Wednesday, June 29, 2011
The Australia First Party has nominated Dr. Jim Saleam as its candidate for ‘Cook’ in 2013. The campaign will begin within two weeks.
Scott Morrison is the Liberal Shadow Minister For Immigration and he holds the seat of Cook by a comfortable margin. The Australia First Party campaign will urge voters to preference-vote last against Mr. Morrison, regardless of who may win, to make the strongest point about the Liberals false line on refugees and so called asylum seekers. The aim is to punish Mr. Morrison personally for his deceit on the refugee question. This deceit centres on the Liberal rhetoric that it is somehow ‘hard’ on refugee matters and seeks to ‘stop the boats’.
Australia First Party has maintained consistently that the Liberal line is a pantomime to convince voters that there is a difference between Liberal and Labor on refugees and that the Liberals will ‘stop the boats.’ In truth, if we stop the boats by hiring the planes, the effect is the same. If we turn boats around to ‘process off shore’, the effect is the same. If we ‘process' in Malaysia or in Nauru, the effect is the same. Australia First Party draws no distinction between ‘legal’ and ‘illegal’ refugees; the hordes are endless and many are engendered by the very wars in which the Australian state has engaged.
In recent weeks and days the refugee question has been paramount in the news and public debate. Most of this discussion is pro refugee, pro ‘asylum seeker’ propaganda. It is our party’s intention to counter that propaganda by building a national people’s campaign against refugee admissions and to expel the so-called refugees. The electoral effort in Cook is part of that campaign.
Dr. Saleam said today:
“The Liberal Party will never repudiate the 1951 United Nations Convention On Refugees anymore than it will end immigration, or defend the Australian national identity. Mr. Morrison has the task of pretending that he is something he is not.”
Australia First Party has observed that many Australians fear that something is happening, that is a real threat to Australia and to their lives and livelihoods. But most ordinary Australians are unable to articulate it amidst the climate of misinformation and propaganda. The party has identified patterns and will campaign on them: the use of refugees to resettle rural Australia; the use of refugees as cheap labour; the use of refugees to culture-bust the Australian identity in guilt trips and the shaming of heritage; the appalling economic privilege granted to refugees; the use of refugees to disguise the other immigration programs that are changing Australia’s demographics.
Dr. Saleam concluded:
“This campaign will not be a regular campaign. It is only partly an exercise in election participation. In truth, I am putting on the agenda the biggest single issue in Australian political history and I will do something unusual when I make a mass question of the book that defines our dispossession: The Camp Of The Saints (1973). Churches, Greens, Trotskyites and capitalists all combine to seek the breaking open of Australia’s borders, the culture busting of Australia’s heritage and our land’s recolonization. For Mr. Morrison, it’s all about the cheap labour the refugee hordes will provide. I am going to be engaged in educating a section of the public as to what the refugee / asylum-seeker threat is about. Our party has campaigned in the Adelaide Hills and other places against the scourge of refugee migration. I am proud to raise the slogan: ‘Expel The Refugees’.”
Source Australia First QLD
This ISD weekend is always a trouble-free fun-filled event and this year the concert also features newcomers to the National Socialist Black Metal (NSBM) scene; Waffenbruder.
As ever, if you'd like to come along to this then if you haven't already done so, you'll need to meet your relevant State Blood & Honour or SCHS Rep beforehand. Meet & greets are held regularly in all States but the last ones before the gig are usually done a number of weeks before the actual concert. Last year a fair number of people missed out on seeing America's Blue Eyed Devils because they left emailing until the week before the gig. Accommodations details for interstaters and the venue details are never given out by email to people we haven't met.
The relevant contact addresses are on the flyer, hope to see you guys there!
The system of global governance must be reinvigorated.
A stronger UN capable of dealing with threats to international peace and security.
Support the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court, and ensure that all nations are subject to its decisions.
Major structural reform is needed to provide stronger, more effective and more representative multilateral institutions.
The leading role of the United Nations (UN) in the maintenance of International peace and security must be recognised and respected by all countries.
The international financial institutions that govern aid, development, trade, and trans-national financial movements require extensive reform to enable them to provide global economic justice.*
Support the establishment of an international environmental court and an environmental council at the UN, with similar decision-making powers to the Security Council to deal with environmental issues of global significance.
*‘Economic Justice’ is certainly not a new concept but rather, like the Greens themselves, is simply a re-labelling of tired old Communist doctrine based on Class hatred and genetic levelling and essentially means expanding their kleptocracy for the ‘re-distribution of wealth’ (read: theft) from the hard working taxpayers, that’s you and me folks, and funnelling it into a United Nations slush fund to finance every harebrained scheme in their demented arsenal.
You can look forward to seeing your hard earned being greedily vacuumed up by an exponentially multiplying plethora of 'Quangos', ‘study groups’, ‘reports’, ‘special councils’, ‘international initiatives’, ‘social restructuring programs’ etc, etc, etc…who said the Soviet system was dead?
Tuesday, June 28, 2011
His history books, his school teachers, his comic books, the TelAvision ‘documentaries’ and the Hollywood movies all inculcated him with the comforting feeling that he was definitely a descendant of the ‘Good Guys’ and that ‘our’ cause was just. He was a good little true believer whose ignorance was merely reinforced by the rare naysayer he encountered in his youth who just made him dig his heels in with jingoistic pride.
In those romantic pre-Internet times the ‘Chinese whisper’ stories of ‘my dad reckons’ or ‘my granddad always says’ or ‘uncle so and so saw such and such with his own eyes’ etc was all he had to go on for the ‘first hand’ or ‘eyewitness’ testimonies and what kid, at least in those days, was going to challenge the veracity of his elders’ war stories? It’s not that these people even necessarily set out to deceive it is just that, ignorance of the big picture aside, stories get ‘polished’ or ‘enhanced’ to make them more ‘interesting’ and to paint the teller in the best possible light and then get passed along by word of mouth until they have a life of their own. This is one of the factors, along with inherent Jewish neurosis and Germanophobic hysteria, which has driven much of the Holocaust© Mythos.
The first ‘Hitler worshipper’ your Old Uncle Victor ever met was an older workmate named Harold who had served in the Australian Army in New Guinea and had fought at Milne Bay and some other well known battles. He was absolutely convinced that Adolf Hitler had been a great bloke who had done many great and progressive things and he never missed an opportunity to try and convince any who would listen.
He wishes, if he was still alive, that he could meet him again and apologise for laughing and sneering in his face like some typical Lefty twit every time he broached the subject. You see, gentle readers, it was not until your Old Uncle Victor was a Thirty something that he began to really research what, at the time, was known as ‘untold’ or ‘suppressed’ History which, while still reasonably 'politically correct', was dealing with 'uncomfortable' incidents that most Lame Stream 'Historians' would rather not touch due to their contentious and sensitive nature. Later, when he hit his late Thirties to early Forties he became acquainted with what is now called ‘Revisionist History’. The scales, as they say in the classics, fell from his eyes.
Of course it is all so easy now, with the fortuitous advent of the Internet, for the curious to find and digest great amounts of enlightening information. Sadly, few do. They would rather be titillated by pornography, gossip and silly jokes. But it’s all out there now. All that needs to be done is to guide the few with open minds in the right direction.
Monday, June 27, 2011
Nationalism in most countries and cultures can have both positive and negative aspects, unifying a people and sometimes leading them against their neighbours. Extremism can emerge, and often has, at least in part in almost every nationalist/independence movement I can recall (e.g., the French nationalist movement had The Terror, Kenya’s had the Mau Mau, etc.).
But whereas extremism in other nationalist movements is an aberration, extremism in Jewish nationalism is the norm, pitting Zionist Jews (secular or observant) against the goyim (everyone else), who are either possible predator or certain prey, if not both sequentially. This does not mean that all Jews or all Israelis feel and act this way, by any means. But it does mean that Israel today is what it cannot avoid being, and what it would be under any electable government (a point I’ll develop in another article).
The differences between Jewish nationalism (Zionism) and that of other countries and cultures here I think are fourfold:
1. Zionism is a real witches’ brew of xenophobia, racism, ultra-nationalism, and militarism that places it way outside of a “mere” nationalist context — for example, when I was in Ireland (both parts) I saw no indication whatsoever that the PIRAs or anyone else pressing for a united Ireland had a shred of design on shoving Protestants into camps or out of the country, although there may well have been a handful who thought that way and goes far beyond the misery for others professed by the Nazis.
2. Zionism undermines civic loyalty among its adherents in other countries in a way that other nationalist movements (and even ultra-nationalist movements like Nazism) did not e.g., a large majority of American Jews, including those who are not openly dual citizens, espouse a form of political bigamy called “dual loyalty” (to Israel & the US) that is every bit as dishonest as marital bigamy, attempts to finesse the precedence they give to Israel over the US (lots of Rahm Emanuel’s out there who served in the IDF but NOT in the US armed forces), and has absolutely no parallel in the sense of national or cultural identity espoused by any other definable ethnic or racial group in America — even the Nazi Bund in the US disappeared once Germany and the US went to war, with almost all of its members volunteering for the US armed forces;
3. The “enemy” of normal nationalist movements is the occupying power and perhaps its allies, and once independence is achieved, normal relations with the occupying power are truly the norm, but for Zionism almost everyone out there is an actual or potential enemy, differing only in proximity and placement on its very long list of enemies (which is now America’s target list); and
4. Almost all nationalist movements (including the irredentist and secessionist variants) intend to create an independent state from a population in place or to reunite a separated people (like the Sudeten Germans in the 1930s) it is very rare for it to include the wholesale displacement of another indigenous population, which is far more common of successful colonialist movements as in the U.S. and perhaps a reason why most Americans wouldn’t care too much about what the Israelis are doing to the Palestinians even if they DID know about it, is because that is no different than what Europeans in North America did to the Indians/Native Americans here in a longer & more low-tech fashion.
The implications of this for Middle East peace prospects, and for other countries in thrall to their domestic Jewish lobbies or not, are chilling. The Book of Deuteronomy come to life in a state with a nuclear arsenal would be enough to give pause to anyone not bought or bribed into submission which these days encompasses the US Government, given Israel’s affinity for throwing crap into the face of the Obama administration and Obama’s visible affinity for accepting it with a smile, Bibi Netanyahu’s own “Uncle Tom” come to Washington.
The late General Moshe Dayan, who, Zionist or not, remains an honoured part of my own Pantheon of military heroes, allegedly observed that Israel’s security depended on its being viewed by others as a mad dog. He may have been correct. But he neglected to note that the preferred response of everyone else is to kill that mad dog before it can decide to go berserk and bite. It is an option worth considering."
Dr. Alan Sabrosky (Ph.D, University of Michigan) is a Ten Year U.S. Marine Corps veteran and a graduate of the US Army War College. He was Director of Studies at the U.S. War College for Five Years. He can be contacted at firstname.lastname@example.org
Then there is the radio interview with Mark Glenn and Phil Tourney of which the following is just a short extract:
Alan Sabrosky: It is, and it's more than that, Mark. What we need to stand up and say is that not only did they attack the USS Liberty, they did 9/11. They did it.
I have had long conversations over the past two weeks with contacts at the Army War College, at the Headquarters Marine Corps, and I have made it absolutely clear in both cases that it is 100% certain that 9/11 was a Mossad operation. Period.
You know, Phil, I don't denigrate what happened to USS Liberty in the slightest - you understand that - but for most Americans what happened to the USS Liberty, or in Vietnam, was history. Now this is history. You know, they can be concerned about it, but they're not going to get mad about it.
9/11 has led directly to 60,000 Americans dead and wounded, God knows how many hundreds of thousands of people in other countries that we've killed or wounded or made homeless, and it's an on-going sore. It's not your sore from the USS Liberty, it's not my sore from Vietnam. Both of us have those, both of us care about. But this is an open wound.
And what Americans need to understand is that they did it. They did it. And if they do understand that, Israel's going to disappear. Israel will flat-ass disappear from this Earth.
I sent a film to one of my colleagues and it basically had Americans grieving over their dead coming back. And I showed one of them - it was a woman - just wrenched by grief over her dead soldier. And I said, you know, if Americans ever know that Israel did this, they're going to scrub them off the Earth, and they're not going to give a rat's ass - forgive my language - what the cost is. They are not going to care. They will do it. And they should. And they should.
Phil Tourney: Alan, your article and your heart and your testimony and what you believe in is heart-wrenching to me. It is like our founding fathers, and their shadows, talking and saying,
"We have to fix this, we have to make our own way, and we have to do it now, or we will go down."
Alan Sabrosky: Exactly. Absolutely, Phil. I agree fully.
Phil Tourney: Your article needs to be shipped off to the library of congress immediately.
Alan Sabrosky: Well, I can tell you it's being read by some people in Headquarters Marine Corps and at the Army War College. I sent it off to them this past week and I've had some long discussions with people up there, and there's some really, really unhappy people.
Mark Glenn: What are they saying, if you can talk about that, Dr. Sabrosky?
Alan Sabrosky: Astonishment. The first thing, Mark, is astonishment. They didn't know. They truly didn't know. And these are not unintelligent people. They really didn't know.
And the next statement is rage. Real rage. And the Zionists are playing this as truly an all-or-nothing exercise, because if they lose this one, if the American people ever realize what happened, they're done.
And I will tell you frankly - I don't think either one of you has any Jewish ancestry. I do. You know, I have one grandparent who's Jewish. As Phil Weiss from Mondoweiss were talking about it - he's a Jewish guy who puts a lot of critical stuff out there on Israel and I said f,r the Orthodox Rabbinate, I'm not a Jew. For the Nazis, I've been there.
And if this explodes, I'm going to go down with the rest of them. And I know this. I flat-out know this. But if that was the price for making America whole again...When I took my oath 51 years ago to the United States marine corps, no one promised us life. No one did. They promised us duty and loyalty and service - and maybe death. And that's how they talked to us in 1959. I don't think they talk to them that way anymore. But in 1959 they did, and if my death were a requirement for the saving of America - well, hell, I could've died in Vietnam.
It's my service, my country, my corps. And, Phil, it's like you in the Navy: we signed onto this, and we love our service. And none of us wishes to die. Certainly I don't. I don't think either one of you guys do. But if that's the price, then that's the price I pay. I mean that.
Phil Tourney: When you're talking about Marines, I have the utmost respect and I know your duty to country. When the torpedo hit our ship and I opened up to scuttle, guess who I pulled out of there: a United States marine, named Bryce Lockwood. And he was holding on to another sailor and saved his life, and he received a silver star. God bless him for that.
And I understand wholeheartedly what's in your heart, because I have it my heart. I didn't learn it by becoming a sailor as such, but I learned it through the grace of God for saving our ship, I learned it through scholars like you, I've learned it through good friends like Mark Glenn and my shipmates - and I've learned it through actions of Israel.
And when you struck me very, very hard just a second ago when you talked about 911. You're very willing to say that, yeah, they did it: 911. Yes, they did. And, you know, my heart broke. And I saw that plane - the last one - go into the tower. And to see that...I mean, I know it's in your heart, and Mark's, and everybody else's, to see your fellow Americans being slaughtered and murdered just as they did the USS Liberty. Alan, it is something that, if we don't talk about it, if we don't tell people about it - I believe God wants us to - and if we don't: shame on us.
Alan Sabrosky: I agree very much on that side, and I'll tell you - I have a dream, as Martin Luther King, Jr. once said, and my dream is that the 5th and 6th U.S. fleets take Israel and cream it. And that's the end of it.
Sunday, June 26, 2011
A Thousand Years of White European History and Culture murdered by bloodthirsty butchers flying OUR flags!
There is a chilling parallel between the present day vilification of Whites in general and the same dehumanising propaganda that was applied to the Germans in particular before, during and after the Second World War which desensitised normally quite altruistic and sentimental types like the English to the point where they cooperated with and participated in some of the most vile atrocities in Human History. All that needed to be done by the maniacal warmongers Churchill and Roosevelt to prepare the British (a people so benign, ordinary and even tempered that Napoleon called them ‘a nation of shopkeepers’ and George Orwell ‘a sleepwalking people’) and other White Europeans such as the Americans was to relentlessly demonise and lie, lie, lie about the Germans, their intentions and their actions, long and hard enough to elicit a Pavlovian response from their populations.
Whether or not it was an exercise in sophisticated mass psychological conditioning it was certainly a cynically contrived process of preparing the populations for conformity and meek compliance to their evil agenda as outlined in the blueprint for genocide of the 1941 book ‘Germany must perish’ written by the loathsome Germanophobic Jew Theodore Newman Kaufman whose fanatical hatred was extrapolated by the U.S. Secretary of the Treasury Henry Morgenthau Jr into what became known as the notorious ‘Morgenthau Plan’. Even the vicious mongrel (his mother was part Jew, part Native American) Winston Churchill only reluctantly agreed to this murderous plot after being badgered by his personal assistant Lord Cherwell who historians have admitted had a ‘pathological hatred’ and a thirst for revenge bordering on the ‘Medieval’ for National Socialist Germany.
“In March 1942 Churchill’s War Cabinet adopted the ‘Lindemann plan’, whereby civilian targeting became official. Working-class homes were preferred to upper-class because they were closer together, and so a greater flesh-incineration-per-bomb could be achieved. The Jewish German émigré Professor Frederick Lindemann, Churchill's friend and scientific advisor had by then become Lord Cherwell. He submitted a plan to the War Cabinet on March 30th urging that German working-class houses be targeted in preference to military objectives, the latter being harder to hit. Middle-class homes had too much space around them, he explained. He was not prosecuted for a ghastly new war-crime, hitherto undreamt-of. Thereby all cities and town over 50,000 inhabitants could be destroyed, or at least brought to ruin. The War Cabinet realised that no inkling of this must reach the public.”
If it were not for the inexorable advance of Soviet Communism across Europe and the escalation of the so-called ‘Cold War’ that threatened American/British/NATO hegemony in the remaining ‘free’ states, the Germans as a people and nation would most probably have succumbed to the deliberate starvation of its people and the rape and pillage of its Industrial, Scientific and Technical sectors. The people who had gifted the World with Bach, Beethoven, Mozart, Wagner, Dürer, Goethe, Schiller, Schoenberg, Schmidt, Schopenhauer, Spengler, etc could just have easily vanished down History’s memory hole. Except, placed as they were in the middle of Europe, they suddenly became extremely useful as a bastion against Communist expansion. Suddenly, around 1949-1950 Germans began to be supplied with more food and other basic necessities and were encouraged to rebuild and strengthen Germany rather than just wait around to die as had been their previously imposed destiny. Death’s hand eased off the lever and the German spirit of creation, innovation, inventiveness and technological excellence was once again allowed to flourish.
The sheer industrial scale of the 24/7 Allied bombing campaign unleashed against Germany in the closing phase of the war was the Forties equivalent of ‘shock and awe’ and was only surpassed in its brutality by the ‘mop up’ efforts committed in the immediate aftermath of the raids on cities like Dresden. It really was a case of absolutely ‘Total War’ where ‘nobody gets out of here alive’. Dresden for example was an utterly undefended city of no military value flooded with refugees fleeing the Soviet butchers in the East. The Americans in particular made a terrible name for themselves. They had already disgraced their uniforms in Italy where there are many accounts of these swaggering young thugs, bored and itching for action between battles, took to taking pot shots at women working in the fields or seeing who could ‘shoot the kid off the bicycle’. They were little more than overpaid, oversexed street scum, young, dumb and full of cum. Of course this is not true of all the Americans, many were honourable warriors who were as horrified as anyone else at the conduct of these idiots but it still remains a fact that post the successes of D-Day 6th June 1944 and emboldened by the inevitability of Allied victory, many more cowboys along with ‘avenging’ Jew thugs signed up for what they believed would be a turkey shoot of Germans.
As it turned out the task of crushing the heroically stubborn German resistance to the pro Communist, Germanophobic Allied invasion would prove much harder than anticipated by the slavering criminal jackals of the Allied command. Once again there would be no ‘home by Christmas’ conclusion to yet another fratricidal European war where hundreds of thousands more young White Men were fed into a giant meat grinder but instead a long drawn out struggle of attrition for almost another year. Churchill, Roosevelt and Stalin were quite literally supervising the process of butchering an entire generation of White European Males and should stand indicted by history and condemned for eternity for their pure evil.
Charles ‘Chuck’ Elwood Yeager is probably most famous for breaking the sound barrier on 14th October 1947 in the X-1 Jet Aircraft. But before being a test pilot he was a highly decorated fighter pilot flying P51 Mustangs in World War Two. He is quoted as saying in his memoirs;
On the 12th April 2007 the independent journalist and writer Christopher Bollyn wrote an article entitled “The Passing of Kurt Vonnegut - An Eyewitness to the Holocaust of Dresden” with an emphasis on the word ‘Holocaust’. In it he made the following observations:
“The Allied bombing of Hamburg in late July 1943 – ‘Operation Gomorrah’, as the British called it - claimed more than 100,000 lives. Some 40,000 of these victims were buried in the Ohlsdorf cemetery, in four mass graves of 10,000 bodies each.”
“Winston Churchill and the War Department set up a situation where London would be blitzed, without telling the people that Britain had started the process several months earlier. This had the effect of getting Britons into a mood for total war, without the traditional restraints of civilised ‘laws’ or conventions, restraints which had hitherto established that civilians would not, as such, be targeted.”
Even the morally flaccid and politically insipid wikipedia has a web page entitled ‘Allied War Crimes During World War II’ where, despite its generally apologist line taken on the Allied terror bombing of civilians, does at least give the Soviets some well deserved stick in comments such as:
Saturday, June 25, 2011
It’s all so very, very, very funny to watch the faux ‘Anarchists’ over at Government Agent' @ndy’s site hissing, spitting, pissing and moaning about the awful ‘injustice’ of the vicious, murdering little AntiFa shit, Jerk Paltry Man, getting his just desserts from the Bulgarian Legal System. You can cut the hypocrisy with a knife *oops!* excuse the pun. These pencil necked twerps will tear each other apart in their headlong rush to be the MOST outraged at the nathsty Fathschist Bulgarians and quoting shitty little class hate street rags like ‘Mutiny’ as if they were the Parliamentary Hansard. Oh mercy! My sides they are a’ splittin’!
He was honoured with a couple of special medals for valour but dumped them ceremoniously in the ocean several years after returning, along with his campaign medals, as a personal act of protest at Gough Whitlam’s betrayal of our Armed Forces and the contemptuous comments made by both he and his wife Margaret regarding what they considered the poor character and quality of our troops and their ineligibility for respect or recognition. This was the standard Internationalist, Fabian Marxist Socialist line of the day. Our troops were smeared as ‘baby killers’ and ‘murderers’ by all the Commie loving pro Sino traitors from ‘Hanoi Jane’ to our Trade Unions. He has one ambition left in life. To outlive the Whitlams so he can dance on their graves.
Now one would think that at that mature age and considering his extensive military experience and professed interest in Naval History he would have at least heard of the notorious USS Liberty incident. To me, the fact that until the other day when I told him, he had not, simply confirms my belief that our history has been terribly suppressed and our people instead spoon fed with Marxist propaganda.
The entire Liberty incident is a typical ‘by numbers’ example of Jewish treachery. It truly is standard operational procedure every bit as predictable as the arrogant chutzpah which characterises their life philosophy and politics. For any who still doubt the veracity of the claims outlined below, one only need consider the MAD (Mutually Assured Destruction) ‘Samson Doctrine’ maintained by these ‘meshuggah’ Jews of the Bandit State of Israel and it becomes very easy to understand how these creatures are more than capable of these type of actions.
USS Liberty Cover Up
On June 8, 1967, the USS Liberty was deliberately attacked by Israel. 40 years later the crew still calls for a proper investigation.
USS Liberty Veterans Association: THE LIBERTY FOUNDATION
THE LIBERTY FOUNDATION
The mission of the Liberty Foundation is to raise donations in order to purchase newspaper space to tell the USS Liberty story. The USS Liberty Veterans Association (LVA) has tried for over 37 years to expose the true story of the deliberate Israeli attack on the USS Liberty to the American people through books, news media, movies, and letters to the President of the United States and congressmen. While we have encountered politicians and news media personnel who were willing to help, they have been unable to interest their superiors or others in supporting our cause. Many people believe it is just too politically risky or politically incorrect to confront the Israeli lobbyists and support groups. Please read on.
The Israelis do not want the truth to be told. It is obvious that they fear that America may be less of a supportive ally if the truth were known. The truth of their deeds and the Johnson Administration needs to be fully investigated. Congress has never officially investigated the attack and so the attack continues to be a cover-up of the worse magnitude. We believe the operational plans were FRONTLET 615 and Operation Cyanide. We have discovered that the USS Liberty was part of these plans. These documents should be declassified immediately and released to the American public for historic analytical purposes. The complicity of the Israelis and the Johnson Administration in starting the Six Day War alarmed the Soviet Union. The United States and the Soviet Union came closer to a nuclear confrontation than any other incident in history including the Cuban Missile crises. When the Soviets discovered that the U.S. was planning to enter the war militarily, they challenged President Johnson with a nuclear confrontation and President Johnson wisely backed down from any further military activities.
Note: Everything written heretofore and the remaining details are accurate and can be proven by corroborated individual witness testimony, logical deduction, and documentation.
SYNOPSIS OF OUR STORY
On June 8, 1967, the Israeli Defense Forces murdered 34 Americans on the high seas (31 sailors, 2 marines, and a NSA civilian). Out of a total compliment of 294 men, 70% of the crew became casualties as 172 were wounded in addition to the 34 killed.
For 6 hours the morning before the attack, the ship was subjected to intense scrutiny by Israeli photo-reconnaissance aircraft flying as low as 200 feet. The USS Liberty had traditional American markings on her bow (GTR-5) and stern (USS LIBERTY) flying a large American Flag, which stood out in the breeze, and sailing in international waters on a clear and sunny day. The ship was a WWII victory hull cargo ship modified to monitor and record ambient radio transmission and lightly armed with four 50 calibre machine guns.
The Israelis began the attack with 3 fighter jets which strafed, rocketed, and bombed the Liberty. This was followed with 3 torpedo boats that fired 30mm canons and torpedoes. Since the Liberty was a virtually unarmed vessel and not a military threat, at no time did the torpedo boats request the Liberty to surrender as did the North Koreans regarding the USS Pueblo in 1968. Responding to our SOS which was about 15 minutes into the Israeli attack, the USS Saratoga launched conventionally armed fighter aircraft to assist the USS Liberty and the USS America launched nuclear armed jet aircraft to bomb Cairo. Why Cairo? Our SOS did not identify the attacker at the time as the identity of the attacker was unknown. Within minutes after the launch, the White House recalled all aircraft abandoning the USS Liberty subjecting us to an additional 2 hours of an Israeli turkey shoot. In disbelief, RADM Geis, Sixth Fleet Carrier Division Commander, challenged the order (as was his right and responsibility in this situation). Unbelievably, the White House again reaffirmed the order to recall all aircraft despite our plea for help. Israelis destroyed one of the most advanced intelligence ships.
The Liberty was riddled with 821 holes, sustained 2 napalm bombs, and a torpedo blowing a 22 by 39 foot hole in her starboard side killing 25 of the 34 murdered. Miraculously, the Liberty refused to sink and was able to get underway under her own power. The Israelis were observed machine gunning 3 life rafts. It was obvious to the Liberty crew that survivors were not to be taken. When hostilities ceased, helicopters were observed overhead with Israeli commandos at the ready to finish us off. Fortuitously, the Israelis picked up an invalid message that U.S. help was on the way. Israel was reluctantly forced to terminate its ongoing attack. Ironically help did not arrive until 18 hours after the attack when the Liberty was only 15 minutes away from USS Saratoga and USS America fighter jets.
The US Naval official inquiry was deliberately falsified to compliment the Israeli story (as testified by retired Navy Lawyer, Captain Ward Boston). Details acquired were either changed or dropped so that the Israeli version which became public was that the attack was a tragic mistake. The orders to falsify came directly from President Johnson for political reasons. The survivors of the USS Liberty were told never to talk about the incident under penalty of fine and/or imprisonment. Military orders that followed were in line with the White House which was not to indicate on any monuments and the like that Israel was the attacker. The USS Liberty skipper, Captain William McGonagle was awarded the Congressional Medal of Honor for his actions to keep the ship afloat and operational. His award was given to him not by President Johnson at the White House. There is no other explanation to believe other than the President did not want to jeopardize the Jewish vote in an upcoming presidential election. The Captain’s medal was presented to him by the Secretary of the Navy at a low level Washington Navy Yard ceremony.
What a crime it would be for historical reasons if the US Government continues to lie about details of the Six Day War. In the end, truth always wins out. What a shame for elected officials who will not stand up to be counted. For the sake of our fallen 34 shipmates, we will not give up. God bless America and may God give our officials the grace and courage to do the right thing and initiate a proper Congressional investigation.
WE NEED YOU
After reading this article, if your American spirit is challenged, please write a tax deductible check or money order to the USS Liberty Veterans Association (LVA) so that we can continue to purchase additional newspaper space in other parts of the country. Anyone who donates $100 or more will receive a free BBC film ‘Dead in the Water’ DVD or VCR tape (your choice). It is the goal of the Liberty Foundation to publish this article in newspapers all over the country. This is the sole purpose of the funds. In addition, you should write to the President of the United States and your congressmen requesting an official investigation. If enough citizens demand to know the truth, the pressure may be too great for our distracters to stop us. Make no mistake, our society will be the winners when the complete truth of the attack on the USS Liberty and the Six Day War (June 67) are fully understood. Please help!
Please mail your donations to:
USS Liberty Veterans Association
4994 Lower Roswell Road, Suite 33
Marietta, GA 30067
Tuesday, June 21, 2011
Just as a little knowledge is a dangerous thing, so too is a little objectivity. Northern Europeans are presently in the condition of a moulted crab, having shed the protective constraining shell of subjectivism but not yet risen to that higher level of objectivity which is Racial Empathy. At their present awkward stage, many Northerners have an acute feeling for the interests of other races, yet lack the deeper understanding of life which is required for an appreciation of their own group's truly unique vulnerability.
The need, says McCulloch, is for more Racial Empaths, Men and Women who, through a long introspective process, have come to understand the congruence of their racial and individual identity. “The true leadership class, natural nobility, or Aristoi, consists of Racial Empaths.” Such people feel Northernkind's wounds as their own.
McCulloch cites Shakespeare's “procreation sonnets” as sublime poetic instances of racial empathy. At the opposite extreme are today's “intellectual terrorists,” who teach the would-be Racial Empath that the “devil” is inside him. Against the constant false association of healthy Race consciousness with every sort of deviance, only those em paths with the most "natural wisdom, intuitive perceptiveness, sensitivity, willpower and psychological independence I can see the truth through the fog of falsehoods."
Yet even such superior Empaths are rarely permitted, under the dominant interracist morality, to express their hopes and fears in any way without risking the most “terrible reprisals.” The anti-Northern forces of repression are supremely effective today, and yet the destructive events and actions which disturb, agitate and activate empathy have yet but barely begun to reveal the full extent of their terrible effects. As the casualties mount, empathic awareness will be ever more difficult to deceive or repress, infeeling will quake ever more restively under the superficial crust of outthinking, and the angelic host may find a strength within itself that can only be given by Creation...
Chapter 4: Form and Content
By “form,” McCulloch means a society's institutions; by “content” its people and all their characteristics. “Historians and ideologues have both tended to be obsessed with form at the expense of content” and this bizarre obsession has only worsened in the past several decades.
Outward form can be grasped and dealt with more readily than inner content. The systems, structures and organisations of form can be easily charted by the historian, and lend themselves to facile manipulation by dogmatic ideologues and superficial “reformers.” Form is all that exists in the doctrines and assorted isms which speak only of reform --changing the form --never of re-content changing the inner content or substance, the nature, value and identity, of the people.
But re-content does occur. The inner content or substance has changed and changed radically in many countries and civilizations. The inner nature and identity of the people within the form has undergone complete and total transubstantiation, decisively altering the nature and values of the country or civilisation, with little or no transformation or change in the outward form of its institutions. This decisive process, the most important phenomenon of history, is missed or ignored by historians obsessed with the unchanging illusion of outward form, who are then perplexed by the profound changes which develop in the behaviour, performance, capabilities and values of the culture they are studying…
Specifically, Northern Europeans have repeatedly founded great civilizations which have attracted “non-Northern infiltrators, immigrants and peaceful invaders” in great numbers because of their excellence. The usurpers “retained in distorted forms -the language and name of the Northern population they have ... replaced, as well as the credit ... for their great deeds.”
The problems now confronting Northernkind are increasingly problems of content, though rarely diagnosed as such. The “yea-saying” mentality of the one Promethean or Faustian race is again being swamped by the “nay-sayers” who predominate among the other races. Traditional Northern “rights, freedoms, folkways and relationships” are being rapidly redefined by the racially alien invaders as “totalitarian,” while the destruction of such freedoms is called "liberation from servitude.”
McCulloch reminds us that the dissatisfactions of the workplace less often derive from the nature of the job itself than from that of the other people involved in it, especially those in managerial or supervisory positions. A truly free economy, with free hiring and firing practices, allows easy means of escape from such problems of “unsatisfactory content.” But as a society's content woes increase, they are increasingly misrepresented (at least publicly) as mere matters of “form.” The re-formers respond by further curtailing freedom, which makes it that much harder to deal with critical content problems.
It is the “erroneous emphasis” on form over content, powered by individual greed, which has "opened the gates of Northern Civilisation to alien races." To close the gates, preoccupation with form must be cast aside. “Each generation must be free to meet and overcome its own dangers” for the survival of an exceptional race is infinitely more important than the democratic procedures which once shielded but now promise to destroy it.
Monday, June 20, 2011
Morris Dees founded the Southern Poverty Law Centerin 1971 by stealing George McGovern's mailing list and soliciting donations from said list.
Dees served in 1958 as state campaign manager for segregationist attorney general candidate McDonald Gallion and also worked for George C. Wallace.
Fuller stated: "We wanted to be sure of having friends in high places."
In 1961 when Freedom Riders were beaten by a white mob at a Montgomery bus station, Dees (and Fuller) expressed openly his sympathies and support for what had happened at the bus station.
When one of the men charged with beating the Freedom Riders came to their office for legal representation, Dees and Fuller took the case. The legal fee was paid by the Ku Klux Klan and the White Citizen's Council. (Fuller, Millard. Love in the Mortar Joints. New Century Press: 1980 and The Progressive, July 1988)
Dees was arrested and removed from court in 1975 for attempting to suborn perjury (bribing a witness) in the Joan Little murder trial in North Carolina.
Perhaps explaining the SPLC's animus towards traditional Christianity (especially traditional Christian views on homosexuality), Dees was cited in 1979 by his ex-wife with a homosexual encounter during their marriage. She also cited numerous affairs with women including his daughter-in-law and underage stepdaughter. (Alabama Court of Civil Appeals CIV 2114, 1979)
-The SPLC's fund raising practices have provoked the disapproval of watchdog groups that monitor charities: The American Institute of Philanthropy assigned the SPLC an "F" grade on a scale of A to F. (American Institute of Philanthropy , AIP Charity Rating Guide and Watchdog Report, Spring 1998 and subsequent issues).
In 1994 the Montgomery Advertiser won a journalism award for a series of incisive and penetrating investigative articles exposing the unethical fund raising practices of Dees and the Southern Poverty Law Center including:
Since August 1, 1984, the Law Center has taken in about $62 million in contributions and yet only spent about $21 million on actual programs, according to federal tax records.
-In a series of fund-raising letters the Law Center implied it forced the United Klan's of American to pay $7 million to the mother of lynching victim Michael Donald in 1987. Beulah Mae Donald actually received only $51,874.70 from the Klansmen. The Law Center collected millions as the result of fund-raising letters about the case.
Dees is well known for putting "Hate on Trial" in the 1990 Portland. Oregon civil trial of extremist Tom Metzger. One of the witnesses in that trial, Greg Withrow, now accuses Dees of suborning perjury by paying witnesses (and then hush money for another 5 years) for their testimony. (San Diego Times-Union. August 25, 2002.)(or 2001 per Boyd?)
Dees assaulted an elderly journalist at a symposium sponsored by the University of West Florida, Pensacola, Florida on January 12, 2002. The journalist had asked Dees a "bad question." Dees then had the journalist physically hauled out of the building by two policemen. (The First Freedom. February, 2002.)
The SPLC spends twice as much (1999 figures) on fund raising as it does on legal services for civil rights abuse victims (Ken Silverstein, 56).
Source The Social Contract
Wednesday, June 15, 2011
On the 15th of every month do something to defend white people. The idea is to get many people doing this. By acting together we can build an effective movement to stop the destruction of white culture and the oppression of white people. The idea is for everyone to do something, anything, no matter how small, at the same time. You can do whatever is suitable for your situation. Mass movements are made up of many people doing what they can. Most do not have the power to do a lot but these are the people who make up the backbone of a mass movement. Everyone should do what they can, even if it doesn't seem like much. Don't be discouraged and not do anything, because your contribution helps. A river is made up of many drops. Together they can create a raging torrent. Here are things you could do on the 15th. Talk to someone about anti-white racism. Pass out a flier. File a complaint at work. Contact an elected official. Educate yourself. Post something on a website. Help a white person. Send out e-mails. Refer people to websites. You could research the life of a prominent white person and share what you learned with someone else. If you like the idea of White Defense Day and you're involved with another organization spread the word. You don't even have to tie whatever you're doing to white advocacy or mention White Defense Day. Just talking about something or building up a white person has a positive effect for our cause. One of the biggest problems facing white people is that many whites don't know what's going on or the extent of it. Just giving people information, just giving them facts is important. White Defense Day is coordinated with Wear Something White day. So in addition to engaging in some action to defend white people you could also wear something white to create unity and show support for the cause of white people. The Philisophical Basis for White Defense Day White people are under attack around the world. Evil people want to destroy white culture, white countries and ultimately the white race. White people have been systematically dehumanized and demonized. Racists are using the schools teach the hatred of white people. White children are being taught to hate themselves and to worship non-whites. Racists in academia openly call for the extermination of the white race. Violence against whites is epidemic and is getting worse. Racists in the justice system treat non-whites who attack whites leniently. Racists in the media cover up crimes against whites and treat those who commit them as victims or heroes. White countries are flooded with non-white immigrants for the purpose of destroying white culture, destroying white power and displacing the indigenous white people. White people are discriminated against in every walk of life. Non-whites are given preferential treatment. Whites are expected to treat non-whites like royalty. Anti-white racism has not only become socially acceptable, it's encouraged and opposing it has become socially unacceptable. Whites who oppose their mistreatment are called racists and bigots. At the same time white hating bigots are lauded and honored. There is growing anger among white people about the non-stop attacks against them and their culture. They want to do something to defend themselves. Many whites are not sure what they can do. Many are still affected by anti-white brainwashing. Some are concerned about racist retaliation against them or their families. Whites are disorganized and fragmented. They've been isolated so that many whites feel they are alone. By being disorganized and isolated whites are not able to stand up for themselves as effectively. A war is being waged against white people. In warfare the concentration of force is an an important principle. If whites can be organized to act in large numbers at the same time they can be much more effective in defending themselves and promoting their interests. Whites must act together. I'm advocating that on a regular basis, one day every month, whites act together to defend themselves. I hope that a world wide movement can be built. The key is everyone acting at the same time. The racists are used to attacking individual whites and small groups to keep whites oppressed. If a white group is large enough there's nothing the racists can do to continue their racism. If they were organized whites would be too powerful. That's why the racists vehemently oppose any organizing or group activity by whites. They can't stop us. We just have to get organized and coordinated. All pro-whites acting on the same day is a way to do this. It will take time to build this up. The goal is a world wide movement of whites acting to defend themselves and their way of life. In the future, on certain months, we can coordinate activities to act against the same problem at the same time. For example, one month we could protest against Affirmative Action. Another month we could educate people about black on white violence. Act on the 15th of every month. Do something that is pro-white or opposes anti-white racism.
Alan Hart (www.alanhart.net) has been engaged with events in the Middle East and their global consequences and terrifying implications - the possibility of a Clash of Civilisations, Judeo-Christian v Islamic, and, along the way, another great turning against the Jews - for nearly 40 years
- As a correspondent for ITN's News At Ten and the BBC's Panorama programme (covering wars and conflicts wherever they were taking place in the world).
- As a researcher and author.
- As a participant at leadership level, working to a Security Council background briefing, in the covert diplomacy of the search for peace.
Listen to the complete interview here.
The F.B.I. soon plans to issue a new edition of its manual, called the Domestic Investigations and Operations Guide, according to an official who has worked on the draft document and several others who have been briefed on its contents. The new rules add to several measures taken over the past decade to give agents more latitude as they search for signs of criminal or terrorist activity.
The F.B.I. recently briefed several privacy advocates about the coming changes. Among them, Michael German, a former F.B.I. agent who is now a lawyer for the American Civil Liberties Union, argued that it was unwise to further ease restrictions on agents’ power to use potentially intrusive techniques, especially if they lacked a firm reason to suspect someone of wrongdoing.
“Claiming additional authorities to investigate people only further raises the potential for abuse,” Mr. German said, pointing to complaints about the bureau’s surveillance of domestic political advocacy groups and mosques and to an inspector general’s findings in 2007 that the F.B.I. had frequently misused “national security letters,” which allow agents to obtain information like phone records without a court order.
Valerie E. Caproni, the F.B.I. general counsel, said the bureau had fixed the problems with the national security letters and had taken steps to make sure they would not recur. She also said the bureau, which does not need permission to alter its manual so long as the rules fit within broad guidelines issued by the attorney general, had carefully weighed the risks and the benefits of each change.
“Every one of these has been carefully looked at and considered against the backdrop of why do the employees need to be able to do it, what are the possible risks and what are the controls,” she said, portraying the modifications to the rules as “more like fine-tuning than major changes.”
Some of the most notable changes apply to the lowest category of investigations, called an “assessment.” The category, created in December 2008, allows agents to look into people and organizations “proactively” and without firm evidence for suspecting criminal or terrorist activity.
Under current rules, agents must open such an inquiry before they can search for information about a person in a commercial or law enforcement database. Under the new rules, agents will be allowed to search such databases without making a record about their decision.
Mr. German said the change would make it harder to detect and deter inappropriate use of databases for personal purposes. But Ms. Caproni said it was too cumbersome to require agents to open formal inquiries before running quick checks. She also said agents could not put information uncovered from such searches into F.B.I. files unless they later opened an assessment.
The new rules will also relax a restriction on administering lie-detector tests and searching people’s trash. Under current rules, agents cannot use such techniques until they open a “preliminary investigation,” which — unlike an assessment — requires a factual basis for suspecting someone of wrongdoing. But soon agents will be allowed to use those techniques for one kind of assessment, too: when they are evaluating a target as a potential informant.
Agents have asked for that power in part because they want the ability to use information found in a subject’s trash to put pressure on that person to assist the government in the investigation of others. But Ms. Caproni said information gathered that way could also be useful for other reasons, like determining whether the subject might pose a threat to agents.
The new manual will also remove a limitation on the use of surveillance squads, which are trained to surreptitiously follow targets. Under current rules, the squads can be used only once during an assessment, but the new rules will allow agents to use them repeatedly. Ms. Caproni said restrictions on the duration of physical surveillance would still apply, and argued that because of limited resources, supervisors would use the squads only rarely during such a low-level investigation.
The revisions also clarify what constitutes “undisclosed participation” in an organization by an F.B.I. agent or informant, which is subject to special rules — most of which have not been made public. The new manual says an agent or an informant may surreptitiously attend up to five meetings of a group before those rules would apply — unless the goal is to join the group, in which case the rules apply immediately.
At least one change would tighten, rather than relax, the rules. Currently, a special agent in charge of a field office can delegate the authority to approve sending an informant to a religious service. The new manual will require such officials to handle those decisions personally.
In addition, the manual clarifies a description of what qualifies as a “sensitive investigative matter” — investigations, at any level, that require greater oversight from supervisors because they involve public officials, members of the news media or academic scholars.
The new rules make clear, for example, that if the person with such a role is a victim or a witness rather than a target of an investigation, extra supervision is not necessary. Also excluded from extra supervision will be investigations of low- and midlevel officials for activities unrelated to their position — like drug cases as opposed to corruption, for example.
The manual clarifies the definition of who qualifies for extra protection as a legitimate member of the news media in the Internet era: prominent bloggers would count, but not people who have low-profile blogs. And it will limit academic protections only to scholars who work for institutions based in the United States.
Since the release of the 2008 manual, the assessment category has drawn scrutiny because it sets a low bar to examine a person or a group. The F.B.I. has opened thousands of such low-level investigations each month, and a vast majority has not generated information that justified opening more intensive investigations.
Ms. Caproni said the new manual would adjust the definition of assessments to make clear that they must be based on leads. But she rejected arguments that the F.B.I. should focus only on investigations that begin with a firm reason for suspecting wrongdoing.
A version of this article appeared in print on June 13, 2011, on page A1 of the New York edition with the headline: F.B.I. AGENTS GET LEEWAY TO PUSH PRIVACY BOUNDS.
Monday, June 13, 2011
Why, you ask. Whatever possessed your Old Uncle to fritter away his precious time this way? Well folks the Opera House was an amazing sight, he even took a lot of photographs, as a very clever and entertaining laser light show was displayed on the ‘sails’ of said building. It’s all part of the ongoing ‘Vivid’ Festival (whatever the Hell that is) and a ‘Festival of Light’ (no, not THAT one) which the highly talented homosexuals of the art scene and cafe latte set have been paid zillions to stage. Still, good on ‘em, it was all very spectacular and at least there were no drag queens or gigantic phallic symbols in evidence. You know, something you could take the kiddies to which is rare these days. There should be more of this kind of thing. After all, we pay enough taxes, don’t we?
Anyway, moving right along, as the walking, talking Jewish proboscis and (presumed) comedic entertainer Jimmy Durante often used to exclaim, “Everybody wants to get into the act!” There is an incredible amount of effort, time and money expended in the maintenance of the other ‘big show in town’ The ‘Holy Hoax’ as an absolutely exclusive and extreme event unequalled in its sheer barbarity and horror. Numbers and statistics, all totally unchallenged (there are actually very serious penalties including huge fines and big gaol terms in many counties to ensure this) are bandied about along with the most lurid tales and quite preposterous claims that defy logic and science, insult one’s intelligence, as well as affronting the most basic and fundamental rules of enquiry, investigation and the onus of proof.
But the purpose of this article is not to criticise the utter lack of intellectual honesty or investigative rigour in these processes but to examine the exclusivity of this modern myth. There is, in this writer’s opinion, good argument to be made that all the other truly horrific acts of cruelty, Genocide and persecution are diminished, minimised and reduced and that the memories of the dead are disrespected and insulted by this exclusivity. The lumbering behemoth of the so-called ‘Holocaust ©’ is, like some ‘Mallueus Evropa’, a weapon designed to smash the folk spirit of White Europeans. The ultimate purpose lays well beyond the mundane ‘make trouble for the White Man’ of which we are all so familiar through such Jew contrived nation wrecking abominations as Humanism, Feminism, Abortion on demand, Socialism, Communism, Anarchism, Gay Rights etc
Nothing short of absolute extinction for our creed and kind will satisfy this monster. The ‘burnt offering’ implied in the Hebrew term ‘Holocaust’ has nothing whatsoever to do with the burning of Jews or their Genocide but rather, in a deliberately perverse fashion typical of the Jew, everything to do with our own demise. To coin a term more crude and from the common vernacular, they own our sorry arses. They own the minds of our children from Kindergarten ferchrissakes! ‘Holocaust Studies’ is becoming increasingly common and compulsory in High Schools and even in Primary Schools. One can only hope that, just as most kids used to snooze through ‘Scripture’ lessons, Bible Studies or even Sunday School, they will swiftly adapt to this new religion by resisting it as a boring crock of shit and sit there daydreaming through class about the weekend rather than soaking it up like poisoned mother’s milk.
George Orwell is credited with the phrase “All animals are created equal, but some animals are more equal than others.” used in his alleged political satire, the novel ‘Animal Farm’. The book reads though, more like an extremely clever and equally savage critique of Communism. Somewhat ironic perhaps, in that Orwell himself was, at least publicly a (former?) dedicated Socialist despite his having written propaganda himself for the British regime during the Second World War and cooperated with the BBC ‘Thought Police’. Maybe it does indeed ‘take one to know one’. ‘Animal Farm’ was perhaps Orwell’s ‘comic book’ version precursor to his final and most grimly realistic work, ‘Nineteen Eighty Four’ where he really tipped the bucket on his former idols. Despite all his failings, Orwell remains this writer’s favourite modern author. Perhaps he truly was, as Malcolm Muggeridge, another long time Fabian Socialist and ‘Establishment man’ (he had been an MI6 operative) once opined, a ‘social barometer’ of his time.
There have of course been others who have used a similar phrase, which may indeed have pre-dated Orwell’s line, “All Men are equal, it’s just that some are more equal than others”. As the television comedy character ‘Father Ted’ once remarked upon viewing a fellow Priest’s collection of National Socialist memorabilia, “It’s funny how you get more Right Wing as you get older.” So too did Muggeridge become more politically conservative and increasingly sceptical of the International Socialist’s Utopian dream, leading to his vilification by the ‘True Believers’ of the extreme Left.
In fact, Muggeridge did such sterling work to repent for his former sins that, during the 2008 commemoration of the 75th anniversary of the Ukrainian ‘Famine’, The Holodomor, (Морити голодом or ‘Killing by Hunger') he and the other British former Journalist Gareth Jones were posthumously awarded the ‘Ukrainian Order of Freedom’ in honour of their efforts to expose the truth about what was really going on in the ‘Workers Paradise’ of the Soviet Union.
It is worth noting that the official policy of the so-called Western Powers was one of totally ignoring and even actively suppressing the facts and that the Leftist Criminals of the preposterously labeled International ‘Labour Movement’ continued in their perpetuation of the great lie and smearing of the ‘doubters’ as fools, liars and agents of hate. Sound familiar? It’s all very much like what happens to so-called ‘Holocaust deniers’ and ‘Climate Change deniers’.
If I type ‘Six Million’ into this document every reader would immediately understand it as shorthand for THE ‘Holocaust ©’ and when it comes to the numbers game the Talmud teaches Jews that ‘A thousand Goyim are not worth one Jewish fingernail.’ In light of this attitude the reader can therefore gain an understanding into why Hollywood fails to regale us with heart wrenching dramas based around the events of the Holodomor and why the History Channel also comes up short on documentary offerings on the same subject. The reader will also come to the realisation that it is utterly futile to try and appease the Jew or appeal to any sense of empathy in the Jew by quoting numbers and comparing them to their ‘Holocaust ©’ because, as several Jews have said over the years, in various words, the killing of even ONE Jew is a ‘Holocaust ©’. When any Race of people has a mindset of such arrogance and monumental self importance as that how can one possibly reason with them?
But really, the so-called ‘Holocaust ©’ would be far more accurately described as an ‘expulsion’. It was not, in general terms, at least within the realms of Germany proper, even a pogrom which implies officially sanctioned extreme violence and a breakdown of law and order. The instinctively efficient, officious and highly disciplined Germans would never have allowed this. Anyone who understands anything at all about the ingrained and traditional character of the Germans knows this. However, in the areas such as the General Government of occupied Poland and the Western Russian/Ukrainian regions there were some acts that could be termed atrocities. One has to realise though that these were mostly reprisals by locals against Jewish Commissars and their collaborators by members of the volunteer Einsatzgruppen (Special Squads or Task Forces) who generally attached themselves to various combat units of the Wehrmacht and SS.
These squads were largely comprised of local militia members with some supervision and training provided by SD, Gestapo and Kripo officers. Indeed, the Eisatzgruppen performed a useful purpose in liquidating Communist partisans but were criticised by the German commanders for being, erm, somewhat over enthusiastic in their work. The spurious claim that there were also many members of the elite combat divisions of the Waffen SS included in the ranks can be dismissed as nonsense and Nuremburg Trial propaganda. Any one who has studied the Waffen SS modus operandi and knows even the most rudimentary basics of military strategy and tactics could believe that highly trained frontline fighters would have been wasted on what was regarded as somewhat ‘low’ or even dishonourable work. It could be compared, on a much more discerning and smaller scale, to the so-called ‘Wet Work’ of the Soviet NKVD. There may have been the ocassional Waffen SS man involved if, for example, he was unfit for combat duty or was being punished.
Himmler is on the record as having looked at the detrimental effects on the morale and even the long term mental health of his SS men in being involved for prolonged periods in firing squad duties. This explains why so many local volunteers were employed for such work. No forcible ‘dragooning’ was necessary due to the extreme enmity the local peasants felt for their former overlords of the Jew dominated Soviets. Why do so many Orthodox Ukrainian and Catholic Poles still, even today, harbour such hatred for Jews? To fully understand this aspect of the story that has only been briefly mentioned one needs to study the complex and often vexed history of the, at best symbiotic and at worst parasite/host, relationship White Europeans have had with Jews down through the centuries. Tragically for the Europeans the relationship has all too often been the of the latter variety.
There have been many ‘Genocides’ such as the reasonably well known Armenian Genocide by the Turks but we are all seemingly only properly familiar with one. Even the mainstream ‘Wikipedia’ admits to the ‘reprisal’ Genocide committed against Ethnic Germans post WWII.
Conspicuous by their absence of course are the murderous atrocities against Whites currently still occurring in South Africa and Zimbabwe. The reader can decide whether they qualify as Genocides or ‘merely’ Ethnic Cleansings.
Well, that's it for this evening folks. More to come later...
Saturday, June 11, 2011
No matter that the Leftoids themselves have their own quite extensive armoury of shrill epithets to hurl at their political enemies. But then that’s the beauty of being a Leftist and obviously why so many arrogant, highly opinionated and self obsessed young people find a calling within the ranks of the Left. It gives them open licence to criticise all and everything while maintaining a position of privileged and unchallenged hypocrisy. Herein lies the fundamental essence of the difference between reality as it actually is and reality as one, and one’s ‘in group’, would prefer it to be or interpret it to be. Obviously the dedicated life long Leftist has found themselves locked in a state of arrested development so far as maturity of character and spirit is concerned. Advocates of the Nanny State to the core, they remain in the infantile/juvenile stage of demanding comfort and convenience over challenge and growth, predictability over venture and taxpayer funded welfare over struggle and self determination. This is why their creed can only ever deliver a tragically dystopic future of weakness and cultural entropy. Their ‘economics’ for example could be best symbolised by the Ancient Egyptian ‘ouroboros’ symbol, a snake devouring its own tail.
The ‘Climate Change’ brigade for example, sans any real hard or conclusive empirical evidence, nevertheless grind on inexorably in their campaign to drag us all back to the Stone Age. The entire ‘Climate Change’ movement has all the hallmarks of a Cult. Although primarily it is a political movement it has many aspects of a faith based religion. There are sceptics who are now heretics and infidels who must be persecuted and punished as ‘deniers’ just as any who have the temerity to question the actual facts and figures of the Jewish ‘Shoah’ are quite literally criminalised for asking questions or pointing out inconsistencies or outright falsehoods in the anointed version. There is a clear pattern, a well trod pathway, leading to the vilification of free thinkers and truth seekers that is every bit as evil as the cruellest indulgences of the Spanish Inquisition.
It is interesting that when one studies the etymology of the now trendy Left Wing term ‘Tolerance’ alternately defined as ‘Toleration’ and in particular the closely related synonym ‘Sufferance’ defined in one online dictionary as; ‘tolerance arising from failure to prohibit; tacit permission’. In another as; ‘Passive permission resulting from lack of interference; Tolerance, especially of something wrong or illegal capacity to endure pain, hardship, etc.; Endurance. Suffering. Misery. Patient endurance.’ that the true political intent behind this term becomes apparent.
Further, one discovers upon pursuing the word ‘Sufferance’ some rather revealing information, particularly in its related terms that crop up in various Thesauri. For example: Inconvenience, Misery, Pain, Submission, Suffering and Toleration, all of which are hardly positive or inspiring terms. It would appear the word ‘Tolerance’ has undergone a similar hijacking and subsequent gross distortion as the word ‘gay’. As George Orwell warned in his writings on the death of the English Language, the ‘lingua franca’ has become simply another weapon in the arsenal of the Nation wreckers and Culture Destroyers. Words are now reduced to sterile political instruments, cleansed of their traditional cultural meanings and utilised by the ruling elites and their useful idiots in the Intelligentsia to ruthlessly crush dissent.