Translate

Tuesday, December 20, 2011

The Origins Of Political Correctness



For the enlightenment of the likes of Michael Borg and other clueless Leftoids your Old Uncle Victor is posting the essay below. The author examines the origins of the cult of 'Political Correctness' in a starightforward and succinct manner that should even be able to be comprehended by the barely literate Marxist Zombies that emerge from the political indoctrination sausage factories the Sytem calls 'Universities'. Enjoy.

The Origins of Political Correctness
Bill Lind, February 5, 2000
An Accuracy in Academia Address by Bill Lind
Variations of this speech have been delivered to various AIA conferences including the 2000 Conservative University at American University. Where does all this stuff that you’ve heard about this morning – the victim feminism, the gay rights movement, the invented statistics, the rewritten history, the lies, the demands, all the rest of it – where does it come from? For the first time in our history, Americans have to be fearful of what they say, of what they write, and of what they think. They have to be afraid of using the wrong word, a word denounced as offensive or insensitive, or racist, sexist, or homophobic.
We have seen other countries, particularly in this century, where this has been the case. And we have always regarded them with a mixture of pity, and to be truthful, some amusement, because it has struck us as so strange that people would allow a situation to develop where they would be afraid of what words they used. But we now have this situation in this country. We have it primarily on college campuses, but it is spreading throughout the whole society. Were does it come from? What is it?
We call it “Political Correctness.” The name originated as something of a joke, literally in a comic strip, and we tend still to think of it as only half-serious. In fact, it’s deadly serious. It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious.
If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.
First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.
Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology (I would note that conservatism correctly understood is not an ideology) is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state.
Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing.
Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white males are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism.
Fourth, both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation. When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property. Similarly, when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions. When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favour of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated. And indeed, affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by, say, Hispanics or women. So expropriation is a principle tool for both forms of Marxism.
And finally, both have a method of analysis that automatically gives the answers they want. For the classical Marxist, it’s Marxist economics. For the cultural Marxist, it’s deconstruction. Deconstruction essentially takes any text, removes all meaning from it and re-inserts any meaning desired. So we find, for example, that all of Shakespeare is about the suppression of women, or the Bible is really about race and gender. All of these texts simply become grist for the mill, which proves that “all history is about which groups have power over which other groups.” So the parallels are very evident between the classical Marxism that we’re familiar with in the old Soviet Union and the cultural Marxism that we see today as Political Correctness.
But the parallels are not accidents. The parallels did not come from nothing. The fact of the matter is that Political Correctness has a history, a history that is much longer than many people are aware of outside a small group of academics who have studied this. And the history goes back, as I said, to World War I, as do so many of the pathologies that are today bringing our society, and indeed our culture, down.
Marxist theory said that when the general European war came (as it did come in Europe in 1914), the working class throughout Europe would rise up and overthrow their governments – the bourgeois governments – because the workers had more in common with each other across the national boundaries than they had in common with the bourgeoisie and the ruling class in their own country. Well, 1914 came and it didn’t happen. Throughout Europe, workers rallied to their flag and happily marched off to fight each other. The Kaiser shook hands with the leaders of the Marxist Social Democratic Party in Germany and said there are no parties now, there are only Germans. And this happened in every country in Europe. So something was wrong.
Marxists knew by definition it couldn’t be the theory. In 1917, they finally got a Marxist coup in Russia and it looked like the theory was working, but it stalled again. It didn’t spread and when attempts were made to spread immediately after the war, with the Spartacist uprising in Berlin, with the Bela Kun government in Hungary, with the Munich Soviet, the workers didn’t support them.
So the Marxists’ had a problem. And two Marxist theorists went to work on it: Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary. Gramsci said the workers will never see their true class interests, as defined by Marxism, until they are freed from Western culture, and particularly from the Christian religion – that they are blinded by culture and religion to their true class interests. Lukacs, who was considered the most brilliant Marxist theorist since Marx himself, said in 1919, “Who will save us from Western Civilization?” He also theorized that the great obstacle to the creation of a Marxist paradise was the culture: Western civilization itself.
Lukacs gets a chance to put his ideas into practice, because when the home grown Bolshevik Bela Kun government is established in Hungary in 1919, he becomes deputy commissar for culture, and the first thing he did was introduce sex education into the Hungarian schools. This ensured that the workers would not support the Bela Kun government, because the Hungarian people looked at this aghast, workers as well as everyone else. But he had already made the connection that today many of us are still surprised by, that we would consider the “latest thing.”
In 1923 in Germany, a think-tank is established that takes on the role of translating Marxism from economic into cultural terms, that creates Political Correctness as we know it today, and essentially it has created the basis for it by the end of the 1930s. This comes about because the very wealthy young son of a millionaire German trader by the name of Felix Weil has become a Marxist and has lots of money to spend. He is disturbed by the divisions among the Marxists, so he sponsors something called the First Marxist Work Week, where he brings Lukacs and many of the key German thinkers together for a week, working on the differences of Marxism.
And he says, “What we need is a think-tank.” Washington is full of think tanks and we think of them as very modern. In fact they go back quite a ways. He endows an institute, associated with Frankfurt University, established in 1923, that was originally supposed to be known as the Institute for Marxism. But the people behind it decided at the beginning that it was not to their advantage to be openly identified as Marxist. The last thing Political Correctness wants is for people to figure out it’s a form of Marxism. So instead they decide to name it the Institute for Social Research.
Weil is very clear about his goals. In 1971, he wrote to Martin Jay the author of a principle book on the Frankfurt School, as the Institute for Social Research soon becomes known informally, and he said, “I wanted the institute to become known, perhaps famous, due to its contributions to Marxism.” Well, he was successful. The first director of the Institute, Carl Grunberg, an Austrian economist, concluded his opening address, according to Martin Jay, “by clearly stating his personal allegiance to Marxism as a scientific methodology.” Marxism, he said, would be the ruling principle at the Institute, and that never changed.
The initial work at the Institute was rather conventional, but in 1930 it acquired a new director named Max Horkheimer, and Horkheimer’s views were very different. He was very much a Marxist renegade. The people who create and form the Frankfurt School are renegade Marxists. They’re still very much Marxist in their thinking, but they’re effectively run out of the party. Moscow looks at what they are doing and says, “Hey, this isn’t us, and we’re not going to bless this.”
Horkheimer’s initial heresy is that he is very interested in Freud, and the key to making the translation of Marxism from economic into cultural terms is essentially that he combined it with Freudism. Again, Martin Jay writes, “If it can be said that in the early years of its history, the Institute concerned itself primarily with an analysis of bourgeois society’s socio-economic sub-structure,” – and I point out that Jay is very sympathetic to the Frankfurt School, I’m not reading from a critic here – “in the years after 1930 its primary interests lay in its cultural superstructure. Indeed the traditional Marxist formula regarding the relationship between the two was brought into question by Critical Theory.”
The stuff we’ve been hearing about this morning – the radical feminism, the women’s studies departments, the gay studies departments, the black studies departments – all these things are branches of Critical Theory. What the Frankfurt School essentially does is draw on both Marx and Freud in the 1930s to create this theory called Critical Theory. The term is ingenious because you’re tempted to ask, “What is the theory?” The theory is to criticize. The theory is that the way to bring down Western culture and the capitalist order is not to lay down an alternative. They explicitly refuse to do that. They say it can’t be done, that we can’t imagine what a free society would look like (their definition of a free society). As long as we’re living under repression – the repression of a capitalistic economic order which creates (in their theory) the Freudian condition, the conditions that Freud describes in individuals of repression – we can’t even imagine it. What Critical Theory is about is simply criticizing. It calls for the most destructive criticism possible, in every possible way, designed to bring the current order down. And, of course, when we hear from the feminists that the whole of society is just out to get women and so on, that kind of criticism is a derivative of Critical Theory. It is all coming from the 1930s, not the 1960s.
Other key members who join up around this time are Theodore Adorno, and, most importantly, Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse. Fromm and Marcuse introduce an element which is central to Political Correctness, and that’s the sexual element. And particularly Marcuse, who in his own writings calls for a society of “polymorphous perversity,” that is his definition of the future of the world that they want to create. Marcuse in particular by the 1930s is writing some very extreme stuff on the need for sexual liberation, but this runs through the whole Institute. So do most of the themes we see in Political Correctness, again in the early 30s. In Fromm’s view, masculinity and femininity were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought. They were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.” Sex is a construct; sexual differences are a construct.
Another example is the emphasis we now see on environmentalism. “Materialism as far back as Hobbes had led to a manipulative dominating attitude toward nature.” That was Horkhemier writing in 1933 in Materialismus und Moral. “The theme of man’s domination of nature,” according to Jay, ” was to become a central concern of the Frankfurt School in subsequent years.” “Horkheimer’s antagonism to the fetishisation of labour, (here’s were they’re obviously departing from Marxist orthodoxy) expressed another dimension of his materialism, the demand for human, sensual happiness.” In one of his most trenchant essays, Egoism and the Movement for Emancipation, written in 1936, Horkeimer “discussed the hostility to personal gratification inherent in bourgeois culture.” And he specifically referred to the Marquis de Sade, favourably, for his “protest…against asceticism in the name of a higher morality.”
How does all of this stuff flood in here? How does it flood into our universities, and indeed into our lives today? The members of the Frankfurt School are Marxist, they are also, to a man, Jewish. In 1933 the Nazis came to power in Germany, and not surprisingly they shut down the Institute for Social Research. And its members fled. They fled to New York City, and the Institute was re-established there in 1933 with help from Columbia University. And the members of the Institute, gradually through the 1930s, though many of them remained writing in German, shift their focus from Critical Theory about German society, destructive criticism about every aspect of that society, to Critical Theory directed toward American society. There is another very important transition when the war comes. Some of them go to work for the government, including Herbert Marcuse, who became a key figure in the OSS (the predecessor to the CIA), and some, including Horkheimer and Adorno, move to Hollywood.
These origins of Political Correctness would probably not mean too much to us today except for two subsequent events. The first was the student rebellion in the mid-1960s, which was driven largely by resistance to the draft and the Vietnam War. But the student rebels needed theory of some sort. They couldn’t just get out there and say, “Hell no we won’t go,” they had to have some theoretical explanation behind it. Very few of them were interested in wading through Das Kapital. Classical, economic Marxism is not light, and most of the radicals of the 60s were not deep. Fortunately for them, and unfortunately for our country today, and not just in the university, Herbert Marcuse remained in America when the Frankfurt School relocated back to Frankfurt after the war. And whereas Mr. Adorno in Germany is appalled by the student rebellion when it breaks out there – when the student rebels come into Adorno’s classroom, he calls the police and has them arrested – Herbert Marcuse, who remained here, saw the 60s student rebellion as the great chance. He saw the opportunity to take the work of the Frankfurt School and make it the theory of the New Left in the United States.
One of Marcuse’s books was the key book. It virtually became the bible of the SDS and the student rebels of the 60s. That book was Eros and Civilization. Marcuse argues that under a capitalistic order (he downplays the Marxism very strongly here, it is subtitled, A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud, but the framework is Marxist), repression is the essence of that order and that gives us the person Freud describes – the person with all the hang-ups, the neuroses, because his sexual instincts are repressed. We can envision a future, if we can only destroy this existing oppressive order, in which we liberate eros, we liberate libido, in which we have a world of “polymorphous perversity,” in which you can “do you own thing.” And by the way, in that world there will no longer be work, only play. What a wonderful message for the radicals of the mid-60s! They’re students, they’re baby-boomers, and they’ve grown up never having to worry about anything except eventually having to get a job. And here is a guy writing in a way they can easily follow. He doesn’t require them to read a lot of heavy Marxism and tells them everything they want to hear which is essentially, “Do your own thing,” “If it feels good do it,” and “You never have to go to work.” By the way, Marcuse is also the man who creates the phrase, “Make love, not war.” Coming back to the situation people face on campus, Marcuse defines “liberating tolerance” as intolerance for anything coming from the Right and tolerance for anything coming from the Left. Marcuse joined the Frankfurt School, in 1932 (if I remember right). So, all of this goes back to the 1930s.
In conclusion, America today is in the throes of the greatest and direst transformation in its history. We are becoming an ideological state, a country with an official state ideology enforced by the power of the state. In “hate crimes” we now have people serving jail sentences for political thoughts. And the Congress is now moving to expand that category ever further. Affirmative action is part of it. The terror against anyone who dissents from Political Correctness on campus is part of it. It’s exactly what we have seen happen in Russia, in Germany, in Italy, in China, and now it’s coming here. And we don’t recognize it because we call it Political Correctness and laugh it off. My message today is that it’s not funny, it’s here, it’s growing and it will eventually destroy, as it seeks to destroy, everything that we have ever defined as our freedom and our culture.


37 comments:

Anonymous said...

Faggot racist fascist losers!

Michael Borg said...

There's nothing better then being multicultural. I guess that's why so many white supremacists have low IQ's, generations of in-breeding ya know what i mean?

Moni said...

Get the hell out of here, losers. And you are, by definition, losers. Every time your cause attempts to rise it is beaten.

Anonymous said...

Do you really believe that Hitler was right when he exterminated all those people especially Jews?

Anonymous said...

Die.

Anonymous said...

Its ok hate people you racist you wont be a brotherhood when jesus judges you. Wake up and realise hate is dumb

Anonymous said...

Just what Brisbane needs, more knuckle draggers. So many limp dicks gathered in one place.

Simon said...

Cowards. Small minded boys with small dicks attend these events

Anonymous said...

Hitler, he only had one ball.
Youse guys ain't got any at all!

Anonymous said...

this is a disgrace! inciting hatred and violence is wrong!!

Anonymous said...

I don't think its fair to call these people losers, they have just formed a different opinion of your own.
do you go onto all black websites and abuse them for hating whites?
do you go onto ultra-Orthodox Jewish websites and call them any other name for thinking the rest of the world is worth less than piss?
people need to wake up to themselves seriously.. Leave groups alone for thinking differently.

Anonymous said...

Got to laugh at all the self-hating cowards posting on this. Come to the festival and say it to our faces! You won't, because you're all soft cocks who hide behind a keyboard and play CoD.
The festival will still be happening and will still be a success despite your feeble attempts to stop it.
Go play in traffic, the lot of you.
WPWW

Anonymous said...

IF YOU HATE BLACK FELLA, WHY YOU LIVE IN AUSTRALIA?

Anonymous said...

jolene is a lesbian. and we all love her.

u ppl need jesus!

Anonymous said...

IF YOU ARENT SCARED...WHY DON'T YOU TELL US ALL WHERE THIS EVEN WILL BE HELD?!!...YOURS TRULLY, MR BIG (CO FOUNDER OF THE BLACK AUSTRALIA POLICY)

Anonymous said...

get fucked

Anonymous said...

Its ok we will have a festival in heaven where these haters wont be there. I hope you see the light before Jesus come again Hitler is now enjoying his reward burning.

Anonymous said...

Yeah I'd like to know where the festival is, so I can go....and chuck buckets of piss at people.

Anonymous said...

CAT scans show that people who are racist/xenophobic actually have a bit of problem in the 'wiring department' in their brains. fact. look it up.

Anonymous said...

did you know that human skin colour is just part of a human's dna? We all started off dark skinned. fact.

Anonymous said...

hurry up and post my comments! What are doing? crying alone in your room again?

VF Sydney said...

I can guarantee you that even if the location of this event was given out, noboday would show, just like every other Wn event in Australia, most notably the Sydney forum last year, when the Antifa knew where it was, yet still didn't show up, because it was out of their safehaven of the inner west.

Antifa are internet warriors. Nothing more, and a whole lot less

Anonymous said...

HOMOSAPIENT NUTS!

Anonymous said...

NAZI = KKK want only whites living on earth

Radical Islamist want only islamist living on earth

You guys both are faggots of the civilizations and dammed sure no more intelligent than insectoid.

Anonymous said...

ANY EXTREMIST IN THE NAME OF RACE OR RELIGION ARE A PRODUCT OF BACKWARDATION OF EVOLUTION OF MAN KIND !!

Anonymous said...

NEO NAZI = KKK = ZIONIST = ISLAMIC JIHAD.... all are symtom of lunacy of brain damage cult !!!

Anonymous said...

BWP!

Anonymous said...

Wow, most of the people posting about this sound quite violent. I believe in multiculturalism, and do not believe in racism, yet everybody is entitled to their view. I would never condone violence however, like all these people who are "against" racism. Instead they are just angry and violent. I hope the show goes well, safely, and it enjoyable for all those involved. I won't be there, for obvious reasons.

Anonymous said...

Hah,

It's rather depressing seeing all these low grade comments that have come from the news article on news.com.au

Did any of you guys actually take the time to read the website here or any of the content on it?

Tell you what I read that wall of text above these posts and I couldn't actually find any hate talk in it at all. Neither could I find anything on the other pages.

In-fact, the only reason you mindless morons believe that this is a "hate" website is because the news article said so.

If you read through this website you'll find some valid points, and even if you don't agree with it, I think you'll find that it doesn't affect you in any way.

@Michael Borg, pick out the few and class as the whole right? Re-look at what you wrote and I think you'll find all races are the same.

A Huge White Guy said...

die you racist scum

Anonymous said...

People wishing death and destruction on this hate group are no better than they. No need to sink to their gutter level.

Anonymous said...

Preying upon the ambiguity of complex ideas by offering up juvenile, inexperienced conclusions. So the world is still flat to u. U are simply wrong. Scholars are responsible for your very existence through the genuine acquisition of knowledge through perseverance. So u hate Einstein? Well don't use computers, don't eat, and be careful or u might float away. And in truth, what u see as a worthwhile pursuit will NEVER be recorded in history, never known by any others. The opposite shall, and indeed always has and always will. Love. The same love some of u may show your children. If u believe u have found the right way try hosting your shindig at CHERBOURG. If not shut up or get some balls. (Or preferably some semblance of truth.) Cowardly attacking people of ethnicity is not ever going to ne supported in this country. I guess over u will still be unintelligibly defensive, and insist that in your twenty plus years of existence u have a right to say u have more wisdom than the indigenous peoples of this land. , 60,000 years vs 20+ hmmm. Realise you've lied to yourself, and have the freedom you seek. SEEK TO TREAT EVERYONE AS U WOULD YOUR OWN CHILDREN. IF NOT WHY NOT? U R INVENTING EXCUSES " Failure is an oppotunity to start again more intelligently. " Albert Einstein

phb07jm said...

An impressive display of ignorance, stupidity and anger. You are a massive twat. I hope I meet you some day so that I can hold you down and shit on your face.

Whitelaw Towers said...

Well phb07jm who exactly are you aiming that comment at?

Anonymous said...

be dead... you're all gaylords

Anonymous said...

When i first read this i was angry and now i just pity you because you are pathetic. I can't believe anyone could this close-minded and just so incredibly stupid and ignorant. I hope you never reproduce because I'd hate to see you mentally abuse your children by ingraining in them messages of hate.

Whitelaw Towers said...

Come on lets be serious, you didnt read a thing. You are just a hater who can only respond in a threatening and deliberately aggressive way. You are what you hate.