Wednesday, December 28, 2011

Anti Antifa Australia. "Karl Dew"

Anti-Fascist calling for the Killing of White Nationalists will be at THIS place on Monday January 2nd.
Shop 3173 Level 3, Highpoint Shopping Centre, 200 Rosamond Road, Maribyrnong, Melbourne.

People in Melbourne should stop by and let him know you don't appreciate his comments.

Also see HERE

Saturday, December 24, 2011

Blood and Belonging

Your Old Uncle Victor would like to express his genuinely held (albeit agnostic) beliefs and feelings about Christmas this year as the other principle of WLT, who normally attends to such formalities, is rather busy keeping the dream alive. Christmas really is, apart obviously from celebrating the birth of the Lord Jesus Christ, all about Family and loved ones. The things in one's life that give one a sense of Identity, Blood and Belonging. The stuff that makes us what we are. Celebrate these things and maintain hope for the future, however bleak it might seem today. Our Folk have been through even tougher times than these, in days of War, Famine and Pestilence. All we need to do is keep our faith in our own abilities and our minds in the right place. We can do it. Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year to all our regular readers and supporters from the staff at Whitelaw Towers:

Whither Diversity?

Now THAT is the sort of 'Diversity' you can SEE...

But where is this elusive Multicultural social ‘diversity’ we all hear so much about from the Marxist Left? When might we, as humble and ignorant White Rednecks, ‘come to know’ and bear witness to the awesome fruits, the stunningly wondrous gifts of Multiculturalism and, basking in the warm glow of its vast successes, have our ‘Road to Damascus’ conversion to the light and the true way? Where are the hitherto obscured secrets and newly revealed mysteries to be found that would have us excoriating ourselves like Mediaeval Flagellants for our prior sins and stubborn stupidity? It is not as if we have been casually perambulating through the ‘occupied territories’ of this Multicultural Wonderland with our eyes shut, quite the opposite in fact. We have been ever vigilant for that first glimmer, that hint of a promise of the golden age to come but, alas, like the cosmo geeks scanning the skies at SETI, we have yet to produce proof of life in this Multi-Kult hypothesis.
For example, if one travels to the Sydney suburbs of Burwood, Cabramatta, Chester Hill, Eastwood, Epping, Fairfield, Hornsby, Leightonfield, Strathfield and several other Post Code locations one observes ninety percent plus Asians of various hue. Travel to the locations of Bankstown, Greenacre, Lakemba, Punchbowl, Wiley Park reveals a similar lack of ‘Diversity’ in the demographic of ninety percent Arabs. Indeed, the main shopping precinct of Lakemba is like a theme park replication of the Gaza Strip, minus only the sights and sounds of AK47 assault rifles being enthusiastically discharged into the air with abandon. Travel to Harris Park and the greater municipality of Parramatta and see ninety percent Indian Sub-Continentals, Blacktown and see Indians and Negroids. The golden domes and garishly painted facades of Buddhist, Hindu and Sikh temples now greet the undiscerning visitor to the Hills District of North West Sydney.
These grotesquely hideous affronts to the sophisticated aesthetics and civilised sensibilities of Western architecture (they are scarcely even technical challenges to European Cathedrals) now increasingly share the patchwork landscape with the usually more insidious Islamic Prayer Halls which, in turn, remind one of the caravan or shed Aussies used to (when they could afford it) plonk on a block of land whilst they garnered the money and materials to build their dwelling proper. One could bet one’s pocketbook on the fact these ‘halls’ will, in time, be replaced with the full blown monstrosity of the ‘temple’. All these formerly almost exclusively White Anglo Saxon locations mentioned above are now no more than Third World ghettos.
Although your humble writer is fully aware of and understands the Left’s peculiar proclivity for redefining and rewriting history it is still quite remarkable how comprehensively they have co-opted the socio-political narrative with their clumsy, ugly and it has to be said largely oxymoronic Newspeak. It requires vast truck loads of chutzpah to lecture allegedly recalcitrant Whites about the great benefits radiating from Multicultural ‘diversity’ to our blighted and besieged society while, quite evidently and observably, there is no such thing whatsoever apparent to even the most rigorous researcher. No data, no empirical evidence whatsoever exists to support the Cultural Marxists’ seemingly endless self congratulatory ‘reports’ and ‘studies’ etc.
When dealing with such blatantly self deceptive idiots and pathological liars it is best to stand one’s ground and challenge their every preposterous claim, fighting them every inch of the way. Sadly, few among our people would appear to possess the required intestinal fortitude and intellectual stamina to persist in this vital tactic of survival despite the terrible certainty of White Apocalypse should we fail to defend even the miserable remains of our once mighty civilisation.
The ultimate cruel irony of this entire ‘Diversity’ scam is that it is a lose/lose for we White Folks anyway when one considers its only logical alternative in our current predicament, is that of assimilation, which the social engineers pretended, in their well practised cynical mendacity, was the precise opposite of their intentions. They, of course, lied. Once the creatures of these alien Races and Cultures are here, and they demonstrably are, in huge numbers, there can be only two possible logical conclusions to this wicked experiment, further tribalism/ghettoisation or ‘genetic blending’ through mongrelisation. Both are undesirable but the latter is the most destructive.
Either way, ‘diversity’ is utterly unsustainable. In the first instance of Tribalism, quite understandably and in accordance with time honoured natural Human behaviour, people (the Non-Whites at least) will continue to seek out the comfort, safety and financial security of their own community locations and networks of contacts. They will continue to maintain and expand their own shopping precincts and commercial enterprises, their own schools and places of worship and they will exclude and disprivilege ‘the other’ Races because, unlike the guilt laden and self loathing Whites, they have a strong sense of group identity and purpose.
No amount of ‘education’ (read: indoctrination), legislation (in the form of ever more draconian so-called ‘Anti Racist’ and ‘Anti-Hate’ legislation) can ever break these fundamental instincts down because this can only ever work on White people with their high degree of cultural ‘sophistication’, egalitarianism, empathy and altruism. Whereas Whites, particularly Anglo Celts and Northern Europeans, have a strong tradition of volunteerism and self sacrifice evidenced by their disproportionate representation per capita among the ranks of the Salvation Army, the SES, Rural Fire Brigades, etc.
ALL Non-Whites have the inbuilt genetic imperative of survival and group think identity very deeply ingrained into their socio-pathology manifesting in their ‘me first’ and ‘charity begins at home’ attitudes. Their black marketing and monopolising strategies will continue to flourish and they will continue to pay little to no Tax, contribute little to no assistance to civic projects that might benefit those outside their in-group and be conspicuous by their absence in volunteer organisations and charities with a broader community focus that might extend beyond their own Racial kin.
The ‘enrichment’ factor in the Multi-Kult mythos is for the interlopers only as the host society is drained, via the teat of the Social Welfare nipple, of its vital wealth and energies at the expense of the indigenous White Australians. While on the subject of indigenous, does anyone reading this honestly and truly believe that once critical mass has been reached and non Whites in general, particularly Asians and specifically Chinese, are in majority control positions within our various strata of government, that the indigenous Black Australians, our Aborigines, will continue to enjoy being indulged with the tens of Billions of Taxpayers Dollars and countless other benefits?
One would expect they will pine for the good old days of when the hated ‘Gubba’ or ‘Whitey’ underwrote their feckless existence and could always be relied upon to respond enthusiastically to their every demand and obey with slavering obsequiousness the edicts of the United Nations.
Not particularly noted by history for their accommodation for and generosity to ‘foreign devils’ one can easily envisage these wretched Antipodean Blacks being paid short shrift by their new Sino masters. If ‘food security’ is still a major concern of the Chinese Diaspora by that time, and we see no reason to suspect it won’t be, then perhaps these ‘original’ Native Australians might find themselves converted to a readily available source of protein in the form of a ‘Soylent’ food product. Soylent Black anyone?
The Pollyannas and Useful Idiots of the broader Left will shake their little fists and protest their impotent rage against the machine (even though they are cogs and gears in that very same machine), the sandal and socks wearing vegetarian schoolteachers will bleat their Marxist dogma in their infuriatingly calm, reasonable and conciliatory tones, the bow tie ‘academics’ and ‘professors’ will publish their ‘peer reviewed’ papers (reviewed by other anointed fellow travelling doppelgangers that is) and continue their lemming-like march to the brink of extinction. The paedophile faggots of the Queer Mafia will dance their Mardi Gras conga lines and demand access to kiddies and the right to marry them.
The soft (a bit) Communists of the Greens will abolish Last Will and Testaments so that, accompanied by their stated policies of the reintroduction of ‘Death Duties’ (asset stripping your descendents) and taxing us for breathing (Carbon Dioxide) they will ensure the maintenance of a massive slush fund from which to feed, clothe and import the unwashed filthy barbarian dregs of the Third World, coming to a suburb near you, while THEY enjoy the post code insularity of living in fully secure gated estates in the nicest areas and send THEIR kids to private schools.
Eyes glazed with lobotomised passivity the Sheeple will stay tuned and won’t ‘touch that dial’ as they chomp their way to morbid obesity through kilos of deep fried genetically modified Frankenfood and the ‘sports fan’ yobbos will yell incoherent obscenities, between burps and farts, at the ‘no payments ‘til the Apocalypse’ monster screen digital TelAvision as they swill down litres of mass produced, generic, tasteless lager.
Not only don’t these yobbos care that the vast majority of newsreaders and T.V hosts are now hand picked Non Whites, that Commercial Advertisements feature an obscenely disproportionate number of Non-Whites, that ninety percent of ‘bargain stores’ are Asian, that almost every Taxi driver is an Indian Sub-Continental, that every Post Office is staffed by the same along with every Seven Eleven and similar ‘convenience store’ they don’t even NOTICE anymore. And yet, because the TelAvision tells them so, they will in turn tell you to your face that this is a nation of ‘Diversity’.
The tired old hackneyed excuse that these Third Worlders only predominate these industries because White Australians either consider these jobs below their dignity or are too lazy to do them is a crock of shit. These creatures come from societies where corruption, cronyism, nepotism and the most crude and brutal violence are mundane facts of life. They know precisely what they are doing when they monopolise the ownership, management and staffing of these industries, employing only their friends and relatives and keeping White people out.
Ask yourself this, if the Racial percentages were reversed and there remained a vast predominance of Whites in these jobs there would be accusations of unfair discrimination, enquiries and legislation concocted to reverse this trend. Because it is ‘only’ Whites who are clearly being shut out of job opportunities there is not a peep from concerned ethnic ‘Community spokesmen’, the Controlled Media or the Government. Whitey can simply go and get fucked!
Well, here’s some homework for you, gentle reader. The next time, the very next time, that someone says within earshot of you, that we live in a Multicultural paradise that has great ‘diversity’ smack them between the eyes with a vigorous challenge to their bovine credulity and extremely casual approach to the truth. Do not be overly aggressive as such but simply strongly assertive. It is only if these types are permitted to continue getting away with spouting this claptrap can the hegemony of Cultural Marxism remain in its lofty, secularly deified position of authority. Fight them. Fight them without fear and without pity. We have only been bullied into our current dire predicament because many have failed over the decades to speak up and effectively protest each incremental step toward the abyss of White Genocide.

Friday, December 23, 2011

A Christmas Gift And A Short Message For The A.P.P.

This December, J.C. Is Number One With A Bullet!
The absolutely brilliant Artist, Writer, Philosopher, Political Historian, former Cultural Adviser to the BNP and awesomely powerful public speaker Mr. Jonathan Bowden has said:
“Right Wing ideas are not about a bit of flag waving and baiting a few Muslims. Right Wing ideas are spiritually about inequality. The Left love equality. They believe we are all the same and they believe that as a morality and as a moral good which will be imposed.”
It would appear that the deranged Darrin ‘Bobby Dazzler’ Hodges and the hilariously misnamed ‘Australian Protectionist Party’ are content to limit their faux, small ‘n’, ‘nationalist’ activities and ideology to the former, supplemented of course with regular slobbering accolades for the Bandit State of Israel and sycophantic worship of the vile Chosenites.
One wonders what the Dazzler would think about Bowden’s statement that “Patriotism is the only Socialism” (because it appeals to individuals in ALL stratas and 'classes' of White Society) and as he and his cronies sneer that White National Socialism is a ‘Left Wing’ movement and therefore, in their ill informed and self delusional opinion, is essentially no different from Marxist/Humanist/Universalist INTER-national Socialism.
In truth, any fair and reasonable assessment of the Australian Proctologists Party will reveal nothing more than a reactionary 'Neo-Conservative' Trojan Horse, filled with philosemitic shills and Shabbos Goyim, cynically contrived to infiltrate the ranks of the True Right with Israel First Islamophobes and microcephalic Judeophile suck-holes. These creatures are not even Racially conscious.They indulge in miscegenation and Inter-Racial 'cooperation'.

If you are White and reckon you're a true 'Christian' don't just sing a few hymns, clap yer hands, roll yer eyes in ecstatic worship while singing Hallelujah this Christmas, grow a set and let the Jews know you're onto their filthy lies and let your fellow happy clappers know the truth about the Synagogue Of Satan.

"I'm dreaming of a WHITE Christmas"

Thursday, December 22, 2011

Emma West. Another White Nationalist's evaluation

Your Old Uncle Victor is posting the piece below to simply once again, reinforce the eminently self evident truth that we White Nationalists are the most eloquent, forthright, honest, morally correct, rational and wise thinkers in this sad, sorry and maladjusted World of Planet Bizarro where nature and reality are inverted. The sheer incontrovertible common sense of our White European Folk annihilates the sick lies of the Liberal Democratic Red Left as a good dose of kerosene eradicates body lice.
The drooling, mouth breathing ‘Anti-Racist’ Leftist louts like the criminal gangsters of the Anti-White cult ‘Fight Dem Back’ who can barely string a sentence together appear all the more insignificant and insect like when compared to such intellects as Kurtagic’s. There is little that satisfies more than the prose of a sharp White mind and the brief essay below does not disappoint. Read on, gentle reader, read on…
Emma West: When the Subaltern Speaks
8th December 2011
Alex Kurtagic

With her four-letter words and direct syntax, Emma West has truly focused the Leftist mind, for one remarkable aspect of the reaction to her critique of government immigration policy in Britain is the sudden regurgitation, in concentrated form, of Leftist clichés in support of the status quo. For those of us who enjoy analysing those clichés, this reaction has simplified our work, since we now need only to look at any one single source to find them all helpfully collated for our convenience. It hardly seems worth bothering responding to some of the most common assertions. The idea that Britain has a ‘tradition’ of welcoming every imaginable race because the island was invaded at various times by White folk with differently coloured hair is simply not a matter for serious debate.
So is the notion that being critical of immigrants and of the government-sponsored policy of immigration, diversity, and multiculturalism is the product of ignorance, bigotry, and delusional feelings of racial superiority. Like the notion that racial feelings are a disease cured through ‘education and love’, this is pure snobbery—the Leftist’s way of telling you that he thinks himself better than you. (It is always interesting how egalitarians are in fact great believers in hierarchy; the only difference between them and their opponents is that in egalitarianism, egalitarians are king.) Leftist commentators who make reference to European colonialism in the effort to embarrass their White opponents are far more worthy of attention. When non-White commentators on the Left argue that Britain colonised Africa and Asia, ‘plundered their wealth’, and ‘oppressed’ the natives, they are effectively saying ‘you did it to us, so we’re now gonna do it to you!’, or more simply and accurately, ‘f**k you too!’—which is an interesting admission, is it not, that they are in the business of colonisation.
Equally interesting is the claim that Britain’s survival is to be credited entirely to immigrants, for this is not an argument, but an expectoration, it being simply a polite way of saying that British people are lazy and stupid. Leftists also deny that there is such a thing as a British identity, or even such a thing as a White race, because of all those White people with different coloured hair that invaded—i.e., not welcomed into—the island over the centuries. These same Leftists would not deny that Indians have an identity, even though what we now call India is diverse and also the product of multiple invasions. When a White Leftist denies White identity, he is expressing self-hatred. When a non-White denies White identity, he is saying that Britain is for him nothing but a wallet—the natives are either a resource or an obstacle: a resource when they give money or change the laws to accommodate immigrants, an obstacle when they complain or prefer their own company.
There is a self-serving, self-reinforcing circularity in the Left’s denial of any European identity. They are quick to point out that the label ‘British’ comprises diverse people of diverse origin. This was true of any European nation state even when the continent was almost entirely White, but it was also the Left who pushed for a degree diversification that eventually rendered the ‘British’ label meaningless beyond a strictly legal sense. In essence, the Left manufactured the proof for its own argument, and then claimed the argument was correct because there was proof. Circular reasoning characterises the conception of the legal process, contrived by the Left, that disenfranchises critics of immigration, diversity, and multiculturalism. A Leftist blogger, in a hate-filled open letter to Emma West, wrote:
‘We have laws against your actions, and laws against your views, precisely because they are unacceptable in a civilised, multicultural, multi-ethnic, multi-racial society. The law sanctions them because they cannot and will not be tolerated in Britain.
This translates into: ‘you’re a criminal because we say so, and we say so because you’re a criminal’. Self-serving, self-reinforcing circularity and circular reasoning also characterises the Left’s conception of government involvement in race relations: ‘anti-racist’ government policy is treated by the Left as external legitimation of their ‘anti-racism’, but the government is Leftist, ideologically if not nominally, so legitimation is not external but internal: the Left claims legitimacy on the basis that it has legitimated itself.
Much of the pontification from the Left has been hideously self-serving and mean-spirited. At best, commentators have used the incident to push for concessions: the White Leftists want to move forward with their experiment, and flagellate themselves some more; non-Whites want a completely open and unrestricted society where Whites have zero racial consciousness and place zero value on their heritage and identity. At worst, snobbish commentators, even politicians, have publicly gloated and indulged their cruelty by kicking the dog that’s already down.
It bears pointing this out:
Emma West has already been publicly insulted and humiliated, arrested, deprived of her child, and remanded into custody; she will spend Christmas and New Years in a cell, where she will be at risk of attacks by coloured inmates. If convicted, she will spend up to two years in prison, after which her conviction will remain on her record for five years, barring her from a number of professions and making employment even more difficult. If she has credit card or other debts, she will face serious financial pressure. Note that not once did she use a racial slur.
Lashing out against random coloured folk on a tram will of course yield negative results. Yet just because some citizens express themselves less well than others, it does not mean their concerns are in all cases illegitimate and to be ignored—the sheer popularity of the video and the volume of commentary it has elicited from all quarters alone attests to the fact that Emma West has voiced what is in the minds of many—including, because she fits their narrative of omnipresent White racism, the non-White media professionals who have commentated on the issue (see here and here). Some working class folk know no other way to communicate their frustrations, and they certainly enjoy fewer options than most in a system where they, and not the Blacks or the postcolonial media commentators, are the subaltern.
Moreover, can those who are in the business of colonising our continent, pushing for permanent structural changes in their favour, including laws that disadvantage the natives, really expect not to experience at least some hostility? Even the diverse White invaders of yesteryear were fiercely resisted, despite being closely related members of the race. This is not to say that throwing cans and shouting slurs at Pakistanis passing by is a good way to behave; we may call such behaviour ignoble—un-Aryan. This is not to say, either, that all of those who do not trace their ancestors to Europe are in the business of colonising the continent; in some cases they, or their fathers, or their grandfathers were born here, and this is all they know. This is to say, rather, that resisting and expressing one’s rage at the present push for colonisation, especially by strangers who despise our culture, harbour historical resentments, and / or have a purely instrumental relationship to our society, is normal, moral, and legitimate, and this may affect not only the White politicians, mediacrats, and academics who are the instruments of colonisation, and who truly deserve our venom, but also those pushing to transform our living space to make it amenable for them. The expectation that Whites be pliant, cooperative, complicit, and enthusiastic about their dispossession and replacement is silly, perverse, and unjust, and we owe it to ourselves oppose it and provide appropriate means of channelling the rage.

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

The Origins Of Political Correctness

For the enlightenment of the likes of Michael Borg and other clueless Leftoids your Old Uncle Victor is posting the essay below. The author examines the origins of the cult of 'Political Correctness' in a starightforward and succinct manner that should even be able to be comprehended by the barely literate Marxist Zombies that emerge from the political indoctrination sausage factories the Sytem calls 'Universities'. Enjoy.

The Origins of Political Correctness
Bill Lind, February 5, 2000
An Accuracy in Academia Address by Bill Lind
Variations of this speech have been delivered to various AIA conferences including the 2000 Conservative University at American University. Where does all this stuff that you’ve heard about this morning – the victim feminism, the gay rights movement, the invented statistics, the rewritten history, the lies, the demands, all the rest of it – where does it come from? For the first time in our history, Americans have to be fearful of what they say, of what they write, and of what they think. They have to be afraid of using the wrong word, a word denounced as offensive or insensitive, or racist, sexist, or homophobic.
We have seen other countries, particularly in this century, where this has been the case. And we have always regarded them with a mixture of pity, and to be truthful, some amusement, because it has struck us as so strange that people would allow a situation to develop where they would be afraid of what words they used. But we now have this situation in this country. We have it primarily on college campuses, but it is spreading throughout the whole society. Were does it come from? What is it?
We call it “Political Correctness.” The name originated as something of a joke, literally in a comic strip, and we tend still to think of it as only half-serious. In fact, it’s deadly serious. It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious.
If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.
First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.
Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology (I would note that conservatism correctly understood is not an ideology) is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state.
Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing.
Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white males are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism.
Fourth, both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation. When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property. Similarly, when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions. When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favour of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated. And indeed, affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by, say, Hispanics or women. So expropriation is a principle tool for both forms of Marxism.
And finally, both have a method of analysis that automatically gives the answers they want. For the classical Marxist, it’s Marxist economics. For the cultural Marxist, it’s deconstruction. Deconstruction essentially takes any text, removes all meaning from it and re-inserts any meaning desired. So we find, for example, that all of Shakespeare is about the suppression of women, or the Bible is really about race and gender. All of these texts simply become grist for the mill, which proves that “all history is about which groups have power over which other groups.” So the parallels are very evident between the classical Marxism that we’re familiar with in the old Soviet Union and the cultural Marxism that we see today as Political Correctness.
But the parallels are not accidents. The parallels did not come from nothing. The fact of the matter is that Political Correctness has a history, a history that is much longer than many people are aware of outside a small group of academics who have studied this. And the history goes back, as I said, to World War I, as do so many of the pathologies that are today bringing our society, and indeed our culture, down.
Marxist theory said that when the general European war came (as it did come in Europe in 1914), the working class throughout Europe would rise up and overthrow their governments – the bourgeois governments – because the workers had more in common with each other across the national boundaries than they had in common with the bourgeoisie and the ruling class in their own country. Well, 1914 came and it didn’t happen. Throughout Europe, workers rallied to their flag and happily marched off to fight each other. The Kaiser shook hands with the leaders of the Marxist Social Democratic Party in Germany and said there are no parties now, there are only Germans. And this happened in every country in Europe. So something was wrong.
Marxists knew by definition it couldn’t be the theory. In 1917, they finally got a Marxist coup in Russia and it looked like the theory was working, but it stalled again. It didn’t spread and when attempts were made to spread immediately after the war, with the Spartacist uprising in Berlin, with the Bela Kun government in Hungary, with the Munich Soviet, the workers didn’t support them.
So the Marxists’ had a problem. And two Marxist theorists went to work on it: Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary. Gramsci said the workers will never see their true class interests, as defined by Marxism, until they are freed from Western culture, and particularly from the Christian religion – that they are blinded by culture and religion to their true class interests. Lukacs, who was considered the most brilliant Marxist theorist since Marx himself, said in 1919, “Who will save us from Western Civilization?” He also theorized that the great obstacle to the creation of a Marxist paradise was the culture: Western civilization itself.
Lukacs gets a chance to put his ideas into practice, because when the home grown Bolshevik Bela Kun government is established in Hungary in 1919, he becomes deputy commissar for culture, and the first thing he did was introduce sex education into the Hungarian schools. This ensured that the workers would not support the Bela Kun government, because the Hungarian people looked at this aghast, workers as well as everyone else. But he had already made the connection that today many of us are still surprised by, that we would consider the “latest thing.”
In 1923 in Germany, a think-tank is established that takes on the role of translating Marxism from economic into cultural terms, that creates Political Correctness as we know it today, and essentially it has created the basis for it by the end of the 1930s. This comes about because the very wealthy young son of a millionaire German trader by the name of Felix Weil has become a Marxist and has lots of money to spend. He is disturbed by the divisions among the Marxists, so he sponsors something called the First Marxist Work Week, where he brings Lukacs and many of the key German thinkers together for a week, working on the differences of Marxism.
And he says, “What we need is a think-tank.” Washington is full of think tanks and we think of them as very modern. In fact they go back quite a ways. He endows an institute, associated with Frankfurt University, established in 1923, that was originally supposed to be known as the Institute for Marxism. But the people behind it decided at the beginning that it was not to their advantage to be openly identified as Marxist. The last thing Political Correctness wants is for people to figure out it’s a form of Marxism. So instead they decide to name it the Institute for Social Research.
Weil is very clear about his goals. In 1971, he wrote to Martin Jay the author of a principle book on the Frankfurt School, as the Institute for Social Research soon becomes known informally, and he said, “I wanted the institute to become known, perhaps famous, due to its contributions to Marxism.” Well, he was successful. The first director of the Institute, Carl Grunberg, an Austrian economist, concluded his opening address, according to Martin Jay, “by clearly stating his personal allegiance to Marxism as a scientific methodology.” Marxism, he said, would be the ruling principle at the Institute, and that never changed.
The initial work at the Institute was rather conventional, but in 1930 it acquired a new director named Max Horkheimer, and Horkheimer’s views were very different. He was very much a Marxist renegade. The people who create and form the Frankfurt School are renegade Marxists. They’re still very much Marxist in their thinking, but they’re effectively run out of the party. Moscow looks at what they are doing and says, “Hey, this isn’t us, and we’re not going to bless this.”
Horkheimer’s initial heresy is that he is very interested in Freud, and the key to making the translation of Marxism from economic into cultural terms is essentially that he combined it with Freudism. Again, Martin Jay writes, “If it can be said that in the early years of its history, the Institute concerned itself primarily with an analysis of bourgeois society’s socio-economic sub-structure,” – and I point out that Jay is very sympathetic to the Frankfurt School, I’m not reading from a critic here – “in the years after 1930 its primary interests lay in its cultural superstructure. Indeed the traditional Marxist formula regarding the relationship between the two was brought into question by Critical Theory.”
The stuff we’ve been hearing about this morning – the radical feminism, the women’s studies departments, the gay studies departments, the black studies departments – all these things are branches of Critical Theory. What the Frankfurt School essentially does is draw on both Marx and Freud in the 1930s to create this theory called Critical Theory. The term is ingenious because you’re tempted to ask, “What is the theory?” The theory is to criticize. The theory is that the way to bring down Western culture and the capitalist order is not to lay down an alternative. They explicitly refuse to do that. They say it can’t be done, that we can’t imagine what a free society would look like (their definition of a free society). As long as we’re living under repression – the repression of a capitalistic economic order which creates (in their theory) the Freudian condition, the conditions that Freud describes in individuals of repression – we can’t even imagine it. What Critical Theory is about is simply criticizing. It calls for the most destructive criticism possible, in every possible way, designed to bring the current order down. And, of course, when we hear from the feminists that the whole of society is just out to get women and so on, that kind of criticism is a derivative of Critical Theory. It is all coming from the 1930s, not the 1960s.
Other key members who join up around this time are Theodore Adorno, and, most importantly, Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse. Fromm and Marcuse introduce an element which is central to Political Correctness, and that’s the sexual element. And particularly Marcuse, who in his own writings calls for a society of “polymorphous perversity,” that is his definition of the future of the world that they want to create. Marcuse in particular by the 1930s is writing some very extreme stuff on the need for sexual liberation, but this runs through the whole Institute. So do most of the themes we see in Political Correctness, again in the early 30s. In Fromm’s view, masculinity and femininity were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought. They were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.” Sex is a construct; sexual differences are a construct.
Another example is the emphasis we now see on environmentalism. “Materialism as far back as Hobbes had led to a manipulative dominating attitude toward nature.” That was Horkhemier writing in 1933 in Materialismus und Moral. “The theme of man’s domination of nature,” according to Jay, ” was to become a central concern of the Frankfurt School in subsequent years.” “Horkheimer’s antagonism to the fetishisation of labour, (here’s were they’re obviously departing from Marxist orthodoxy) expressed another dimension of his materialism, the demand for human, sensual happiness.” In one of his most trenchant essays, Egoism and the Movement for Emancipation, written in 1936, Horkeimer “discussed the hostility to personal gratification inherent in bourgeois culture.” And he specifically referred to the Marquis de Sade, favourably, for his “protest…against asceticism in the name of a higher morality.”
How does all of this stuff flood in here? How does it flood into our universities, and indeed into our lives today? The members of the Frankfurt School are Marxist, they are also, to a man, Jewish. In 1933 the Nazis came to power in Germany, and not surprisingly they shut down the Institute for Social Research. And its members fled. They fled to New York City, and the Institute was re-established there in 1933 with help from Columbia University. And the members of the Institute, gradually through the 1930s, though many of them remained writing in German, shift their focus from Critical Theory about German society, destructive criticism about every aspect of that society, to Critical Theory directed toward American society. There is another very important transition when the war comes. Some of them go to work for the government, including Herbert Marcuse, who became a key figure in the OSS (the predecessor to the CIA), and some, including Horkheimer and Adorno, move to Hollywood.
These origins of Political Correctness would probably not mean too much to us today except for two subsequent events. The first was the student rebellion in the mid-1960s, which was driven largely by resistance to the draft and the Vietnam War. But the student rebels needed theory of some sort. They couldn’t just get out there and say, “Hell no we won’t go,” they had to have some theoretical explanation behind it. Very few of them were interested in wading through Das Kapital. Classical, economic Marxism is not light, and most of the radicals of the 60s were not deep. Fortunately for them, and unfortunately for our country today, and not just in the university, Herbert Marcuse remained in America when the Frankfurt School relocated back to Frankfurt after the war. And whereas Mr. Adorno in Germany is appalled by the student rebellion when it breaks out there – when the student rebels come into Adorno’s classroom, he calls the police and has them arrested – Herbert Marcuse, who remained here, saw the 60s student rebellion as the great chance. He saw the opportunity to take the work of the Frankfurt School and make it the theory of the New Left in the United States.
One of Marcuse’s books was the key book. It virtually became the bible of the SDS and the student rebels of the 60s. That book was Eros and Civilization. Marcuse argues that under a capitalistic order (he downplays the Marxism very strongly here, it is subtitled, A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud, but the framework is Marxist), repression is the essence of that order and that gives us the person Freud describes – the person with all the hang-ups, the neuroses, because his sexual instincts are repressed. We can envision a future, if we can only destroy this existing oppressive order, in which we liberate eros, we liberate libido, in which we have a world of “polymorphous perversity,” in which you can “do you own thing.” And by the way, in that world there will no longer be work, only play. What a wonderful message for the radicals of the mid-60s! They’re students, they’re baby-boomers, and they’ve grown up never having to worry about anything except eventually having to get a job. And here is a guy writing in a way they can easily follow. He doesn’t require them to read a lot of heavy Marxism and tells them everything they want to hear which is essentially, “Do your own thing,” “If it feels good do it,” and “You never have to go to work.” By the way, Marcuse is also the man who creates the phrase, “Make love, not war.” Coming back to the situation people face on campus, Marcuse defines “liberating tolerance” as intolerance for anything coming from the Right and tolerance for anything coming from the Left. Marcuse joined the Frankfurt School, in 1932 (if I remember right). So, all of this goes back to the 1930s.
In conclusion, America today is in the throes of the greatest and direst transformation in its history. We are becoming an ideological state, a country with an official state ideology enforced by the power of the state. In “hate crimes” we now have people serving jail sentences for political thoughts. And the Congress is now moving to expand that category ever further. Affirmative action is part of it. The terror against anyone who dissents from Political Correctness on campus is part of it. It’s exactly what we have seen happen in Russia, in Germany, in Italy, in China, and now it’s coming here. And we don’t recognize it because we call it Political Correctness and laugh it off. My message today is that it’s not funny, it’s here, it’s growing and it will eventually destroy, as it seeks to destroy, everything that we have ever defined as our freedom and our culture.

Australian New Nation. "Invaders ask - where is my visa and my house?"

If this doesn't pop a few veins on your forehead nothing will -

Where is my visa and my house? - the first question asylum seekers (invaders) ask


PEOPLE smugglers are luring asylum seekers
(invaders) on to boats bound for Australia during the dangerous monsoon season with promises of visas, housing and internet access. (Yep, while 125,000 Australians go hungry and homeless every night!)

The Daily Telegraph was yesterday the first media organisation to interview detainees in the nation's newest detention centre at Wickham Point in Darwin.
(Alert : Darwin boys, we need some 'happy' snaps!)

A 21-year-old Hazari asylum seeker
(invader) who recently arrived from Pakistan after paying people smugglers $4000 in Indonesia said he knew the Malaysia deal had collapsed and that he had an expectation of receiving a visa.

He said he expected to be out of detention within four months and released into the community on a temporary visa.

"The country of Malaysia is not good. If this was possible (being sent to Malaysia) then I would be back home, not in Malaysia," he said while doing laundry in accommodation area where asylum seekers
(invaders) sleep two to a room in airconditioned converted shipping containers.

It is understood the top three questions being asked by those who have arrived since the government announced bridging visas for asylum seekers
(invaders) last month was "when will I get a visa", "a house" or "access to the internet". (No doubt the net access is so they can tell all of their mates back home how stupid the Australian taxpayer is!)

Arrivals (invaders) who were last week flown to the new centre - which was housing 210 detainees as of yesterday - had specific expectations about their detention accommodation and had gripes about the lack of facilities.

Detainees complained that the centre's 40 computers were not enough and four English classes were insufficient.

A 34-year-old Iranian engineer
(invader) said he paid $15,000 to people smugglers in the Middle East and used multiple fake passports before boarding a boat in Indonesia.

He said people smugglers offered to take him to France or Australia but he decided reaching Australia was "easier".
(Yep Australia is an easy touch, tell us something we don't know!)

"In my country I have a house and a car (but) I had one problem. I had to leave my country, some people could kill me," he said.

Opposition Leader Tony Abbott toured the $200 million Wickham centre yesterday and called on Prime Minister Julia Gillard to immediately reintroduce the temporary protection visas introduced by the Howard government.

"This would immediately mean much less of a pull factor for people currently waiting across the Indonesian archipelago," he said.

A spokesman for Immigration Minister Chris Bowen hit back, attacking the Coalition for not supporting law changes to allow the Malaysia people swap after it was struck down in the High Court.

"All the expert advice the government has received is that the Malaysia arrangement would be a genuinely effective deterrent to prevent these boat journeys," he said.

Visit Australian New nation HERE to join the discussion.

Saturday, December 17, 2011

Dedicated to ...

Steve Lieblich, Stanley Elliot Keyser, Mathew Henderson Hau, Slackbastard, Donald Orst, Darrin Hodges, Brian Stokes, Cam Smith, Greg Roberts, and the list goes on.

Thursday, December 15, 2011

The Voice - The Dark Age of Australia

After the fall of the Roman Empire which fell because of its decadence, its reliance on foreigners as mercenaries in the Roman Army and the fact that the seed of the original Romans was tarnished Europe slipped into the dark ages which lasted for a thousand years. This was caused by religion, now Australia is about to fall into a dark age of its own.

Yes, this time we're taking a look at the carbon tax, a tax that will bring the country to its knees and leave many living in poverty.

Emma West Released on BAIL!

Sadly this is just the beginning I fear. But great work everyone! United we stand divided we fall! Now to get Brendon O'Connell out.

Emma West, the suspected tram racist, has been granted bail.

The decision was reached at a Croydon Crown Court hearing behind closed doors this morning.

Miss West is charged with a racially-aggravated public order offence after a video showing a woman abusing passengers on a Croydon tram was posted online on November 27.

The 34-year-old, from New Addington, had initally been denied bail at Croydon Magistrates' Court on December 6 and faced the prospect of spending Christmas behind bars.

She is due to appear at Croydon Magistrates' Court on January 3 for a committal hearing. SOURCE

Saturday, December 10, 2011

My Tram Ride Experience, A Brief Analysis

More balls than your average English 'Man' ... apparently...

Upon examination of the video clip your Old Uncle Victor would like to vent his opinions on what we are actually seeing at work in this sorry incident. Taken as it is, a small vignette, a snapshot of everyday life on the public transport system of a modern western metropolis it is as tragically sad as it is informative. What we are seeing in the, quite frankly, chilling commentary and the hype surrounding this video is the emergence of an increasingly militant and violent so-called ‘Anti-Racist’ response to alleged ‘Racist’ incidents. The typical stereotype of the hand-wringing insipid liberal, the bespectacled, sandal wearing, vegetarian school teacher type is rapidly being replaced by a vicious and nasty sort of radical who would cut your throat for having an opinion inconsistent with their own world view.
This shocking and disgusting hatred has been made possible only through a carefully contrived and sustained, decades long ‘re-education’ and preparation of the popular psyche via the Controlled Media and Entertainment Industry in demonising White Racial Pride as the most evil thing in the known Universe. The blood of innocent Whites all over the World at the hands of the Mud Races, weaned on the politics of envy and incensed by stories of White cruelty and oppression, is on the hands of the scum who have promoted this program of propaganda, mainly the Jew owned and controlled Media and their lackeys.
If there is one positive aspect to emerge from this ridiculous ‘twitter’ craze perhaps it is the opportunity for us to discern, through study of these impromptu, ‘shooting from the lip’ comments, a more accurate appraisal of the ‘tweeter’s’ true opinions. We are almost certainly getting a more honest, instinctive and reflexive response to any socio-political matter from these short bursts of mental flatulence.
As casual observers after the fact we do not know what initiated the incident, what has happened or been said immediately prior to the video clip. Despite this lack of information we can still safely deduce from the evidence before us that the White people standing about saying nothing are pretty much an utter waste of their White skin. They are an embarrassment to their ancestors who built, with their blood, sweat and tears, a mighty nation and extensive empire, shame on them. So comprehensively denuded of their sense of Racial identity, cultural integrity and National sovereignty are these ghosts of the English, so terrorised by the oppressive statutes of the state that prohibit free expression of opinion or even fact, they stand frozen and stunned in this tableau like trapped animals, their eyes glazed with an intense effort to wish themselves away to anywhere but here.
In the current circumstances that all formerly White Nations find themselves in, an atomised state of hyper individuality underwritten by consumerism and indoctri-tainment with no solidarity or ethno identity, every White knows there is little if any chance he would be backed up by his racial fellows if he were to stick his neck out and have a crack at the Multi-Cult. There is no esprit de corps or sense of blood and belonging. This has been knocked out of our people.
Whereas all healthy societies and ethno-states are largely and quite necessarily self policing on moral and ethical issues we now find a Stasi-land mentality in our heavily monitored Politically Correct Western Nations. Cultural Marxism is relentless in its quest to promote social permissiveness of all kinds and dismantle all traditional cultural institutions and former societal control mechanisms while simultaneously replacing them with its own, far more ruthless and intolerant, cult of Political Correctness. Virtually EVERYTHING goes except Racial realism, cultural identity and ethnic sovereignty of Whites. The highest of all evils is White Identity. White is now synonymous with ‘Racist’.
The White Woman threatens no violence, unlike the Negroid matriarch and the young black male sitting directly behind her, who stands up suddenly, throws off his backpack and makes threatening gestures while another unseen, apart from his white arm, passenger pleads with him not to attack. In a perfect World of course there would be no ‘pleading’ at all from a White Man protecting a White Woman but simply a king hit to the ape’s jaw thereby rendering the threat neutralised. Hers is merely a brutally honest and visceral response to the cumulative effect of decades of cruel and vile injustices and dispossession of the indigenous British peoples by successive corrupt administrations, manipulated by Jews and their Corporate Shabbos Goy, who employ Multiculturalism as a psychological operation and genetic weapon to advance the Corporate Globalist agenda of a One World Slave State.
Although it is clearly the unsophisticated and inarticulate outburst of a rather basic and probably poorly educated person it is still essentially true. She tells no lies. So what is the main problem? What is her crime? Old Victor would suggest it is the awkward and uncomfortable case of a very common and lowly ranked person speaking that which all know to be true with no fear of the consequences while supposedly more clever and educated people with university degrees fail to acknowledge due to selfishness and moral cowardice. If we gaoled every parent who was illiterate or poorly behaved in public we would require many institutions the size of the Pentagon building to house them.
In a former generation, not all that long ago, the Englishmen that your humble writer knew, regardless of social station, had a self confidence, a natural sense of justice and properness, an assertiveness rather than aggression, that would have manifested simply as the art of control in a scene such as this. No furious fits of rage from neurotic individuals with so much pent up anger and repressed resentment that they could spend decades as apparently docile, bovine conformists only to ‘go postal’ in a sudden and catastrophic ‘el snappo berserko’ moment. The very least the other White passengers could or perhaps should have done, out of common sense and Human decency, is to have calmly appealed to the Woman to ‘not make a scene’ and to respect the rights of the other passengers not to have to listen to her spleen vent. They could have even appealed to her sense of self preservation by helpfully informing her that this outburst might result in her getting into trouble with the law. They could even have said, yes, we agree with your rights of expression, but the Law does not. Look after your own interests by being quiet. The village squire, in his tweed jacket, might have spoken up and said “Now see here, my good woman. Behave yourself and tend to your child. I will handle these fuzzy wuzzies’ and he would have put the Negroids in their place also, at the back of the bus, so to speak. But you see, a society that would have such dutiful and responsible people would not have, in the first place, permitted the existence of so many brutal primitives in its midst any more than they would have tolerated these so-called ‘Chavs’ (Bogans) and other low rank Whites to be ‘cheeky’, lazy and disrespectful.
It is also possible even that the other White mother who verbally assaults the White woman is actually as frustrated at her inability to summon the courage and support the other White mother so instead ‘shoots the messenger’ and blames her for ‘waking her baby’. Deep down perhaps she does agree with what is being said but resents the uncomfortable situation she has been placed in by this other irresponsible, in her mind, loud mouthed Woman. You see, the greatest fear all the Whites in that carriage possess, greater even than the fear of physical harm or death, is being labelled a ‘Racist’ so they seek to strongly disassociate themselves from the inconvenient truths being yelled out by that damned stupid woman. Why can’t she just keep her mouth shut? She’s going to get us ALL into trouble.
The extreme irony of the large Negroid female, the main antagonist, trying to take the high moral ground by complaining about the White Woman’s use of swear words is not lost on your Old Uncle Victor. Any who have experienced even brief proximity to Blacks, thugs or otherwise, will be aware of their disgusting and primitive pidgin lingo laced with terms ranging from merely disrespectful to the hatefully misanthropic and misogynist. One wonders would she attempt to ‘correct’ the speech of such a group of Negroid youths who are engaged in impersonating their ‘Gangsta’ rapper heroes, ‘dissin’ bitches’ and ‘hoe’s’ and utilising the foulest epithets in the English language to convey intimidation and violence.
Finally, the ‘Twitter’ comments are not all that surprising when coming from the usual suspects of White hating Muds, self hating White Marxists and self righteous, pompous so-called ‘Liberal Democrats’ but are more shocking for the fact that these people have no qualms whatsoever in revealing their identities, along with snapshots of their faces, to the entire World. Emboldened by the current Anti-White political climate they obviously see nothing wrong, immoral or illegal in inciting violence and advocating summary execution and child abuse (what else is raping and murdering a mother in front of her child?) How these cruel fools reconcile their vicious comments with a claimed desire to live in a free and open world where all people and views are respected and tolerated is beyond the comprehension and imagination of your kindly Old Uncle Victor.
Do not hold your breath for any of these disgusting animals to be condemned or sanctioned in any way let alone prosecuted. (Perhaps this might be a project for highly motivated White Nationalists with the time required to pursue these creeps and shame them with their own words of hate and intolerance.) Do not wait for a witch hunt of these creatures by the daily tabloids or for special televised Police statements and media conferences announcing the establishment of a ‘Strike Force’ to bring these criminals to justice and ‘prosecute them with the full weight of the Law’ for inciting violence and promoting Racial tension. It is open season on White ‘Racists’ but all other species are protected. Here in Australia we witnessed, during the now infamous Cronulla Uprising, the virtual excoriation by the corrupt career politicians, the so-called Anti-Racists and the Ethnic Mafias in league with the filthy whores of the Controlled Media, of anyone who openly identified as a White Australian. Forget about so-called ‘Neo-Nazis’ or ‘Fascists’ or ‘White Supremacists’. For many months after, any who had the audacity to simply call themselves ‘White’ was at the best viewed with suspicion or thought to be ‘misguided’ and at the worst treated as a ‘dangerous’ threat to ‘Multicultural harmony’ or a potential ‘terrorist’ and this is no exaggeration at all.
This incident, and others like it, may be a very good opportunity to highlight the hypocrisy of our enemies and to alert the apathetic White fence sitters to the dire state their Race faces. It is an ill wind indeed that blows no good.

How the British National Party saw it:
Blackout as Emma West is Remanded in Custody!
by Carlos Cortiglia.

The British judicial system is yet again in disgrace as Emma West was remanded in custody on Tuesday the 6th December to appear in Crown Court on January 3rd, 2012! No media outlets have covered the story even though SKY and the BBC and dozens of journalists where at the courts today. Luckily a delegation from London British National Party where there to support Emma and her family and to report on the shocking events. I will write a major piece on this over the next 24 hours but here are the FACTS:
The decision made today to keep Emma West behind bars was a political decision because some courts in this country are no longer Judicial courts. Some courts in this country are Political courts and the magistrates operating today in Croydon Magistrates Court are not judges. They are politicians following the dictats of political correctness and not the spirit of real justice. This is what I saw when all the excuses and explanations given to keep Emma West behind bars were totally, utterly and completely refuted by Emma West’s relatives. The relatives of Emma West said there have been no threats made against Emma West and her family. The supposed danger against Emma West has been fabricated by the Crown Prosecution Service as an excuse to justify a political decision. Even murder suspects have been awarded bail. Bail was not awarded because this is a politically motivated case. What those behind this injustice fail to see is that today levels of hatred against ethnic minorities have gone up exponentially because a frail woman has been demonised. The process, at the request of Emma West and her barrister, will continue at the Crown Court on January 3rd, 2012. Taking the case to the Crown Court was seen as the only hope of getting real justice. The Croydon Magistrates Kangaroo Court would not be the answer. I hope all do-gooders enjoy their turkeys and their Christmas celebrations and especially Christmas Day in the knowledge that somewhere a mother will spend her time away from her family and, most importantly, away from her own child. The mother, the father, the sister and an uncle of Emma West were and we were there to support them. Merry Christmas to the judges and to all individuals that created this injustice. When Judgment Day comes they will be properly rewarded.

Friday, December 09, 2011

It has begun. Tyranny will be our constant companion.

We will be next!

Jewish Aggression

Okay! So they're handsome beasts but good looks just aren't enough...

Know thine enemy. A small extract from an extensive, three part study into the Jewish pathological condition and general socio-political neurosis entitled ‘Understanding Jewish Influence’ by Professor Kevin MacDonald, professor of psychology at California State University, Long Beach. Prof Mac knows the Zhids as well as they know us and that’s really saying something. Rarely does one encounter such consummate expertise in the study of the Jewish pathogen as his work on the loathsome Chosenites. Read on gentle reader, read on…
A prototypical example of Jewish aggressiveness toward American culture has been Jewish advocacy of liberal immigration policies which have had a transformative effect on the U.S.:
In undertaking to sway immigration policy in a liberal direction, Jewish spokespersons and organizations demonstrated a degree of energy unsurpassed by any other interested pressure group. Immigration had constituted a prime object of concern for practically every major Jewish defence and community relations organization. Over the years, their spokespersons had assiduously attended congressional hearings, and the Jewish effort was of the utmost importance in establishing and financing such non-sectarian groups as the National Liberal Immigration League and the Citizens Committee for Displaced Persons.100
Jewish aggressiveness and their role in the media, in the creation of culture and information in the social sciences and humanities, and in the political process in the United States contrasts with the role of Overseas Chinese.101
The Chinese have not formed a hostile cultural elite in Southeast Asian countries motivated by historical grievances against the people and culture of their hosts. For example, despite their economic dominance, the Chinese have not been concerned with restrictions on their citizenship rights, which have been common in Southeast Asia.102
Whereas the Chinese have reacted rather passively to such restrictions, Jews have reacted to any manifestation of anti-Jewish attitudes or behaviour with an all-out effort at eradication. Indeed, we have seen that the mainstream Jewish attitude is that even trivial manifestations of anti-Jewish attitudes and behaviour must not be ignored because they can and will lead to mass murder. Not only have the Chinese not attempted to remove public displays of symbols of Indonesian nationalism and religion, they have not seriously attempted to change laws in place since the 1960s mandating that there be no public displays of Chinese culture.103
Besides the normal sorts of lobbying typical of the political process in the U.S., perhaps the clearest examples of Jewish aggressiveness are the many examples of intimidation of their opponents—loss of job, death threats, constant harassment, economic losses such as loss of advertising revenue for media businesses, and charges of anti-Semitism—the last being perhaps the greatest sin against the post-World War II political order that can be imagined. When Adlai Stevenson III was running for governor of Illinois, his record in opposition to Israeli settlement policy and his statement that the PLO was a legitimate voice of the Palestinian people resulted in a whisper campaign that he was an anti-Semite. Stevenson commented:
There is an intimidating, activist minority of American Jews that supports the decisions of the Israeli government, right or wrong. They do so very vocally and very aggressively in ways that intimidate others so that it’s their voice—even though it is a minority—that is heard in American politics. But it still is much louder in the United States than in Israel. In other words, you have a much stronger, more vocal dissent in Israel than within the Jewish community in the United States. The prime minister of Israel has far more influence over American foreign policy in the Middle East than over the policies of his own government generally.104
A common tactic has been to charge that critics of Israel are anti-Semites. Indeed, George Ball, a perceptive critic of Israel and its U.S. constituency, maintains that the charge of anti-Semitism and guilt over the Holocaust is the Israeli lobby’s most effective weapon—outstripping its financial clout.105
The utility of these psychological weapons in turn derives from the very large Jewish influence on the U.S. media. Historian Peter Novick notes regarding the importance of the Holocaust in contemporary American life:
We [i.e., Jews] are not just “the people of the book,” but the people of the Hollywood film and the television miniseries, of the magazine article and the newspaper column, of the comic book and the academic symposium. When a high level of concern with the Holocaust became widespread in American Jewry, it was, given the important role that Jews play in American media and opinion-making elites, not only natural, but virtually inevitable that it would spread throughout the culture at large.106
And, of course, the appeal to the Holocaust is especially compelling for American Jews. When the Mossad wants to recruit U.S. Jews for help in its espionage work, in the words of a CIA agent “the appeal is a simple one: ‘When the call went out and no one heeded it, the Holocaust resulted.’ 107
Charges of anti-Semitism and guilt over the Holocaust are not the only instruments of Jewish aggressiveness on Israeli issues. Jewish groups intimidate their enemies by a variety of means. People who oppose policies on Israel advocated by Jewish activist organizations have been fired from their jobs, harassed with letters, subjected to intrusive surveillance, and threatened with death. Although there is a great deal of self-censorship in the media on Israel as a result of the major role of Jews in the ownership and production of the media, gaps in this armour are aggressively closed. There are “threats to editors and advertising departments, orchestrated boycotts, slanders, campaigns of character assassination, and personal vendettas.”108
Other examples recounted by Findley include pressure on the Federal Communications Commission to stop broadcast licenses, demands for submission to an oversight committee prior to publication, and the stationing of a Jewish activist in the newsroom of the Washington Post in order to monitor the process.
The result of all this intense, well-organized aggression is that those who criticize Israeli policy in any sustained way invite painful and relentless retaliation, and even loss of their livelihood by pressure from one or more parts of Israel’s lobby. Presidents fear it. Congress does its bidding. Prestigious universities shun academic programs and buckle under its pressure. Instead of having their arguments and opinions judged on merit, critics of Israel suddenly find their motivations, their integrity, and basic moral values called into question. No matter how moderate their criticism, they may be characterized as pawns of the oil lobby, apologists for Arabs, or even anti-Semitic.109
The following quote from Henry Kissinger sums up the aggressive Israeli attitudes toward U.S. aid:
Yitzak [Rabin] had many extraordinary qualities, but the gift of human relations was not one of them. If he had been handed the entire “United States Strategic Air Command” as a free gift he would have (a) affected the attitude that at last Israel was getting its due, and (b) found some technical shortcoming in the airplanes that made his accepting them a reluctant concession to us.110
But of course by far the most important examples of Israeli aggressiveness have been toward their neighbours in the Middle East. This aggression has been there from the beginning, as Israel has consistently put pressure on border areas with incursions, including the Kibya massacre of 1953 led by Ariel Sharon.111
The personal aggressiveness of Israeli society has long been a topic of commentators. Israel is known for its arrogance, insolence (chutzpah), coldness, roughness, rudeness, and lack of civility. For example, B. Z. Sobel, an Israeli sociologist at the University of Haifa, found that among the motivations for emigrating from Israel was that “there is indeed an edginess [in Israeli society]; tempers flare, and verbal violence is rampant”112

100. Neuringer 1971, 392–393.

101. MacDonald 1998b/2002.

102. Coughlin 1960, 169.

103. See MacDonald 1994/2002, Preface to the First Paperback Edition.

104. In Findley 1989, 92.

105. Findley 1989, 127.

106. Novick 1999, 12.

107. Newsweek 9/3/1979.

108. Findley 1989, 296.

109. Findley 1989, 315.

110. In Ball and Ball 1992, 70.

111. See Ball and Ball 1992, 44 and passim.

112. Sobel 1986, 153.

The War on Christmas

Sunday, December 04, 2011

Please explain...again...

Partly in response to @ndy slackbastard’s ‘Twenty Questions’

A quick quiz for stupid White Liberals
Please explain how, precisely, is it ‘hateful’ to prefer one’s own kind over all others?
Please explain how one achieves ‘strength’ through ‘diversity’ rather than through homogeneity and unity.
Please explain who, truly, has been ‘enriched’ by Multiculturalism. If necessary, outline your particular and peculiar definition of the term ‘enrichment’.
Please explain any of the ‘benefits’ of Multiculturalism to White Westerners. Just one, any one, will do.
Please explain how so-called Liberal Democratic (Cultural Marxist) indoctrination is any better or more valid than National Socialist ‘indoctrination’.
Please explain how the Science of Eugenics has been ‘discredited’, ‘disproved’ etc (rather than simply disavowed and disprivileged) when, every day, animal breeders and farmers employ this system of ‘breeding for excellence’ by carefully selecting those individuals with desired attributes to mate with similar types and thereby obtain more positive outcomes in physical features, performance, temperament, life expectancy etc.
Please explain why the illegally imposed (No Vote, No Plebiscite, No Referendum) ideological system known as ‘Multiculturalism’ is, in fact and effect, Multi-Racialism that results in the Balkanisation of First World Nations into insular Racial ghettos peopled with aggressive tribalistic ‘crews’ who think only of themselves.
Please explain why it is only WHITE First World Nations that are forced, by the criminal cabal of the United Nations, to accept millions of Third World ‘refugees’. Why do Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, several Arab Oil baron nations and other wealthy, high tech, developed Non White Nations accept and/or ‘assimilate’ virtually zero ‘refugees’?
Please explain why it is exclusively the ‘burden of the West’ to ‘Save the World’, in particular what is known as the Third World, largely from its own incompetence, ignorance, corruption and savagery, to the detriment of many of our own people who are living in real hardship, when we have already given so much in the way of technology medicine and raw cash to assist these feckless hordes of primitive ingrates.
Please explain how it is possible, enthusiastically encouraged, legislated into Law and Taxpayer funded even, for all Non White peoples to celebrate their Racial/Cultural uniqueness and possess endless organisations promoting this, while this same privilege is totally denied to White people?
Please explain how ‘diversity’ is achieved through the random blending of genes via Race Mixing, particularly in light of the following quotation taken from page 179 of ‘Genetics and Origin of Species’ by the eminent Ukrainian geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky:
“Race and species usually differ from each other in many genes and chromosomal alterations. Interbreeding of race and species results in a breakdown of these systems.... Some of these combinations are the harmonious genotypic systems adapted to the different ecological niches in the environment. But the Interbreeding could be just as efficient in breaking down the harmonious gene combinations as it was in forming them. Unlimited interbreeding of distinct species would result in submergence of the existing genetic systems in a mass of recombinations. Among the recombinations some may be as harmonious, or in fact better, than the existing gene patterns, and thus by hybridization the species may “discover” new evolutionary possibilities. But the chance of discovery is pitted against the fact that a majority, and probably a vast majority, of the new genic patterns are discordant, unfit for any available environment, and represent a total loss to the species. If life is to endure, the gene combinations whose adaptive value has been vouchsafed by natural selection must be protected from disintegration. Without isolation the ravages of natural selection would be too great. But too early and too rigid isolation of the favourable gene combinations formed in the process of race differentiation would mean too much specialization of the organism to environmental conditions that may be only temporary. The end result may be extinction. Favourable conditions for progressive evolution are created when a certain balance is struck: isolation is necessary, but it must not come too soon.”
If you can, as a self described ‘Progressive’ and ‘Democratic’ White Liberal, answer ANY of these questions with a credible, detailed and data backed explanation that would pass muster with any reasonably intelligent person, let’s set the bar low and say anyone with an average Intelligence Quotient of a mean 100 points, (can’t do fairer than that) then your kindly Old Uncle Victor will retire from politics and never bother you slack jawed Lefty again.
When @ndy tags your kindly Old Uncle Victor with the epithet ‘bigot’, in the pejorative sense, he finds it somewhat amusing in light of the word’s definition, etymology and accepted general usage.
From wikipedia:
‘A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs. The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing sex, race, ethnicity, religion or spirituality, nationality, language, inter-regional prejudice, gender and sexual orientation, age, homelessness, various medical disorders particularly behavioral disorders and addictive disorders. Forms of bigotry may have a related ideology or world views.’
Okay, so let’s examine this particular definition. ‘obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices’. We honestly believe this accurately describes the mindset of @ndy and his cohorts on the Left perfectly and succinctly. Moving on we have ‘especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.’ Again, this is correct, with scalpel like accuracy, in its description of the militant Leftist fanatics we find in the various Anarchist and Communist groups.
Now we come to its more modern, Cultural Marxist, ‘politically correct’ form of accepted usage. ‘The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing sex, race, ethnicity, religion or spirituality, nationality, language, inter-regional prejudice, gender and sexual orientation, age, homelessness, various medical disorders particularly behavioral disorders and addictive disorders.’ Admitting no perception of irony or hypocrisy in this extrapolation the Cultural Marxists have extended and broadened the scope of this term’s meaning in relation to the bigot’s real and potential ‘targets’ along with their implicitly exclusive rights to victimology and yet simultaneously narrowed its focus to direct any negative connotations onto their ‘usual suspects’ who are almost always White, Male, Heterosexual Conservatives and/or Nationalists with a realistic and commonsense attitude to the question of Race and Ethnicity.
‘Forms of bigotry may have a related ideology or world views.’
Well ‘of course’ this ‘bigotry’ is related to ‘ideology and world views’. How could it not be? The only alternative is the assumption that this rejection or wariness of ‘the other’ is based purely on an instinctive reaction with no intellectualisation of the ‘offending’ individual’s attitude or opinions. Even the oft employed Leftist slur of ‘ignorance’ is preposterous because a truly ‘ignorant’ individual, presumably with zero knowledge of the ‘other’ would have no information that could elicit a negative or hostile response. They would simply run away or hide like a wild animal. This is clearly not the case and the precise opposite is the usual.
As with the old adage that ‘familiarity breeds contempt’ it is normally the case that when fundamentally different peoples and cultures attempt to live together the first response, particularly with the supposedly more ‘sophisticated’ and ‘tolerant’ (enforced by Law) White Europeans is to extend empathy, charity and goodwill to the foreigners in the vain hope of reciprocal appreciation and friendship. It is simply not in the Nature of Whites, particularly Anglo Saxons, to be overtly rude to strangers.
However, as time and time again History has taught us, (will we ever learn?) the good nature of the White hosts is inevitably exploited as weakness and this naturally and quite understandably, in accordance with what is known of Human Nature, results in the other Race developing contempt and even eventually naked hatred for the Whites. No more evidence of this is required than to observe the current American Negroid behaviour and so-called Gangsta and Ghetto ‘culture’. Whites, if they are to ever survive and prevail, will need to understand that all these so-called ‘minority’ groups never, ever want or wanted ‘equality’. They want domination. And they are achieving it. One Ancient Greek philosopher, whose name escapes your Uncle Victor, commented that a slave never simply wanted his freedom and ‘equality’, he wanted to replace and lord it over his former master in an act of pure revenge and this is perfectly understandable whether or not anyone believes it is just and proper.
These understandings, regarding how the world and its people actually work in reality, rather than the theoretical models of the Left, are at the core of the problems we are faced with today with the hegemony of Cultural Marxist thought in our daily social activities as well as our academic institutions.
A far more charitable, and in your Old Uncle Victor’s humble opinion, more succinct definition, is supplied by the infamous humorist and eminent lexicographer Ambrose Bierce in his excellent ‘The Devil’s Dictionary’ or, alternately ‘The Cynic’s Handbook’. He defines the term thusly: Bigot, n. ‘One who is obstinately and zealously attached to an opinion that you do not entertain.’

Saturday, December 03, 2011

My Tram Experience in France. The problem is worldwide

Anti racism is a code word for Anti White!

My Tram Experience-The Mantra Response

The information in this video is the CORRECT and ONLY method to fight White genocide.

Anti-racism is a CODE WORD for anti-white

ALL White countries and ONLY White countries are being blended out of existence.

"To do our jobs" does not justify White genocide
"Because of history " does not justify White genocide.
"For the economy" does not justify White genocide.
"Low birth rates", does not justify White genocide.
"We all bleed red!" does not justify White genocide.
"Because of colonialism" does not justify White genocide.
"A shortage of doctors" does not justify White genocide
"We are all human!" does not justify White genocide.
"Race is just a social construct!" does not justify White genocide.
"We are all from Africa!" does not justify White genocide.
"So we have pensions" does not justify White genocide.
And so on and so forth
Anti-racist is a code word for anti-white.

Images and Sounds from the video presentation:
Hur man debatterar ner "anti-rasoster"

Horus the Avenger:

Bob Whitaker:

Another Jew Paedo Predator caught?

Everything the well equipped Paedo-Predator needs to stalk, 'groom', intimidate and, ultimately, abduct, rape and torture kiddies. All that's missing is the MOSSAD badge and Kosher instruments of 'persuasion'...

The filthy criminal predator is a (almost certainly) Jew creep named Michael Feuerstein. Feuerstein is a very common Ashkenazi/German Yiddish name which is, in its Anglicised form, the more familiar surname Firestone. Although it is not exclusively indicative of Jew ancestry, the vast majority (90% plus) of people with this name are Jews. A photo of this filthpig would be invaluable in ascertaining, via physiognomic study, the genetic origins. Hilariously, his current monicker, via deed poll, is Elvis Presley, although the Police have charged him under his original name.
Former AFP employee charged after 35,000 child porn images found at his home:

Alicia Wood
December 2, 2011
Former AFP employee in child porn bust

Police have allegedly found thousands of child pornography images, police uniforms and prohibited weapons at the Sydney home of a former Australian Federal Police employee.
A former Australian Federal Police employee has been charged after police allegedly found 35,000 "obscene" child pornography images and 800 videos at his home.
The 49-year-old man was an employee of the federal police from 1986 to 1990.
Campbelltown police officers raided the man's Rosemeadow house, in Sydney's south-west, and said the alleged images were some of the worst examples of child pornography that they had seen.
Police allegedly seized batons and handcuffs from the man's house.
Campbelltown Local Area Commander Superintendent Greg Rolph, said: “Many of the images depicted have left the investigation team, some with more than 20 years' investigations experience, extremely concerned about the obscene nature of what they discovered.
"It was concerning to police because of the graphic nature of some of the images. While we have very experienced police, it would be inhuman if they weren’t affected from viewing these images.
"Our inquiries are still continuing to identify those children depicted in the photos and video files."
Superintendent Rolph said he could not comment on whether the man was depicted in the images that were allegedly found, as police were still in the process of classifying them.
Police will allege the man worked in positions of authority that allowed him to have contact with emotionally and physically vulnerable children.
The 49-year old man was charged with possessing child pornography, disseminating child pornography and possessing a prohibited weapon.
Police also seized federal police uniforms, batons and handcuffs from the man's house, and expect to lay further charges.
Superintendent Rolfe said detectives from Campbelltown carried out the raid on the man's house based on information provided by the federal police, but police did not expect to discover the uniforms and police paraphernalia in the house.
He could not comment on whether the man was a sworn federal police officer, or merely worked within the organisation.
Police said the man was "compliant" when officers turned up unannounced to search his house.
He will appear in Campbelltown Local Court today.
Leesha McKenny and AAP