Translate

The Mantra! Anti racism is a code word for anti white!

Saturday, March 17, 2012

Setting a 'commenter' straight

Tedious though it might be, sometimes it is necessary to address the wilful ignorance of those who, while presuming wisdom beyond our humble comprehension, take it upon themselves to lecture us as to the validity of our sincerely held beliefs. The relative anonymity of the Internet emboldens these self righteous twats to unload their poisonous stupidity onto any who, like Whitelaw Towers, stand outside the crowd and speak the truth.
http://whitelawtowers.blogspot.com.au/2012/03/left-wing-jews-sought-eradication-of.html


Joseph McGrath says:
“I sometimes wonder whether people such as yourself are actually leftist trolls, (it would be somewhat odd to be ‘trolling’ one’s own site, would it not?) since you promulgate much (many?) of the same ideas, albeit for ostensibly different reasons. The common themes are too many to list exhaustively here, but I'll name a few I see regularly: - Both tend to have a revisionist, restricted definition of white which attempts (to?) limit the application of the term to Europeans with a more or less Nordic phenotype. Jewish Europeans, though not generally swarthy and often comparable in coloring to northern Europeans, are often deemed 'non-white'. – "

Race is much more than skin deep. You obviously know zero about Anthropology. Race is determined at a GENETIC level that in turn predicates behaviour. The ‘nurture over nature’ premise is pure, unadulterated Marxist claptrap. Although social conditioning can produce some improvement in the behaviour of the lesser Races, ultimately all will revert to type particularly when under pressure or stress. One might, for example, teach one’s dog to shake hands but one does not then observe one’s dog teaching its puppy the same thing. This is a form of ‘arrested development’ that limits the progress one can make in changing deeply ingrained instinctive behaviours. Science, real Science, has taught us that there are specific genes that effect behaviour. Negroids, for example, generally have very poor impulse control and, lacking ‘Western’ civilised conditioning, are quite childlike, prone to irrationally aggressive and often violent outbursts (Chimp-Outs), have a proclivity for generally criminal activity and are very predictable in their simplistic and unsophisticated behaviours. As far as the ‘European Jews’ are concerned, although the Ashkenazim Jews of Eastern Europe have infused their gene pool with much White blood over the centuries, much of it acquired through the kidnapping of White infants, they remain, at their genetic core, a mongrel Race of Turkic, Tartaric, Mongoloid, Armenoid, Gypsy origin. They are simply diluted Khazars who cling to their vile and inherited self worshipping, Talmudic, neurotic Middle Eastern psychosis that is a tribal death cult rather than either a Race or a Religion.

"Both often deny the witheness (sic) of Spaniards and sometimes other people of Mediterranean origin, such as southern and eastern Europeans ans (sic) Caucasian middle eastereners (sic) and North Africans. - Both the 'anti-racist' left and pro-racist right promote the idea that all whites are members of a privileged 'caste'. In one particularly odd post here, the poster says that non-white women often try to 'grab wimpy white men' to climb the social ladder. The poster seems oblivious to the fact that the notion that whites are held in such esteem and by non-whites who desire white looking babies contradicts the notions that whites are hated in general by non-whites and that whites are a downtrodden race in decline."

There is no contradiction or mystery whatsoever in the revelation that Non Whites wish to REPLACE Whites while simultaneously acquiring their Natural beauty as a adjunct to their own gene pool. Is your ‘confusion’ merely feigned here for the sake of sustaining the inertial urge of your attack?

"In short, you seem intent on promoting the same things the hard core, anti-white left does (e.g. divide the white race by redefining historically white people as 'oppressed people of color', promote the stereotype that to be white is to necessarily be on top of the social order, etc)."

This is not a ‘stereotype’ but rather a reality that has been expunged through Clearly this White ‘stereotype’ is currently NOT the case in the artificially contrived Marxist dystopia that is Planet Bizarro as we know it today with its perversely inverted values, but Nature is relentlessly persistent in its hard wired imperative to maintain hierarchies so therefore the ‘ideal’ of White separatism, self determination and the consequent inevitable technological dominance remains as something, if no longer to strive for, then to ultimately reinstate once sanity and Natural Justice prevail. This ‘supremacy’ epithet bandied about as a pejorative term is no more than the Natural consequence of White Civilisation, sans parasitic elements, being permitted to run its Natural course and realise its arc of techno-socio development free from alien interference.

"You essentially echo all the basic tenets of radical leftist whiteness studies curricula, you just do it from a purportedly pro-white perspective. Also, while it is true that a disproportionate number of the anti-white left is Jewish, most lefists (Sic) are nevertheless non-Jewish whites. Former weatherman kingpin Bill Ayers,whom your post suggest (s?) is Jewish, is in fact a WASP."

This, if it is indeed accurate, means absolutely nothing. WASPS, particularly the Neo-Con type and the hard core Calvinist sort are NOTORIOUSLY Pro-Jew and Pro-Zionist. Their ranks are bursting with fatalistic, apocalyptic, millennialism nutters who are almost more Jewish than the Jews. Many are actively working to bring on Armageddon ASAP (virtually guaranteed by Israel’s ‘Samson Doctrine’) for little more reason than to prove their interpretations of Bible revelations are correct. I honestly don't know whether you are a sincere white supremacist type, The use of the hackneyed, though loaded, ‘white supremacist’ tag is indicative of one who has deeply imbibed the Marxist Kool Aid and is either simply ignorant or a useful idiot. or a white liberal Jew or black trolling as a stereotypical white racist loon. The interesting observation is that both extremes are socially destructive. Ah yes, the penultimate refuge of the scoundrel, immediately prior to ‘Patriotism’, the ‘centrist’ position. C’mon Joey boy, that old middle of the road is getting awfully crowded. Mediocrity and conformity are prerequisites for slavery. You appear to possess both qualities in spades. The insipid liberalism inherent in your rhetoric becomes ever clearer by the sentence even if its particular ‘brand’ remains somewhat elusive.

"The racist right is an extremely small phenomenon; truly the fringe of the fringe (and deservedly so), whereas the 'anti-racist' left is far larger and very active in the blogosphere."

Erm… and your point would be… precisely… what? Odds are you're a troll. Again we are puzzled by this ‘troll’ accusation. Please explain more clearly how one ‘trolls’ one’s own site.

"Either way you're spewing nonense (sic). This race crap is a dangerous waste of time whether it is spewed by PC white guilt left or a beer guzzling would be 'white nationalist' posting rants to the Internet from his parents' basement. PS - I get a kick out of your admonishment to "keep it civil", given all the hate spewed on this blog.”
“all the hate spewed on this blog”…It is quite clear old Joe boy has not taken the trouble and/or time to read anything much beyond this particular thread, otherwise, presuming he is not severely mentally retarded, he would have gleaned, from our rather extensive archives of almost 1800 posts, that we here at Whitelaw Towers have a rather more transparent ideology and mission than he implies with his clumsy and, quite frankly, barely literate, accusations and criticisms.

It would greatly benefit the political narrative if he were to clarify his particular position and openly declare his hand regarding his actual intentions. If he simply wishes to play the generic belligerent with provocative contrariness, supplemented with insulting epithets, then perhaps he and this movement, might be better served by his silence until such time that he might actually offer something new, intellectually stimulating or even unique to the debate.
By Joseph McGrath on Left Wing Jews sought the eradication of the White... on 3/15/12
As a final tip Joe, when posing as an intellectual, through the utilisation of many words with more than two syllables, as you have here in your turgid diatribe, it might be advisable, in this quest to convey the impression of intelligence, to at least check your spelling and grammar before posting it on the World Wide Web for all to see.

Our best guess is that you are simply another pathetic victim among the ranks of the terminally confused and self deluded. You have convinced yourself that you ‘know stuff’ and that this sets you aside from and above the average lemming. Here’s some free advice, be truly courageous for once in your miserable life, Joey boy, and break the programming, think outside the square, swallow that old red pill and see the wicked World AND yourself for what they truly are. Seek the TRUTH and ONLY the TRUTH but first get your head on straight so you will at least RECOGNISE the TRUTH when you see it. Good luck.

5 comments:

Joe McGrath said...

Part1 of 2


I don't have time to address all the points I'd like to, but I'll cover what my present time allows.

First, and most trivially, regarding typos, as we all know, smartphones have notoriously imprecise autocorrect. I'm posting a message on some fringe racist blog, not writing a letter to the editor. As such, I could care less about running a worthless smartphine spellcheck. It's not like anybody reads this thing anyway (as far as I can tell I am the only person who has responded to any of your posts).

Second, still relatively trivial, anyone effecting a false persona under cover of Internet anonymity to cause mischief is a troll. The term isn't limited to people causing such mischief on a other's blog or website. I am aware of several confirmed instances where mischeious white leftists (some credentialed academics mind you)  have not only posed as white raists on blogs and in Wikipedia articles, but have hosted sites where theyose as anything from mainstream right winger to fringe racist. You may well be a genuine white racist 'nationalist', but many of the things on your blog are very similar to things I'd seen on some of the exposed troll blogs. The idea is to essentially to promote the same ideas they promote openly in their classrooms (e.g. that white supremacy is rampant, whites are 'privileged'), and to add force to some of the more strained and implausible assertions of leftist "whiteness studies" curricula, such as the idea that Jews or even southern Europeans are 'people of color'. In me fairly well known case a leftist academic who taught a white bashing 'whiteness studies' class at a state university posed as a 'white nationalist' on the racist website "Stormfront" trying to sell the idea that Greeks and Italians aren't white. In a other case a black radical did the same. So yeah, I am skeptical of the actual motives of anonymous people posting things that make no sense but do sound an awful lot like the claims of whiteness studies academics.

Third,I never said anything about "nature versus nurture". Your claims about the genetics of Ashkenazi Jews was absurd. The have actually been several credible studies done in this area recently. I will forward you links when I have time. In brief, Jews in general tend to have substantially the same genetic markers (haplogroups etc.) as the larger communities hey live in (i.e. German Jews are substantially similar to non-German Jews, Italian Jews are substantially similar to non-Italian Jews, Moroccan Jews are substantially similar to non-Morrocon Jews, etc.). However, they also share substantial genetic markers associated with middle eastereners.The problem with these studies is that - at least the ones I have seen - don't do smilarsidebybsie comparisons with other Eitopean groups. North Aficans and Middle Easterners are very similar genetically to Europeans to begin with, so it's not clear whether the fact that Ashkenazi Jews share genetic characteristics found in Middle Easterners is meaningful or unique among Europeans. People from the middle east have been moving westward and northward into Europe for thousands of years.

Joe McGrath said...

Part 2 of 2:

I don't time to with much more now, but if indeed you are what you claim to be, I would reiterate that this preoccupation with race and racism is pathological. I think part of the problem is that people rarely discuss race and ethnicity honestly. They counter paranoid remarks about Jews or hateful comments about blacks etc. with warm and fuzzy but unconvincing platitudes. I don't do that. I'm not going to tell a racist Jew hater for example that the notion that Jews disproportionately tend to be radical leftist is a 'myth' or deny the existence of Jewish 'anti-goyism'or that there are a disproportionate percentage of Jews in certain areas relative to their % of the general population (e.g. media, academia). But this isn't due to some nefarious 'conspiracy', and to suggest that it is is at least as whiny and self pitying as the cries of certain minority groups that they are under represented here or there. How a guy who runs a white supremacist website can complain about the relatively benign ethnocentrism of some Jews strikes me as both myopic and hypocritical. Across he board amongst all races and ethnicities, ethnocentrism rarely goes so far as to become manifest as a hatred pfnothervraces and ethnicities. You're truly on the fringe. Even many ethnocentric types end up marrying outside of their ethnicity, if not their race (interracial marriage being far less common).

Society has by in large moved beyond that sort of "old school racism". There is still too often certain ethnic cliques and ethnocentrism that are sometimes  disturbing, sometimes merely annoying. There is in many cases today a PC double standard where whites. especially 'non-ethnic'  or 'Angloid' whites are unfairly made to feel 'guilty' or 'priveleged' for past sins and present day inequalities, both real and imagined. The solution to this is not to nurse an intense hatred of non-Angloid types however. 

They aren't the enemy. The troublemakers are the people of all races sowing this divisive identity politics crap etc. But, since you are apparently for absolute racial and/or ethnic separatism anyway, why should you are about it? Identity politics, 'multi-culturalism', and political correctness actually tend to alienate races and ethnicities from one another, so it actually serves your purpose, whether you realize it or not. The leftist academics you hate is much are actually doing more to keep your imaginary 'pure white race' separate from all other groups than you are. I actually have wondered sometimes whether indeed some of the hard core left wingers promoting 'diversity' are actually clever white separatists, using a sneaky runaround socially acceptable tactic to assuring a relative degrees of segregation with socially acceptable - even 'politically correct' - rhetoric.

I don't think this is the case however. They are as oblivious to the racial divisions sowed by their politics as you are.

Anyway, you seem relatively intelligent. It's a shame to waste your time and energy hating people, and is almost invariably self destructive. Let it go. Or at least, know who the real trouble makers are and go after them in the marketplace of ideas, with words. Challenge the ideas of those you disagree with directly. To go around saying "I hate all blacks!" or "the Jews are controlling everything from behind the scenes!" is pointless and irrational. Your battling phantoms and letting the real 'bogeymen' off the hook.

Oh well, I'm out of time...

Joe McGrath said...

You didn't post part 1 of 2:

I don't have time to address all the points I'd like to, but I'll cover what my present time allows.

First, and most trivially, regarding typos, as we all know, smartphones have notoriously imprecise autocorrect. I'm posting a message on some fringe racist blog, not writing a letter to the editor. As such, I could care less about running a worthless smartphine spellcheck. It's not like anybody reads this thing anyway (as far as I can tell I am the only person who has responded to any of your posts).

Second, still relatively trivial, anyone effecting a false persona under cover of Internet anonymity to cause mischief is a troll. The term isn't limited to people causing such mischief on a other's blog or website. I am aware of several confirmed instances where mischeious white leftists (some credentialed academics mind you)  have not only posed as white raists on blogs and in Wikipedia articles, but have hosted sites where theyose as anything from mainstream right winger to fringe racist. You may well be a genuine white racist 'nationalist', but many of the things on your blog are very similar to things I'd seen on some of the exposed troll blogs. The idea is to essentially to promote the same ideas they promote openly in their classrooms (e.g. that white supremacy is rampant, whites are 'privileged'), and to add force to some of the more strained and implausible assertions of leftist "whiteness studies" curricula, such as the idea that Jews or even southern Europeans are 'people of color'. In me fairly well known case a leftist academic who taught a white bashing 'whiteness studies' class at a state university posed as a 'white nationalist' on the racist website "Stormfront" trying to sell the idea that Greeks and Italians aren't white. In a other case a black radical did the same. So yeah, I am skeptical of the actual motives of anonymous people posting things that make no sense but do sound an awful lot like the claims of whiteness studies academics.

Third,I never said anything about "nature versus nurture". Your claims about the genetics of Ashkenazi Jews was absurd. The have actually been several credible studies done in this area recently. I will forward you links when I have time. In brief, Jews in general tend to have substantially the same genetic markers (haplogroups etc.) as the larger communities hey live in (i.e. German Jews are substantially similar to non-German Jews, Italian Jews are substantially similar to non-Italian Jews, Moroccan Jews are substantially similar to non-Morrocon Jews, etc.). However, they also share substantial genetic markers associated with middle eastereners.The problem with these studies is that - at least the ones I have seen - don't do smilarsidebybsie comparisons with other Eitopean groups. North Aficans and Middle Easterners are very similar genetically to Europeans to begin with, so it's not clear whether the fact that Ashkenazi Jews share genetic characteristics found in Middle Easterners is meaningful or unique among Europeans. People from the middle east have been moving westward and northward into Europe for thousands of years.

Anonymous said...

He tells us all that anti-racist crap again what we hear since 1945. He still has not realized that the human brain discriminates and is distincting and for that reason the UN-charter to eliminate all forms of racism has a flaw. For that reason he belongs to the brain-washers of humanity. By discriminating and distincting from each other, we learn also from each other. For example west of the black forest in Germany are living the Badensers and east of the black forest are living the Swabians and the Badensers believed also they were superior to the Swabians thus always asked: What is the difference between a Badenser and a Swabian and the answer was: The Swabian works and the Badenser thinks. Saying this by a Badenser in a Swabian pub led to a brawl in the old days. People like Joe never want face the facts about who runs the world, because they are part of the ones who run the world!

Obadiah 1:18 said...

White racists who've debated with people like Joe online don't need me to them that it's an exercise in futility. No matter what cogent reasoning and corroborating evidence you offer, Joe is going to keep believing as he does because (a) he's an antifa, (b) he's a Jew, (c) he's thicker than an oak tree stump, or (d) he's all of the above.

Spending five minutes talking to an open-minded white in the real world will always prove far more fruitful than squandering hours casting your pearls before faceless swine like Joe in the virtual world.