Sunday, December 04, 2011

Please explain...again...

Partly in response to @ndy slackbastard’s ‘Twenty Questions’

A quick quiz for stupid White Liberals
Please explain how, precisely, is it ‘hateful’ to prefer one’s own kind over all others?
Please explain how one achieves ‘strength’ through ‘diversity’ rather than through homogeneity and unity.
Please explain who, truly, has been ‘enriched’ by Multiculturalism. If necessary, outline your particular and peculiar definition of the term ‘enrichment’.
Please explain any of the ‘benefits’ of Multiculturalism to White Westerners. Just one, any one, will do.
Please explain how so-called Liberal Democratic (Cultural Marxist) indoctrination is any better or more valid than National Socialist ‘indoctrination’.
Please explain how the Science of Eugenics has been ‘discredited’, ‘disproved’ etc (rather than simply disavowed and disprivileged) when, every day, animal breeders and farmers employ this system of ‘breeding for excellence’ by carefully selecting those individuals with desired attributes to mate with similar types and thereby obtain more positive outcomes in physical features, performance, temperament, life expectancy etc.
Please explain why the illegally imposed (No Vote, No Plebiscite, No Referendum) ideological system known as ‘Multiculturalism’ is, in fact and effect, Multi-Racialism that results in the Balkanisation of First World Nations into insular Racial ghettos peopled with aggressive tribalistic ‘crews’ who think only of themselves.
Please explain why it is only WHITE First World Nations that are forced, by the criminal cabal of the United Nations, to accept millions of Third World ‘refugees’. Why do Japan, South Korea, Taiwan, several Arab Oil baron nations and other wealthy, high tech, developed Non White Nations accept and/or ‘assimilate’ virtually zero ‘refugees’?
Please explain why it is exclusively the ‘burden of the West’ to ‘Save the World’, in particular what is known as the Third World, largely from its own incompetence, ignorance, corruption and savagery, to the detriment of many of our own people who are living in real hardship, when we have already given so much in the way of technology medicine and raw cash to assist these feckless hordes of primitive ingrates.
Please explain how it is possible, enthusiastically encouraged, legislated into Law and Taxpayer funded even, for all Non White peoples to celebrate their Racial/Cultural uniqueness and possess endless organisations promoting this, while this same privilege is totally denied to White people?
Please explain how ‘diversity’ is achieved through the random blending of genes via Race Mixing, particularly in light of the following quotation taken from page 179 of ‘Genetics and Origin of Species’ by the eminent Ukrainian geneticist Theodosius Dobzhansky:
“Race and species usually differ from each other in many genes and chromosomal alterations. Interbreeding of race and species results in a breakdown of these systems.... Some of these combinations are the harmonious genotypic systems adapted to the different ecological niches in the environment. But the Interbreeding could be just as efficient in breaking down the harmonious gene combinations as it was in forming them. Unlimited interbreeding of distinct species would result in submergence of the existing genetic systems in a mass of recombinations. Among the recombinations some may be as harmonious, or in fact better, than the existing gene patterns, and thus by hybridization the species may “discover” new evolutionary possibilities. But the chance of discovery is pitted against the fact that a majority, and probably a vast majority, of the new genic patterns are discordant, unfit for any available environment, and represent a total loss to the species. If life is to endure, the gene combinations whose adaptive value has been vouchsafed by natural selection must be protected from disintegration. Without isolation the ravages of natural selection would be too great. But too early and too rigid isolation of the favourable gene combinations formed in the process of race differentiation would mean too much specialization of the organism to environmental conditions that may be only temporary. The end result may be extinction. Favourable conditions for progressive evolution are created when a certain balance is struck: isolation is necessary, but it must not come too soon.”
If you can, as a self described ‘Progressive’ and ‘Democratic’ White Liberal, answer ANY of these questions with a credible, detailed and data backed explanation that would pass muster with any reasonably intelligent person, let’s set the bar low and say anyone with an average Intelligence Quotient of a mean 100 points, (can’t do fairer than that) then your kindly Old Uncle Victor will retire from politics and never bother you slack jawed Lefty again.
When @ndy tags your kindly Old Uncle Victor with the epithet ‘bigot’, in the pejorative sense, he finds it somewhat amusing in light of the word’s definition, etymology and accepted general usage.
From wikipedia:
‘A bigot is a person obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices, especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs. The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing sex, race, ethnicity, religion or spirituality, nationality, language, inter-regional prejudice, gender and sexual orientation, age, homelessness, various medical disorders particularly behavioral disorders and addictive disorders. Forms of bigotry may have a related ideology or world views.’
Okay, so let’s examine this particular definition. ‘obstinately or intolerantly devoted to his or her own opinions and prejudices’. We honestly believe this accurately describes the mindset of @ndy and his cohorts on the Left perfectly and succinctly. Moving on we have ‘especially one exhibiting intolerance, and animosity toward those of differing beliefs.’ Again, this is correct, with scalpel like accuracy, in its description of the militant Leftist fanatics we find in the various Anarchist and Communist groups.
Now we come to its more modern, Cultural Marxist, ‘politically correct’ form of accepted usage. ‘The predominant usage in modern English refers to persons hostile to those of differing sex, race, ethnicity, religion or spirituality, nationality, language, inter-regional prejudice, gender and sexual orientation, age, homelessness, various medical disorders particularly behavioral disorders and addictive disorders.’ Admitting no perception of irony or hypocrisy in this extrapolation the Cultural Marxists have extended and broadened the scope of this term’s meaning in relation to the bigot’s real and potential ‘targets’ along with their implicitly exclusive rights to victimology and yet simultaneously narrowed its focus to direct any negative connotations onto their ‘usual suspects’ who are almost always White, Male, Heterosexual Conservatives and/or Nationalists with a realistic and commonsense attitude to the question of Race and Ethnicity.
‘Forms of bigotry may have a related ideology or world views.’
Well ‘of course’ this ‘bigotry’ is related to ‘ideology and world views’. How could it not be? The only alternative is the assumption that this rejection or wariness of ‘the other’ is based purely on an instinctive reaction with no intellectualisation of the ‘offending’ individual’s attitude or opinions. Even the oft employed Leftist slur of ‘ignorance’ is preposterous because a truly ‘ignorant’ individual, presumably with zero knowledge of the ‘other’ would have no information that could elicit a negative or hostile response. They would simply run away or hide like a wild animal. This is clearly not the case and the precise opposite is the usual.
As with the old adage that ‘familiarity breeds contempt’ it is normally the case that when fundamentally different peoples and cultures attempt to live together the first response, particularly with the supposedly more ‘sophisticated’ and ‘tolerant’ (enforced by Law) White Europeans is to extend empathy, charity and goodwill to the foreigners in the vain hope of reciprocal appreciation and friendship. It is simply not in the Nature of Whites, particularly Anglo Saxons, to be overtly rude to strangers.
However, as time and time again History has taught us, (will we ever learn?) the good nature of the White hosts is inevitably exploited as weakness and this naturally and quite understandably, in accordance with what is known of Human Nature, results in the other Race developing contempt and even eventually naked hatred for the Whites. No more evidence of this is required than to observe the current American Negroid behaviour and so-called Gangsta and Ghetto ‘culture’. Whites, if they are to ever survive and prevail, will need to understand that all these so-called ‘minority’ groups never, ever want or wanted ‘equality’. They want domination. And they are achieving it. One Ancient Greek philosopher, whose name escapes your Uncle Victor, commented that a slave never simply wanted his freedom and ‘equality’, he wanted to replace and lord it over his former master in an act of pure revenge and this is perfectly understandable whether or not anyone believes it is just and proper.
These understandings, regarding how the world and its people actually work in reality, rather than the theoretical models of the Left, are at the core of the problems we are faced with today with the hegemony of Cultural Marxist thought in our daily social activities as well as our academic institutions.
A far more charitable, and in your Old Uncle Victor’s humble opinion, more succinct definition, is supplied by the infamous humorist and eminent lexicographer Ambrose Bierce in his excellent ‘The Devil’s Dictionary’ or, alternately ‘The Cynic’s Handbook’. He defines the term thusly: Bigot, n. ‘One who is obstinately and zealously attached to an opinion that you do not entertain.’

No comments: