Monday, January 21, 2013

Seeing is believing...?

Almost nothing you think you ‘know’ which has been broadcast through the Controlled Mass Media is true, at least in its purest form, as in factual and verifiable. Everything has been edited, expurgated, filtered, twisted, spun, enhanced, augmented and polished up until it is in a form that is friendly and helpful to the overall Global, Politically Correct agenda. Raw, unprocessed information must never be permitted to reach the great unwashed, their minds couldn’t take it. In the view of the Controllers it would be like a ‘Hot Shot’ of pure Heroin given to an addict accustomed only to highly adulterated ‘cut’ product. No, the package must be cleverly wrought to elicit the correct response in a most predictable way. This is what underwrites the process of true control. Anything less is merely reactive, remedial punishment that must be applied once the Sheeple have already caught a glimpse of what might actually be going on and this is draining on The System’s resources.       
Perception is everything, as any political propagandist and indeed any advertising executive understands, and today we live in a ‘Consensus Reality’ conceived, constructed and maintained largely by the Controlled Media and their ‘handlers’ in the Global Military Industrial Complex and International Finance. The Plain Truth carries very little currency today. Simply look to the Legal System for example which has nothing whatsoever to do with that quaint, old fashioned concept of Justice. We hear almost every day of cases that appear on the surface to be ‘open and shut’ dead certainties only to hear that the Magistrate, Judge, Tribunal, Panel or other investigating authority have ruled the vast bulk of evidence ‘inadmissible’ for some spurious reason or another which inevitably favours the villains over the victims. Infamously, for example, so-called ‘Defamation’ Law determined the Truth to be ‘no defence’! This apparently was originally introduced in Australia by sleazy politicians seeking immunity from criticism and exposure but has since been changed to the theoretically more reasonable onus on the ‘offender’ to prove his allegations ‘substantially true’. However, one would not want to be an ordinary person in court facing a wealthy, well represented and well-connected accuser.
Our perception of what constitutes a ‘War Crime’ and a ‘War Criminal’ is as phony and plastic as the scenarios routinely presented to us via the TelAvision screen. In the endless ‘War on Terror’ Black-Ops are being executed on a daily basis. How do we know? Easy, by observing their effects just as one cannot see the wind but can see the grass and trees moving due to its force. Similarly, the generally more domestic Psy-Ops, such as False Flag Terrorism are merely tools to gain clearly sought objectives. The recent spate of ‘Lone Gunman’ shooting sprees are typical of these engineered or ‘permitted’ events. Shock and disbelief are perfectly understandable emotional responses to such atrocities and perhaps we should take our initial reactions a bit more seriously and seriously question why we should so obediently believe without resistance.   
Without going into the specifics of the individual events here we can say that none of these stand up to rigorous and objective forensic scrutiny. Certainly, the essential framework of these events appears to have some validity, there are simply too many witnesses and an army of officials involved to ensure a watertight conspiracy on the sheer scale of these operations…but…there are also way too many anomalies, contradictions, ‘coincidences’, huge gaps in evidence, very peculiar behavior of ‘survivours, etc for them to have occurred exactly ‘as writ’ in the script.
At the very least, as with the 911debacle, we suspect these events to have been accorded ‘Watch and Act’ status by the security agencies once they had been alerted to their planning, so they might be bump steered via covert ‘assistance’ so as to gain benefit for The State from the tragedies. For The System it truly is an ill wind that blows no good. Everything, however negative, can be turned into an asset.
Now, back to 'War Crimes'...          
“Every ten years or so, the United States needs to pick up some small crappy little country and throw it against the wall, just to show the world we mean business,” - Jewish neoconservative Michael Ledeen, in a speech given in the early 1990s.
Since that time, it’s not only “every 10 years or so” that the American Superbully picks up some “crappy little country” and throws it against the wall, it now happens all the time: with drone warfare, targeted assassinations, legalized torture, and threats and intimidation against ANY country the Jews don’t like.
The Neoconservative War Criminals In Our Midst
By Paul Craig Roberts
1st August 2012
The State Department has an office that hunts German war criminals. Bureaucracies being what they are, the office will exist into next century when any surviving German prison guards will be 200 years old. From time to time the State Department claims to have found a lowly German soldier who was assigned as a prison camp guard. The ancient personage, who had lived in the US for the past 50 or 60 years without doing harm to anyone, is then merciless persecuted, usually on the basis of hearsay. I have never understood what the State Department thinks the alleged prison guard was supposed to have done–freed the prisoners, resign his position?–when Prussian aristocrats, high-ranking German Army generals and Field Marshall and national hero Erwin Rommel were murdered for trying to overthrow Hitler.
What the State Department needs is an office that rounds up American war criminals. They are in abundance and not hard to find. Indeed, recently 56 of them made themselves public by signing a letter to President Obama demanding that he send in the US Army to complete the destruction of Syria and its people that Washington has begun.
At the Nuremberg Trials of the defeated Germans after World War II, the US government established the principle that naked aggression–the American way in Afghanistan, Iraq, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, and Yemen–is a war crime. Therefore, there is a very strong precedent for the State Department to round up those neoconservatives who are fomenting more war crimes.
But don’t expect it to happen. Today, war criminals run the State Department and the entire US Government. They are elected to the presidency, the House, and the Senate, and appointed to the federal courts as judges. American soldiers, such as Bradley Manning, who behave as the State Department expects German soldiers to have behaved, are not honored, but are thrown into dungeons and tortured while a court martial case is concocted against them.
Hypocrisy is Washington’s hallmark, and all but the most delusional are now accustomed to their rulers speaking one way and behaving in the opposite. It is now part of the American character to regard ourselves as members of the “virtuous nation,” “the indispensable people,” while our rulers commit war crimes around the globe.
Whereas we have all been made complicit in war crimes by “our” government, it still behooves us to know who are the active war criminals in our midst who have burdened us with our war criminal reputation.
You can learn the identity of many of those who are driving the world into World War Three, while their policies result in the murder of large numbers of Arabs and Muslims in Syria, Afghanistan, Libya, Somalia, Pakistan, Yemen, Iraq, and Lebanon, by perusing the signatures to the contrived letter to Obama from the neo-conservatives calling on Obama to invade Syria in order to “rescue” the Syrian people from their government.
According to the letter signed by 56 neoconservatives, only the Syrian government is responsible for deaths in Syria. The Washington sponsored and armed “rebels” are merely protecting the Syrian people from the Assad government. According to the letter signers, the only way the Syrian people can be saved is if Washington overthrows the Syrian government and installs a puppet state attentive to the needs of Israel and Washington.
Among the 56 signatures are a few names from the Syrian National Congress, believed to be a CIA front, and a few names from dupes among the goyim. The rest of the signatures are those of Jewish neoconservatives tightly allied with Israel, some of whom are apparently dual-Israeli citizens who participate in the formation of US foreign policy. The names on this list comprise a concentration of evil, the goal of which is not only to bring Armageddon to the Syrian people but also to the world.
The letter to Obama is part of the propaganda operation to demonize the Syrian government with lies in order to get rid of a government that supports Hizbollah, the Muslims in southern Lebanon who have twice driven the vaunted, but cowardly, Israeli army out of Lebanon, thus preventing the Israeli government from achieving its aim of stealing the water resources of southern Lebanon.
Not a single sentence in the letter is correct. Listen to this one for example: “The Assad regime poses a grave threat to national security interests of the United States.” What utter total absurdity, and the morons who signed the letter pretend to be “security experts.
How do we evaluate the fact that 56 people have no shame whatsoever and will lie to the President of the United States, telling him to his face the most absurd and obvious false things in order to advance their personal agenda at the expense of not merely the lives of Syrians but, by leading to wider war, of life on earth?
This same neocon architects of Armageddon are also working against Iran, Russia, the former Soviet central Asian countries, Ukraine, Belarus, and China. It seems that they can’t wait to start a nuclear war.
You can find the names of some of humanity’s worst enemies here: [1]

No comments: