Monday, November 15, 2010

'Bigotry' and 'AntiSemitism' out of the mouths of geniuses...

It would appear (like we didn't already know) that Whitelaw Towers and all True White Nationalists are in good, VERY good, company. Hodges and his band of A.P.P. retards are totally out of step with some of the greatest minds in Human History.
So many greats were so greatly 'anti-Semitic'...

Hey Sol, did you see In the March issue of Commentary how Mahatma Gandhi didn't like Africans?

Jake, Jake, keep in mind that Commentary is our main "neoconservative" organ. To get a little you have to give a little. Norm Podhoretz knows he had to sick his writers on the schwartzes now and again to Win points with the goyim. Gandhi was the tops.

I don't know, Sol. It says in the Richard Grenier article that Gandhi remained a supporter of the Indian caste system "until the end of his day." In fact, his ultimate weapon," the "fast unto death," was first directed not against Hindu-Moslem sectarian violence in 1917 but against "a kind of affirmative-action program for Untouchables" which the British tried to set up in 1911! Come on now, Jake. What are you trying to do? Play the devil's advocate? Everyone knows Gandhi was a great man.

The Devil you say! Listen to this, Sol. It says that, as the British were evacuating Dunkirk, Gandhi urged them to surrender, saying, "Hitler is not a bad man”. And he advised Jews to respond to Nazism by collectively committing suicide. Yet in Gandhi’s earliest days in South Africa, fighting the wicked racists, Commentary writes that "his three staunchest White supporters were Jews, everyone." How's that for gratitude?

Why didn't you tell me this sooner? Rhoda! Cancel our reservations at the Bijou! If Attenborough wants to make defamatory movies, he will have to do it without help from me!

And so, it appears, Mohandas K. Gandhi, the Mahatma of India and Idol of the decadent West, is on record as having said (in writing to the Viceroy), "Hitler is not a bad man." This may come as a shock to the workaday "Sols" and "Jakes," but Jewish academicians are all too aware of the accolades and the more qualified expressions of approval for Hitler which issued from innumerable prominent lips in the pre-World War II period (and during the war in those areas which happened to fall within the National Socialist power nexus). A rather imposing book could be compiled consisting entirely of the flattering things which Winston Churchill, H.G. Wells and other leaders said about the "prince of darkness" before he was permanently typecast. The "Sols" and "Jakes" would have quite a mammoth boycott on their hands if they shunned every erstwhile Hitler-flatterer.

Their boycott would grow immeasurably if they likewise shunned the works of those great artists and writers of the past who have, at one time or another condemned the Jewish people in the most vehement language. The wiser and better informed Jews know that it is preferable to single out an occasional Wagner or Richard Strauss for "special treatment" than to admit that a majority of the West's great personalities have at least privately expressed opinions not too different from Wagner's.

If the deracinated mass man of the West ever learns how Western genius has really tended to regard the Jew, the discovery could go far toward relieving his condition. It is safer to pretend that Wagner was a freakish and obsessed individual. But anyone who has leafed through Antizion must struggle to uphold the charade. Subtitled "A Survey of Commentary On Organized Jewry By Leading Personalities Through the Ages," Antizion is available from The Noontide Press, Box 1248, Torrance, CA 90505, for $5.00. The anthologist and commentator is William Grimstad.

The 200 pages of anti-Jewish quotations from "more than 575 of history's greatest minds" include striking observations like these:

O destructive nation! O infamous ones. O nasty race, to what misery you have brought your empty hopes, your crazy folly and your matchless obstinacy, you who summon hard-heartedness and obduracy against all truth and reason.
Miguel de Cervantes, liLa gran sultana dOrla Catalina de Oviedo.

It is true that once more the Jew has enthroned himself everywhere.
Why, not only has he "enthroned himself," but he never ceased to reign!
Feodor Dostoevski, The Very Last Word of Civilization.

They already dominate all international politics, and what will follow the Jews themselves know full well: their kingdom is coming, their complete empire.
Feodor Dostoevski, Status in Statu.

The sufferance which is the badge of the Jew has made him, in these days, the ruler of the rulers of the earth.
Ralph Waldo Emerson, Fate.

Does not the intelligible thought ever occur to you that the Jews who, apart from you, are citizens of a state which is more firmly founded and more powerful than all of yours, will, if you once give them citizenship in your own countries, thrust you the original citizens under their feet?
Johann Gottlieb Fichte, Urteile uberdie franzosische Revolution.

The "Aryan" unconscious contains explosive forces and seeds of a future yet to be born, and these may not be devalued as nursery romanticism without psychic danger. The still youthful Germanic peoples are fully capable of creating new cultural forms that still lie dormant in the darkness of the unconscious of every individual seeds bursting with energy and capable of mighty expansion. The Jew, who is something of a nomad, has never yet created a cultural form of his own and as far as we can see never will, since all his instincts and talents require a more or less civilized nation to act as host for their development.
Carl Gustav Jung, Aion: Researches Into the Phenomenology of the Self.

When first by Eden Tree,
The Four Great Rivers ran,
To each was appointed a man
Her Prince and Ruler to be,
But after this was ordained,
(The ancient legends tell)
There came dark Israel,
For whom no river remained.
Then He that IS wholly lust
Said to him, "Fling on the ground
A handful of yellow dust,
And a Fifth Great River shall run,
Mightier than these Four,
In secret the Earth around;
And her secret evermore,
Shall be known to thee and thy Race.
Rudyard Kipling, The Song of the Fifth River.

The presence of the Jews in the midst of the European nations is a cause of many evils and a serious danger....

The Jew continues to monopolize money, and he frees or strangles the throat of the state with the loosening or tightening of his purse strings. A veritable Pandora's box has been opened . . . . with vertiginous rapidity, the Jew has become the autocrat king and absolute lord ....

They are found behind all social commotion, as they are at the bottom of all epidemics of immorality. They sell surreptitiously the crowbars and the projectiles that destroy the foundation of faith and morals. They know well that no society can resist the potent degenerative force of immorality administered in adequate doses, bringing the enervation of complete intellectual abasement.
Franz Liszt, Die Israeliten.

The Jews are the most remarkable people in human history because, whenever they have been faced with the question, "to be or not to be," they have always decided, with an uncanny insight, to be, at any price --even if that price was the radical falsification of human nature, naturalness, reality, and the entire inner world as well as the external world .... Out of their own consciousness they have evolved a set of ideas in opposition to all natural conditions of living --one by one they have taken religion, culture, morality, history, and psychology, and converted them irreparably into a contradiction of their natural meaning .... Because of their capacity for distortion, the Jews are the most fateful people in human history.
Friedrich Nietzsche, The Antichrist

Scores of other great men said very much the same sorts of things. Yet the young academic of today, coming up through the ranks, is told to ignore this overwhelming testimony. All too susceptible to flattery, he is informed that because he lives in the uniquely enlightened 1980s, while the creative immortals lived in the benighted 1200s, 1300s, 1400s, 1500s, 1600s, 1700s, 1800s, and early 1900s, he has an advantage over them in understanding. Liszt may have based his warnings about Jewish money-power and immorality on years of close observation in a dozen European capitals, and on conversations with other intellectual giants of his era, but the "political science" student at SI ippery Rock State Teachers College, who has never met anyone with broader experience than his own, is assured that poor Liszt lacked a "modern education." Why, he probably never even attended a "racial sensitivity seminar"!

Actually, the sheltered student is most unlikely ever to encou nter the anti-Jewish convictions of great men other than Richard Wagner and a few other scapegoats. Wagner is the perfect foil for liberals because of his loose mouth and some unpleasant behaviour patterns. A recent review of The Ring (TV Guide, January 22) begins with a suitably cranky Wagnerian quotation: "All the evils of the world are due to three causes: the Jews, the French, the Jesu its (and in that order) ...." Wagner did not really believe that, of course, but it sets the right tone for the article which follows: Wagner, the remarkable artist, is shown as no less remarkably arrogant and fearful. The man who "composed the storm that blows on Brunnhilde's mountaintop was afraid of every draught and wrapped himself in dressing gowns of 'pink satin stuffed with eiderdown' ...." He borrowed money from every friend "without the slightest intention of paying it back." He was "relentlessly, passionately self-centred," indeed, "self-obsessed." H is Alsatian disciple, Edouard Schun, once wrote, "The least contradiction provoked him to incredible anger. Then he would leap like a stag, roar like a lion." The lesson of all this, made suitable simple for a mass publication, is that anti-Semites are naturally unlikeable fellows.

But consider another recent review, by Richard Freed, which appeared in Book World. The book was Franz Liszt: The Virtuoso Years, 78 77-7847, by Alan Walker, and Freed exulted in its heroic portrait.

Liszt was simply one of the most fascinating individuals in any field of human activity, and fascinating not in terms of perversity or surface glitter, but rather on the most exemplary levels of artistic dedication and personal nobility. The more his music is understood, the more we come to value it; the same may be said of the wise, generous, prophetic, compassionate man himself.

Franz Liszt

Later, we learn that Liszt was "perhaps the very first 'music therapist' in his work with inmates of mental institutions." These and other humanitarian services revealed a "limitless generosity." Indeed, Liszt, the great lover of women, was also a profoundly religious man who remained close to the Franciscan order of monks (for which he was named) all his life. Though he "did not grow up in a Hungarian atmosphere, and did not speak the language," he is remembered by most as a Hungarian (as Copernicus is remembered as a Pole), perhaps because it is unwise to have too many kindly Germans running about in the pages of history.

The point is that the generous, sympathetic Liszt is usually forgiven his stridently anti-Jewish remarks, as are Byron, G.K. Chesterton, Goethe, Hegel, T.H. Huxley, Napoleon, Pushkin, Sand, Schopenhauer, Shaw, Sterne and Voltaire, to name just a few. Poor Dick Wagner, who never learned to control himself, has paid a heavy price for saying loudly what most of the others said softly.

Softly! Softly! I want none but the judges to hear me. The Jews have already gotten me into a fine mess, as they have many another gentleman. I have no desire to furnish further grist for their mills.
Marcus Tullius Cicero, Oration in Defense of Flaccus.

Jewish power, so uniquely different from other forms of power, was widely feared in the Islamic, Greco-Roman, Egyptian and Mesopotamian civilizations, as well as our own. Listen to Strabo, the Greek geographer: "There is hardly any place on the whole of the earth which is not dominated by the Jews." Perhaps Strabo should have said that the Jews dominated in such-and-such critical spheres of life. The point is that when hundreds of well-informed men over thousands of years make such remarks, there is unquestionably a great deal of truth to what they say.

One is struck by how many of history's leading socialists and would-be "altruists" condemned world Jewry in the harshest terms:

They have grabbed hold of all newspapers, and you can imagine what a nauseating literature is the outcome of it. Now this entire Jewish world, which constitutes an exploiting sect, a people of leeches, a voracious parasite, closely and intimately connected with one another, regardless not only of frontiers but of political differences as well --this Jewish world is today largely at the disposal of Marx or Rothschild. I am sure that, on the one hand, the Rothschilds appreciate the merits of Marx, and that on the other hand, Marx feels an instinctive Inclination and a great respect for the Rothschilds. This may seem strange. What could there be in common between communism and high finance?
Mikhail Bakunin, Polemique contre les juifs.

The Jew is, so to speak, a traitor by definition...
Leave the Jews in France for a century and they will organize their sect in each town; they will cooperate only among themselves.
They will become in France what they are in Poland and will eventually snatch commercial vocations from citizens who have thus far carried them on smoothly without the Jews, That IS what is happening in Germany, where honest burghers have to give up their businesses because they cannot survive the organized competition of the Jews.
Charles Fournier, Publication des manuscripts.

Karl Marx, the scion of a long line of Rabbis, wrote very much the same thing:

The Jew has already emancipated himself in the Jewish way: the Jew who is, for example, merely tolerated in Vienna, determines with his money power the fate of the entire German Empire. The Jew who is without rights In the smallest German state decides the fate of Europe.

This is no isolated fact. The Jew has emancipated himself in the Jewish fashion not only by acquiring money power but through money's having become (with him or without him) the world power, and the Jewish spirit's having become the practical spirit of the Christian peoples.

Karl Marx, in his review of Bruno Bauer's The Capacity of Today's Jews and Christians to Become Free.

More recent public figures also belong in any authoritative collection of anti-Semitic quotations. Jack Kerouac, who was sold to Gentile America as "the father of the beat generation," told Esquire readers in March 1970, "the real enemy is the Communist, the Jew."

Knowledgeable readers of Antizion will be struck by how many anti-Jewish statements of this century have been omitted. Here is H.L. Mencken, in the introduction to his translation of Nietzsche's The Antichrist: liThe case against the Jews is long and damning: it would justify ten thousand times as many pogroms as now go on in the world." A rather noteworthy assertion this, coming from perhaps the most respected American critic of modern times.

The anti-Semitic quotes given above might suggest to some readers worthwhile projects along related lines:

A respected scholar might be persuaded to list the "100 greatest men (or greatest literary figures) in Western history." He should then scan their entire recorded output and Iist everything they said or wrote pro, con or neutral about Jews. This would answer once and for all the question of whether Western genius has found more good or harm in this strange race. At the same time the views of the "hundred greatest" on racial differences and other currently taboo topics might be examined and tabulated.

As suggested in the opening remarks on Gandhi and Hitler, someone should record the opinions of important personages on National Socialism before international Jewry made it prohibitively costly to praise the movement or even treat it neutrally.

Finally, someone should bring the hidden record up to date, by examining in detail how the leaders of our own era have privately regarded Jewish power, black intelligence, forced racial integration, and other forbidden subjects. Much of this record will remain obscure for decades to come, but crucial fragments are emerging. For example, Chief Justice Earl Warren's memoirs showed President Eisenhower to be a private foe of the Supreme Court's 1954 school integration decision.

Ike once took his appointee aside at a White House dinner to say this about Southern segregationists: "These are not bad people. All they are concerned about is to see that their sweet little girls are not required to sit in school alongside some big overgrown Negroes." After Warren's ruling for integration, he was invited to the Eisenhower White House only when protocol demanded it. Our perilous times demand thick reference books packed with information of this sort. Then, when the narrow-minded "Sols" and "Jakes" try to boycott those who are none too pleased with them and their schemes, they might Just find themselves boycotting the world.

No comments: