping the syringe to eliminate those they disagree with politically comes easily to these types. And those few among them whose hands might tremble at the vital moment will just as gladly hand the executioners tools to another to achieve murder by proxy.

There is no doubt whatsoever in the mind of this writer that these freaks of nature who perpetuate their grotesque and mendacious pantomime of ‘Multicultural Tolerance’ will prove one day, if not stopped, to be the sort of murderous scum that would make Pol Pot blush.

Why do we persist, here at Whitelaw Towers, in repeating this stuff over and over again? Well, it’s like this Folks, there has been a definite, observable and provable ramping up of hostilities coming from the likes of @ndy and the Red Left against ANY White Nationalist group and individual whatsoever currently in Australia.

The rhetoric has been getting increasingly shrill but also, more disturbingly, more malicious and threatening in nature with declarations of intent to commit violence It was even recently stated by one of the Red Scum rioters in Sydney that they would ‘follow’ White Nationalists wherever they went and ‘prevent’ them from meeting ‘anywhere’ at all. The statement was made clearly that White Nationalists will not be permitted to gather ANYWHERE in Sydney without being targeted.

Sadly, it appears only a matter of time before there is blood in the streets. To their credit, there have been some on the Left calling for calm and to refrain from violence. This has been echoed on the Right from those with cooler heads. But @ndy has an insatiable fetish for provoking violence and he wants to see blood at any cost. Although he is a gutless, jelly backed coward hiding in the shadows he is still capable of inciting acts of extremism.

6 comments:

Anonymous said...

Bang bang

Goodnight white pride

Mmmmm hmmmmm

jokes aside;

Nice article and an interesting experiment.
But, would T keep pressing the buttons if T were to SEE the results of their actions rather than hear them? Like, seeing the person writhing on the ground with electricity coursing through their body, would they still go along with Es commands?

I don't think so.

I don't believe that a person can be thoroughly convinced of the cruelty they are inflicting from simply hearing sound, in another room, under the circumstance of a "simple experiment" at a University - i'd think it was all a joke and'd mash away at the keypad for kicks.

Peter Watson said...

Do you know what role the Communist Party has been playing in the anti fascist movement in Sydney? I haven't heard much about what the CPA has been doing in the anti fascist movement. The Party has clearly stated that it is anti Zionist and pro Arab so does that mean that the Communist Party is opposed to the likes of Darp and his mates down at Fight Dem Back? I think that there might e a divide between the pro Zionist left and the anti Zionist left. I think the Australia First Party should try and the Communist Party on side and form some kind of a united front against the Zionists and Fight Dem Back.

WLT NSW said...

To be honest Pete, the term 'Communist' is used here, as on most White Nationalist sites as a generic term for the Looney Left.

Just as THEY love to label anyone from John Howard and Pauline Hanson to David Duke 'Nazis'.

It's a term of convenience.

Also, the Commos, as you well know, are essentially divided along Stalinist or Trotskyist lines.

I doubt there are many true Stalinists left in Australia. They are mostly 'Spartacists' or whatever they call themselves now.

We are aware that Hitler drew many recruits from the disillusioned ranks of the Commos back in the Twenties but times, and ideology, have moved on since then.

Anyway, thanks for your opinions and insights. We value 'constructive' criticism and will debate sensibly with anyone.

Eithne said...

T would keep pressing the button even if he/she could see L writhing in pain, IF T is convinced that L is a threat to T and/or inherently evil and/or inherently someone who exagerates their pain etc.

Anonymous said...

oooooh interesting.

Jew walks in sits down as T. On the other side of the glass there's a skinhead,nazi,ss, 88 type as L.

E tells the Jew that the person is an Anti-semite and relishes in the fact that there was a holocaust and would wish to repeat it.

What is T's response now to the visual stimuli of a person writhing on the ground in pain when said person is someone they hate and they are being directed to inflict it upon them.

Now that would be an interesting experiment.

WLT said...

What you are describing there though, anonymous, is simple revenge on a person already identified as an 'enemy' or potential 'tormentor'.Obviously 'T'will keep pressing the button until RSI sets in.

What this experiment was all about was 'following orders' and slavishly obeying authority regardless of the morals/ethics involved or the consequences rather than simple indulgence of revenge.

We at WLT have no doubt the scenario you describe is absolutely feasible but the findings of the experiment are more pertinent to how our own WHITE people dumbly follow orders and obey ZOG Statute 'laws' that are clearly destructive to our own Race and Culture.