Translate

Saturday, January 07, 2012

@ndy the consummate ‘politician’

It would appear that @ndy is becoming more and more like the politically expedient creatures in the organised political parties he pretends to despise. As an ‘Anarchist’ who believes in no formal government one would naturally presume @ndy eschews the routine mendacity of party politics yet, here he is, in the below comments taken from his website, behaving precisely like your common garden variety career politician, feigning ignorance (perhaps) about historical events, offering no explanation, verification or references for his own claims while boldly demanding of others that when they make a similar general observation they virtually back it up with CCTV footage and DNA samples.
It reminds your Old Uncle Victor of the Concentration Camp joke where, to gain their freedom, the inmates must answer a simple question. There is a lengthy lead up to the final punchline but the American P.O.W. correctly identifies the ocean liner that sank while on its maiden voyage on 15th April 1912 as the Titanic, the British P.O.W. correctly gives the death toll of 1,514 but when it comes to the Jew he is asked “And what were their names and addresses?” Boom-tish!
@ndy, it won’t surprise our regular readers, is hardly on a quest for the truth and, to utilise his own peculiar terminology, couldn’t be ‘arsed’ about what is right or just or fair, he simply wants to, or at least appear to, WIN the argument. Victory in debate is ALL that matters. Weight of evidence is quite inconsequential. After all, as we have said before, this is a battle if IDEAS. Like any career political maggot he engages in discourse for only one purpose, to promote his own twisted socio-political agenda and bamboozle his adversaries with blatantly contradictory statements, infuriatingly contrived faux misunderstanding and confusion or, at times, cynically and expediently designed convoluted phraseology and rhetoric.
That’s why you’ll never see @ndy outraged, raging against the machine and pissing and moaning about the awful injustice of White Genocide in South Africa and Zimbabwe or the intimidation, bashing, rape, murder and ethnic cleansing of Whites from urban precincts the world over, particularly in the United States. You see @ndy is NOT “Anti-Racist” he is simply ANTI-WHITE.
Outside of the Internet, Google search and wikipedia and away from his handful of fawning acolytes who egg him on, he would be the typical barber’s cat, all piss and wind, with no common sense, let alone substantial knowledge base or moral fortitude to back up his harebrained Humanist Marxist Universalist claptrap. But, operating in his own chosen theatre of battle, the Internet, he appears far more effective and knowledgeable than he really is.

9 Responses to nazi-leaks.net brings lulz #OpBlitzkrieg
Herbert Danz says:
January 4, 2012 at 3:38 am
You kind of people missed to ban Voltaire first. So a lot of people don´t like your ways of stopping people having a own opinion. Like Voltaire says: I don’t like the way they talk, but I fight for their right of a own free thinking. The old leftwing bunch banned Voltaire first and after the right of free opinion. By the way, I´m no Neonazi. Remember, “Red Front” in “Weimar Republik” killed 44000 people for having a own opinion (source: Deutsches Institut für Zeitgeschichte). So it is also the fault of those people, having so many people voting for the Nazi party, as they believed the lesser evil leftwing party.
@ndy says:
January 4, 2012 at 11:26 am
G’day Herbert,
First, Voltaire never actually said “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”.

Okay, so being French he probably said:
“Je désapprouve ce que vous dites, mais je me battrai jusqu'à la mort pour que vous ayez le droit de le dire”
…or perhaps Stephen Tallentyre said it but Voltaire will forever be CREDITED with it.
Secondly, I’m unaware of the works of Voltaire being banned — when and by whom?
The Catholic Church banned and censored several of his works, most notably ‘Candide’ over the years. He also got into some shit for ‘disrespecting’ Mohammed…apparently…

Thirdly, I don’t know how many people the Red Front murdered in Germany during the Weimar Republic, but whether it was 44 or 44,000, I don’t see its relevance.
Well, it’s fucking RELEVANT to the 44,000 victims and their families, you TWAT! Red Terror Good, Fascist Terror Bad. Four legs good, Two legs bad. Baaa! Baaa!
Peter Watson says:
January 4, 2012 at 1:47 pm
I think he is referring to the totalitarian nature of the left. Political Correctness is totalitarian because it seeks to silence unapproved opposition. If the anti-racists really believed in what they believe in then they would abolish all racial vilification laws and introduce unlimited rights to free speech.
What are you people scared of?
@ndy says:
January 4, 2012 at 4:51 pm
Peter,
“I think he is referring to the totalitarian nature of the left.”
It’s an implication, perhaps, but not a sustained argument.
Huh??? WHAT the fuck? What sort of comment is that?
References to Voltaire, the murderous Red Front and the reasons Germans voted for the Nazis do not add up to much of anything and certainly bear little relationship to #OpBlitzkrieg.
Yeah, yeah, yeah! Stick to the script Pete. Don’t generalise, make broad sweeping statements or say silly stuff like the Left. Y’know, stuff like… “Hitler was the worst and most evil man who ever lived” or “There’s no such thing as ‘Race’. It’s all a ‘social construct’” or “Diversity is strength” or “We're all the same under the skin" blah, blah, blah...
“Political Correctness is totalitarian because it seeks to silence unapproved opposition.”
What makes something ‘totalitarian’ is not its oppositional perspective but its extent: total.

By @ndy’s logic then, there can never have been a ‘totalitarian’ political regime, not even the National Socialists, the Communists or the Fascists at the peak of their power, because every one of these regimes had its dissidents and enemies within right to the very end of their reigns.
In any case, in ordinary usage, ‘political correctness’ has little to do with #OpBlitzkrieg. A more appropriate consideration would be ‘privacy’ and it’s this which forms the basis of possible legal action regarding the nazi-leaks site.
Yet again @ndy quite deliberately and pedantically deals with the terminology only insofar as it relates to the scope of the original story. He is behaving like a crooked judge who decides quite arbitrarily, for his own purposes, what is permissible evidence and what falls outside the parameters of the permitted area of discussion.
“If the anti-racists really believed in what they believe in then they would abolish all racial vilification laws and introduce unlimited rights to free speech.”
This is a nonsensical proposition as well as being irrelevant to the case at hand.

A ‘Nonsensical proposition’… but Multicultural Universalism isn’t?
First, ‘anti-racists’ adopt a variety of positions with regards ‘racial vilification’ laws and the fact that these vary does not lessen the depth of commitment to the principles of anti-racism by those who propound them. The same applies to ‘freedom of speech’, rights associated with this concept and its legislative framework.
Well, there you go, ‘legislative framework’. Firstly @ndy claims/admits that so-called 'Anti-Racists' have no agreement on what actually constitutes 'Racial Vilification' then admits that this nevertheless has no damping effect whatsoever on the reckless enthusiasm to steam full ahead with total, fanatical commitment to an, as yet, unagreed upon set of 'principles'. And to sum up, in his comment on 'free speech' he reveals he and his Leftist fellow travellers still actually believe there can be DEGREES of 'Freedom of speech' like a woman can be half pregnant. T
waddle, gobbledegook and claptrap. This twerp could talk himself into a corner, do a double backflip and disappear up his own arse in a cloud of smoke.


Finally, these debates have little to do with #OpBlitzkrieg.
“What are you people scared of?”
#OpBlitzkrieg kicked off with the following statement:
Neo-Nazis
Your incomprehensible actions, and your reluctance to accept the Freedom and Equality that every single human being possesses by right from birth, causes the birth to hatred and worldwide Racism.
After the first World War, your ideology plunged the world into chaos. You took over a plague, known as anti-Semitism, and made sure that racism was drilled into our collective consciousness, in order for humanity to accept this crude ideas as given, mostly without ever questioning them.
Your misdirected politics and your hate filled crusade against humanity have not only blurred your perception, but also affected countries worldwide. You have robbed irretrievable evidences of history as well as valuable art objects and architectural structures which belong to mankind, or were part of the cultural heritage of humanity. You were anxious to cause trouble between continents, which involved a collapse of political dialogues. The result, the cold war, lasted for years and its voice still echoes today. The holocaust against the Jewish, the sinti and the roma, your so called “euthanasia” imposed on disabled people, all of them are considered the cruel climax of the Second World War, to a cost of 6.000.000 innocent people’s lifes. You have combined the ideals of industrialization with the abomination of mass murder, a circumstance that led to destruction of human life, in a scale never seen before.
All this are known facts and yet you are still following and spreading such ideals, in order to enhance the symbolism of this despicable hate further. You are still causing injuries and killing people, people who have that done nothing against you, and yet you do it partly out of disgust or simply for your own personal pleasure.
You intimidate people that go on the streets protest for their ideals, and attack your political opponents, thus you deny them the right of free speech. Yet you hypocriticaly demand this exact same right of free speech for yourself, and throw the dirt in the form of agitations and “art around you”. You attack journalists and the media in general, you attack members of the opposing parties and equally you attack refugees and immigrants, who live and work in your “home country”. This people simply had to leave their native countries because of suppression and misery.
This behaviour can no longer be tolerated. You have convicted yourself to many crimes against humanity. With this hypocritical attitude and your drive to become a mirror of your inspirational criminals, you have brought the attention of the collective known as Anonymous upon yourself.
In this case, this attention implies the taken of crucial actions against your actions.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not Forgive.
We do not Forget.
Expect Us.
Peter Watson says:
January 4, 2012 at 7:48 pm
Let[']s have a track record of the anti-racist movement in the [W]estern world.
Anti-racist organisations like Fight Dem Back! and Searchlight have hounded people causing them to lose their jobs and some are unable to regain employment.
Anti-racists have taken people to court resulting in people going to jail or being fined for simply speaking their mind on matters concerning multiculturalism/racialism.
Anti-racists have committed cyber-terrorism against legal organisations and people going about their lawful business. Examples include the theft of membership lists of One Nation, National Front and the British National Party. As a result, people have lost their jobs and some have been physically assaulted by anti-racists.
Anti-racists have physically attacked nationalists on many occasions. One example would be how a man back in the 1980s was killed when an anti-racist threw a brick at him which hit his head. Other examples include Trotskyists who threw human waste at One Nation members back in the late 1990s.
Evidence has indicated that certain members of the anti-racist movement are in fact agents of state security organisations (ASIO, FBI, SIS) or provide state security organisations with information.
Certain high profile figures of the anti-racist movement have received police support and/or protection. An example would include [Mathew] Henderson, high profile figure of Fight Dem Back!, when he was protected by the NSW Police from nationalists.
The racial vilification laws make any attempt at criticising Cultural Marxism illegal. It is illegal under the racial vilification laws to publish facts about non-white crime.
As for the statement about “neo-Nazis” and National Socialism and White Racialism has murdered millions and “plunged the world into chaos” that is slightly hypocritical.
Humans are [in]equal. The movements of the 19th and 20th centuries that attempted to enforce human equality resulted in the deaths of over a hundred million people in the space of less than one hundred years. Every attempt at creating human equality has failed because it is not natural. Most problems in Australian, and indeed [W]estern societies, have been created by Cultural Marxism which is in fact a creation of the left.
The Zionist Jews have been the major players of the left since the 19th Century. Jews played a key role in the creation of Marxist Socialism and of Cultural Marxism. The twin ideologies of Marxist Socialism and Cultural Marxism have lead to the deaths of over a hundred million people during the 20th Century. Thousands of mainly White people have died because of multiculturalism in South Africa, Rhodesia and in many [W]estern countries through interracial murders and violence. Cultural Marxism is supported by many people in the leftist movement and by anarchists such as yourself, @ndy.
Cultural Marxism is of course anti-White Racialist but has no problem with other races being proud of their race. For example White Racial power or pride is denounced by people such as yourself but you have no problem with Australian Aboriginal power or pride. You claim that [it] is justifiable because it is “reverse discrimination” or “positive racism”. But it is racism and discrimination nonetheless and undermines your claims that races don’t exist and that all people are equal. The Black Empowerment Programme in South Africa and the anti-[W]hite policies of the Mugabe government have plunged millions of White Africans into poverty but the policies have not improved the lives in general of black people in South Africa or Zimbabwe.
In reality, Cultural Marxism and Marxist Socialism along with all ideologies based on the perception of human equality are disgusting and are dangerous.
Now go and suck cock, faggot!
@ndy says:
January 4, 2012 at 11:52 pm
“Anti-racist organisations like Fight Dem Back! and Searchlight have hounded people causing them to lose their jobs and some are unable to regain employment.”
Really. Who are these people?
“Anti-racists have taken people to court resulting in people going to jail or being fined for simply speaking their mind on matters concerning multiculturalism/racialism.”
Really. Who are these people? I don’t know of any person in Australia who’s been sentenced to prison after ‘anti-racists’ have taken them to court “for simply speaking their mind on matters concerning multiculturalism/racialism”. There are two recent cases of possible relevance. The first (January 2011) relates to Brendon O’Connell, “the first person in Western Australia to be convicted under the state’s racial vilification laws”. That case was brought by WA police and O’Connell represented himself. The other case (August 2009) involves Uncle Fred (Töben). In this instance, Uncle Fred went to jail for contempt of court. Neither case involved ‘anti-racists’ taking court action; neither O’Connell nor Uncle Fred were merely expressing an opinion on multi-culturalism and/or multi-racialism.
“Anti-racists have committed cyber-terrorism against legal organisations and people going about their lawful business. Examples include the theft of membership lists of One Nation, National Front and the British National Party. As a result, people have lost their jobs and some have been physically assaulted by anti-racists.”
Nonsense. What on Earth is “cyber-terrorism”?
One Nation’s membership list was not published by ‘anti-racists’ but by AIJAC (July 1998), an act that was considered to be highly controversial, both within and outside of local Jewish communities. (The publishers of the Review also claimed the infos was provided to them by disgruntled senior members.)
I’m not aware of the UK NF’s list being leaked, tho’ a coupla years ago the tiny email list of the NZNF was published online. That wasn’t a case of theft but the party’s inability to BCC.
As for the BNP, yes, on at least two or possibly three occasions of late (that I’m aware of) their membership lists have been published online (October 2009, November 2008). Responsibility for the last leak has not, to my knowledge, been established; an ex-BNP member was found guilty of leaking material in the November case. In any event, I’m not aware of anybody being assaulted following or as a result of the publication of these lists, and the only person (that I’m aware of) to have lost their job as the result of the leaks was a DJ named Rod Lucas. Finally, the list published on Wikileaks in 2009 appears to be substantially similar to the one originally leaked in 2008 and published on a blog (presumably by the guy what got done for it).
“Anti-racists have physically attacked nationalists on many occasions. One example would be how a man back in the 1980s was killed when an anti-racist threw a brick at him which hit his head. Other examples include Trotskyists who threw human waste at One Nation members back in the late 1990s.”
Anti-racists have assaulted ‘White nationalists’ yes, but in Australia such assaults are extremely rare: feel free to provide examples of convictions for assault committed under these circumstances. As for the death of a man in the 1980s, I’ve no idea. You’re free to elaborate. So too regarding Trots throwing shit at ON members; I do remember NA throwing shit on protesters during the same period but.
“Evidence has indicated that certain members of the anti-racist movement are in fact agents of state security organisations (ASIO, FBI, SIS[?]) or provide state security organisations with information.”
What evidence? Otherwise, yes of course: when thought appropriate, the state infiltrates anti-racist groups. (And racist groups. And any other group believed to pose a threat to social order.) A notable recent example is former police officer turned academic Bob Lambert infiltrating the Socialist Party front Youth Against Racism in Europe in the 1990s. He was exposed as a spy by London Greenpeace in October 2011.
“Certain high profile figures of the anti-racist movement have received police support and/or protection. An example would include [Mathew] Henderson, high-profile figure of Fight Dem Back!, when he was protected by the NSW Police from nationalists.”
Uh-huh. Presumably, you’re referring to a newspaper article from 2005 (‘Race-hate campaigner unmasked’, Greg Roberts, The Australian, August 22, 2005) in which it’s written that:
THE man behind a race-hate campaign in southern Queensland has been identified as a professional kangaroo shooter from the Darling Downs town of Crows Nest. Police are tracking the movements of Jim Perren, 38, after anti-racism campaigners contacted them to register concern about his activities. Mr Perren has posted hundreds of race-hate messages on the internet under the pseudonym stug111 — a type of German assault gun.
IIRC, at the time Jim made some blah about coming down to Sydney and showing Mathew who’s boss.
“The racial vilification laws make any attempt at criticising Cultural Marxism illegal. It is illegal under the racial vilification laws to publish facts about non-white crime.”
Transparent nonsense. Read the legislation.
Really? It’s a pity the agenda of the legislators is not ‘transparent’.
Later hater.
That’s pretty funny too. @ndy utilises that trusty old label ‘hater’ like only non ‘Anti-Racists’ can ‘hate’, and we all know that’s ‘transparently nonsensical’ don’t we kiddies?
Aussie says:
January 5, 2012 at 12:09 am
Peter, sorry to butt in.
But, I just want to make a simple point to you.
There is truth to what you say, if you were to generalise about the left.
Does this mean you approve of the right? Disapprove of the right yet still find it necessary to defend them? Or do you dislike the left for ‘other’ reasons?
It just doesn’t make sense when you fight hate, yet appear to defend it at the same time.
@ndy says:
January 5, 2012 at 1:19 am
As for the statement about “neo-Nazis” and National Socialism and White Racialism has murdered millions and “plunged the world into chaos” that is slightly hypocritical.
Hardly. First, the statement is directed at neo-Nazis. Secondly, the Nazis and the puppet regimes they installed throughout Europe did indeed murder millions of civilians: Jews, Roma, Sinti and others, in accord with their ideology and their crazed desire to cleanse the continent of these ‘sub-human’ populations. Finally, the statement would be hypocritical only if those responsible for issuing it claimed the same mandate, which they expressly do not.
“Humans are [in]equal. The movements of the 19th and 20th centuries that attempted to enforce human equality resulted in the deaths of over a hundred million people in the space of less than one hundred years. Every attempt at creating human equality has failed because it is not natural. Most problems in Australian, and indeed [W]estern societies, have been created by Cultural Marxism which is in fact a creation of the left.”
More nonsense. What were these movements and whom did they kill? The movements against slavery did not ‘enforce equality’, they resisted racial oppression. By the same token, equality before the law and movements for women’s rights did not emerge in the 19th and 20th centuries but (in Europe at least) as the logical extension of liberal Enlightenment values: citizens did not obtain the right to legal representation and women did not obtain the franchise through committing mass murder. In any case (and in summary), to collapse several hundred years of social struggle into such fatuous propositions as you do above is simply idiotic.
“The Zionist Jews have been the major players of the left since the 19th Century. Jews played a key role in the creation of Marxist Socialism and of Cultural Marxism. The twin ideologies of Marxist Socialism and Cultural Marxism have lead to the deaths of over a hundred million people during the 20th Century.”
Further stoopid. ‘Zionist Jews’ constitute a tiny fraction of movements of the left,
erm…so what? It is well understood that most political movements are controlled and led by the top one or two of the general membership just as any society is manipulated by the five or six percent that is considered ‘critical mass’ for any special interest ‘minority’ to gain a controlling influence over national affairs.
and Jewish nationalism has assumed diverse forms; many of the most prominent Jewish intellectuals of the nineteenth century (Marx for example) opposed Zionism —
@ndy is deliberately misconstruing what Mr. Watson means when he refers to ‘Zionists’ and mischievously milks this for all it’s worth. He surely understands that, although technically incorrect, the term, as Watson and also White Nationalists employ it in ‘ordinary usage’, has a pejorative meaning referring to Jewish extremists in general and not specifically only those ‘nationalist’ Jews who demand a homeland in Palestine. Some people have selective memory. It would appear @ndy has ‘selective comprehension’.
an ideology whose growth was to a large extent the result of the failure of other emancipatory (sic) movements of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries…
As for the rest, I couldn’t be arsed. You’re an ignorant, ill-mannered, racially-obsessed pissant, and will no longer be gracing my blog with your ill-informed diatribes.
Paul Justo says:
January 5, 2012 at 9:15 am
Peter, your only chance now is to revert back to your former role as General Secretary of the Stalinist League of Australia (Warwick) and fighting the Anti-Normal People’s Alliance at the tuck shop.
It is all very well for the likes of @ndy and his fellow travellers to simplistically smear any who value Racial reality politics and Jew awareness with hackneyed epithets like “Neo-Nazis” with the obvious implication that this ethno-nationalistic concern is simply a hateful continuation of the legacy of German National Socialism and Italian/Spanish Fascism that emerged in Europe less than a century ago, but no lesser a document than The Magna Carta (The Great Charter) of 1215 made provision to protect the indigenous English from the predations of the Jew. And we quote:
10. If any one has taken anything, whether much or little, by way of loan from Jews, and if he dies before that debt is paid, the debt shall not carry usury so long as the heir is under age, from whomsoever he may hold. And if that debt falls into our hands, we will take only the principal contained in the note.
11. And if any one dies owing a debt to Jews, his wife shall have her dowry and shall pay nothing on that debt. And if the said deceased is survived by children who are under age, necessities shall be provided for them in proportion to the tenement that belonged to the deceased; and the debt shall be paid from the remainder, saving the service of the lords. In the same way let action be taken with regard to debts owed to others besides Jews.
It is an insult to one’s intelligence to suggest that such an eminent document as this would make such carefully specific declarations regarding the behaviour of Jews merely to satisfy base desires of envy, hatred, jealousy and ‘Racism’ with no foundation.
Later, in 1290, the hard and heroic King Edward The First of England, known as ‘Longshanks’, and carrying the fearsome title of ‘Malleus Scoti’ (Hammer Of The Scots) issued the ‘Edict Of Expulsion’ whereby all Jews were expelled from England. It would be over 350 years before it was overturned in 1656 by the self appointed English dictator (Lord Protector) ruthless iconoclast, apostate and traitor Oliver Cromwell whose ‘New Model Army’ was largely funded by Dutch Jews. The readmittance of the coin clippers and usurers to England was a payback for services rendered.
Cromwell though was a creature so comprehensively despised and hated by his own fellow countrymen that on 30th January in 1661, (the 12th anniversary of the execution of Charles The First), his body was exhumed from Westminster Abbey, and was subjected to the ritual of a posthumous execution. The rotting corpse was then hanged in chains at Tyburn. Finally, as the ultimate act of disrespect, the beheaded corpse was thrown into a pit, while his severed head was displayed on a pole outside Westminster Hall until 1685. THAT folks is how traitors to their people USED to be treated in the good old days, unlike today where they seem to be REWARDED with cushy jobs at the ‘United Nations’ and other criminal organisations.
Again, are we to believe that Edward ‘Longshanks’ was as simplistically evil and intrinsically wicked as he has been portrayed in many a Hollywood movie, and particularly the extremely nasty version we saw in the Mel Gibson movie ‘Braveheart’? Is this how we ‘study history’ and receive wisdom? The main root of our problem today, particularly with this current generation, and the previous one, of Uni grad ‘student’ types is that they do not even know the most rudimentary methodology and rules of study and research and many leave University with Degrees while remaining barely functioning illiterates. There are Doctors and Lawyers out there who cannot even construct a letter. As Jonathan Bowden says; “There is no need to ban books in a society where forty percent of the population
can’t even read!”
To paraphrase @ndy himself… seriously, read a book.

No comments: