Middle Eastern drug gangs turn Sydney into wild west
Middle Eastern drug gangs are rampaging through Sydney shooting up houses and cars, murdering people on the streets, and even shooting it out with each other on street corners . . . all unchecked by the police who appear to lack either the ability or the will to act lest they be called *gasp* racist.
For the past three months, almost every day there has been some kind of gangland shooting that has involved Middle Eastern drug gangs. Some days there has been more than one shooting. Illegal weapons are pouring into the country, concealed in shipping containers from the Middle East, but all that the police, the controlled media and the idiot politicians talk about is making firearm ownership more difficult for law-abiding citizens. There is only one solution and it is obvious: deport all people of Middle Eastern origin, immediately and by as much force as is necessary to achieve that end.
Click HERE to listen.
Sunday, January 29, 2012
Saturday, January 28, 2012
“Science and evolution says that at one stage we were ALL black. But I guess you FUNDAMENTALISTS won't agree with rational logic.”
It amuses your Old Uncle Victor to read some of this hate mail, particularly when the senders invoke such elements as ‘Science’ and ‘rational logic’ and, by obvious inference, accuse US of being bereft of these qualities. Even the most casual perusal of their own contributions to ‘argument’ will swiftly convince the most charitable and neutral observer of their docile credulity for blatantly partisan sources of ‘information’ and their fanatical adherence, once inculcated, to even the most spurious propositions and preposterous conclusions. Additionally, if the sender intends to convey an accusation of ignorance through the term ‘FUNDAMENTALISTS’ then he has chosen his words poorly. We see the flaccid and permissive cultural relativism of Marxist Liberal Democracy as the creed of the weak and feeble minded, a secular religion for the Lemmings.
(another) Anonymous said…
“btw...Chinese people have been here SINCE settlemet (sic)”
Yes indeed they have, there was always a need for coolie labourers, laundries and, later, cheap restaurants. The Chinese were always present, as an opportunistic and parasitic contingent, with any White European army or caravan venturing beyond the bounds of Mother Europe, particularly when going East or South. You reveal nothing new or surprising to Old Uncle Victor who is widely versed in History.
“too- more 'Aussie' than 'Aussie' if you will!. God, you guys will not last, because you don't even get your basic australian (sic) history facts right...and most people will see this. Face it, you just want someone to hate because you are so, so weak. Classic bully behaviour. So, how does it feel to feel so small and angry compared to most people's rational sense of calm and peace?...go and weep.”
Also, many a Chinese sailor ‘discovered’ Australia well before Captain Cook but they did not last long enough to fully navigate, explore, map and colonise this great southern land. Asian Colonisation has occurred only recently once all the hard work has been done and an infrastructure established. Apparently though, the cannibalistic Aborigines greatly preferred the tasty Chinamen, grain fed on rice as they were and doubtlessly marinated in Soy, over the rather stringy and salty White Europeans. Perhaps there might be found one day, among the refuse that comprises an Aboriginal midden, a pile of Chinese bones? Perhaps also, some time in the future, as the ultimate result of the Dysgenic Cult of Multiculturalism, we European Aussies will be reduced to a ‘Soylent White’ protein source to nourish the Asiatic Hordes.
Finally, are you unaware of your own ‘irrational anger’ as you accuse those you know nothing about of being motivated purely by hate? Did you shake your puny fist at the heavens in impotent rage as you typed your doggerel? Assuming you are White, and young, perhaps you are not yet beyond salvage if only you were to study some real History and Science and readjust your moral compass to more noble bearings. Good luck.
Friday, January 27, 2012
Rob Messenger today released a Parliamentary Library research (see attached) which shows that the Queensland Labor government has the legislative power to authorise a criminal investigation against the person or persons promoting and organising the neo-Nazi “Hammered" music festival and race hate gathering in Queensland.
"Today I call on the LNP’s Shadow Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie to state what he would do if the LNP were the alternative government, and to also sign my petition (www.robmessenger.com/anti-neo-nazi-petition)," Mr Messenger said.
"Will Jarrod act like the current Attorney-General and do nothing regarding the Neo-Nazi festival organisers? Or would a future LNP government use the considerable powers authorised to our state’s first law officer under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld)?
"The library study is an embarrassment for the current Labor Government and Attorney-General, Paul Lucas, who said recently that he didn't have any power to intervene or stop the festival. Does the Shadow Attorney-General agree with him?," he said.
The research brief clearly points out that in relation to proponents of race-hate, which would include Neo-Nazis: “ in some States, including Queensland, the legislation allows for the offence of serious vilification to be defined as a criminal offence, if consent is obtained from the Attorney-General to proceed."
Mr Messenger said in other words, the Attorney-General does have the power to act.
"If Paul Lucas gave written consent to Queensland Police, they could at the very least, begin a criminal investigation into the people responsible for the Hammered festival website:( http://whitelawtowers.blogspot.com/2012/01/hammered-music-festival-australia-2012.html )," Mr Messenger said.
"This website is likely to contain material which qualifies as a 'public act' and have links to material which 'knowingly or recklessly incites hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the grounds of their race, religion, sexuality or gender identity of the person or members of the group'.
“If this was the case, then the person or persons responsible for the website may have committed a crime under section 131A of our Anti-Discrimination Act (see attached) and should feel the full force of our law.”
Hmmm! We seem to recall that in March 2006, three months after the Cronulla Uprising of 11th December 2005, Milton Orkopoulos the then NSW Aboriginal Affairs Minister and staunch member of the Socialist Left faction of the Labor Party, was similarly demanding the harshest possible treatment for White Nationalists involved in or even merely supportive of the protests. While attending, as the keynote speaker, a Feminist organised rally purporting to be “reclaiming the streets” for the “visitors” (presumably only Non-Whites) he went on the public record with his shrill calls for “the full weight of the law” to come crashing down on these “criminal rednecks”. Sound familiar?
The ABC reported it thusly in their sanitised version:
Sydney women rally for racial harmony
26th March 2006
Women from around Sydney have converged on the beachside suburb of Cronulla in an attempt to foster ethnic harmony. The gathering, which has been organised by the New South Wales Government, comes three months after race riots made the suburb a no-go zone. Those attending hope it will help replace images of violence in Cronulla with images of racial harmony.
"This is a chance for Cronulla to show that they, like every other community, want to live in peace and harmony, and respect for each other's backgrounds," Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Milton Orkopoulos said. Speakers have told the crowd of the need for racial tolerance and unity. The Minister for Women, Sandra Nori, says women often have to take the initiative in promoting harmony.
"Does violence come on the Y chromosome? Is civilisation only skin deep?" she said.
"I hope that's not the case but if it is, what that says to us as women is that we have to redouble our efforts because it means then that civilised society, harmonious society is something that we have to create."
The rally has been followed by a march through the shopping strip of the suburb. The Government says community liaison officers are now working in Cronulla to manage potential conflicts and interact with people who gather in public spaces.
A mere six months later he was in the news for a very different reason. On 7th November 2006 he was arrested and charged with child prostitution, sexual assault and supplying illegal drugs. In May 2008 he was sentenced to 13 years jail. One can only speculate on the ‘revelations’ that perhaps might surface in the coming weeks or months about Mr. Messenger. There is, after all, now a clear precedent for this type of occurrence.
“This government is keen to prosecute farmers and fishers who cut down the wrong tree or drop a line one metre inside a green zone - why won’t they spend money to try and stop neo-Nazis from spreading their poison?,” Mr Messenger said.
And of course Mr Messenger’s humble thread of ‘concern’ recently added to the already rich tapestry of the Anti-White narrative is not ‘poison’ at all now, is it? Stridently vilifying and summarily condemning people who he knows nothing whatsoever about, and certainly, going on the evidence of his incoherent ramblings, understands nothing of their ideology, with not merely pejorative terminology but outright shrill hysteria he is guilty of criminally culpable behaviour. If anyone at all is guilty of irrationally promoting contempt, hatred and, potentially, actual physical violence it is Messenger himself. He is a dangerous peanut. He should be gaoled for his crimes.
Thursday, January 26, 2012
Strange days have tracked us down”
Just when you thought it was safe to venture forth from the P.C. proofed bunker and assess the current situation with a bit of the old reconnaissance, along comes the rather peculiar creature known as Rob Messenger. Is there perhaps some sinister portent in his moniker, the messenger of Doom perhaps? The sheer enthusiasm with which he has latched onto this whole ‘Hammered’ affair, like a bull terrier ripping into an old tennis shoe is, at one level, quite surreal and, at another, a cogent example of the inherent absurdity of Liberal Democratic thinking.
Your Old Uncle Victor swears that even when he was a young lad equipped with the vivid imagination of youth he could not have made up such a nightmarish scenario. As a teenager he was wont to draw Daliesque pictures, this being the psychedelic Seventies and Science Fiction and Surrealism being in vogue, but the sheer grim grotesquery of the current status quo lies in realms well beyond the pale of such creative invention. To coin a popular phrase, you could not make this shit up.
It is truly chilling to consider that this once mighty nation carved out and built by the heroic European pioneers of yore, is now not only reduced to a virtual dumping ground for the wretched and festering refuse of the Third World but that many of the descendents of those brave pioneers are fully complicit in the very process of Racial/Cultural suicide that is facilitating the destruction of what their ancestors built. This ‘Messenger’ is only one of a million traitorous despoilers squirming in the maggot bucket of decadence, hedonism and materialism.
Quite bizarrely, in your Old Uncle Victor’s view, the so-called ‘world-renowned neurosurgeon’ Dr Charlie Teo was selected to present the 2012 Australia Day address for NSW. He arrogantly presumes to lecture White Australians on how not only they should behave but how they should think. After admitting, early on in the speech, that he fled to America to pursue his medical career, very ‘patriotic’ of him, and praising the vile despot Bill Clinton, he launches into a thinly veiled critique of real and fundamental Australian cultural values and then concentrates on lauding the stereotypical ‘soft’ characteristics of Aussies that have made them so easy to con and trick over the years. Of COURSE aliens like him just LOVE these weaknesses that they can so easily exploit. It is so reminiscent of the Jews lecturing Christians on how to be ‘Christian’ on the now very rare occasion when a White Christian asserts themself or interprets their own scriptures accurately and for their own interests, a shocking thing denied to all White people and vehemently condemned but enthusiastically encouraged for all others. Just as the Jew will say “That is very Un-Christian” the Asian will now say “That’s Un-Australian” as if he possessed any authority to make such an insolent observation.
The Asian says: “I am proud of the many jobs I had before neurosurgery, milk-run boy, bowser boy, gardener, apprentice mechanic, barman, bouncer, electrician’s assistant. It was in fact during these times that I was exposed to and fell in love with the quintessential Aussie. In those days, my view of an Aussie was someone who was hard working, unaffected, genuine, affable, relaxed, egalitarian, irreverent and charitable. I still believe most Aussies share these appealing qualities, although I am saddened by the increasing incidents of rage in our society. Once there was only road rage but now it seems to have spread into the workplace, the malls and even the last bastion of the laid-back, free spirited Aussie, the surf!”
Now, gentle reader, let those words sink in. Think carefully about what they mean. Yet again, we have an alien creature, generously granted the gift of opportunity in this great nation built by White Folk, and doubtlessly displacing equally qualified Whites, via affirmative action style initiatives from reaching their full potential, preaching to us that we must more firmly adhere to HIS concept of what constitutes a ‘real and proper Australian’. Is this not totally galling and insulting? The hide of this thing! The reference to ‘rage’ is also interesting because blind Freddie could see that this ‘rage’ is largely born from the unresolved anxiety, depression and frustration of White Aussies who feel utterly disenfranchised, dispossessed and vilified in the Nation State their forefathers created and see every possible benefit and opportunity enriching the interlopers and invaders at the expense of themselves, their families and their loved ones. The sick and twisted criminal cult of Multiculturalism does NOT ‘enrich’ our society, rather it enriches the parasitic carpetbagger class of ruthless opportunists posing as ‘quality immigrants’.
The fact that Teo was born in Australia counts for absolutely nothing, nil, zero, zilch, a random event, a purely obstetric accident. The geographic location of one’s ejection from the uterine canal has no bearing whatsoever upon what NATION you belong to. National Identity, your Nationality cannot be found in the coordinates of a Nav Com unit. Longitude, Latitude and Altitude are irrelevant. Your RACE is your NATION. It is indelibly etched on your Genetic Matrix. You could put a Chinaman on Mars and he’d still be a Chinaman, just as a White Man could be sent to orbit the twin star system of Alpha Centauri and still be a White Man. As Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull penned: “Everyone is from somewhere even if you’ve never been there” Also, as the late, great Sir Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, once opined on the occasion of his being accused of being Irish because he was born in Ireland, “Because a Man is born in a stable does not make him a horse”
Every one of those qualities the Asian mentions above is beneficial to OTHER peoples. Every one of those qualities is passive and giving and puts the Aussie at a distinct disadvantage when interacting with alien cultures. It is amazing to this writer that he omitted ‘gullible’, ‘naïve’ and ‘trusting’ because there is ample evidence that these qualities/weaknesses have contributed greatly to our downfall. You might also notice the conspicuous absence of POSITIVE qualities such as Racial Identity, National Pride, Civic Duty, (Australians are great volunteers and community minded)
None of those qualities favoured by the Chinaman are the tools that were utilised to carve a Nation State from the wretched wilderness of this antipodean island continent. Rather the assets carried in the genes of the White European heroes who made Australia were qualities such as Bravery, Creativity, Determination, Genius, Honesty, Industry and Stoicism.
In the final episode of the recently screened British Television documentary series ‘Greatest Cities Of The World’ that is set in Hong Kong, the presenter, Griff Rhys Jones, interviews a White European resident who was born in Shanghai and has lived his entire life in Hong Kong. Despite coming from a multigenerational White ‘Chinese’ family he tells Jones he knows he does not really belong here and will always be an outsider. He appears quite content with this concise, though seemingly harsh, self assessment of his status as one of the five percent or so ‘Gwailos’ (‘Foreign Devils’ or ‘Ghost Men’) who are permanent residents in the island city and harbours no resentment. The White Hong Konger clearly has pretensions to DEMANDING acceptance as a native so why do the Yellow ‘Australians’ persist? Where do they get this arrogant attitude from?
Wednesday, January 25, 2012
The corporate media have been given their orders to throw the focus back on to Iran.
Here is a recap of what they are trying to make you forget.
4. Iran's formal notification to the IAEA of the planned construction of the backup fuel-rod facility underscores that Iran is playing by the rules of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which Iran has signed.
5. Iran allows IAEA inspections of all its facilities.
6. Contrary to face-saving claims, it appears that the US and Israel were both caught off guard by Iran's announcement of a planned underground (to avoid being bombed) enrichment facility. The reasoning is simple. Had the US or Israel announced the existence of he new facility before Iran's notified the IAEA, it would have put Iran on the defensive. As it is now, the US and Israel seem to be playing catch up, casting doubt on the veracity of Israel's claims to "know" that Iran is a nuclear threat.
8. In 1986, Mordachai Vanunu blew the whistle and provided photographs showing Israel's clandestine nuclear weapons factory underneath the reactor at Dimona.
9. Israel made the same accusations against Iraq that it is making against Iran, leading up to Israel's bombing of the power station at Osirik. Following the invasion of 2003, international experts examined the ruins of the power station at Osirik and found no evidence of a clandestine weapons factory in the rubble.
10. The United Nations has just released the Goldstone Report, a scathing report which accuses Israel of 37 specific war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza earlier this year. Israel has denounced the report as "Anti-Semitic (even though Judge Goldstone is himself Jewish), and the United States will block the report from being referred to the War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague, thereby making the US Government an accessory after-the-fact.
11. Recently revealed documents prove not only that Israel has nuclear weapos, but actually tried to sell some to Apartheid South Africa. Who else Israel approached to sell nuclear weapons remains an unasked question.
13. Declassified documents from the former South African regime prove not only that Israel has had nuclear weapons for decades, but has tried to sell them to other countries!
We all need to be Joe Wilson right now. We need to stand up and scream, "LIAR!" at every politician and every talking media moron that is pushing this war in Iran. And we need to keep dong it until they get the message that we will not be deceived any more.
Israel wants to send your kids off to die in Iran, and YOU are the only one that can stop them.
Please forward this comment to your social networks.
Monday, January 23, 2012
And this years event is also celebrating the 20th Anniversary of the Southern Cross Hammerskins in Australia! A worthwhile celebration and surely not one to be missed!!
We have secured bands for the event and are working on adding more to the bill shortly, and we have this year decided to arrange day events for all, fun stuff like strongman comp, team tug of war and boxing and MMA bouts... fun stuff!!!
For further information regarding the event, please email firstname.lastname@example.org or email@example.com
Member for Burnett Rob Messenger has officially and proudly launched a YouTube video clip regarding his position on a Carbon Tax (produced by the Australian Tea Party).
What a guy? So what type of people make up the Australian Tea Party?
Above, Australian Tea "Party legend Cr. Hajnal Black" . Such a kosher name don't you think? Racism every where. Nazis all over the place.
TEA Party legend Cr. Hajnal Black..Not content with defeating and chasing away the slimy BDS Greens/Nazi demonstrators outside of Max Brenners, http://austeaparty.com.au/web/?p=4800 …. Hajnal has decided to confront the issue head on at the Logan Council. This first humiliating defeat of the extreme left at one of their protests was a catalyst to further resistance and opposition to their previously unopposed or only weakly or politely opposed campaign.
But wait, there is more. You just cant get any closer to the tribe than this.
THE Public Trustee may trace more than $1.37 million which Logan City councillor Hajnal Black yesterday was found to have moved from a joint account with a dementia patient into her sole control.
Supreme Court Justice David Boddice found Ms Black should have held the money from the sale of a property at Park Ridge, on Brisbane's southern outskirts, in trust for the man, who can not be named under Queensland law.
However, the Public Trustee failed in a second claim to get a summary judgment dismissing Ms Black's counterclaim for a declaration she was gifted a property at Greenbank. The Greenbank matter is likely to go to trial in February.
In his written judgment, Justice David Boddice noted the man, 69, had been diagnosed with dementia and was now a resident receiving full-time care at an aged-care facility.
Justice Boddice found the Public Trustee had established Ms Black had no real prospect of succeeding in her defence and the funds in question now had been transferred from the joint account.
ustice Boddice said Ms Black was a close friend of the man and they had known each other for at least 10 years when he mentored her in her legal studies, and assisted in her political career.
He detailed how on April 28, 2009, the man executed an enduring power of attorney to Ms Black.
It was alleged on July 21, 2009, Ms Black went with the man, who was suffering from a confused state, to the Logan Hospital.
Ms Black allegedly later took him to Garden City Shopping Centre where the man executed a draft contract of sale provided by Ms Black to sell the Park Ridge property for $2,250,000.
On October 28, 2009, Ms Black, as the man's attorney, executed a transfer of the Park Ridge property to the purchaser on behalf of the man because of "her belief or concern that he lacked the capacity to do so".
The sum of $2,154,404 was deposited it into a joint account in the names of the man and Ms Black and she withdrew $1.37 million over six months for her own personal benefit.
Ms Black claimed the man was alert and orientated when admitted to hospital in July 2009 and he asked her to arrange for the contract for the sale of the Park Ridge property to be provided to him outside of the hospital.
Ms Black denied she took any unfair advantage of her position to obtain the benefit and tweeted yesterday afternoon that she would appeal the Supreme Court decision "on a number of points of law".
I think we all get the picture?
A series of CIA memos describes how Israeli Mossad agents posed as American spies to recruit members of the terrorist organization Jundallah to fight their covert war against Iran.
The memos, as described by the sources, one of whom has read them and another who is intimately familiar with the case, investigated and debunked reports from 2007 and 2008 accusing the CIA, at the direction of the White House, of covertly supporting Jundallah -- a Pakistan-based Sunni extremist organization. Jundallah, according to the U.S. government and published reports, is responsible for assassinating Iranian government officials and killing Iranian women and children.
But while the memos show that the United States had barred even the most incidental contact with Jundallah, according to both intelligence officers, the same was not true for Israel's Mossad. The memos also detail CIA field reports saying that Israel's recruiting activities occurred under the nose of U.S. intelligence officers, most notably in London, the capital of one of Israel's ostensible allies, where Mossad officers posing as CIA operatives met with Jundallah officials.
The officials did not know whether the Israeli program to recruit and use Jundallah is ongoing. Nevertheless, they were stunned by the brazenness of the Mossad's efforts.
"It's amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with," the intelligence officer said. "Their recruitment activities were nearly in the open. They apparently didn't give a damn what we thought."
Interviews with six currently serving or recently retired intelligence officers over the last 18 months have helped to fill in the blanks of the Israeli false-flag operation. In addition to the two currently serving U.S. intelligence officers, the existence of the Israeli false-flag operation was confirmed to me by four retired intelligence officers who have served in the CIA or have monitored Israeli intelligence operations from senior positions inside the U.S. government.
The CIA and the White House were both asked for comment on this story. By the time this story went to press, they had not responded. The Israeli intelligence services -- the Mossad -- were also contacted, in writing and by telephone, but failed to respond. As a policy, Israel does not confirm or deny its involvement in intelligence operations.
There is no denying that there is a covert, bloody, and ongoing campaign aimed at stopping Iran's nuclear program, though no evidence has emerged connecting recent acts of sabotage and killings inside Iran to Jundallah. Many reports have cited Israel as the architect of this covert campaign, which claimed its latest victim on Jan. 11 when a motorcyclist in Tehran slipped a magnetic explosive device under the car of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a young Iranian nuclear scientist. The explosion killed Roshan, making him the fourth scientist assassinated in the past two years. The United States adamantly denies it is behind these killings.
According to one retired CIA officer, information about the false-flag operation was reported up the U.S. intelligence chain of command. It reached CIA Director of Operations Stephen Kappes, his deputy Michael Sulick, and the head of the Counterintelligence Center. All three of these officials are now retired. The Counterintelligence Center, according to its website, is tasked with investigating "threats posed by foreign intelligence services."
The report then made its way to the White House, according to the currently serving U.S. intelligence officer. The officer said that Bush "went absolutely ballistic" when briefed on its contents.
"The report sparked White House concerns that Israel's program was putting Americans at risk," ( what about the rest of the world) the intelligence officer told me. "There's no question that the U.S. has cooperated with Israel in intelligence-gathering operations against the Iranians, but this was different. No matter what anyone thinks, we're not in the business of assassinating Iranian officials or killing Iranian civilians."
Israel's relationship with Jundallah continued to roil the Bush administration until the day it left office, this same intelligence officer noted. Israel's activities jeopardized the administration's fragile relationship with Pakistan, which was coming under intense pressure from Iran to crack down on Jundallah. It also undermined U.S. claims that it would never fight terror with terror, and invited attacks in kind on U.S. personnel.
"It's easy to understand why Bush was so angry," a former intelligence officer said. "After all, it's hard to engage with a foreign government if they're convinced you're killing their people. Once you start doing that, they feel they can do the same."
A senior administration official vowed to "take the gloves off" with Israel, according to a U.S. intelligence officer. But the United States did nothing -- a result that the officer attributed to "political and bureaucratic inertia."
"In the end," the officer noted, "it was just easier to do nothing than to, you know, rock the boat." Even so, at least for a short time, this same officer noted, the Mossad operation sparked a divisive debate among Bush's national security team, pitting those who wondered "just whose side these guys [in Israel] are on" against those who argued that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."
The debate over Jundallah was resolved only after Bush left office when, within his first weeks as president, Barack Obama drastically scaled back joint U.S.-Israel intelligence programs targeting Iran, according to multiple serving and retired officers.
The decision was controversial inside the CIA, where officials were forced to shut down "some key intelligence-gathering operations," a recently retired CIA officer confirmed. This action was followed in November 2010 by the State Department's addition of Jundallah to its list of foreign terrorist organizations -- a decision that one former CIA officer called "an absolute no-brainer."
Since Obama's initial order, U.S. intelligence services have received clearance to cooperate with Israel on a number of classified intelligence-gathering operations focused on Iran's nuclear program, according to a currently serving officer. These operations are highly technical in nature and do not involve covert actions targeting Iran's infrastructure or political or military leadership.
"We don't do bang and boom," a recently retired intelligence officer said. "And we don't do political assassinations."
Israel regularly proposes conducting covert operations targeting Iranians, but is just as regularly shut down, according to retired and current intelligence officers. "They come into the room and spread out their plans, and we just shake our heads," one highly placed intelligence source said, "and we say to them -- 'Don't even go there. The answer is no.'"
Unlike the Mujahedin-e Khalq, the controversial exiled Iranian terrorist group that seeks the overthrow of the Tehran regime and is supported by former leading U.S. policymakers, Jundallah is relatively unknown -- but just as violent. In May 2009, a Jundallah suicide bomber blew himself up inside a mosque in Zahedan, the capital of Iran's southeastern Sistan-Baluchistan province bordering Pakistan, during a Shiite religious festival. The bombing killed 25 Iranians and wounded scores of others.
The attack enraged Tehran, which traced the perpetrators to a cell operating in Pakistan. The Iranian government notified the Pakistanis of the Jundallah threat and urged them to break up the movement's bases along the Iranian-Pakistani border. The Pakistanis reacted sluggishly in the border areas, feeding Tehran's suspicions that Jundallah was protected by Pakistan's intelligence services.
The 2009 attack was just one in a long line of terrorist attacks attributed to the organization. In August 2007, Jundallah kidnapped 21 Iranian truck drivers. In December 2008, it captured and executed 16 Iranian border guards -- the gruesome killings were filmed, in a stark echo of the decapitation of American businessman Nick Berg in Iraq at the hands of al Qaeda's Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. In July 2010, Jundallah conducted a twin suicide bombing in Zahedan outside a mosque, killing dozens of people, including members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.
The State Department aggressively denies that the U.S. government had or has any ties to Jundallah. "We have repeatedly stated, and reiterate again that the United States has not provided support to Jundallah," a spokesman wrote in an email to the Wall Street Journal, following Jundallah's designation as a terrorist organization. "The United States does not sponsor any form of terrorism. We will continue to work with the international community to curtail support for terrorist organizations and prevent violence against innocent civilians. We have also encouraged other governments to take comparable actions against Jundallah."
A spate of stories in 2007 and 2008, including a report by ABC News and a New Yorker article, suggested that the United States was offering covert support to Jundallah. The issue has now returned to the spotlight with the string of assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and has outraged serving and retired intelligence officers who fear that Israeli operations are endangering American lives.
"This certainly isn't the first time this has happened, though it's the worst case I've heard of," former Centcom chief and retired Gen. Joe Hoar said of the Israeli operation upon being informed of it. "But while false-flag operations are hardly new, they're extremely dangerous. You're basically using your friendship with an ally for your own purposes. Israel is playing with fire. It gets us involved in their covert war, whether we want to be involved or not."
The Israeli operation left a number of recently retired CIA officers sputtering in frustration. "It's going to be pretty hard for the U.S. to distance itself from an Israeli attack on Iran with this kind of thing going on," one of them told me.
Jundallah head Abdolmalek Rigi was captured by Iran in February 2010. Although initial reports claimed that he was captured by the Iranians after taking a flight from Dubai to Kyrgyzstan, a retired intelligence officer with knowledge of the incident told me that Rigi was detained by Pakistani intelligence officers in Pakistan. The officer said that Rigi was turned over to the Iranians after the Pakistani government informed the United States that it planned to do so. The United States, this officer said, did not raise objections to the Pakistani decision.
Iran, meanwhile, has consistently claimed that Rigi was snatched from under the eyes of the CIA, which it alleges supported him. "It doesn't matter," the former intelligence officer said of Iran's charges. "It doesn't matter what they say. They know the truth."
Rigi was interrogated, tried, and convicted by the Iranians and hanged on June 20, 2010. Prior to his execution, Rigi claimed in an interview with Iranian media -- which has to be assumed was under duress -- that he had doubts about U.S. sponsorship of Jundallah. He recounted an alleged meeting with "NATO officials" in Morocco in 2007 that raised his suspicions. "When we thought about it we came to the conclusion that they are either Americans acting under NATO cover or Israelis," he said.
While many of the details of Israel's involvement with Jundallah are now known, many others still remain a mystery -- and are likely to remain so. The CIA memos of the incident have been "blue bordered," meaning that they were circulated to senior levels of the broader U.S. intelligence community as well as senior State Department officials.
What has become crystal clear, however, is the level of anger among senior intelligence officials about Israel's actions. "This was stupid and dangerous," the intelligence official who first told me about the operation said. "Israel is supposed to be working with us, not against us. If they want to shed blood, it would help a lot if it was their blood and not ours. You know, they're supposed to be a strategic asset. Well, guess what? There are a lot of people now, important people, who just don't think that's true."
Saturday, January 21, 2012
Friday, January 20, 2012
"Today B'nai B'rith is the largest Jewish organization in the world. In 1970 it had 500 000 male members spread over 1700 lodges in 43 countries and 210 000 female members in 600 lodges (Encyclopaedia Judaica). There are presently 70 established lodges in Europe. The only lodge in Austria is called Maimonides.
The organization works to secure the power of the Jews over humanity, as revealed by the Hungarian Jew Aron Monus in his book "Verschworung: das Reich von Nietzsche" (Vienna, 1995, p. 149). B'nai B'rith is an executive organ for L'Alliance Israelite Universelle. The official budget before 1970 was 13 million dollars. B'nai B'rith's secret service, the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), has been called the KGB of the extremist Jews.
Leiba Bronstein aka Leon Trotsky.
Mr Leiba Bronstein became a freemason in 1897 and later a high-ranking Illuminatus through his friend Alexander Parvus. He also maintained contacts with B'nai B'rith, a Jewish Masonic order, which had previously aided Jewish "revolutionaries" in Russia. A man named Jacob Schiff, chairman of the banking house Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and a minion of the Rothschilds, took care of the contacts between the "revolutionary movement in Russia" and B'nai B'rith. (Gerald B. Winrod, "Adam Weishaupt - A Human Devil", p. 47.)
Bronstein became a convinced internationalist who, by the agency of Parvus' care, learned that the Jewish people were their own collective Messiah and would reach dominion over all peoples through the mixing of the other races and elimination of national boundaries. An international republic was to be created, where the Jews would be the ruling element, since no others would be able to understand and control the masses.
Leiba Bronstein became a member of the French Masonic lodge Art et Travail, to which Lenin also belonged, but also joined B'nai B'rith, according to the political scientist Karl Steinhauser ("EG - Die Super-UdSSR von morgen" / "EU - the New Super-USSR", Vienna, 1992, p. 162).
Leon Trotsky became a member of the Jewish Masonic order B'nai B'rith in New York, in January 1917. (Yuri Begunov, "Secret Forces in the History of Russia", St. Petersburg, 1995, pp. 138-139.) He was already a member of the Misraim-Memphis freemasonry.
It was Trotsky who founded the Red Army. He used especially gruesome methods for this purpose, according to the Jewess Dora Shturman's book "The Dead Grasp after the Living" (London, 1982). Trotsky had young peasants taken from their farms by force and coerced them into new careers as red soldiers, giving orders to shoot all who resisted. With such criminal methods he formed the so-called voluntary Red Army which "fought with great honor against landowners and capitalists and won", as the Soviet history books said. Not a word was mentioned about the American instructors Trotsky called in to help train his soldiers.
Trotsky was without doubt the cruelest and most dangerous "revolutionary" in the world, who ordered literally millions of Russians to be shot. He took children as hostages and, if necessary, ordered them murdered. It was Trotsky who released criminals from the prisons and thereby also terrorized the people.
Leon Trotsky's great-grandson David Axelrod also followed in the terrorist tradition. He emigrated from the Soviet Union to Israel, where he was arrested in his 28th year on June 12, 1989 for having destroyed the property of Palestinians."
Thursday, January 19, 2012
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Anti Racism is a code word for Anti White
Sunday, January 15, 2012
Huh? A Leftist talking about ‘ambiguity’ and juvenile, inexperienced conclusions? That’s a little rich.
"So the world is still flat to u. (sic)"
Erm, no. So far as we can tell, going on the available Scientific evidence, it’s an oblate spheroid or, if you prefer, a rotationally symmetric ellipsoid.
"U (sic) are simply wrong."
"Scholars are responsible for your very existence through the genuine acquisition of knowledge through perseverance."
So, let’s get this straight, ‘scholars are responsible for our very existence’. Wow! And we’ve been thinking it was mum and dad! Pray tell us more. Then perhaps you might explain how sheep’s bladders can be employed to help prevent earthquakes…
"So u (sic) hate Einstein?"
Do we? We thought he was dead. We tend to reserve our ‘hate’ for living entities. We could not care less really except when he is lavished with an inordinately high degree of praise and his name is used synonymously with genius when he is well known to have plagiarised and stolen many of his ideas from predecessors and contemporaries. Let your fingers do the walking. Google it and read some facts on the subject.
"Well don't use computers, don't eat, and be careful or u might float away."
Einstein did not invent the Computer. Einstein did not invent food. Are we also to presume from that silly rant that Einstein ‘invented’ Gravity?
"And in truth, what u (sic) see as a worthwhile pursuit will NEVER be recorded in history, never known by any others."
Oh really? We believe you’ll find it already has been.
"The opposite shall, and indeed always has and always will."
What? Could you repeat that?
Yes indeed, love is a many splendored thing… apparently. There should be more of it.
"The same love some of u (sic) may show your children."
To paraphrase our old mate ‘Sting’… the ‘Nazis’ love their children too.
"If u believe u (sic) have found the right way try hosting your shindig at CHERBOURG."
Why? Please explain…
"If not shut up or get some balls. (Or preferably some semblance of truth.)"
"Cowardly attacking people of ethnicity is not ever going to ne (sic) supported in this country."
‘Cowardly’? How so? ‘Attacking’? How so? Are White people bereft of ‘ethnicity’? Why is it that you Leftoids think there are White people and then there are ‘Ethnic’ people? Do you not have even a basic, rudimentary understanding of the terminology you utilise?
"I guess over u (sic) will still be unintelligibly defensive, and insist that in your twenty plus years of existence u (sic) have a right to say u (sic) have more wisdom than the indigenous peoples of this land."
We are unaware of the existence of evidence of any particular ‘wisdom’ when it comes to ‘the indigenous peoples of this land’. Could you please elaborate and elucidate? As we have stated here before, Data is not Information, Information is not Knowledge, Knowledge is not Wisdom. However, one is still required by Nature itself to ascend through the existing hierarchies in an appropriate ‘learning curve’ and intellectually, culturally and philosophically ‘evolve’ to a stage of rather refined development before one can claim ‘Wisdom’. Cockroaches, for example, are extraordinarily resilient creatures and some believe they might be capable of surviving even a nuclear holocaust, but one can scarcely confer ‘Wisdom’ status upon them simply for being good survivors.
", 60,000 years vs 20+ hmmm."
It is quite amusing how the period of occupation of Australia by the Aborigines appears to get exponentially longer by the year. At this rate they will soon pre-date the Dinosaurs. One is also puzzled by what exactly they did, apart from hunt, forage and do a few rock paintings, for that great length of time. Just being around for a very long time is hardly a mighty achievement in itself when compared to the development of Human Civilisation.
"Realise you've lied to yourself,"
The precise opposite is the case. We relentlessly and ruthlessly seek the truth.
"and have the freedom you seek."
Doing that right now thanks.
"SEEK TO TREAT EVERYONE AS U (sic) WOULD YOUR OWN CHILDREN."
Not possible or desirable.
"IF NOT WHY NOT? U (sic) R (sic) INVENTING EXCUSES " Failure is an oppotunity (sic) to start again more intelligently. " Albert Einstein"
Yes, perhaps ‘next time’ we will avoid being so generous in our dispensation of egalitarianism and tolerance. We just get taken for granted and abused. Again though, quoting Einstein will get you nowhere with us. We are distinctly unimpressed.
Saturday, January 14, 2012
Great White Men…
Johann Sebastian Bach (21st March 1685, O.S. – 28th July 1750) German Composer and Multi-Instrumentalist
Ludwig Van Beethoven (17th December 1770 – 26th March 1827) German Composer and Pianist
Hieronymus Bosch (c. 1450 – 9th August 1516) Dutch Artist
Isambard Kingdom Brunel (9th April 1806 – 15th September 1859) Great British Civil Engineer
Charlemagne (c. 742 – 28th January 814) Frankish Hero who defended Europe against Islam
Christopher Columbus (31st October 1451 – 20th May 1506) Genoese Explorer and Navigator
Captain James Cook (7th November 1728 – 14th February 1779) Cartographer, Explorer, Navigator
Nicolaus Copernicus (19th February 1473 – 24th May 1543) Prussian born Renaissance Astronomer.
King Edward the First aka ‘Longshanks’ (17th June 1239 – 7th July 1307) White Hero who expelled Jews from England
Henry Ford (30th July 1863 – 7th April 1947) American Industrialist and White Patriot who resisted Jewish Supremacist Hegemony
Sir Francis Galton (16th February 1822 – 17th January 1911) Scientist, Geneticist, Inventor. Cousin of Charles Darwin
Adolf Hitler (20th April 1889 – 30th April 1945) Austrian Born Painter, Soldier, Politician and Leader of the German Third Reich
Andrew Jackson (15th March 1767 – 8th June 1845) Seventh President of the United States (1829–1837). Nicknamed ‘Old Hickory’.
Dr. Samuel Johnson (18th September 1709 – 13th December 1784) English Author, Lexicographer, Poet, Essayist, Moralist, Literary Critic, Biographer and Editor
King Leonidas I (died 9th August 480 BC at the Battle of Thermopylae resisting the Persian Mud Horde) Hero king of Sparta, the 17th of the Agiad line.
Charles Martel (23rd August 686 – 22nd October 741) Frankish Hero who defeated the Muslims at the Battle of Tours in 732
Sir Isaac Newton (25th December 1642 – 20th March 1727) Mathematician, Philosopher, Scientist
Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (15th October 1844 – 25th August 1900) German Philosopher, Poet and Composer
George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) (25th June 1903 – 21st January 1950) Journalist and Author
Edgar Allan Poe (19th January 1809 – 7th October 1849) American Author and Poet
Enoch Powell (16th June 1912 – 8th February 1998) British Statesman, Classical Scholar, Multi-Linguist, Poet, Soldier, Writer
George Lincoln Rockwell (March 9, 1918 – August 25, 1967) Founded the American Nazi Party. Served his nation from 1941 to 1960 as a Lieutenant Commander Pilot in the U.S. Navy, fighting in both WWII and Korea. William Shakespeare (26th April 1564 - 23rd April 1616) was England’s greatest Poet and Playright
Prince Vlad Țepeș (Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia) (1431–1476) White Hero who dedicated his life to the defence of the Balkans against the Ottoman Turks thereby resisting the Islamic invasion of Europe
Nikola Tesla (10th July 1856 – 7th January 1943) Serbian-American Mechanical and Electrical Engineer and Inventor
Mark Twain (Samuel Langhorne Clemens) (30th November 1835 – 21st April 1910) American Author and Humorist
Richard Wagner (22nd May 1813 –13th February 1883) Classical Composer, Conductor and Theatre Director
Francis Parker Yockey (18th September 1917 – 16th June 1960) ‘Third Positionist’ Political Writer
Alfred the Great (c. 849 – 899) King of the Anglo-Saxons.
Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (1714–1788) German composer, son of J. S. Bach
Joseph Banks (1743–1820) English Naturalist. Well known to Australians.
Johannes Brahms (1833–1897) German composer
Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher, Fürst von Wahlstatt (16th December 1742 – 12th September 1819) The Prussian Hussar General, the true hero of Waterloo and possibly the toughest cavalry commander ever who was still leading cavalry charges well into his Fifties! A giant among Men.
Pieter Bruegel The Elder (1528-1569) Dutch Painter
John Constable (1776-1837) English Painter
Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528) German painter
Georg Friedrich Händel (1685–1759), German composer, opera composer
John Herschel (1792–1871) mathematician and astronomer
William Hogarth (1697-1764) English Painter
Hans Holbein the Elder (c. 1465–1524), painter
Michael Faraday (1791–1867) English Scientist
Hans Holbein The Younger (1497-1543)
Tim Berners - Lee (born 1955) English computer scientist and inventor of the World Wide Web.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791), Austrian composer and musician
Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson, 1st Duke of Bronté, (29th September 1758 – 21st October 1805) Great British Naval Hero.
Carl Orff (1895–1982), German composer
Johann Pachelbel (1653–1706), German composer
Joseph Priestley (1733–1804), English Chemist
Leni Riefenstahl (1902–2003), German film director
Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640) Flemish Painter
Joseph Mallord William Turner (23rd April 1775 – 19th December 1851) English Painter
Field Marshal Sir Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington (1st May 1769 – 14th September 1852) Great British Military Commander.
Anti-Fascist Action Affinity : Brisbane
"Kill All The Whiteman by NOFX apparently offended/threatened a couple of you.."
Here is the offending post off the Face Book wall of the group who are organising demos (lol) against The Hammered Music Festival, a private invite only Festival. When will see the media or Rob Messenger have a go at these twats?
Anti racism is a code word for anti white.
The Fall Of Eddie Funde And A State Perjurer Reveals A Life On ‘Witness Protection’ As A Case Against Me Unravels.
Edited, January 13
Political trials usually have a habit at biting their organizers on the metaphoric arse. So it is unfolding with the political trial run against me over twenty years ago.
It is a matter of record that I was convicted in May 1991 of organizing on January 27 1989, a shotgun attack upon the home of Eddie Funde, then Representative to Australia of the African National Congress (ANC).
I have always denied any involvement in the affair and have authored an Internet book-legal-submission on the subject – Pardon Me: The Anatomy Of An Australian Political Trial at: www.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/pardonme/index.html
For years now, I have noted the scoffing of the professional ‘antifa’ (anti-fascists) at my assertion that the case against me was a political police conspiracy. These antifa, who often assert the existence of state conspiracies and political police dirty tricks ops when they are playing at being anti-system lefties, seem quite happy with the idea that the same thing just didn’t operate against me. They use my conviction as proof of my utter perfidy. The mind boggles why they question nothing. Is it too hard? Or doesn’t my story ‘fit’ with the line they want to run?
Other players can get dirty too. Certain persons who have called themselves ‘patriots’ - and even ‘nationalists’ – have also run with the state script. In loading me with a garbage crime, they seek to slither away as ‘clean-skins’, ready to enter the political mainstream as normals who eschew any notion of violence, and as they put it, leaving me and those like me - in our squalid gutter. Such charm and such moral courage do they show.
A couple of years ago, I was interviewed by a journalist from the Sydney Morning Herald. When I told the bloke that the political policeman who ran the Funde case against me (orchestrated it?), fell at the ‘New South Wales Royal Commission Into The Police Service’ way back in 1997, it was clear that he knew. Certainly, he hated the idea that an anti racist hero could fall. Yet, he plain baulked when I told him that this officer, Superintendent Neville Ireland, just didn’t go down, but was pushed by my information given to Commission investigators. The Royal Commission showed that Ireland was a rorter of the informant’s fund, a perjurer, and a ‘protector’ of a sexually perverted Justice of the Supreme Court. I reminded the journalist how Ireland would pick the old pervert up from railway police offices after he’d been caught ‘flashing’ in public toilets – and take him home with no charge. He could see that I regarded Ireland as typical of the political police. I could see hatred on the face of this intrepid journalist. After all, Ireland had passed into anti racist folklore as the man who ‘got Jim’. Sadly, some of our more informed anti racists (sic) know the truth and conceal it, ‘Jim got Neville’.
Now it gets better, a lot better.
I was in the dock at Sydney’s Central Local Court on December 4 1989, to hear Eddie Funde give evidence against me. Yes, he was home on January 27 1989. Yes, the house had been shot at and so forth. Yes, he headed the ANC in Australia. As he was leaving the court-room, I leaned out of the dock and said to him: “Mr. Funde, I had nothing to do with this attack upon you.” He nodded. He probably knew. The whole thing was bad theatre.
After the New World Order forces overturned the ‘white minority government’ in South Africa, Funde went on to become an important man in the ANC regime which took its place. He rose through the ranks of the South African Broadcasting Commission (SABC) to actually control it; he went on to become the Ambassador to Germany (2008 – 2010). After years of subtle attacks from anti corruption fighters in South Africa (Noseweek, July 2004), and after being implicated in the sheltering of a fraudster at the SABC who ran off with 2 million rand, Funde was accused in 2010 of a massive fraud – some 4 million rand misappropriated via contracts with private companies, courtesy of Sentech, the state owned signals controller in South Africa,. Funde was the central player in the fraud and received shares in a beneficiary company. The evidence seems compelling and Funde should end up in prison.
See the Mail And Guardian’s article:
Eddie Funde was, as I shall describe here in greater detail shortly, the darling of Australian liberal and leftist ‘anti-racists’ in the 1980’s and a lynchpin figure in the entire ‘anti racist movement’. When his house was shotgunned, he stepped up as a martyr of racist (sic) and fascist (sic) violence, the valiant fighter for a colour-blind South Africa – ad nauseum. I think the shotgun crime did him a favour. It was a funds-raising bonanza. If I had ever organized this nonsense attack upon Funde, it sure back-fired (pun intended).
We have come full circle. It can only leave the proverbial bad taste in the collective mouth of the anti racists, that it will ultimately become Funde’s turn to stand the dock, a sad representative of a regime mired in corruption and scandal (and I should add parenthetically, anti-white hatred).
I cannot say that I do not enjoy the schadenfreud. Essentially, the fall of Funde is indicative of the collapse of a myth. In the 1980’s, the ANC could do no wrong according to liberals and leftists. Its sullied status now – just makes my trial smell that little more odorous. The fall of Funde cannot reverse the verdict against me; but rather, it just takes the pseudo-moral blather out of the case.
That is important. As I write, I observe that the very history of the Funde shooting is being rewritten by the Slackbastard anarchist group via Wikipedia and other outlets and thanks to other anti racists with their toilet-wall Internet smearings and assorted public gossip-mongering. It is even said that I tried to assassinate the man! Assassinate? The prosecution case made no such claim. Yet, as time moves on and myths can be rewoven around the case – why not? And who would know?
It is the fall of Funde as a moral symbol (sic) that just brings the entire affair back to hard earth. To put it in the vernacular: Eddie Funde is revealed as a miserable grub, a parasite on his own people and party and a man unworthy of any attempt at statue-building. Bad luck for all the so-called anti racists / anti fascists and other state connected propagandists! Good luck for me and other comrades from those days of frame-up!
Witness Protection For State Perjurer
It should not be thought by the reader that I was convicted at my trial by any real evidence. Let’s be quite clear about that. There was certainly no confession. There was no scientific evidence. There was no civilian witness who could point the finger. All that the prosecution had was the evidence of two men who claimed to be my accomplices. They seriously contradicted themselves and they contradicted each other about key elements of the story line. The prosecution also had the stitch-the-case-together-evidence of the discredited Neville Ireland.I need not delay the reader by explaining why the guilty verdict issued forth; you can read all about that elsewhere.
Let’s go right to the current point: one of the main (‘accomplice’) witnesses was Jason Roderick Frost, now 44 yrs and by our report, not doing too well. Unlike his co-offender, Frost never wavered in the allegation that I had been involved in the crime even if he couldn’t get his story truly straight. For my part, I have often pondered over what his deal with Special Branch was and how it worked. What benefits did he receive for his evidence? I have exposed some of that in terms of the lenient sentencing on other offences and so forth, the sort of usual stuff, but the truth has the bizarre twist I would expect in any Australian political trial.
We have just learnt that Frost resides in New Zealand on Witness Protection. In 1997, Frost disappeared from view in Australia and appeared nowhere on any radar since until he was found recently living in New Zealand. It was an ‘accident’ that he was located. Nothing more on that will be said here, because the state’s agents observe whatever is said.
It is also reasonably clear from the disclosed circumstances that Frost is not finished with the world of police-work (if I can use such a phrase). It may be that he does some clandestine job for New Zealand’s police. IT probably involves the activities of so-called “youth gangs”. Certainly, the Australian authorities, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the NSW Police, assisted him greatly to remove himself to New Zealand – new passport, new identity, housing, employment. That requires ‘pay-off’ and Frost may have been providing it. Perhaps long hours in a dull factory job set up for him was not rewarding enough for a man who had the bare bones of particular political knowledge? Perhaps undercover work pays a little better?
I have no doubt that the Australian state’s security, police and prosecutions’ agencies would say that Frost was removed to New Zealand to be protected ‘against’ me, against the possibility that I might do him harm. I could say in reply that Frost had to be protected ‘from’ me. His co-offender had already said things to me that contradicted the state version of the Funde crime. That’s a fact. The state could not afford that Frost ever blab things which might contradict the trial script. If I ever communicated with Frost, what might he say? As he said in trial evidence about his story: “bits and pieces come back to me” and “it was drummed into me at court” when being sentenced and so on. The telltale signs of scripting were clear then and the state could take no chances. Indeed, when Frost disappeared from view in Australia in 1997, the NSW Special Branch had just been dissolved amidst the findings of corruption by the Royal Commission. His protector, Neville Ireland, a man who had even obligingly driven Frost to weekend detention in the years 1989- 1991, could no longer look out for him. Other action was necessary.
Of course, being on Witness Protection does not prove that Frost was generally untruthful at my trial, anymore than Funde’s corruption can establish he was not a crime victim in the past. I must say too that Ireland’s proven corruption and bad character, while it undermines a part of the prosecution case, does not demonstrate that the evidence of my supposed accomplices was necessarily - perjury. It just suggests he could have scripted them and did other things to make the charges stick.
However, in the matter before us, we must read Frost’s history in reverse, right back to the point in March or April 1989 (and how we know that time-frame is a story for another time) when Ireland determined that Frost may have been the shooter in the Funde crime
In May-June 1989, Ireland proceeded very carefully, having three one-on-one meetings with Frost at his home discussing, well – something, several weeks prior to Frost’s formal statement which incriminated me. They had a couple of more-formal discussions “after court” where, according to Frost in fact, he was threatened with an “attempted murder” prosecution and according to Ireland, no such thing was said.
Frost was treated lightly and given 18 months periodic detention for the Funde crime. Two other sentences of three months gaol for other offences, were later converted to bonds on appeal. Years later, Frost was placed in public housing and it seems he was given assistance to obtain employment. Did he receive any money? Time will tell on that one.
The New Zealand transfer operation somewhat demonstrates the importance to the state of my Funde conviction. I have said for years that these convictions were important parts of the state’s anti racist drive at the time. The verdicts cannot be surrendered under any circumstances.
The compliant and subservient attitude of Jason Frost to the Special Branch may properly have a basis in the field of psychology. I have read Frost’s psychological reports tendered at the time of his sentencing on the Funde crime. The transferring of allegiances from one group to another has difficulties, but is consistent with the ‘type’ under review. A reward, care and official concern for his well-being, are operative factors. The likely current role of Frost in undercover work would have nascent origins in his suborning by Special Branch as a state witness. The final pattern of rewards shows that reward was present at the start, that the relationship was extraordinary at the start, that Frost would say anything at the start to gain acceptance and ensure his survival.
If Eddie Funde is ultimately labeled in history as a grub, then Jason Frost takes the award for pathos.
The ‘Anti Racist’ Network And The Saleam Prosecution
I have long concluded that my prosecution for the Funde crime was part of a tangled web of activities related to the 1980’s traitor class war from above against the Australian people, a class-war designed to internationalize (then globalize) the Australian economy but with victory achieved in the name of liberal myths such as openness, a Third-World-uplifting free trade system and anti racism. Essentially, I believe there was a political economy element in the prosecution and it is just no wonder that I ‘got mugged’ by the political police.
The frame against me was a long time in gestation. At the time of the Eddie Funde crime, I was the Chairman of Australian National Action (ANA), or as it was simply called - National Action. The organisation had, according to Prime Minister Bob Hawke, caused Australia a reputation problem in Asia. It had damaged investment and trade. He denounced it twice: first on Perth radio in October 1988 and again in Federal Parliament in March 1989.
In other words, National Action was doing its job. It was standing up for Australian independence. However, the inter-linkages of state anti racism (read: anti Australianism, read: whatever undermines the Australian identity and independent status, economically, politically etc) saw it embrace an anti South African policy in tandem with its commitment to economic and demographic Asianization. It was a two front war. The anti South Africa line enabled it to assemble an army of community fighters so it could create a pseudo moral climate conducive to Asianization. Brilliant stuff.
Unbeknownst to National Action, in 1988 Hawke privately asked Funde whether Australia should proceed on sanctions against South Africa without the support of Margaret Thatcher’s government. Funde urged him to enact sanctions. Clearly, Funde was part of the Australian government’s network for foreign policy decision making. He was considered a veritable diplomatic-person. Anyone who struck at Funde was striking at the Australian state.
In November 1988, it was announced too that the Human Right Commission would host a ‘National Inquiry Into Racist Violence’ after the lobbying efforts of innumerable anti racists, many of whom claimed to be “victims” of National Action violence (sic). The Inquiry was an example of anti racist McCarthyism and ran throughout 1989 whilst the Funde prosecution was incubated. It created the requisite pseudo moral atmosphere for repressive action. I have no doubt the things were linked and I have found one or two such links.
Consider John Brink, an anti apartheid activist whose house was firebombed in Sydney in mid 1984. The National Inquiry Into Racist Violence ‘witnesses’ ascribed that crime to National Action. Brink was originally a South African who had been chairman of the Liberal Party Pretoria Branch and a friend of Albert Luthuli, who had burnt his ‘pass’ on 26 March 1960 when ‘staying in the home of the Brinks His case became a sensation. Soon after, Brink went to prison for 93 days, going on a hunger strike and sharing a cell with Joe Slovo, later head of the South African Communist Party. He was a big fish in anti racism.
Then, there was another émigré, Colin Tatz, who had claimed to be a victim of anti-Semitism in 1940’s Johannesburg. After ‘watching friend after friend after friend go down like ten pin bowling pins on all sorts of extraordinary charges of treason’ (as he explained it) he left for Australia in 1961. In Canberra, Tatz became researcher for a short-lived Committee for Human Rights in South Africa. He sought to convince cabinet ministers that many émigrés deemed ‘communists’ under the South African 1951 Suppression of Communism Act were not communists, and a few such people were later granted entry. In 1984, his house in Sydney was shotgunned. This crime too was ascribed to National Action. Tatz was also a big fish in anti racism.
Essentially, it was a case of blame it on the Kellys. National Action was accused by various anti racists and anti fascists of the Brink and Tatz offences – among others. Eventually in 1989, it became payback time, with powerful forces pushing for a successful prosecution of those involved in the Funde crime. The idea that this crime could have been the work of an odd fellow like Jason Frost, just a bloke out on a lark, would never do. The Funde shooting had to be a dark racist plot and dark racists had to be found.
Of course, National Action did know that Funde had arrived in Australia with government support. He was assisted to arrive in Australia by high profile anti racists who were later very active against National Action in Adelaide.
I rely here (and as I have above) upon the informative article by an anti-nationalist, Peter Limb: The anti-apartheid movements in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. I will freely quote from it, paraphrase and adapt its information.
By 1981, Jim Gale, Irene Gale and others succeeded in transforming Campaign Against Racial Exploitation (CARE) into a pro-ANC body and the national office shifted to Adelaide. CARE emerged as the effective national centre, with the United Nations’ Special Committee on South Africa’s blessing, representing Australia internationally and active in the Asia–Pacific region on anti apartheid matters, hosting also major conferences on Namibia in 1985 and 1989. Its leaders increased pressure on government for an ANC office. Gale, who knew Foreign Minister Hayden through the ALP, bombarded him with pleas for assistance. Canberra was suspicious about linking openly with supposed liberation movements, but lobbying and visits by key ANC leaders, notably Mavis Nhlapo and Andrew Molotsane, swung the case. Sonwabo Edwin (Eddie) Funde arrived in Perth on 5 December 1983 as the ANC’s Chief Representative in Australasia and the Pacific and he opened a mission in Sydney in January 1984. He used the offices of Community Aid Abroad for a while and later took offices at Trades Hall; as early as that year, Funde was able to have some input into draft ALP national policy on South Africa.
Funde worked on a wide front and was successful in building broad networks of support. In his first week in Australia, he met liberal South African emigres and befriended NSW state parliamentarian Maurice Keane. On 10 December the African Liberation Trust Fund, aimed at financially aiding the office, was launched by prominent ALP, church, and union leaders Don Dunstan, Richard Wooton, and Cliff Dolan. By his second week, Funde had visited Melbourne and met ACTU and church leaders, federal and state ALP parliamentarians, and NGOs. Wide media publicity was secured. ANC Support groups came into being in Sydney and Melbourne. The following week Funde met Foreign Affairs officials, who reiterated conditions of acceptance for the opening of the ANC office: the ANC was ‘not granted a special privileged status’, and government would ‘not provide financial assistance’. Funde had to rely on donations from supporters..
Again, we can see the high-powered individuals rallying around Funde. I say again: anyone who struck at Funde was striking at the Australian state.
Eventually, later in the 1980’s, the Australian ANC Support Committee (ANCSC) based in Sydney brought together figures from church, union, women’s, media, business, and legal sectors as well as the ALP and Democrats. Former ACTU leader Cliff Dolan served as president, Helen McCue as secretary. McCue was central, but she was invisible to National Action.
McCue, who began as a United Nations worker oversaw the foundation of Australian People for Health, Education and Development Abroad (now Union Aid Abroad APHEDA) by the Australian Council of Trade Unions in 1984 and was able to channel funds from unions and the Australian government to agriculture, health, and vocational training projects in many countries in Africa. In other words, the support for ANC terrorism and anti white racism was channeled via non government structures (but with covert support)
Soon after, APHEDA meetings were held with Eddie Funde about how to get assistance for anti South African elements, in particular those refugees in Zambia and Tanzania associated with the so-called liberation movements. APHEDA focussed initially on refugees and liberation movements.
In 1988, after the discussions with Eddie Funde McCue made her first trip to Lusaka where she met with the exiled ANC leadership, in particular President Oliver Tambo and Treasurer-General Thomas Nkobi. With Nkobi, she mapped out a strategy for a program of support to the ANC.
I note that in September 1989, Tambo visited Australia and conferred in detail with Foreign Minister Gareth Evans. Was the Funde prosecution discussed between Evans and Tambo? Undoubtedly, it rated a line or two. The Australian state would prove its credentials by prosecuting a ‘racist leader’ (sic) for anti ANC violence. Yes, of course it was discussed. I was charged with the Funde crime two weeks later
In March 1990 prior to going to South Africa, McCue suggested to Nkobi that the Australian Government, and in particular Foreign Minister Gareth Evans, would be keen to make a significant gesture of support to the just-released-from-prison Nelson Mandela at the forthcoming Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting. McCue recommended the ANC ask for $20m of development assistance to support the so-called transition to democracy. Eddie Funde, Mohammad Tickly, Nkobi and McCue sat down in Lusaka and framed a development request. The Australian Government agreed to this proposal and Gareth Evans was able to make this announcement to Mandela when he first met him.
That took place in October 1990. I was due to face trial then, but the prosecution sought an adjournment lest I fail to get a fair trial, given Mandela’s presence in Australia. Such generosity. But it shows the close linkage of my trial and foreign policy considerations.
The Funde case was part of the rich tapestry of anti racist effort at the time, one organized aspect of it, something which highlighted their strategy. By 1989, there was a plethora of groups, all interwoven and at their peaks, integrated into state action. The nationalist magazine, Audacity, identified a number of anti racist organisations in the years around 1984-5, all of which were linked through to politicians and state players and broad community networks. National Action was alone in discussing anti racism as a community movement which required an activist response.
It has been said by one academic critic that the National Action made a major mistake in targeting the anti-apartheid movement; he said it was tangential to the basic nationalist message of the group and the ensuing struggle sidelined it. I disagree with that assessment. In point of fact, much of Australia’s anti-racism was expressed through the prism of the anti-apartheid movement. While National Action waged many campaigns in the community (chiefly around immigration, refugees and economic nationalist questions) it would invariably be the same gamers at anti apartheid who would organize against the group. In any case, National Action waged struggle against the anti apartheid movement.
Another academic said that National Action had a “considerable intelligence facility”. That was true. It collected considerable material on anti racists and similar dross and certainly identified many involved in the anti South Africa campaign. However, it is also true that it missed totally the shadowy and complex interactions between the anti racist movements and actual highly placed state players. It failed to identify the leaders of the movement at the highest levels and detail the actual support being rendered to the ANC by the state. In that regard, National Action failed to adequately understand the array of forces levied against it in 1988 – 1989, a factor which played a role in the defeat of the group before it could develop a mass influence.
The material advanced here tends to show that the Funde crime existed in a significant context. This too suggests that the verdicts against me will not be surrendered without legal bloodshed.
Political trials must preserve their rectitude. They are showy things, where not only are convictions produced to imprison alleged villains, but great moral lessons supposedly demonstrated in action. In my case, the state wanted to show its cleverness and moral position to the public; it had solved a “terrorist” offence organized by a group of thugs who had terrorized Sydney for years, a crime aimed at an anti racist icon. To those of us in the movement of national resistance, we were supposed to become cowed. Our leaders were to be imprisoned (and hopefully broken) and the secret methods of the political police were there in enough relief to teach us how useless were our efforts and how shallow the commitment of some of our troops. The problem, for the organizers of political trials is not simply that the evidence must never come to be challenged, but that the moral quality of the prosecution’s actors never be exposed; they must never be seen as feet-of-clay, crooks, liars and manipulators. One by one, the witness-actors and the organizers of the trial, have fallen.
My task is to push the edifice right over. In New South Wales in the last thirty odd years, there have been a number of political trials – the Ananda Marga Three, the Croatian Six, the Hilton Bomb Trial and my trial. All were flawed exercises involving (in part) the same core actors in the Special Branch apparatus and in the police. All feature odd central witnesses who were paid off in some way or other to testify. The first three have been shattered in fact or in the court of public opinion. It is now my turn.
The troika in my case, Ireland, Funde and Frost, have lost their personal credibility. In the political trial scenario, what they lose, I gain.
I am resolved to move the affair on and break the convictions, not simply in my personal interest, but in the interest of the nationalist movement. For those who still insist I am the guilty one, I look forward at their ranting responses to this article.