Whitelaw Towers

Modern Human NOT from Africa ?

2012-01-31T15:56:00.000+10:00

"Will Israel Assassinate Obama"

2012-01-29T15:54:00.002+10:00

This wont win you any support!

2012-01-28T11:43:00.003+10:00

In reality this is what they burnt!

More fresh Hate

2012-01-28T09:01:00.005+10:00

Anonymous said...
“Science and evolution says that at one stage we were ALL black. But I guess you FUNDAMENTALISTS won't agree with rational logic.”

It amuses your Old Uncle Victor to read some of this hate mail, particularly when the senders invoke such elements as ‘Science’ and ‘rational logic’ and, by obvious inference, accuse US of being bereft of these qualities. Even the most casual perusal of their own contributions to ‘argument’ will swiftly convince the most charitable and neutral observer of their docile credulity for blatantly partisan sources of ‘information’ and their fanatical adherence, once inculcated, to even the most spurious propositions and preposterous conclusions. Additionally, if the sender intends to convey an accusation of ignorance through the term ‘FUNDAMENTALISTS’ then he has chosen his words poorly. We see the flaccid and permissive cultural relativism of Marxist Liberal Democracy as the creed of the weak and feeble minded, a secular religion for the Lemmings.

(another) Anonymous said…
“btw...Chinese people have been here SINCE settlemet (sic)”
Yes indeed they have, there was always a need for coolie labourers, laundries and, later, cheap restaurants. The Chinese were always present, as an opportunistic and parasitic contingent, with any White European army or caravan venturing beyond the bounds of Mother Europe, particularly when going East or South. You reveal nothing new or surprising to Old Uncle Victor who is widely versed in History.

“too- more 'Aussie' than 'Aussie' if you will!. God, you guys will not last, because you don't even get your basic australian (sic) history facts right...and most people will see this. Face it, you just want someone to hate because you are so, so weak. Classic bully behaviour. So, how does it feel to feel so small and angry compared to most people's rational sense of calm and peace?...go and weep.”

Also, many a Chinese sailor ‘discovered’ Australia well before Captain Cook but they did not last long enough to fully navigate, explore, map and colonise this great southern land. Asian Colonisation has occurred only recently once all the hard work has been done and an infrastructure established. Apparently though, the cannibalistic Aborigines greatly preferred the tasty Chinamen, grain fed on rice as they were and doubtlessly marinated in Soy, over the rather stringy and salty White Europeans. Perhaps there might be found one day, among the refuse that comprises an Aboriginal midden, a pile of Chinese bones? Perhaps also, some time in the future, as the ultimate result of the Dysgenic Cult of Multiculturalism, we European Aussies will be reduced to a ‘Soylent White’ protein source to nourish the Asiatic Hordes.

Finally, are you unaware of your own ‘irrational anger’ as you accuse those you know nothing about of being motivated purely by hate? Did you shake your puny fist at the heavens in impotent rage as you typed your doggerel? Assuming you are White, and young, perhaps you are not yet beyond salvage if only you were to study some real History and Science and readjust your moral compass to more noble bearings. Good luck.

Déjà vu all… over again…again?

2012-01-27T17:41:00.004+10:00

http://www.robmessenger.com/nazism-research
Rob Messenger today released a Parliamentary Library research (see attached) which shows that the Queensland Labor government has the legislative power to authorise a criminal investigation against the person or persons promoting and organising the neo-Nazi “Hammered" music festival and race hate gathering in Queensland.
"Today I call on the LNP’s Shadow Attorney-General Jarrod Bleijie to state what he would do if the LNP were the alternative government, and to also sign my petition (www.robmessenger.com/anti-neo-nazi-petition)," Mr Messenger said.
"Will Jarrod act like the current Attorney-General and do nothing regarding the Neo-Nazi festival organisers? Or would a future LNP government use the considerable powers authorised to our state’s first law officer under the Anti-Discrimination Act 1991 (Qld)?
"The library study is an embarrassment for the current Labor Government and Attorney-General, Paul Lucas, who said recently that he didn't have any power to intervene or stop the festival. Does the Shadow Attorney-General agree with him?," he said.
The research brief clearly points out that in relation to proponents of race-hate, which would include Neo-Nazis: “ in some States, including Queensland, the legislation allows for the offence of serious vilification to be defined as a criminal offence, if consent is obtained from the Attorney-General to proceed."
Mr Messenger said in other words, the Attorney-General does have the power to act.
"If Paul Lucas gave written consent to Queensland Police, they could at the very least, begin a criminal investigation into the people responsible for the Hammered festival website:( http://whitelawtowers.blogspot.com/2012/01/hammered-music-festival-australia-2012.html )," Mr Messenger said.
"This website is likely to contain material which qualifies as a 'public act' and have links to material which 'knowingly or recklessly incites hatred towards, serious contempt for, or severe ridicule of, a person or group of persons on the grounds of their race, religion, sexuality or gender identity of the person or members of the group'.
“If this was the case, then the person or persons responsible for the website may have committed a crime under section 131A of our Anti-Discrimination Act (see attached) and should feel the full force of our law.”

Hmmm! We seem to recall that in March 2006, three months after the Cronulla Uprising of 11th December 2005, Milton Orkopoulos the then NSW Aboriginal Affairs Minister and staunch member of the Socialist Left faction of the Labor Party, was similarly demanding the harshest possible treatment for White Nationalists involved in or even merely supportive of the protests. While attending, as the keynote speaker, a Feminist organised rally purporting to be “reclaiming the streets” for the “visitors” (presumably only Non-Whites) he went on the public record with his shrill calls for “the full weight of the law” to come crashing down on these “criminal rednecks”. Sound familiar?
The ABC reported it thusly in their sanitised version:
http://www.abc.net.au/news/2006-03-26/sydney-women-rally-for-racial-harmony/1716898
Sydney women rally for racial harmony
26th March 2006
Women from around Sydney have converged on the beachside suburb of Cronulla in an attempt to foster ethnic harmony. The gathering, which has been organised by the New South Wales Government, comes three months after race riots made the suburb a no-go zone. Those attending hope it will help replace images of violence in Cronulla with images of racial harmony.
"This is a chance for Cronulla to show that they, like every other community, want to live in peace and harmony, and respect for each other's backgrounds," Minister for Aboriginal Affairs Milton Orkopoulos said. Speakers have told the crowd of the need for racial tolerance and unity. The Minister for Women, Sandra Nori, says women often have to take the initiative in promoting harmony.
"Does violence come on the Y chromosome? Is civilisation only skin deep?" she said.
"I hope that's not the case but if it is, what that says to us as women is that we have to redouble our efforts because it means then that civilised society, harmonious society is something that we have to create."
The rally has been followed by a march through the shopping strip of the suburb. The Government says community liaison officers are now working in Cronulla to manage potential conflicts and interact with people who gather in public spaces.
A mere six months later he was in the news for a very different reason. On 7th November 2006 he was arrested and charged with child prostitution, sexual assault and supplying illegal drugs. In May 2008 he was sentenced to 13 years jail. One can only speculate on the ‘revelations’ that perhaps might surface in the coming weeks or months about Mr. Messenger. There is, after all, now a clear precedent for this type of occurrence.
“This government is keen to prosecute farmers and fishers who cut down the wrong tree or drop a line one metre inside a green zone - why won’t they spend money to try and stop neo-Nazis from spreading their poison?,” Mr Messenger said.
And of course Mr Messenger’s humble thread of ‘concern’ recently added to the already rich tapestry of the Anti-White narrative is not ‘poison’ at all now, is it? Stridently vilifying and summarily condemning people who he knows nothing whatsoever about, and certainly, going on the evidence of his incoherent ramblings, understands nothing of their ideology, with not merely pejorative terminology but outright shrill hysteria he is guilty of criminally culpable behaviour. If anyone at all is guilty of irrationally promoting contempt, hatred and, potentially, actual physical violence it is Messenger himself. He is a dangerous peanut. He should be gaoled for his crimes.

An Australia Day Message From Old Uncle Victor

2012-01-26T08:19:00.016+10:00

“Strange days have found us,
Strange days have tracked us down”
The Doors

Just when you thought it was safe to venture forth from the P.C. proofed bunker and assess the current situation with a bit of the old reconnaissance, along comes the rather peculiar creature known as Rob Messenger. Is there perhaps some sinister portent in his moniker, the messenger of Doom perhaps? The sheer enthusiasm with which he has latched onto this whole ‘Hammered’ affair, like a bull terrier ripping into an old tennis shoe is, at one level, quite surreal and, at another, a cogent example of the inherent absurdity of Liberal Democratic thinking.

Your Old Uncle Victor swears that even when he was a young lad equipped with the vivid imagination of youth he could not have made up such a nightmarish scenario. As a teenager he was wont to draw Daliesque pictures, this being the psychedelic Seventies and Science Fiction and Surrealism being in vogue, but the sheer grim grotesquery of the current status quo lies in realms well beyond the pale of such creative invention. To coin a popular phrase, you could not make this shit up.

It is truly chilling to consider that this once mighty nation carved out and built by the heroic European pioneers of yore, is now not only reduced to a virtual dumping ground for the wretched and festering refuse of the Third World but that many of the descendents of those brave pioneers are fully complicit in the very process of Racial/Cultural suicide that is facilitating the destruction of what their ancestors built. This ‘Messenger’ is only one of a million traitorous despoilers squirming in the maggot bucket of decadence, hedonism and materialism.

Quite bizarrely, in your Old Uncle Victor’s view, the so-called ‘world-renowned neurosurgeon’ Dr Charlie Teo was selected to present the 2012 Australia Day address for NSW. He arrogantly presumes to lecture White Australians on how not only they should behave but how they should think. After admitting, early on in the speech, that he fled to America to pursue his medical career, very ‘patriotic’ of him, and praising the vile despot Bill Clinton, he launches into a thinly veiled critique of real and fundamental Australian cultural values and then concentrates on lauding the stereotypical ‘soft’ characteristics of Aussies that have made them so easy to con and trick over the years. Of COURSE aliens like him just LOVE these weaknesses that they can so easily exploit. It is so reminiscent of the Jews lecturing Christians on how to be ‘Christian’ on the now very rare occasion when a White Christian asserts themself or interprets their own scriptures accurately and for their own interests, a shocking thing denied to all White people and vehemently condemned but enthusiastically encouraged for all others. Just as the Jew will say “That is very Un-Christian” the Asian will now say “That’s Un-Australian” as if he possessed any authority to make such an insolent observation.

The Asian says: “I am proud of the many jobs I had before neurosurgery, milk-run boy, bowser boy, gardener, apprentice mechanic, barman, bouncer, electrician’s assistant. It was in fact during these times that I was exposed to and fell in love with the quintessential Aussie. In those days, my view of an Aussie was someone who was hard working, unaffected, genuine, affable, relaxed, egalitarian, irreverent and charitable. I still believe most Aussies share these appealing qualities, although I am saddened by the increasing incidents of rage in our society. Once there was only road rage but now it seems to have spread into the workplace, the malls and even the last bastion of the laid-back, free spirited Aussie, the surf!”

Now, gentle reader, let those words sink in. Think carefully about what they mean. Yet again, we have an alien creature, generously granted the gift of opportunity in this great nation built by White Folk, and doubtlessly displacing equally qualified Whites, via affirmative action style initiatives from reaching their full potential, preaching to us that we must more firmly adhere to HIS concept of what constitutes a ‘real and proper Australian’. Is this not totally galling and insulting? The hide of this thing! The reference to ‘rage’ is also interesting because blind Freddie could see that this ‘rage’ is largely born from the unresolved anxiety, depression and frustration of White Aussies who feel utterly disenfranchised, dispossessed and vilified in the Nation State their forefathers created and see every possible benefit and opportunity enriching the interlopers and invaders at the expense of themselves, their families and their loved ones. The sick and twisted criminal cult of Multiculturalism does NOT ‘enrich’ our society, rather it enriches the parasitic carpetbagger class of ruthless opportunists posing as ‘quality immigrants’.

Ironically, it seems that Teo is himself 'raging' against Human Nature, in that every sovereign and self determined group has, for its very survival as an independent entity, the basic inbuilt imperitive of group identity, insularity and protection. The 'other' is rejected or at least treated with extreme caution for no more complex reason than to maintain group solidarity, cultural/genetic integrity and opportunity to grow and flourish within the boundaries of the created 'Nation'. These are the real and genuine 'Human Rights' that should be respected and protected for ALL Humans. Organic Nationalism is the only true 'Socialism' that binds a people together and ensures prosperity and survival. It must not be surrendered for the fistful of cheap and gaudy beads and baubles offered by the Neo-Feudalist Corporate Capitalist Globalism in exchange for genocide and slavery.

The fact that Teo was born in Australia counts for absolutely nothing, nil, zero, zilch, a random event, a purely obstetric accident. The geographic location of one’s ejection from the uterine canal has no bearing whatsoever upon what NATION you belong to. National Identity, your Nationality cannot be found in the coordinates of a Nav Com unit. Longitude, Latitude and Altitude are irrelevant. Your RACE is your NATION. It is indelibly etched on your Genetic Matrix. You could put a Chinaman on Mars and he’d still be a Chinaman, just as a White Man could be sent to orbit the twin star system of Alpha Centauri and still be a White Man. As Ian Anderson of Jethro Tull penned: “Everyone is from somewhere even if you’ve never been there” Also, as the late, great Sir Arthur Wellesley, the Duke of Wellington, once opined on the occasion of his being accused of being Irish because he was born in Ireland, “Because a Man is born in a stable does not make him a horse”

Every one of those qualities the Asian mentions above is beneficial to OTHER peoples. Every one of those qualities is passive and giving and puts the Aussie at a distinct disadvantage when interacting with alien cultures. It is amazing to this writer that he omitted ‘gullible’, ‘naïve’ and ‘trusting’ because there is ample evidence that these qualities/weaknesses have contributed greatly to our downfall. You might also notice the conspicuous absence of POSITIVE qualities such as Racial Identity, National Pride, Civic Duty, (Australians are great volunteers and community minded)

None of those qualities favoured by the Chinaman are the tools that were utilised to carve a Nation State from the wretched wilderness of this antipodean island continent. Rather the assets carried in the genes of the White European heroes who made Australia were qualities such as Bravery, Creativity, Determination, Genius, Honesty, Industry and Stoicism.

In the final episode of the recently screened British Television documentary series ‘Greatest Cities Of The World’ that is set in Hong Kong, the presenter, Griff Rhys Jones, interviews a White European resident who was born in Shanghai and has lived his entire life in Hong Kong. Despite coming from a multigenerational White ‘Chinese’ family he tells Jones he knows he does not really belong here and will always be an outsider. He appears quite content with this concise, though seemingly harsh, self assessment of his status as one of the five percent or so ‘Gwailos’ (‘Foreign Devils’ or ‘Ghost Men’) who are permanent residents in the island city and harbours no resentment. The White Hong Konger clearly has pretensions to DEMANDING acceptance as a native so why do the Yellow ‘Australians’ persist? Where do they get this arrogant attitude from?

Okay, so it's a rhetorical question. Most should know it comes from the hate propaganda of the TelAvision and the education curriculum that inculcates our own children with self loathing and the alien children with contempt and resentment for Whites. This will not cease until we again become masters of our own destiny and can once again proudly say 'We are Australian' and know it actually means something more than a geopolitical accident of birth or a sheet of paper with all the dignity and honour of a parking permit or a tenancy agreement.

Australia Awake!

Australia Day.

2012-01-26T03:52:00.001+10:00

To dream of simpler times.

No more wars for Israel!

2012-01-25T08:40:00.002+10:00

Iran vs Israel: What The Media Wants You To Forget

The corporate media have been given their orders to throw the focus back on to Iran.

Here is a recap of what they are trying to make you forget.

1. Last Spring, Rose Gottemoeller, an assistant secretary of state and Washington's chief nuclear arms negotiator, asked Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Israel refused.

2. The United Nations passed a resolution calling on Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to submit to inspections. Israel refused.

3. The IAEA asked Israel to sign the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty and to submit to inspections. Israel refused.

4. Iran's formal notification to the IAEA of the planned construction of the backup fuel-rod facility underscores that Iran is playing by the rules of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty which Iran has signed.

5. Iran allows IAEA inspections of all its facilities.

6. Contrary to face-saving claims, it appears that the US and Israel were both caught off guard by Iran's announcement of a planned underground (to avoid being bombed) enrichment facility. The reasoning is simple. Had the US or Israel announced the existence of he new facility before Iran's notified the IAEA, it would have put Iran on the defensive. As it is now, the US and Israel seem to be playing catch up, casting doubt on the veracity of Israel's claims to "know" that Iran is a nuclear threat.

7. The IAEA and all 16 United States Intelligence Agencies are unanimous in agreement that Iran is not building and does not possess nuclear weapons.

8. In 1986, Mordachai Vanunu blew the whistle and provided photographs showing Israel's clandestine nuclear weapons factory underneath the reactor at Dimona.

9. Israel made the same accusations against Iraq that it is making against Iran, leading up to Israel's bombing of the power station at Osirik. Following the invasion of 2003, international experts examined the ruins of the power station at Osirik and found no evidence of a clandestine weapons factory in the rubble.

10. The United Nations has just released the Goldstone Report, a scathing report which accuses Israel of 37 specific war crimes and crimes against humanity in Gaza earlier this year. Israel has denounced the report as "Anti-Semitic (even though Judge Goldstone is himself Jewish), and the United States will block the report from being referred to the War Crimes Tribunal at the Hague, thereby making the US Government an accessory after-the-fact.

11. Recently revealed documents prove not only that Israel has nuclear weapos, but actually tried to sell some to Apartheid South Africa. Who else Israel approached to sell nuclear weapons remains an unasked question.

12. In 1965, Israel stole over 200-600 pounds of weapons-grade uranium from the United States.

13. Declassified documents from the former South African regime prove not only that Israel has had nuclear weapons for decades, but has tried to sell them to other countries!

We all need to be Joe Wilson right now. We need to stand up and scream, "LIAR!" at every politician and every talking media moron that is pushing this war in Iran. And we need to keep dong it until they get the message that we will not be deceived any more.

Israel wants to send your kids off to die in Iran, and YOU are the only one that can stop them.

Please forward this comment to your social networks.

Hammered Music Festival - Australia 2012

2012-01-23T16:06:00.000+10:00

The now infamous Hammered Music Festival, usually held on the Gold Coast, will now be held in Brisbane, Australia on the 21st of April 2012!

And this years event is also celebrating the 20th Anniversary of the Southern Cross Hammerskins in Australia! A worthwhile celebration and surely not one to be missed!!

We have secured bands for the event and are working on adding more to the bill shortly, and we have this year decided to arrange day events for all, fun stuff like strongman comp, team tug of war and boxing and MMA bouts... fun stuff!!!

For further information regarding the event, please email hammeredfestival@gmail.com or schsqld@gmail.com

Meet the opposition. :)

Rob Messenger, so whom does he serve?

2012-01-23T09:42:00.007+10:00

Just another Israel firster.

Source

Member for Burnett Rob Messenger has officially and proudly launched a YouTube video clip regarding his position on a Carbon Tax (produced by the Australian Tea Party).

What a guy? So what type of people make up the Australian Tea Party?

Above, Australian Tea "Party legend Cr. Hajnal Black" . Such a kosher name don't you think? Racism every where. Nazis all over the place.

Source

TEA Party legend Cr. Hajnal Black..Not content with defeating and chasing away the slimy BDS Greens/Nazi demonstrators outside of Max Brenners, http://austeaparty.com.au/web/?p=4800 …. Hajnal has decided to confront the issue head on at the Logan Council. This first humiliating defeat of the extreme left at one of their protests was a catalyst to further resistance and opposition to their previously unopposed or only weakly or politely opposed campaign.

But wait, there is more. You just cant get any closer to the tribe than this.

Source

THE Public Trustee may trace more than $1.37 million which Logan City councillor Hajnal Black yesterday was found to have moved from a joint account with a dementia patient into her sole control.

Supreme Court Justice David Boddice found Ms Black should have held the money from the sale of a property at Park Ridge, on Brisbane's southern outskirts, in trust for the man, who can not be named under Queensland law.

However, the Public Trustee failed in a second claim to get a summary judgment dismissing Ms Black's counterclaim for a declaration she was gifted a property at Greenbank. The Greenbank matter is likely to go to trial in February.

In his written judgment, Justice David Boddice noted the man, 69, had been diagnosed with dementia and was now a resident receiving full-time care at an aged-care facility.

Justice Boddice found the Public Trustee had established Ms Black had no real prospect of succeeding in her defence and the funds in question now had been transferred from the joint account.

ustice Boddice said Ms Black was a close friend of the man and they had known each other for at least 10 years when he mentored her in her legal studies, and assisted in her political career.

He detailed how on April 28, 2009, the man executed an enduring power of attorney to Ms Black.

It was alleged on July 21, 2009, Ms Black went with the man, who was suffering from a confused state, to the Logan Hospital.

Ms Black allegedly later took him to Garden City Shopping Centre where the man executed a draft contract of sale provided by Ms Black to sell the Park Ridge property for $2,250,000.

On October 28, 2009, Ms Black, as the man's attorney, executed a transfer of the Park Ridge property to the purchaser on behalf of the man because of "her belief or concern that he lacked the capacity to do so".

The sum of $2,154,404 was deposited it into a joint account in the names of the man and Ms Black and she withdrew $1.37 million over six months for her own personal benefit.

Ms Black claimed the man was alert and orientated when admitted to hospital in July 2009 and he asked her to arrange for the contract for the sale of the Park Ridge property to be provided to him outside of the hospital.

Ms Black denied she took any unfair advantage of her position to obtain the benefit and tweeted yesterday afternoon that she would appeal the Supreme Court decision "on a number of points of law".

I think we all get the picture?

Filthy Zionists in it up to their necks!

2012-01-23T09:01:00.004+10:00

I suppose this journalist will be looking for another job soon?

Source.

False Flag
A series of CIA memos describes how Israeli Mossad agents posed as American spies to recruit members of the terrorist organization Jundallah to fight their covert war against Iran.

Buried deep in the archives of America's intelligence services are a series of memos, written during the last years of President George W. Bush's administration, that describe how Israeli Mossad officers recruited operatives belonging to the terrorist group Jundallah by passing themselves off as American agents. According to two U.S. intelligence officials, the Israelis, flush with American dollars and toting U.S. passports, posed as CIA officers in recruiting Jundallah operatives -- what is commonly referred to as a "false flag" operation.

The memos, as described by the sources, one of whom has read them and another who is intimately familiar with the case, investigated and debunked reports from 2007 and 2008 accusing the CIA, at the direction of the White House, of covertly supporting Jundallah -- a Pakistan-based Sunni extremist organization. Jundallah, according to the U.S. government and published reports, is responsible for assassinating Iranian government officials and killing Iranian women and children.

But while the memos show that the United States had barred even the most incidental contact with Jundallah, according to both intelligence officers, the same was not true for Israel's Mossad. The memos also detail CIA field reports saying that Israel's recruiting activities occurred under the nose of U.S. intelligence officers, most notably in London, the capital of one of Israel's ostensible allies, where Mossad officers posing as CIA operatives met with Jundallah officials.

The officials did not know whether the Israeli program to recruit and use Jundallah is ongoing. Nevertheless, they were stunned by the brazenness of the Mossad's efforts.

"It's amazing what the Israelis thought they could get away with," the intelligence officer said. "Their recruitment activities were nearly in the open. They apparently didn't give a damn what we thought."

Interviews with six currently serving or recently retired intelligence officers over the last 18 months have helped to fill in the blanks of the Israeli false-flag operation. In addition to the two currently serving U.S. intelligence officers, the existence of the Israeli false-flag operation was confirmed to me by four retired intelligence officers who have served in the CIA or have monitored Israeli intelligence operations from senior positions inside the U.S. government.

The CIA and the White House were both asked for comment on this story. By the time this story went to press, they had not responded. The Israeli intelligence services -- the Mossad -- were also contacted, in writing and by telephone, but failed to respond. As a policy, Israel does not confirm or deny its involvement in intelligence operations.

There is no denying that there is a covert, bloody, and ongoing campaign aimed at stopping Iran's nuclear program, though no evidence has emerged connecting recent acts of sabotage and killings inside Iran to Jundallah. Many reports have cited Israel as the architect of this covert campaign, which claimed its latest victim on Jan. 11 when a motorcyclist in Tehran slipped a magnetic explosive device under the car of Mostafa Ahmadi Roshan, a young Iranian nuclear scientist. The explosion killed Roshan, making him the fourth scientist assassinated in the past two years. The United States adamantly denies it is behind these killings.

According to one retired CIA officer, information about the false-flag operation was reported up the U.S. intelligence chain of command. It reached CIA Director of Operations Stephen Kappes, his deputy Michael Sulick, and the head of the Counterintelligence Center. All three of these officials are now retired. The Counterintelligence Center, according to its website, is tasked with investigating "threats posed by foreign intelligence services."

The report then made its way to the White House, according to the currently serving U.S. intelligence officer. The officer said that Bush "went absolutely ballistic" when briefed on its contents.

"The report sparked White House concerns that Israel's program was putting Americans at risk," ( what about the rest of the world) the intelligence officer told me. "There's no question that the U.S. has cooperated with Israel in intelligence-gathering operations against the Iranians, but this was different. No matter what anyone thinks, we're not in the business of assassinating Iranian officials or killing Iranian civilians."

Israel's relationship with Jundallah continued to roil the Bush administration until the day it left office, this same intelligence officer noted. Israel's activities jeopardized the administration's fragile relationship with Pakistan, which was coming under intense pressure from Iran to crack down on Jundallah. It also undermined U.S. claims that it would never fight terror with terror, and invited attacks in kind on U.S. personnel.

"It's easy to understand why Bush was so angry," a former intelligence officer said. "After all, it's hard to engage with a foreign government if they're convinced you're killing their people. Once you start doing that, they feel they can do the same."

A senior administration official vowed to "take the gloves off" with Israel, according to a U.S. intelligence officer. But the United States did nothing -- a result that the officer attributed to "political and bureaucratic inertia."

"In the end," the officer noted, "it was just easier to do nothing than to, you know, rock the boat." Even so, at least for a short time, this same officer noted, the Mossad operation sparked a divisive debate among Bush's national security team, pitting those who wondered "just whose side these guys [in Israel] are on" against those who argued that "the enemy of my enemy is my friend."

The debate over Jundallah was resolved only after Bush left office when, within his first weeks as president, Barack Obama drastically scaled back joint U.S.-Israel intelligence programs targeting Iran, according to multiple serving and retired officers.

The decision was controversial inside the CIA, where officials were forced to shut down "some key intelligence-gathering operations," a recently retired CIA officer confirmed. This action was followed in November 2010 by the State Department's addition of Jundallah to its list of foreign terrorist organizations -- a decision that one former CIA officer called "an absolute no-brainer."

Since Obama's initial order, U.S. intelligence services have received clearance to cooperate with Israel on a number of classified intelligence-gathering operations focused on Iran's nuclear program, according to a currently serving officer. These operations are highly technical in nature and do not involve covert actions targeting Iran's infrastructure or political or military leadership.

"We don't do bang and boom," a recently retired intelligence officer said. "And we don't do political assassinations."

Israel regularly proposes conducting covert operations targeting Iranians, but is just as regularly shut down, according to retired and current intelligence officers. "They come into the room and spread out their plans, and we just shake our heads," one highly placed intelligence source said, "and we say to them -- 'Don't even go there. The answer is no.'"

Unlike the Mujahedin-e Khalq, the controversial exiled Iranian terrorist group that seeks the overthrow of the Tehran regime and is supported by former leading U.S. policymakers, Jundallah is relatively unknown -- but just as violent. In May 2009, a Jundallah suicide bomber blew himself up inside a mosque in Zahedan, the capital of Iran's southeastern Sistan-Baluchistan province bordering Pakistan, during a Shiite religious festival. The bombing killed 25 Iranians and wounded scores of others.

The attack enraged Tehran, which traced the perpetrators to a cell operating in Pakistan. The Iranian government notified the Pakistanis of the Jundallah threat and urged them to break up the movement's bases along the Iranian-Pakistani border. The Pakistanis reacted sluggishly in the border areas, feeding Tehran's suspicions that Jundallah was protected by Pakistan's intelligence services.

The 2009 attack was just one in a long line of terrorist attacks attributed to the organization. In August 2007, Jundallah kidnapped 21 Iranian truck drivers. In December 2008, it captured and executed 16 Iranian border guards -- the gruesome killings were filmed, in a stark echo of the decapitation of American businessman Nick Berg in Iraq at the hands of al Qaeda's Abu Musab al-Zarqawi. In July 2010, Jundallah conducted a twin suicide bombing in Zahedan outside a mosque, killing dozens of people, including members of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

The State Department aggressively denies that the U.S. government had or has any ties to Jundallah. "We have repeatedly stated, and reiterate again that the United States has not provided support to Jundallah," a spokesman wrote in an email to the Wall Street Journal, following Jundallah's designation as a terrorist organization. "The United States does not sponsor any form of terrorism. We will continue to work with the international community to curtail support for terrorist organizations and prevent violence against innocent civilians. We have also encouraged other governments to take comparable actions against Jundallah."

A spate of stories in 2007 and 2008, including a report by ABC News and a New Yorker article, suggested that the United States was offering covert support to Jundallah. The issue has now returned to the spotlight with the string of assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists and has outraged serving and retired intelligence officers who fear that Israeli operations are endangering American lives.

"This certainly isn't the first time this has happened, though it's the worst case I've heard of," former Centcom chief and retired Gen. Joe Hoar said of the Israeli operation upon being informed of it. "But while false-flag operations are hardly new, they're extremely dangerous. You're basically using your friendship with an ally for your own purposes. Israel is playing with fire. It gets us involved in their covert war, whether we want to be involved or not."

The Israeli operation left a number of recently retired CIA officers sputtering in frustration. "It's going to be pretty hard for the U.S. to distance itself from an Israeli attack on Iran with this kind of thing going on," one of them told me.

Jundallah head Abdolmalek Rigi was captured by Iran in February 2010. Although initial reports claimed that he was captured by the Iranians after taking a flight from Dubai to Kyrgyzstan, a retired intelligence officer with knowledge of the incident told me that Rigi was detained by Pakistani intelligence officers in Pakistan. The officer said that Rigi was turned over to the Iranians after the Pakistani government informed the United States that it planned to do so. The United States, this officer said, did not raise objections to the Pakistani decision.

Iran, meanwhile, has consistently claimed that Rigi was snatched from under the eyes of the CIA, which it alleges supported him. "It doesn't matter," the former intelligence officer said of Iran's charges. "It doesn't matter what they say. They know the truth."

Rigi was interrogated, tried, and convicted by the Iranians and hanged on June 20, 2010. Prior to his execution, Rigi claimed in an interview with Iranian media -- which has to be assumed was under duress -- that he had doubts about U.S. sponsorship of Jundallah. He recounted an alleged meeting with "NATO officials" in Morocco in 2007 that raised his suspicions. "When we thought about it we came to the conclusion that they are either Americans acting under NATO cover or Israelis," he said.

While many of the details of Israel's involvement with Jundallah are now known, many others still remain a mystery -- and are likely to remain so. The CIA memos of the incident have been "blue bordered," meaning that they were circulated to senior levels of the broader U.S. intelligence community as well as senior State Department officials.

What has become crystal clear, however, is the level of anger among senior intelligence officials about Israel's actions. "This was stupid and dangerous," the intelligence official who first told me about the operation said. "Israel is supposed to be working with us, not against us. If they want to shed blood, it would help a lot if it was their blood and not ours. You know, they're supposed to be a strategic asset. Well, guess what? There are a lot of people now, important people, who just don't think that's true."

Free your mind, free your people!

2012-01-21T15:04:00.001+10:00

Little known facts!

2012-01-20T11:23:00.009+10:00

"Today B'nai B'rith is the largest Jewish organization in the world. In 1970 it had 500 000 male members spread over 1700 lodges in 43 countries and 210 000 female members in 600 lodges (Encyclopaedia Judaica). There are presently 70 established lodges in Europe. The only lodge in Austria is called Maimonides.

The organization works to secure the power of the Jews over humanity, as revealed by the Hungarian Jew Aron Monus in his book "Verschworung: das Reich von Nietzsche" (Vienna, 1995, p. 149). B'nai B'rith is an executive organ for L'Alliance Israelite Universelle. The official budget before 1970 was 13 million dollars. B'nai B'rith's secret service, the ADL (Anti-Defamation League), has been called the KGB of the extremist Jews.

Leiba Bronstein aka Leon Trotsky.

Mr Leiba Bronstein became a freemason in 1897 and later a high-ranking Illuminatus through his friend Alexander Parvus. He also maintained contacts with B'nai B'rith, a Jewish Masonic order, which had previously aided Jewish "revolutionaries" in Russia. A man named Jacob Schiff, chairman of the banking house Kuhn, Loeb & Co. and a minion of the Rothschilds, took care of the contacts between the "revolutionary movement in Russia" and B'nai B'rith. (Gerald B. Winrod, "Adam Weishaupt - A Human Devil", p. 47.)

Bronstein became a convinced internationalist who, by the agency of Parvus' care, learned that the Jewish people were their own collective Messiah and would reach dominion over all peoples through the mixing of the other races and elimination of national boundaries. An international republic was to be created, where the Jews would be the ruling element, since no others would be able to understand and control the masses.

Leiba Bronstein became a member of the French Masonic lodge Art et Travail, to which Lenin also belonged, but also joined B'nai B'rith, according to the political scientist Karl Steinhauser ("EG - Die Super-UdSSR von morgen" / "EU - the New Super-USSR", Vienna, 1992, p. 162).

Leon Trotsky became a member of the Jewish Masonic order B'nai B'rith in New York, in January 1917. (Yuri Begunov, "Secret Forces in the History of Russia", St. Petersburg, 1995, pp. 138-139.) He was already a member of the Misraim-Memphis freemasonry.

It was Trotsky who founded the Red Army. He used especially gruesome methods for this purpose, according to the Jewess Dora Shturman's book "The Dead Grasp after the Living" (London, 1982). Trotsky had young peasants taken from their farms by force and coerced them into new careers as red soldiers, giving orders to shoot all who resisted. With such criminal methods he formed the so-called voluntary Red Army which "fought with great honor against landowners and capitalists and won", as the Soviet history books said. Not a word was mentioned about the American instructors Trotsky called in to help train his soldiers.

Trotsky was without doubt the cruelest and most dangerous "revolutionary" in the world, who ordered literally millions of Russians to be shot. He took children as hostages and, if necessary, ordered them murdered. It was Trotsky who released criminals from the prisons and thereby also terrorized the people.

Leon Trotsky's great-grandson David Axelrod also followed in the terrorist tradition. He emigrated from the Soviet Union to Israel, where he was arrested in his 28th year on June 12, 1989 for having destroyed the property of Palestinians."

Source

As you can see both groups are alive and well.

Australia Calling.

2012-01-19T21:50:00.001+10:00

Middle Eastern drug gangs turn Sydney into wild west

Middle Eastern drug gangs are rampaging through Sydney shooting up houses and cars, murdering people on the streets, and even shooting it out with each other on street corners . . . all unchecked by the police who appear to lack either the ability or the will to act lest they be called *gasp* racist.

For the past three months, almost every day there has been some kind of gangland shooting that has involved Middle Eastern drug gangs. Some days there has been more than one shooting. Illegal weapons are pouring into the country, concealed in shipping containers from the Middle East, but all that the police, the controlled media and the idiot politicians talk about is making firearm ownership more difficult for law-abiding citizens. There is only one solution and it is obvious: deport all people of Middle Eastern origin, immediately and by as much force as is necessary to achieve that end.

Click HERE to listen.

Anti-White Assault-Robbery - African Gang in The Grand Duchy of Luxembourg

2012-01-17T09:28:00.000+10:00

"Police have posted footage from a train surveillance camera showing a group of youngsters savagely attack a lone passenger. The horrific incident took place on December 14th 2011 between 22:15h and 23:00h on a train between Luxembourg City and Rodange."

Anti Racism is a code word for Anti White

More Leftist Hate Mail…

2012-01-15T05:55:00.008+10:00

Taken from the comments section on the post: 'The Origins of Political Correctness'

"Preying upon the ambiguity of complex ideas by offering up juvenile, inexperienced conclusions."
Huh? A Leftist talking about ‘ambiguity’ and juvenile, inexperienced conclusions? That’s a little rich.

"So the world is still flat to u. (sic)"
Erm, no. So far as we can tell, going on the available Scientific evidence, it’s an oblate spheroid or, if you prefer, a rotationally symmetric ellipsoid.

"U (sic) are simply wrong."

No explanations. No evidence. No hypotheses. No theories. Just…you’re wrong. Erm, okaaay…

"Scholars are responsible for your very existence through the genuine acquisition of knowledge through perseverance."
So, let’s get this straight, ‘scholars are responsible for our very existence’. Wow! And we’ve been thinking it was mum and dad! Pray tell us more. Then perhaps you might explain how sheep’s bladders can be employed to help prevent earthquakes…

"So u (sic) hate Einstein?"
Do we? We thought he was dead. We tend to reserve our ‘hate’ for living entities. We could not care less really except when he is lavished with an inordinately high degree of praise and his name is used synonymously with genius when he is well known to have plagiarised and stolen many of his ideas from predecessors and contemporaries. Let your fingers do the walking. Google it and read some facts on the subject.

"Well don't use computers, don't eat, and be careful or u might float away."
Einstein did not invent the Computer. Einstein did not invent food. Are we also to presume from that silly rant that Einstein ‘invented’ Gravity?

"And in truth, what u (sic) see as a worthwhile pursuit will NEVER be recorded in history, never known by any others."
Oh really? We believe you’ll find it already has been.

"The opposite shall, and indeed always has and always will."
What? Could you repeat that?

"Love."
Yes indeed, love is a many splendored thing… apparently. There should be more of it.

"The same love some of u (sic) may show your children."
To paraphrase our old mate ‘Sting’… the ‘Nazis’ love their children too.

"If u believe u (sic) have found the right way try hosting your shindig at CHERBOURG."
Why? Please explain…

"If not shut up or get some balls. (Or preferably some semblance of truth.)"
Unintelligible gobbledegook.

"Cowardly attacking people of ethnicity is not ever going to ne (sic) supported in this country."
‘Cowardly’? How so? ‘Attacking’? How so? Are White people bereft of ‘ethnicity’? Why is it that you Leftoids think there are White people and then there are ‘Ethnic’ people? Do you not have even a basic, rudimentary understanding of the terminology you utilise?

"I guess over u (sic) will still be unintelligibly defensive, and insist that in your twenty plus years of existence u (sic) have a right to say u (sic) have more wisdom than the indigenous peoples of this land."
We are unaware of the existence of evidence of any particular ‘wisdom’ when it comes to ‘the indigenous peoples of this land’. Could you please elaborate and elucidate? As we have stated here before, Data is not Information, Information is not Knowledge, Knowledge is not Wisdom. However, one is still required by Nature itself to ascend through the existing hierarchies in an appropriate ‘learning curve’ and intellectually, culturally and philosophically ‘evolve’ to a stage of rather refined development before one can claim ‘Wisdom’. Cockroaches, for example, are extraordinarily resilient creatures and some believe they might be capable of surviving even a nuclear holocaust, but one can scarcely confer ‘Wisdom’ status upon them simply for being good survivors.

", 60,000 years vs 20+ hmmm."
It is quite amusing how the period of occupation of Australia by the Aborigines appears to get exponentially longer by the year. At this rate they will soon pre-date the Dinosaurs. One is also puzzled by what exactly they did, apart from hunt, forage and do a few rock paintings, for that great length of time. Just being around for a very long time is hardly a mighty achievement in itself when compared to the development of Human Civilisation.

"Realise you've lied to yourself,"
The precise opposite is the case. We relentlessly and ruthlessly seek the truth.

"and have the freedom you seek."
Doing that right now thanks.

"SEEK TO TREAT EVERYONE AS U (sic) WOULD YOUR OWN CHILDREN."
Not possible or desirable.

"IF NOT WHY NOT? U (sic) R (sic) INVENTING EXCUSES " Failure is an oppotunity (sic) to start again more intelligently. " Albert Einstein"
Yes, perhaps ‘next time’ we will avoid being so generous in our dispensation of egalitarianism and tolerance. We just get taken for granted and abused. Again though, quoting Einstein will get you nowhere with us. We are distinctly unimpressed.

No More Heroes?

2012-01-14T14:24:00.014+10:00

In response to the Cultural Marxist Anti-White Haters’ ‘ethnic cleansing’ of our White History, suppression of all serious study of our heroes and rewriting a ‘black armband’ version where all great White achievements are minimised and any negative aspects amplified and enhanced to vilify the White Race, WLT are commencing a new, long term project to list every Great White Man, both Historical and Contemporary, we can find. We call upon all our regular readers and casual visitors alike to submit their suggestions for approval and inclusion in this hall of fame. Be they Authors, Composers, Designers, Explorers, Filmmakers, Industrialists, Inventors, Medical Pioneers, Musicians, Painters, Philosophers, Poets, Saints, Scientists, Soldiers, Statesmen we want them all. We know they are out there, even though our children are either not told about them or are subjected to lies and vilification about them. We have given you are good start, in our humble opinion, with the ones already listed below.

Great White Men…

Johann Sebastian Bach (21st March 1685, O.S. – 28th July 1750) German Composer and Multi-Instrumentalist

Ludwig Van Beethoven (17th December 1770 – 26th March 1827) German Composer and Pianist

Hieronymus Bosch (c. 1450 – 9th August 1516) Dutch Artist

Isambard Kingdom Brunel (9th April 1806 – 15th September 1859) Great British Civil Engineer

Charlemagne (c. 742 – 28th January 814) Frankish Hero who defended Europe against Islam

Christopher Columbus (31st October 1451 – 20th May 1506) Genoese Explorer and Navigator

Captain James Cook (7th November 1728 – 14th February 1779) Cartographer, Explorer, Navigator

Nicolaus Copernicus (19th February 1473 – 24th May 1543) Prussian born Renaissance Astronomer.

King Edward the First aka ‘Longshanks’ (17th June 1239 – 7th July 1307) White Hero who expelled Jews from England

Henry Ford (30th July 1863 – 7th April 1947) American Industrialist and White Patriot who resisted Jewish Supremacist Hegemony

Sir Francis Galton (16th February 1822 – 17th January 1911) Scientist, Geneticist, Inventor. Cousin of Charles Darwin

Adolf Hitler (20th April 1889 – 30th April 1945) Austrian Born Painter, Soldier, Politician and Leader of the German Third Reich

Andrew Jackson (15th March 1767 – 8th June 1845) Seventh President of the United States (1829–1837). Nicknamed ‘Old Hickory’.

Dr. Samuel Johnson (18th September 1709 – 13th December 1784) English Author, Lexicographer, Poet, Essayist, Moralist, Literary Critic, Biographer and Editor

King Leonidas I (died 9th August 480 BC at the Battle of Thermopylae resisting the Persian Mud Horde) Hero king of Sparta, the 17th of the Agiad line.

Charles Martel (23rd August 686 – 22nd October 741) Frankish Hero who defeated the Muslims at the Battle of Tours in 732

Sir Isaac Newton (25th December 1642 – 20th March 1727) Mathematician, Philosopher, Scientist

Friedrich Wilhelm Nietzsche (15th October 1844 – 25th August 1900) German Philosopher, Poet and Composer

George Orwell (Eric Arthur Blair) (25th June 1903 – 21st January 1950) Journalist and Author

Edgar Allan Poe (19th January 1809 – 7th October 1849) American Author and Poet

Enoch Powell (16th June 1912 – 8th February 1998) British Statesman, Classical Scholar, Multi-Linguist, Poet, Soldier, Writer

George Lincoln Rockwell (March 9, 1918 – August 25, 1967) Founded the American Nazi Party. Served his nation from 1941 to 1960 as a Lieutenant Commander Pilot in the U.S. Navy, fighting in both WWII and Korea. William Shakespeare (26th April 1564 - 23rd April 1616) was England’s greatest Poet and Playright

Prince Vlad Țepeș (Vlad III, Prince of Wallachia) (1431–1476) White Hero who dedicated his life to the defence of the Balkans against the Ottoman Turks thereby resisting the Islamic invasion of Europe

Nikola Tesla (10th July 1856 – 7th January 1943) Serbian-American Mechanical and Electrical Engineer and Inventor

Mark Twain (Samuel Langhorne Clemens) (30th November 1835 – 21st April 1910) American Author and Humorist

Richard Wagner (22nd May 1813 –13th February 1883) Classical Composer, Conductor and Theatre Director

Francis Parker Yockey (18th September 1917 – 16th June 1960) ‘Third Positionist’ Political Writer

Addendum:

Alfred the Great (c. 849 – 899) King of the Anglo-Saxons.
Carl Philipp Emanuel Bach (1714–1788) German composer, son of J. S. Bach
Joseph Banks (1743–1820) English Naturalist. Well known to Australians.
Johannes Brahms (1833–1897) German composer
Gebhard Leberecht von Blücher, Fürst von Wahlstatt (16th December 1742 – 12th September 1819) The Prussian Hussar General, the true hero of Waterloo and possibly the toughest cavalry commander ever who was still leading cavalry charges well into his Fifties! A giant among Men.
Pieter Bruegel The Elder (1528-1569) Dutch Painter
John Constable (1776-1837) English Painter
Albrecht Dürer (1471–1528) German painter
Georg Friedrich Händel (1685–1759), German composer, opera composer
John Herschel (1792–1871) mathematician and astronomer
William Hogarth (1697-1764) English Painter
Hans Holbein the Elder (c. 1465–1524), painter
Michael Faraday (1791–1867) English Scientist
Hans Holbein The Younger (1497-1543)
Tim Berners - Lee (born 1955) English computer scientist and inventor of the World Wide Web.
Wolfgang Amadeus Mozart (1756–1791), Austrian composer and musician
Horatio Nelson, 1st Viscount Nelson, 1st Duke of Bronté, (29th September 1758 – 21st October 1805) Great British Naval Hero.
Carl Orff (1895–1982), German composer
Johann Pachelbel (1653–1706), German composer
Joseph Priestley (1733–1804), English Chemist
Leni Riefenstahl (1902–2003), German film director
Peter Paul Rubens (1577-1640) Flemish Painter
Joseph Mallord William Turner (23rd April 1775 – 19th December 1851) English Painter
Field Marshal Sir Arthur Wellesley, 1st Duke of Wellington (1st May 1769 – 14th September 1852) Great British Military Commander.

Anti-Fascist Action Affinity Brisbane. You dont say?

2012-01-14T11:28:00.005+10:00

Click on image

Anti-Fascist Action Affinity : Brisbane
"Kill All The Whiteman by NOFX apparently offended/threatened a couple of you.."

Oops I thought we were the haters. Credibility ZERO!

Click on image

Here is the offending post off the Face Book wall of the group who are organising demos (lol) against The Hammered Music Festival, a private invite only Festival. When will see the media or Rob Messenger have a go at these twats?

Anti racism is a code word for anti white.

Anti Racism, how it destroyed South Africa and imprisoned its opponents. Dr. Jim Saleam speaks out!

2012-01-14T10:44:00.011+10:00

A Matter Of Credibility - And Mine Just Got A Whole Better!
The Fall Of Eddie Funde And A State Perjurer Reveals A Life On ‘Witness Protection’ As A Case Against Me Unravels.

Jim Saleam

Edited, January 13

Political trials usually have a habit at biting their organizers on the metaphoric arse. So it is unfolding with the political trial run against me over twenty years ago.

It is a matter of record that I was convicted in May 1991 of organizing on January 27 1989, a shotgun attack upon the home of Eddie Funde, then Representative to Australia of the African National Congress (ANC).

I have always denied any involvement in the affair and have authored an Internet book-legal-submission on the subject – Pardon Me: The Anatomy Of An Australian Political Trial at: www.alphalink.com.au/~radnat/pardonme/index.html

For years now, I have noted the scoffing of the professional ‘antifa’ (anti-fascists) at my assertion that the case against me was a political police conspiracy. These antifa, who often assert the existence of state conspiracies and political police dirty tricks ops when they are playing at being anti-system lefties, seem quite happy with the idea that the same thing just didn’t operate against me. They use my conviction as proof of my utter perfidy. The mind boggles why they question nothing. Is it too hard? Or doesn’t my story ‘fit’ with the line they want to run?

Other players can get dirty too. Certain persons who have called themselves ‘patriots’ - and even ‘nationalists’ – have also run with the state script. In loading me with a garbage crime, they seek to slither away as ‘clean-skins’, ready to enter the political mainstream as normals who eschew any notion of violence, and as they put it, leaving me and those like me - in our squalid gutter. Such charm and such moral courage do they show.

A couple of years ago, I was interviewed by a journalist from the Sydney Morning Herald. When I told the bloke that the political policeman who ran the Funde case against me (orchestrated it?), fell at the ‘New South Wales Royal Commission Into The Police Service’ way back in 1997, it was clear that he knew. Certainly, he hated the idea that an anti racist hero could fall. Yet, he plain baulked when I told him that this officer, Superintendent Neville Ireland, just didn’t go down, but was pushed by my information given to Commission investigators. The Royal Commission showed that Ireland was a rorter of the informant’s fund, a perjurer, and a ‘protector’ of a sexually perverted Justice of the Supreme Court. I reminded the journalist how Ireland would pick the old pervert up from railway police offices after he’d been caught ‘flashing’ in public toilets – and take him home with no charge. He could see that I regarded Ireland as typical of the political police. I could see hatred on the face of this intrepid journalist. After all, Ireland had passed into anti racist folklore as the man who ‘got Jim’. Sadly, some of our more informed anti racists (sic) know the truth and conceal it, ‘Jim got Neville’.

Now it gets better, a lot better.

The Ignominious Fall Of Eddie Funde

I was in the dock at Sydney’s Central Local Court on December 4 1989, to hear Eddie Funde give evidence against me. Yes, he was home on January 27 1989. Yes, the house had been shot at and so forth. Yes, he headed the ANC in Australia. As he was leaving the court-room, I leaned out of the dock and said to him: “Mr. Funde, I had nothing to do with this attack upon you.” He nodded. He probably knew. The whole thing was bad theatre.

After the New World Order forces overturned the ‘white minority government’ in South Africa, Funde went on to become an important man in the ANC regime which took its place. He rose through the ranks of the South African Broadcasting Commission (SABC) to actually control it; he went on to become the Ambassador to Germany (2008 – 2010). After years of subtle attacks from anti corruption fighters in South Africa (Noseweek, July 2004), and after being implicated in the sheltering of a fraudster at the SABC who ran off with 2 million rand, Funde was accused in 2010 of a massive fraud – some 4 million rand misappropriated via contracts with private companies, courtesy of Sentech, the state owned signals controller in South Africa,. Funde was the central player in the fraud and received shares in a beneficiary company. The evidence seems compelling and Funde should end up in prison.

See the Mail And Guardian’s article:

http://www.techcentral.co.za/funde-molobela-linked-to-dodgy-sentech-deal/18317/

Eddie Funde was, as I shall describe here in greater detail shortly, the darling of Australian liberal and leftist ‘anti-racists’ in the 1980’s and a lynchpin figure in the entire ‘anti racist movement’. When his house was shotgunned, he stepped up as a martyr of racist (sic) and fascist (sic) violence, the valiant fighter for a colour-blind South Africa – ad nauseum. I think the shotgun crime did him a favour. It was a funds-raising bonanza. If I had ever organized this nonsense attack upon Funde, it sure back-fired (pun intended).

We have come full circle. It can only leave the proverbial bad taste in the collective mouth of the anti racists, that it will ultimately become Funde’s turn to stand the dock, a sad representative of a regime mired in corruption and scandal (and I should add parenthetically, anti-white hatred).

I cannot say that I do not enjoy the schadenfreud. Essentially, the fall of Funde is indicative of the collapse of a myth. In the 1980’s, the ANC could do no wrong according to liberals and leftists. Its sullied status now – just makes my trial smell that little more odorous. The fall of Funde cannot reverse the verdict against me; but rather, it just takes the pseudo-moral blather out of the case.

That is important. As I write, I observe that the very history of the Funde shooting is being rewritten by the Slackbastard anarchist group via Wikipedia and other outlets and thanks to other anti racists with their toilet-wall Internet smearings and assorted public gossip-mongering. It is even said that I tried to assassinate the man! Assassinate? The prosecution case made no such claim. Yet, as time moves on and myths can be rewoven around the case – why not? And who would know?

It is the fall of Funde as a moral symbol (sic) that just brings the entire affair back to hard earth. To put it in the vernacular: Eddie Funde is revealed as a miserable grub, a parasite on his own people and party and a man unworthy of any attempt at statue-building. Bad luck for all the so-called anti racists / anti fascists and other state connected propagandists! Good luck for me and other comrades from those days of frame-up!

Witness Protection For State Perjurer

It should not be thought by the reader that I was convicted at my trial by any real evidence. Let’s be quite clear about that. There was certainly no confession. There was no scientific evidence. There was no civilian witness who could point the finger. All that the prosecution had was the evidence of two men who claimed to be my accomplices. They seriously contradicted themselves and they contradicted each other about key elements of the story line. The prosecution also had the stitch-the-case-together-evidence of the discredited Neville Ireland.I need not delay the reader by explaining why the guilty verdict issued forth; you can read all about that elsewhere.

Let’s go right to the current point: one of the main (‘accomplice’) witnesses was Jason Roderick Frost, now 44 yrs and by our report, not doing too well. Unlike his co-offender, Frost never wavered in the allegation that I had been involved in the crime even if he couldn’t get his story truly straight. For my part, I have often pondered over what his deal with Special Branch was and how it worked. What benefits did he receive for his evidence? I have exposed some of that in terms of the lenient sentencing on other offences and so forth, the sort of usual stuff, but the truth has the bizarre twist I would expect in any Australian political trial.

We have just learnt that Frost resides in New Zealand on Witness Protection. In 1997, Frost disappeared from view in Australia and appeared nowhere on any radar since until he was found recently living in New Zealand. It was an ‘accident’ that he was located. Nothing more on that will be said here, because the state’s agents observe whatever is said.

It is also reasonably clear from the disclosed circumstances that Frost is not finished with the world of police-work (if I can use such a phrase). It may be that he does some clandestine job for New Zealand’s police. IT probably involves the activities of so-called “youth gangs”. Certainly, the Australian authorities, the Australian Security Intelligence Organisation (ASIO) and the NSW Police, assisted him greatly to remove himself to New Zealand – new passport, new identity, housing, employment. That requires ‘pay-off’ and Frost may have been providing it. Perhaps long hours in a dull factory job set up for him was not rewarding enough for a man who had the bare bones of particular political knowledge? Perhaps undercover work pays a little better?

I have no doubt that the Australian state’s security, police and prosecutions’ agencies would say that Frost was removed to New Zealand to be protected ‘against’ me, against the possibility that I might do him harm. I could say in reply that Frost had to be protected ‘from’ me. His co-offender had already said things to me that contradicted the state version of the Funde crime. That’s a fact. The state could not afford that Frost ever blab things which might contradict the trial script. If I ever communicated with Frost, what might he say? As he said in trial evidence about his story: “bits and pieces come back to me” and “it was drummed into me at court” when being sentenced and so on. The telltale signs of scripting were clear then and the state could take no chances. Indeed, when Frost disappeared from view in Australia in 1997, the NSW Special Branch had just been dissolved amidst the findings of corruption by the Royal Commission. His protector, Neville Ireland, a man who had even obligingly driven Frost to weekend detention in the years 1989- 1991, could no longer look out for him. Other action was necessary.

Of course, being on Witness Protection does not prove that Frost was generally untruthful at my trial, anymore than Funde’s corruption can establish he was not a crime victim in the past. I must say too that Ireland’s proven corruption and bad character, while it undermines a part of the prosecution case, does not demonstrate that the evidence of my supposed accomplices was necessarily - perjury. It just suggests he could have scripted them and did other things to make the charges stick.

However, in the matter before us, we must read Frost’s history in reverse, right back to the point in March or April 1989 (and how we know that time-frame is a story for another time) when Ireland determined that Frost may have been the shooter in the Funde crime

In May-June 1989, Ireland proceeded very carefully, having three one-on-one meetings with Frost at his home discussing, well – something, several weeks prior to Frost’s formal statement which incriminated me. They had a couple of more-formal discussions “after court” where, according to Frost in fact, he was threatened with an “attempted murder” prosecution and according to Ireland, no such thing was said.

Frost was treated lightly and given 18 months periodic detention for the Funde crime. Two other sentences of three months gaol for other offences, were later converted to bonds on appeal. Years later, Frost was placed in public housing and it seems he was given assistance to obtain employment. Did he receive any money? Time will tell on that one.

The New Zealand transfer operation somewhat demonstrates the importance to the state of my Funde conviction. I have said for years that these convictions were important parts of the state’s anti racist drive at the time. The verdicts cannot be surrendered under any circumstances.

The compliant and subservient attitude of Jason Frost to the Special Branch may properly have a basis in the field of psychology. I have read Frost’s psychological reports tendered at the time of his sentencing on the Funde crime. The transferring of allegiances from one group to another has difficulties, but is consistent with the ‘type’ under review. A reward, care and official concern for his well-being, are operative factors. The likely current role of Frost in undercover work would have nascent origins in his suborning by Special Branch as a state witness. The final pattern of rewards shows that reward was present at the start, that the relationship was extraordinary at the start, that Frost would say anything at the start to gain acceptance and ensure his survival.

If Eddie Funde is ultimately labeled in history as a grub, then Jason Frost takes the award for pathos.

The ‘Anti Racist’ Network And The Saleam Prosecution

I have long concluded that my prosecution for the Funde crime was part of a tangled web of activities related to the 1980’s traitor class war from above against the Australian people, a class-war designed to internationalize (then globalize) the Australian economy but with victory achieved in the name of liberal myths such as openness, a Third-World-uplifting free trade system and anti racism. Essentially, I believe there was a political economy element in the prosecution and it is just no wonder that I ‘got mugged’ by the political police.

The frame against me was a long time in gestation. At the time of the Eddie Funde crime, I was the Chairman of Australian National Action (ANA), or as it was simply called - National Action. The organisation had, according to Prime Minister Bob Hawke, caused Australia a reputation problem in Asia. It had damaged investment and trade. He denounced it twice: first on Perth radio in October 1988 and again in Federal Parliament in March 1989.

In other words, National Action was doing its job. It was standing up for Australian independence. However, the inter-linkages of state anti racism (read: anti Australianism, read: whatever undermines the Australian identity and independent status, economically, politically etc) saw it embrace an anti South African policy in tandem with its commitment to economic and demographic Asianization. It was a two front war. The anti South Africa line enabled it to assemble an army of community fighters so it could create a pseudo moral climate conducive to Asianization. Brilliant stuff.

Unbeknownst to National Action, in 1988 Hawke privately asked Funde whether Australia should proceed on sanctions against South Africa without the support of Margaret Thatcher’s government. Funde urged him to enact sanctions. Clearly, Funde was part of the Australian government’s network for foreign policy decision making. He was considered a veritable diplomatic-person. Anyone who struck at Funde was striking at the Australian state.

In November 1988, it was announced too that the Human Right Commission would host a ‘National Inquiry Into Racist Violence’ after the lobbying efforts of innumerable anti racists, many of whom claimed to be “victims” of National Action violence (sic). The Inquiry was an example of anti racist McCarthyism and ran throughout 1989 whilst the Funde prosecution was incubated. It created the requisite pseudo moral atmosphere for repressive action. I have no doubt the things were linked and I have found one or two such links.

Consider John Brink, an anti apartheid activist whose house was firebombed in Sydney in mid 1984. The National Inquiry Into Racist Violence ‘witnesses’ ascribed that crime to National Action. Brink was originally a South African who had been chairman of the Liberal Party Pretoria Branch and a friend of Albert Luthuli, who had burnt his ‘pass’ on 26 March 1960 when ‘staying in the home of the Brinks His case became a sensation. Soon after, Brink went to prison for 93 days, going on a hunger strike and sharing a cell with Joe Slovo, later head of the South African Communist Party. He was a big fish in anti racism.

Then, there was another émigré, Colin Tatz, who had claimed to be a victim of anti-Semitism in 1940’s Johannesburg. After ‘watching friend after friend after friend go down like ten pin bowling pins on all sorts of extraordinary charges of treason’ (as he explained it) he left for Australia in 1961. In Canberra, Tatz became researcher for a short-lived Committee for Human Rights in South Africa. He sought to convince cabinet ministers that many émigrés deemed ‘communists’ under the South African 1951 Suppression of Communism Act were not communists, and a few such people were later granted entry. In 1984, his house in Sydney was shotgunned. This crime too was ascribed to National Action. Tatz was also a big fish in anti racism.

Essentially, it was a case of blame it on the Kellys. National Action was accused by various anti racists and anti fascists of the Brink and Tatz offences – among others. Eventually in 1989, it became payback time, with powerful forces pushing for a successful prosecution of those involved in the Funde crime. The idea that this crime could have been the work of an odd fellow like Jason Frost, just a bloke out on a lark, would never do. The Funde shooting had to be a dark racist plot and dark racists had to be found.

Of course, National Action did know that Funde had arrived in Australia with government support. He was assisted to arrive in Australia by high profile anti racists who were later very active against National Action in Adelaide.

I rely here (and as I have above) upon the informative article by an anti-nationalist, Peter Limb: The anti-apartheid movements in Australia and Aotearoa/New Zealand. I will freely quote from it, paraphrase and adapt its information.

By 1981, Jim Gale, Irene Gale and others succeeded in transforming Campaign Against Racial Exploitation (CARE) into a pro-ANC body and the national office shifted to Adelaide. CARE emerged as the effective national centre, with the United Nations’ Special Committee on South Africa’s blessing, representing Australia internationally and active in the Asia–Pacific region on anti apartheid matters, hosting also major conferences on Namibia in 1985 and 1989. Its leaders increased pressure on government for an ANC office. Gale, who knew Foreign Minister Hayden through the ALP, bombarded him with pleas for assistance. Canberra was suspicious about linking openly with supposed liberation movements, but lobbying and visits by key ANC leaders, notably Mavis Nhlapo and Andrew Molotsane, swung the case. Sonwabo Edwin (Eddie) Funde arrived in Perth on 5 December 1983 as the ANC’s Chief Representative in Australasia and the Pacific and he opened a mission in Sydney in January 1984. He used the offices of Community Aid Abroad for a while and later took offices at Trades Hall; as early as that year, Funde was able to have some input into draft ALP national policy on South Africa.

Funde worked on a wide front and was successful in building broad networks of support. In his first week in Australia, he met liberal South African emigres and befriended NSW state parliamentarian Maurice Keane. On 10 December the African Liberation Trust Fund, aimed at financially aiding the office, was launched by prominent ALP, church, and union leaders Don Dunstan, Richard Wooton, and Cliff Dolan. By his second week, Funde had visited Melbourne and met ACTU and church leaders, federal and state ALP parliamentarians, and NGOs. Wide media publicity was secured. ANC Support groups came into being in Sydney and Melbourne. The following week Funde met Foreign Affairs officials, who reiterated conditions of acceptance for the opening of the ANC office: the ANC was ‘not granted a special privileged status’, and government would ‘not provide financial assistance’. Funde had to rely on donations from supporters..

Again, we can see the high-powered individuals rallying around Funde. I say again: anyone who struck at Funde was striking at the Australian state.

Eventually, later in the 1980’s, the Australian ANC Support Committee (ANCSC) based in Sydney brought together figures from church, union, women’s, media, business, and legal sectors as well as the ALP and Democrats. Former ACTU leader Cliff Dolan served as president, Helen McCue as secretary. McCue was central, but she was invisible to National Action.

McCue, who began as a United Nations worker oversaw the foundation of Australian People for Health, Education and Development Abroad (now Union Aid Abroad APHEDA) by the Australian Council of Trade Unions in 1984 and was able to channel funds from unions and the Australian government to agriculture, health, and vocational training projects in many countries in Africa. In other words, the support for ANC terrorism and anti white racism was channeled via non government structures (but with covert support)

Soon after, APHEDA meetings were held with Eddie Funde about how to get assistance for anti South African elements, in particular those refugees in Zambia and Tanzania associated with the so-called liberation movements. APHEDA focussed initially on refugees and liberation movements.

In 1988, after the discussions with Eddie Funde McCue made her first trip to Lusaka where she met with the exiled ANC leadership, in particular President Oliver Tambo and Treasurer-General Thomas Nkobi. With Nkobi, she mapped out a strategy for a program of support to the ANC.

I note that in September 1989, Tambo visited Australia and conferred in detail with Foreign Minister Gareth Evans. Was the Funde prosecution discussed between Evans and Tambo? Undoubtedly, it rated a line or two. The Australian state would prove its credentials by prosecuting a ‘racist leader’ (sic) for anti ANC violence. Yes, of course it was discussed. I was charged with the Funde crime two weeks later

In March 1990 prior to going to South Africa, McCue suggested to Nkobi that the Australian Government, and in particular Foreign Minister Gareth Evans, would be keen to make a significant gesture of support to the just-released-from-prison Nelson Mandela at the forthcoming Commonwealth Heads of Government meeting. McCue recommended the ANC ask for $20m of development assistance to support the so-called transition to democracy. Eddie Funde, Mohammad Tickly, Nkobi and McCue sat down in Lusaka and framed a development request. The Australian Government agreed to this proposal and Gareth Evans was able to make this announcement to Mandela when he first met him.

That took place in October 1990. I was due to face trial then, but the prosecution sought an adjournment lest I fail to get a fair trial, given Mandela’s presence in Australia. Such generosity. But it shows the close linkage of my trial and foreign policy considerations.

The Funde case was part of the rich tapestry of anti racist effort at the time, one organized aspect of it, something which highlighted their strategy. By 1989, there was a plethora of groups, all interwoven and at their peaks, integrated into state action. The nationalist magazine, Audacity, identified a number of anti racist organisations in the years around 1984-5, all of which were linked through to politicians and state players and broad community networks. National Action was alone in discussing anti racism as a community movement which required an activist response.

It has been said by one academic critic that the National Action made a major mistake in targeting the anti-apartheid movement; he said it was tangential to the basic nationalist message of the group and the ensuing struggle sidelined it. I disagree with that assessment. In point of fact, much of Australia’s anti-racism was expressed through the prism of the anti-apartheid movement. While National Action waged many campaigns in the community (chiefly around immigration, refugees and economic nationalist questions) it would invariably be the same gamers at anti apartheid who would organize against the group. In any case, National Action waged struggle against the anti apartheid movement.

Another academic said that National Action had a “considerable intelligence facility”. That was true. It collected considerable material on anti racists and similar dross and certainly identified many involved in the anti South Africa campaign. However, it is also true that it missed totally the shadowy and complex interactions between the anti racist movements and actual highly placed state players. It failed to identify the leaders of the movement at the highest levels and detail the actual support being rendered to the ANC by the state. In that regard, National Action failed to adequately understand the array of forces levied against it in 1988 – 1989, a factor which played a role in the defeat of the group before it could develop a mass influence.

The material advanced here tends to show that the Funde crime existed in a significant context. This too suggests that the verdicts against me will not be surrendered without legal bloodshed.

Endtime

Political trials must preserve their rectitude. They are showy things, where not only are convictions produced to imprison alleged villains, but great moral lessons supposedly demonstrated in action. In my case, the state wanted to show its cleverness and moral position to the public; it had solved a “terrorist” offence organized by a group of thugs who had terrorized Sydney for years, a crime aimed at an anti racist icon. To those of us in the movement of national resistance, we were supposed to become cowed. Our leaders were to be imprisoned (and hopefully broken) and the secret methods of the political police were there in enough relief to teach us how useless were our efforts and how shallow the commitment of some of our troops. The problem, for the organizers of political trials is not simply that the evidence must never come to be challenged, but that the moral quality of the prosecution’s actors never be exposed; they must never be seen as feet-of-clay, crooks, liars and manipulators. One by one, the witness-actors and the organizers of the trial, have fallen.

My task is to push the edifice right over. In New South Wales in the last thirty odd years, there have been a number of political trials – the Ananda Marga Three, the Croatian Six, the Hilton Bomb Trial and my trial. All were flawed exercises involving (in part) the same core actors in the Special Branch apparatus and in the police. All feature odd central witnesses who were paid off in some way or other to testify. The first three have been shattered in fact or in the court of public opinion. It is now my turn.

The troika in my case, Ireland, Funde and Frost, have lost their personal credibility. In the political trial scenario, what they lose, I gain.

I am resolved to move the affair on and break the convictions, not simply in my personal interest, but in the interest of the nationalist movement. For those who still insist I am the guilty one, I look forward at their ranting responses to this article.

Source

Visit the Afrikaner Genocide museum HERE to find out what the Jewish head of the South African Communist Party Joe Slovo had installed for South African Whites.

Thick As A Brick…

2012-01-14T09:38:00.014+10:00

“My words but a whisper, your deafness a shout” (Jethro Tull)

Dumb and Dumber. Thick and Thicker...

‘Anti-Racist’ is NOTHING more than code for Anti-WHITE, period. So called ‘Anti-Hate’ legislation is purely and cynically designed to suppress any expression of resistance to the currently prevailing dictatorship of Cultural Marxist hegemony. As in the old, more overtly brutal, Soviet Russian system, your only ‘freedom’ is to compete with your fellow drones to be even more compliant, loyal and slavishly worshipful of the glorious system than they. ‘Snitch culture’ is not only encouraged but, as is shown in the escalating authoritarian rhetoric around the recent Western Sydney shootings, (a beautifully convenient pretence) looking more like impending legislation forcing citizens to dob. One of the most fundamental (assumed) rights of a citizen in our English based legal system is the right to remain silent and that is in regard to a person who has actually been charged. The proposals being floated currently include compelling witnesses, or even just people suspected of being witnesses, to talk. What next? A ‘Guantanamo’ style State sanctioned torture program to forcibly extract information from recalcitrant citizens?
And yet Australians are supporting, through their alliance with the ZOG of the United States, a Global ‘Liberal Democratic’ system that delivers ‘International Justice’ via the warhead of a cruise missile. Less than half a century ago this situation would have been considered high farce and been rendered in the form of black comedies such as ‘Dr. Strangelove’. Yet here it is, here and now. Murdering and oppressing and torturing and framing up everyone from Serbian Nationalists to flea bitten Arabs who have the misfortune to be living in the same wretched desert as the Jews on sand that equally unfortunately conceals what ‘the West’ considers THEIR Oil Reserves. And these cowboys have the sheer audacity, the hide, the chutzpah, to talk about hate? Killing for Israel and worshipping, in their own national congress, with record breaking multiple standing ovations, a maniacal bandit state of thieving genocidal Jews who are feeding the cream of White Middle American Manhood, along with many other unfortunates, into a meat grinder? Now THAT is what we call a ‘Holocaust’.
Okay, so who defines what is ‘hateful’? What criteria, precisely, is employed in the determination process what is to be considered as ‘hateful’? It would appear to WLT that merely celebrating one’s White European and, in the case of the so-called ‘Skinhead Culture’ having a certain dress sense and grooming style and favouring particular kinds of music makes you a ‘hater’. Despite the lurid Hollywood and TelAvision productions depicting marauding gangs of shaven headed thugs randomly targeting Non-Whites for summary beatings we see no evidence that this occurs in reality.
Sure, there have been the odd and very rare exceptions where certain individuals or small groups of self styled ‘White Crusaders’ have been misguided enough to believe it is a viable tactic to bash Non Whites but this is a drop in the bucket of street violence. Two of the Black criminal street gangs alone, (and Folks, there are hundreds of them) the ‘Bloods’ and the ‘Crips’, kill and maim more people in a single week than the entire body count, over decades, for the so called ‘Neo-Nazis’. So why the morbid fascination of the Controlled Media for so-called White Hate Crimes? There can be only one explanation, an Anti-White agenda.
Truly, one finds it increasingly difficult to parody such a political regime, like this so-called ‘Western Liberal Democracy’, that bleats incessantly about ‘freedom’ and ‘inclusiveness’ and ‘sensitivity’ and ‘diversity’ and ‘tolerance’ while absolutely NOT tolerating, not only any actual dissident behaviour, but even ruthlessly crushing any THOUGHTS or IDEAS that are summarily deemed ‘Politically Correct’. The hypocrisy is palpable.
Your Old Uncle Victor is not a Skinhead, although he likes their music, and in fact, as a longhaired motorcycle riding Grebo (Greaser Boy) in the Seventies, clashed and fought with them and their various sub-groups such as the ‘Sharpies’ and the ‘Suede Heads’ and the ‘Mods’ etc. Such is the folly of youth, gentle reader, but no great or lasting harm done. In those days it was rare to cop more than a thick ear or a black eye from a beating, and your writer received several of those as well as dispensing the odd one himself. These days…well, you know the answer. So, despite being scumbag Bikers, WLT stand fully, shoulder to shoulder, with any White group, Skinhead or not, doing the right thing by the White Race. Provided they act sensibly and do not impinge on the affairs of other citizens then we fail to see any legitimate reason why the Hammerskins are being targeted by this latest hate campaign of shrill hysteria from the ZOG and its lap dogs in the Controlled Media. The very fact that the concert is being held at a discrete location and invitation only venue is evidence of their sensitivity and, unlike the Fag Parades we are all assaulted with on a regular basis, they will not be on a public street proselytising their political message and inconveniencing the taxpayer.
This certifiable peanut, a certain Rob Messenger, (his is a ‘message’ we truly don’t need to hear) who should, quite frankly, in a normal and well adjusted world, be ‘scheduled’, is simply the latest manifestation of political opportunism hitching a ride on the back of Political Correctness and Multiculturalism in this very sick society. It is extremely unlikely that, given his simplistic waffling, this twit has even the vaguest understanding of Historical, Cultural and Philosophical matters pertaining to the White Race. In the well known process whereby scum floats to the top and, in this case flocculates the faecal colloids into political turds, Racial renegades and traitors such as he percolate to the higher levels of the Cultural Marxist system currently in the ascendancy. Pathogens like this can only survive, even for a short time, due to the soul sick condition of our distorted and degraded society.
Like his ideological fellow travellers in America Messenger is a ‘Neocon’ a ‘New Conservative’ who are merely fiscal/economic ‘conservatives’ who champion the cause of Corporate Global Capitalist hegemony, a borderless One World Superstate where all ethno nationalism must and will be ultimately extinguished. But this agenda must follow a carefully planned trajectory. Firstly, the most troublesome Racial group must be crushed, those uppity and stubbornly independent thinking, individualist Whites. Then, once broken, and this has almost been accomplished, the other Races must be manipulated against the remaining Whites and even each other to neutralise any residual sense of ‘in-group’ tribalism. Then the stage is set, swept clear, for the construction of what all the Globalists from Kissinger to Bush to Clinton to Blair have all called the ‘New World Order’. A Global, Genetically levelled Slave State from which the Oligarch Overlords can draw their coolie labour and maintain a Neo Feudal system where their ‘Guild’ of ‘Elite’ Corporate Families and Clans will live in enormous gated city states insulated from the filth and squalor of the blended beige underclass outside. ‘Messenger’ is just another vile maggot feasting on the necrotised flesh of the corpse that was once the mighty and proud White Western Civilisation. What is though becoming somewhat problematical for these shallow, opportunistic types is, outside of the clique of self appointed pseudo intelligentsia of the ‘true believer’ Bolshevist elite, to convince the increasingly cynical general public, weary from decades of the MultiKult and suffering the depredations of Labor mismanagement, that causes like this have any relevance or benefit to them whatsoever. The great bulk of Middle Australia are more concerned with pragmatic affairs of economic survival and some are even beginning to correctly identify the expediently contrived nature and design of ‘decoys’ such as this.
Morons like him would have you frogmarched to the gulag for defending your Race, traditional values and culture, cause which are really matters of duty and not choice, yet (presumably) simultaneously advocate for abortion on demand, decadence, depravity, dysgenics, free access to ‘recreational’ drugs, genocide, general social, intellectual and moral permissiveness, ‘tolerance’ of sodomy and who knows what other sexual perversions. Go figure…

Haters are just gunna hate. Who supports QLD MP Rob the dob Messenger?

2012-01-12T22:17:00.009+10:00

Well folks being a hater creates strange bed fellows I guess. Rob has friends in high or should we say low places. Could it be that Rob is exactly the opposite of who he says he is?

Now what type of people support Rob the dob. What type of people would agree that its alright to ban/imprison other people from assembling at a private invite only Festival? Well get ready for it.

Click on image to laugh.

You have to be shitting me right? Yes folks its the Large Penis Support group. But watch out, large penis or not you will get banned if you don't follow " The Dragon". This is to funny to be true.

Thanks big guy but you just got banned! Large penis or not you must follow the herd.

Ok now that you have all stopped laughing lets try another. We have all heard by now that Rob is a bit of Homophobe right? "INDEPENDENT MP Rob Messenger has accused gay couples seeking marriage rights of "heterophobia" and said he would feel discriminated against if the controversial civil union Bill was passed."

Well this antifascist is a bit of a mans man if you know what I mean. He also is involved with the anti white hate group Anti Fascist Affinity Brisbane who also support Rob Messenger. Is Rob hiding something from us? Is he using his networks? Or maybe we will see Rob in the paper in the morn saying he feels discriminated by the LPSG because he is a small minded PRICK! Anyways....

Here ya go: Randel Morris (http://www.facebook.com/randelm). From Sydney and tied to antifa Brisbane. Also owns Netfinger Promotions (http://www.netfinger.com.au/) and Daisy tickets (http://www.facebook.com/DaisyTix), which happens to employ Sonny Ellis (http://www.facebook.com/dTickets) also of Sydney and helping lead antifa Brisbane (http://www.facebook.com/AFAAB)

Between the Large Penis Support Group, the Gay antifascists from Sydney and what looks like a closet Homosexual QLD MP, whats a white boy to do besides have a good old belly laugh. Yes folks the patients have taken control of the asylum. What a upside down world we live in.

But wait there is more. Here is the biggest laugh and the biggest HATER of them all. Robs good friends the Israelis. Such nice guys those lot. It would seem you can help Israel by getting Australian citizens thrown into gaol. Dont mind the fact that Israhell is the State that openly KILLS its neighbors and has laws that prevents Jews from marrying Arabs. Nothing wrong with a bit of eugenics hey Rob. Maybe Rob could organise for us all to help man the next aid flotilla to Gaza? Two birds one stone Rob, what do you say mate?

Oh Rob just a heads up mate, again pardon the pun. Next time you incite hatred towards a select group and call them Terrorists on an Australian News Network, you better check with your Lawyer first. I think you may have over stepped the mark this time old son. Later hater.

GENOCIDE!

2012-01-12T21:25:00.003+10:00

Afrikaner Genocide Museum BOOKMARK it!

Antifa Poster Boy MP Rob Messenger drops the ball.

2012-01-12T20:09:00.005+10:00

At 0.55 Rob the Dob said. "Hitler trashed every Democratic institution in Canberra" Oh Rob your so silly. You have certainly earned the crown for 2012 as the official Antifa crusader. Can everyone say with us, hypocrisy?

I doubt he will be around next year.

Anti-Fascist Action Affinity : Brisbane. "Kill All the White Man"

2012-01-12T19:13:00.006+10:00

Click on image.

Yes friends, what do all these dead beats we have pictured in the past few hours stand for? Anti Nazi, anti Fascist, anti State maybe? Well there sure as shit isnt any "Nazis" around anymore unless you believe the MSM or Darrin Hodges. Well maybe we could find a few people who could possibly be called Fascist, but sadly the majority of them are on the Left side of the political arena. Maybe the State? Sure as hell isn't that considering its the State that protects them, its the State they always complain to. Well lets see.... Whats this? "Kill All the White Man" Maybe we should ask Rob Messenger to ban them also? No that's right his son probably runs it.

What a fucking pathetic joke this is being pulled on the Australian public by our Zionist controlled media.

Communicating with insectoids...

2012-01-12T19:03:00.008+10:00

I agree with you about the need to maintain freedom of speech, and respect that this is upholded (sic) by you publishing comments on your site which clearly oppose your 'cause' (worldview? ideology? it's not clear).
I don't get how, on the one hand, you say you don't hate other ethnicities, you just support each 'race' living in its own designated country and not transgressing their national borders.
A ‘Nation’ is nothing more or less than an ‘Ethno-State’. Read about the Indian Nations of North America. ‘Countries’ however, in the modern geo-political sense, are nothing more than Corporatised ‘footy teams’ living within defined borders or largely arbitrary lines on a map.
This is just not realistic.
Who says so?
What about mixed marriages?
Mixed marriages simply would not, have not and do not occur with members of any Ethno-State that has a healthy IDENTITY. Weeds can only grow in an unhealthy lawn or garden. One does not need to resort to toxic herbicides to ensure mono cultural sovereignty, one simply needs to nourish the grass to strangle out the weeds.
You seem to support freedom of speech and other such 'civil rights' but do you support mixed marriages?
Every Human Being, like all sentient organisms, has certain inalienable rights. Deliberate destruction of one’s own seed line through miscegenation is not one of them. That is Genocide. A crime far more nefarious than common murder.
In your perfect world
There can never be such a thing. However, one’s duty as a righteous Human must be to strive for a higher ideal to ensure evolution and improvement regardless of whether it is achievable or not.
what are you going to do to stop them?
Nothing, physically. We can only educate them and hope for the best. If they still then persist in aberrant behaviour then they must be ejected and shunned. Their offspring are abomination.
Are you happy to infringe upon one's civil right to marry/partner/procreate with whomever she or he wants?
Yes. It is beyond ‘infringement’. It is Duty.
If you don't support ethnicities crossing borders - what about goods and services? i (sic) would like to know that in your ideal world i (sic) can still buy goods online from around the world and take holidays in mexico. (sic)
Of course. We are not barbarians. An exchange of ideas, even technology is all perfectly acceptable. For example, one need not marry or import aliens to benefit from their recipes and food technology. An exchange of food process techniques and recipes is amply sufficient. You would also be free to visit any Third World shit hole you choose to so long as you agree to comply to strict (real) quarantine regulations etc.
As you say, there is more genetic variance within a 'race' then (sic) between them. This is why scientists have argued for some time that 'race' (biologically determined) has no genetic definition.
Why do you seek to both misinterpret what we say and spuriously claim a monolithic consensus of 'scientists' on an utterly unproven and, quite honestly, hysterically comical premise? Your bold claim has absolutely no basis in scientific fact. None whatsoever. It is 'pop science' promoted by talking heads on Pay TV. Laughable.
So in this light, why the anti-mixing? if (sic) there is more variation within 'white' - what is the big deal in mixing with 'black', 'brown', etc etc.
One very salient reason is simple aesthetics. As we outlined, Whites have much variation. Non Whites do not. Every Chinese for example knows their baby will have Jet Black, dead straight hair, Dark Brown eyes, Yellow or sallow skin, a flat or depressed nose and probably also suffer from occluded eyes (slit eyes) protruding teeth, bandy legs and myopia. Negroids will have coarse black skin, dark brown to black pupils, frizzy black hair, a receding forehead, thick skull etc. Whites, on the other hand, come in various skin complexions, eye and hair colours. Please explain where the ‘diversity’ would be when one randomly blends all the Races together and everyone ends up as caramel coloured mongrels in the great melting pot. Where’s the rainbow there? Unless rainbows come in monochrome where you live.
Also, for someone who says you're not against ethnicities, why the anti-Jew obsession.
Seriously? Read the site’s archives. There is a WORLD of information available.
Seriously. In this day and age, your views align more with anti-semite (sic) extremists and terrorists in the middle east (who are non-white) than Hitler!
Please study the History, Sociology and Anthropology of the Ancient Mesopotamian tribes, the Black Sea, Caspian Sea and Red Sea peoples, particularly the Khazarian Empire, and then get back to us. Seriously. Do some study. Get up to speed and THEN come here and spout off. You sound like a child.
Your reportings (sic) of blacks killing of whites aren't surprising. People do horrible things. whites kill whites, whites kill blacks, blacks kill blacks, blacks kill whites.
Whites can be criminal and brutal and murderous but, per capita, it is MUCH less than the other races. FACTS.
What are you trying to do?
Disseminate the TRUTH. That is all.
keep a tally to determine which race is more racist? which (sic) race is the most victimised? For what? (sic) to prove that races don't mix and shouldn't? what about the whites killing whites? how do you explain that? maybe it's the whole variation within 'white' that's to blame?!
It is all a matter of degree. Whites do FAR less violent crime than the others. FAR less.
Your views are just so redundant today.
The TRUTH can never be ‘redundant’. You probably mean ‘unpopular’ or ‘suppressed’. Be HONEST. It’s akin to declaring the wheel as ‘old hat’ technology when it has never been improved on. What are you? An ‘agist’?
Why don't you direct your energies into something positive for humanity and the environment rather than just whingeing and blaming 'jews and blacks' for what must be a pretty sad existence?
The only ‘sad’ thing is that there is still, despite the wealth of information available for free and through good independent sources, still such abject and gross ignorance such as yours about what makes the world go ‘round. Clearly you have swallowed the Blue Pill. Good luck with that.
and if it's not so sad an existence, why would you want to radically change the world into the kind that you're promoting?
It is not about ‘changing’ at all. It is about preservation and conservation. It is the current situation that is aberrant and unnatural. Not the one we are proposing. Do you perhaps crave for interracial sexual relations? Are you ‘kinky’ about certain Non-White Races? Do you fantasise about ‘exotic flesh’? Have you perhaps hankered after inter-species sex?
PS maybe people are electing to be anonymous because you're protecting your own identity, and if it's good enough for you it's good enough for all of us.
Everyone, at least those enemies of ours on the Left, allegedly know who the authors of this site are. Check out the old FightDemBack site.
From:
a very tanned 'white' Australian of Orkney Isles, English, Irish, and French ancestory, (sic) who likes Indian food, hip-hop AND fold (sic) music, and doesn't judge a book by it's cover, or a person by their skin tone or who they want to fuck. And no, i'm (sic) not a leftie.
Sorry, but you ARE a ‘Leftie’ whether you like it or not. You are a Globalist. You are a One Worlder. You are A Rainbow Coalition advocate. You are a Universalist. You are a Multiculturalist. You are a Mongreliser. You are a Race Traitor. Get used to it. It’s reality.
No hard feelings…
Break the programming…
THINK!

Yet another crazy and zany antifa member from Brisbane.

2012-01-12T18:26:00.004+10:00

LOL does it get any better? Say hello to Adam Spong.

Those crazy kids from antifa Brisbane.

2012-01-12T18:21:00.002+10:00

Say hello to Meatball. Yes we are serious. Could he be Rob Messengers son?

Antifa Brisbane. What there is actually such a thing?

2012-01-12T18:05:00.003+10:00

Looks like there is. This is the local antifa band Whiskey and Speed. Oh we have heaps more on the way. Stay tuned. We think the photo was taken while calling their new found friend MP Rob Messenger. The company these anarchist keep hey.

Now who can come up with best caption describing the call to Uncle Rob?

It’s SO unfair…addendum…

2012-01-12T17:39:00.003+10:00

Ben Crossley , Antifa Brisbane and member of the band Whiskey and Speed, see you soon buddy?

There’s an old saying about how certain self righteous people will, quite literally, cross the road to be offended. This adage would certainly fit the likes of the so-called ‘AntiFa’ (read: Anti White). This entire attitude of the generic Marxist Left, as manifested in the modus operandi (hypocrisy made flesh) of the criminal gang ‘Fight Dem back’, carefully distilled and articulated by @ndy, reveals their true intent. This is WAR. It is war upon thought and ideas. In true Orwellian fashion, it is not enough that the dissident be criminalised, tortured, killed, disappeared. The dissident must be ‘reconstructed’ and made to love the Great Goddess of the MultiKult. For the Bolshevist Brahmins (the ‘inner party’ members) it is nowhere near enough to crush the body. The spirit and the soul must be utterly destroyed and any thoughts of resistance expunged from the cerebral cortex. The mind must be kept plastic, like a ‘floppy’ drive or ‘RAM’ and subject to constant readjustment as the eternally ‘progressive’ dialogue of the ideological dialectic sustains the state of flux necessary to keep all, elitist acolytes, dissidents and casual observers alike, utterly confused and on the back foot.
Increasingly, sad creatures such as @ndy are moving beyond the scope of parody. Their dogma is evolving and mutating so swiftly into ever more preposterous realms, it is becoming almost impossible to extract the urine (take the piss) out of them. The old farcical (presumably) comments about ‘land rights for gay whales’ and suchlike are transmogrifying into reality at an alarming rate. It has never been more difficult to stay ‘ahead of the game’ as a humorist or satirist with the Leftoids having the pedal to the metal so far as accelerating the decline of not only Western Civilisation but universal common sense and logic as well.
This business about invading other people’s personal spaces and infiltrating groups with the only cynical intent being to feign offence and initiate purely vexatious complaints and legal actions is beyond the bounds of what has, until now, been considered fair and reasonable. But these creatures are neither fair nor reasonable. They merely exist for an ideological agenda and thrive on hate and suppression of opposing ideas. It is not enough for them to weed the garden of those plants they detest. They seek to destroy the very seed and process of germination that results in ‘growths’ they disapprove of. This is nothing short of a ‘Genocidal’ approach being applied to the socio-political process. Crush, Kill, Destroy…

It's SO unfair!

2012-01-11T18:07:00.004+10:00

Small 'a' Anarchist @ndy said:

“Thirdly, while it’s technically possible for a ‘concerned citizen’ to lodge a complaint with the Australian Human Rights Commission regarding the gig, this depends upon them actually being in attendance (or having the misfortune of overhearing it). However, as the Hammered Festival — like all such events organised by the neo-Nazis concerned — is held at an undisclosed location this seems extraordinarily unlikely. (In order to attend the gig, a member of the public must first make contact with B&H and arrange to meet; and only if they meet with the approval of the organisers will they be provided with further details.)”

The first and most bleedingly obvious question is…so why worry? But this is what so-called AntiFa is all about, vexatious and entirely ideologically based objections to other groups of people sharing their own beliefs and enjoying themselves. So what @ndy is lamenting here is the fact that, shock horror, these people will (probably) be able to actually get away with holding a totally private, invitation only gathering where likeminded individuals can express and share their genuinely held beliefs in a safe venue where critics, detractors and violent enemies are totally excluded. Wow! How disgusting is that? Why isn’t the 'mind probe' function of the ZOG Death Star fully functional yet so they can charge these people with Thought Crimes? Please explain! Are you folks out there getting this yet? Do you see what this means and where it’s going? Don’t any of you Lefties have even the slightest curiosity about who might be next on the Thought Crime hate list? Or is it all just fine and dandy with you so long as its only those evil, wicked ‘Nazis’ who are being oppressed by the hated State?

Jail sentence and fines for anyone organising neo-Nazi gatherings

2012-01-11T14:22:00.006+10:00

First he was anti gay, that didn't win him to many friends by the looks of things. Now he is the anti fa pin up boy.

Independent Burnett MP Rob Messenger to compel the State Government to ban the festival.

Mr Messenger is preparing a private member's Bill which will include a mandatory jail sentence and fines for anyone organising neo-Nazi gatherings and has launched an online petition calling for both sides of the house to support legislative changes.

"I'll be looking at a maximum fine of $300,000," Mr Messenger said.

First they came for the outlaw bikers , and I did not speak out—because I was not a outlaw biker;
Then they came for the civil libertarians, and I did not speak out—because I was not a civil libertarian;
Then they came for the gun owners, and I did not speak out—because I was not a gun owner;
Then they came for the White Nationalists, and I did not speak out—because I was not a White Nationalists;
Then they came for me—and there was no one left to speak out for me.

Australain Jewry have a crack at Freedom of Speech and Freedom to Associate.

2012-01-11T13:23:00.003+10:00

Looks like another cut and paste mixed with hate.

Jewish community leaders in Australia are appalled that a neo-Nazi music festival has been allowed to go ahead in Queensland

Dr. Danny Lamm, president of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry, said: "What a sad reflection on contemporary Australia that the State government of Queensland and the Queensland police say they are powerless to prevent an open-air festival celebrating racism and bigotry."

He said he has written to the relevant authorities about this "appalling festival of hate."

via jta.org

A website promoting the festival held on the Gold Coast features links to various white supremacist groups and an embedded YouTube video which praises the "achievements" of Adolf Hitler and the Third Reich before and during World War II.

Now since when is it praising someone to post the Political Statement from a Historical Political figure? What is it that is so damaging that they would attempt to misrepresent this You Tube Video? The truth maybe?

Dr.Danny Lamm President of the Executive Council of Australian Jewry""not acceptable to any decent organization or to any religious groups." Well Dr Lamm neither is this.

Israel and its loyalists abroad have been engaged in a concerted propaganda effort to demonize the Muslim/Arab world and nations which get in the way of Israeli hegemony in the middle-east. Israel rarely fights its own battles unless their opponent is so completely hopeless who are armed with nothing more than sticks and stones, like the Palestinians.

The following is a list of United Nations resolutions that concern Israel and bordering states such as Lebanon. The Human Rights Council has passed more resolutions condemning Israel than it has all other states combined.[1]

From 1967 to 1989 the UN Security Council passed 131 resolutions directly addressing the Arab–Israeli conflict. In early Security Council practice, resolutions did not directly invoke Chapter VII. They made an explicit determination of a threat, breach of the peace, or act of aggression, and ordered an action in accordance with Article 39 or 40. Resolution 54 determined that a threat to peace existed within the meaning of Article 39 of the Charter, reiterated the need for a truce, and ordered a cease-fire pursuant to Article 40 of the Charter. Although the phrase "Acting under Chapter VII" was never mentioned as the basis for the action taken, the chapter's authority was being used.[2]

The United Nations General Assembly has adopted a number of resolutions saying that the strategic relationship with the United States encourages Israel to pursue aggressive and expansionist policies and practices.[3] The 9th Emergency Session of the General Assembly was convened at the request of the Security Council when the United States blocked efforts to adopt sanctions against Israel.[4] The United States responded to the frequent criticism from UN organs by adopting the Negroponte doctrine.

See also: United Nations Security Council Resolution

Resolution 42: The Palestine Question (5 March 1948) Requests recommendations for the Palestine Commission
Resolution 43: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Recognizes "increasing violence and disorder in Palestine" and requests that representatives of "the Jewish Agency for Palestine and the Arab Higher Committee" arrange, with the Security Council, "a truce between the Arab and Jewish Communities of Palestine...Calls upon Arab and Jewish armed groups in Palestine to cease acts of violence immediately."
Resolution 44: The Palestine Question (1 Apr 1948) Requests convocation of special session of the General Assembly
Resolution 46: The Palestine Question (17 Apr 1948) As the United Kingdom is the Mandatory Power, "it is responsible for the maintenance of peace and order in Palestine." The Resolutions also "Calls upon all persons and organizations in Palestine" to stop importing "armed bands and fighting personnel...whatever their origin;...weapons and war materials;...Refrain, pending the future government of Palestine...from any political activity which might prejudice the rights, claims, or position of either community;...refrain from any action which will endager the safety of the Holy Places in Palestine."
Resolution 48: April 23, 1948, calls on all concerned parties to comply with UNSC Resolution 46 and establishes a Truce Commission for Palestine to assist the SC in implementing the truce. Approved 8-0, abstentions from Colombia, Ukrainian SSR and USSR.
Resolution 49: May 22, 1948 issues a cease-fire order to come into effect at noon, May 24, 1948, New York time. Orders the Truce Commission for Palestine previously set up to report on compliance. Passed by 8-0, abstentions from Ukrainian SSR, USSR and Syria.
Resolution 50: May 29, 1948, calls for a four week ceasefire covering Palestine, Egypt, Iraq, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, Syria, Transjordan and Yemen. Urges all to protect the Holy Places and Jerusalem. Offers the UN Mediator as many military observers as necessary. Further violations and the Council would consider action under Chapter VII of the UN Charter. Adopted in parts; no voting on the resolution as a whole.
Resolution 53: The Palestine Question (7 Jul 1948)
Resolution 54: The Palestine Question (15 Jul 1948)
Resolution 56: The Palestine Question (19 Aug 1948)
Resolution 57: The Palestine Question (18 Sep 1948)
Resolution 59: The Palestine Question (19 Oct 1948)
Resolution 60: The Palestine Question (29 Oct 1948)
Resolution 61: The Palestine Question (4 Nov 1948)
Resolution 62: The Palestine Question (16 Nov 1948)
Resolution 66: The Palestine Question (29 Dec 1948)
Resolution 72: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
Resolution 73: The Palestine Question (11 Aug 1949)
Resolution 89 (17 November 1950): regarding Armistice in 1948 Arab-Israeli War and "transfer of persons".
Resolution 92: The Palestine Question (8 May 1951)
Resolution 93: The Palestine Question (18 May 1951)
Resolution 95: The Palestine Question (1 Sep 1951)
Resolution 100: The Palestine Question (27 Oct 1953)
Resolution 101: The Palestine Question (24 Nov 1953)
Resolution 106: The Palestine Question (29 Mar 1955) 'condemns' Israel for Gaza raid.
Resolution 107: The Palestine Question (30 March)
Resolution 108: The Palestine Question (8 September)
Resolution 111: The Palestine Question (January 19, 1956) " ... 'condemns' Israel for raid on Syria that killed fifty-six people".
Resolution 113: The Palestine Question (4 April)
Resolution 114: The Palestine Question (4 June)
Resolution 127: The Palestine Question (January 22, 1958) " ... 'recommends' Israel suspends its 'no-man's zone' in Jerusalem".
Resolution 138: (June 23, 1960) Question relating to the case of Israel's capture of Adolf Eichmann, concerning Argentina's complaint that Israel breached its sovereignty.
Resolution 162: The Palestine Question (April 11, 1961) " ... 'urges' Israel to comply with UN decisions".
Resolution 171: The Palestine Question (April 9, 1962) " ... determines flagrant violations' by Israel in its attack on Syria".
Resolution 228: The Palestine Question (November 25, 1966) " ... 'censures' Israel for its attack on Samu in the West Bank, then under Jordanian control".
Resolution 233 Six Day War (June 6, 1967)
Resolution 234 Six Day War (June 7, 1967)
Resolution 235 Six Day War (June 9, 1967)
Resolution 236 Six Day War (June 11, 1967)
Resolution 237: Six Day War June 14, 1967) " ... 'urges' Israel to allow return of new 1967 Palestinian refugees". and called on Israel to ensure the safety and welfare of inhabitants of areas where fighting had taken place.
Resolution 240 (October 25, 1967): concerning violations of the cease-fire
Resolution 242 (November 22, 1967): Termination of all claims or states of belligerency and respect for and acknowledgment of the sovereignty, territorial integrity and political independence of every State in the area. Calls on Israel's neighbors to end the state of belligerency and calls upon Israel to reciprocate by withdraw its forces from land claimed by other parties in 1967 war. Interpreted commonly today as calling for the Land for peace principle as a way to resolve Arab-Israeli conflict
Resolution 248: (March 24, 1968) " ... 'condemns' Israel for its massive attack on Karameh in Jordan".
Resolution 250: (April 27) " ... 'calls' on Israel to refrain from holding military parade in Jerusalem".
Resolution 251: (May 2) " ... 'deeply deplores' Israeli military parade in Jerusalem in defiance of Resolution 250".
Resolution 252: (May 21) " ... 'declares invalid' Israel's acts to unify Jerusalem as Jewish capital".
Resolution 256: (August 16) " ... 'condemns' Israeli raids on Jordan as 'flagrant violation".
Resolution 258: (September 18) ... expressed 'concern' with the welfare of the inhabitants of the Israeli-occupied territories, and requested a special representative to be sent to report on the implementation of Resolution 237, and that Israel cooperate.
Resolution 259: (September 27) " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to accept UN mission to probe occupation".
Resolution 262: (December 31) " ... 'condemns' Israel for attack on Beirut airport".
Resolution 265: (April 1, 1969) " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on Salt".
Resolution 267: (July 3) " ... 'censures' Israel for administrative acts to change the status of Jerusalem".
Resolution 270: (August 26) " ... 'condemns' Israel for air attacks on villages in southern Lebanon".
Resolution 271: (September 15) " ... 'condemns' Israel's failure to obey UN resolutions on Jerusalem".
Resolution 279: (May 12, 1970) "Demands the immediate withdrawal of all Israeli armed forces from Lebanese territory."(full text)
Resolution 280: (May 19) " ... 'condemns' Israeli's attacks against Lebanon".
Resolution 285: (September 5) " ... 'demands' immediate Israeli withdrawal from Lebanon".
Resolution 298: (September 25, 1971) " ... 'deplores' Israel's changing of the status of Jerusalem".
Resolution 313: (February 28, 1972) " ... 'demands' that Israel stop attacks against Lebanon".
Resolution 316: (June 26) " ... 'condemns' Israel for repeated attacks on Lebanon".
Resolution 317: (July 21) " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to release Arabs abducted in Lebanon".
Resolution 331: (April 20, 1973)
Resolution 332: (April 21) " ... 'condemns' Israel's repeated attacks against Lebanon".
Resolution 337: (August 15) " ... 'condemns' Israel for violating Lebanon's sovereignty and territorial integrity and for the forcible diversion and seizure of a Lebanese airliner from Lebanon's air space".
Resolution 338 (22 October 1973): " ...'calls' for a cease fire" in Yom Kippur War and "the implementation of Security Council Resolution 242 (1967) in all of its parts", and "Decides that, immediately and concurrently with the cease-fire, negotiations shall start between the parties concerned under appropriate auspices aimed at establishing a just and durable peace in the Middle East."
Resolution 339 (23 October 1973): Confirms Res. 338, dispatch UN observers.
Resolution 340 (25 October): "Demands that immediate and complete cease-fire be observed, per 338 and 339, and requests to increase the number of United Nations military observers
Resolution 341 (27 October): "Approves the report on the implementation resolution 340
Resolution 344 (15 December)
Resolution 346 (April 8, 1974)
Resolution 347: (April 24)" ... 'condemns' Israeli attacks on Lebanon".
Resolution 350 (31 May 1974) established the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force, to monitor the ceasefire between Israel and Syria in the wake of the Yom Kippur War.
Resolution 362 (October 23) decides to extend the mandate of the United Nations Emergency Force for another six months
Resolution 363 (November 29)
Resolution 368 (April 17, 1975), called on the parties involved in the prevailing state of tension in the Middle East to immediately implement Resolution 338.
Resolution 369 (May 28, 1975), expressed concern over the prevailing state of tension in the Middle East, reaffirmed that the two previous agreements were only a step towards the implementation of Resolution 338 and called on the parties to implement it, and extended the mandate of the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 371, expressed concern at a lack of progress towards a lasting peace in the Middle East.
Resolution 378, called for the implementation of Resolution 338 and extended the mandate of the United Nations Emergency Force.
Resolution 381, expressed concern over continued tensions, extended the mandate of the United Nations Emergency Force, and scheduled a later meeting to continue the debate on the Middle East.
Resolution 390, considered a report regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force and extended its mandate, noted the efforts to establish peace in the Middle East, but expressed concern over the prevailing state of tensions, and called for the implementation of Resolution 338.
Resolution 396
Resolution 408
Resolution 416
Resolution 420, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 425 (1978): " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon". Israel's withdrawal from Lebanon was completed by 16 June 2000.
Resolution 426, established the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon (UNIFIL).
Resolution 427: " ... 'calls' on Israel to complete its withdrawal from Lebanon".
Resolution 429
Resolution 434, renewed the mandate of UNIFIL and called upon Israel and Lebanon to implement prior resolutions.
Resolution 438
Resolution 441
Resolution 444: " ... 'deplores' Israel's lack of cooperation with UN peacekeeping forces".
Resolution 446 (1979): 'determines' that Israeli settlements are a 'serious obstruction' to peace and calls on Israel to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
Resolution 449, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 450: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacking Lebanon".
Resolution 452: " ... 'calls' on Israel to cease building settlements in occupied territories".
Resolution 456, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 459, regarding UNIFIL.
Resolution 465: " ... 'deplores' Israel's settlements and asks all member states not to assist Israel's settlements program".
Resolution 467: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's military intervention in Lebanon".
Resolution 468: " ... 'calls' on Israel to rescind illegal expulsions of two Palestinian mayors and a judge and to facilitate their return".
Resolution 469: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's failure to observe the council's order not to deport Palestinians".
Resolution 470, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 471: " ... 'expresses deep concern' at Israel's failure to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention".
Resolution 474, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 476: " ... 'reiterates' that Israel's claim to Jerusalem are 'null and void'".
Resolution 478 (20 August 1980): 'censures (Israel) in the strongest terms' for its claim to Jerusalem in its 'Basic Law'.
Resolution 481, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 483, noted the continuing need for UNIFIL given the situation between Israel and Lebanon, and extended its mandate.
Resolution 484: " ... 'declares it imperative' that Israel re-admit two deported Palestinian mayors".
Resolution 485, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 487: " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel for its attack on Iraq's nuclear facility".
Resolution 488, regarding UNIFIL.
Resolution 493, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 497 (17 December 1981), decides that Israel's annexation of Syria's Golan Heights is 'null and void' and demands that Israel rescinds its decision forthwith.
Resolution 498: " ... 'calls' on Israel to withdraw from Lebanon".
Resolution 501: " ... 'calls' on Israel to stop attacks against Lebanon and withdraw its troops".
Resolution 506, regarding the United Nations Disengagement Observer Force.
Resolution 508: demanded an end to hostilities between Israel and the PLO taking place in Lebanon, and called for a cease-fire.
Resolution 509: " ... 'demands' that Israel withdraw its forces forthwith and unconditionally from Lebanon".
Resolution 511, extended the mandate of UNIFIL.
Resolution 515: " ... 'demands' that Israel lift its siege of Beirut and allow food supplies to be brought in".
Resolution 516, demanded an immediate cessation of military activities in Lebanon, noting violations of the cease-fire in Beirut.
Resolution 517: " ... 'censures' Israel for failing to obey UN resolutions and demands that Israel withdraw its forces from Lebanon".
Resolution 518: " ... 'demands' that Israel cooperate fully with UN forces in Lebanon".
Resolution 519, extended the mandate of UNIFIL, and authorized it to carry out humanitarian tasks.
Resolution 520: " ... 'condemns' Israel's attack into West Beirut".
Resolution 523
Resolution 524
Resolution 529
Resolution 531
Resolution 536
Resolution 538
Resolution 543
Resolution 549
Resolution 551
Resolution 555
Resolution 557
Resolution 561
Resolution 563
Resolution 573: " ... 'condemns' Israel 'vigorously' for bombing Tunisia in attack on PLO headquarters.
Resolution 575
Resolution 576
Resolution 583
Resolution 584
Resolution 586
Resolution 587 " ... 'takes note' of previous calls on Israel to withdraw its forces from Lebanon and urges all parties to withdraw".
Resolution 590
Resolution 592: " ... 'strongly deplores' the killing of Palestinian students at Birzeit University by Israeli troops".
Resolution 594
Resolution 596
Resolution 599
Resolution 603
Resolution 605: " ... 'strongly deplores' Israel's policies and practices denying the human rights of Palestinians.
Resolution 607: " ... 'calls' on Israel not to deport Palestinians and strongly requests it to abide by the Fourth Geneva Convention.
Resolution 608: " ... 'deeply regrets' that Israel has defied the United Nations and deported Palestinian civilians".
Resolution 609
Resolution 611: "... condemned Israel's assassination of Khalil al-Wazir as a 'flagrant violation of the Charter'
Resolution 613
Resolution 617
Resolution 624
Resolution 630
Resolution 633
Resolution 636: " ... 'deeply regrets' Israeli deportation of Palestinian civilians.
Resolution 639 (31 Jul 1989)
Resolution 641 (30 Aug 1989): " ... 'deplores' Israel's continuing deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 645 (29 Nov 1989)
Resolution 648 (31 Jan 1990)[1] The Security Council extends the mandate of the UN Interim Force in Lebanon until July 31, 1990.
Resolution 655 (31 May 1990)
Resolution 659 (31 Jul 1990)
Resolution 672 (12 Oct 1990): " ... 'condemns' Israel for "violence against Palestinians" at the Haram al-Sharif/Temple Mount.
Resolution 673 (24 Oct 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's refusal to cooperate with the United Nations.
Resolution 679 (30 Nov 1990)
Resolution 681 (20 Dec 1990): " ... 'deplores' Israel's resumption of the deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 684 (30 Jan 1991)
Resolution 694 (24 May 1991): " ... 'deplores' Israel's deportation of Palestinians and calls on it to ensure their safe and immediate return.
Resolution 695 (30 May 1991)
Resolution 701 (31 Jul 1991)
Resolution 722 (29 Nov 1991)
Resolution 726 (06 Jan 1992): " ... 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of Palestinians.
Resolution 734 (29 Jan 1992)
Resolution 756 (29 May 1992)
Resolution 768 (30 Jul 1992)
Resolution 790 (25 Nov 1992)
Resolution 799 (18 Dec 1992): ". . . 'strongly condemns' Israel's deportation of 413 Palestinians and calls for their immediate return.
Resolution 803 (28 Jan 1993)
Resolution 830 (26 May 1993)
Resolution 852 (28 Jul 1993)
Resolution 887 (29 Nov 1993)
Resolution 895 (28 Jan 1994)
Resolution 904 (18 Mar 1994): Cave of the Patriarchs massacre.
Resolution 938 (28 Jul 1994): extends mandate of the United Nations Interim Force in Lebanon until January 31, 1995.
Resolution 1039 (29 Jan 1996)
Resolution 1052 (18 Apr 1996)
Resolution 1057 (30 May 1996)
Resolution 1068 (30 Jul 1996)
Resolution 1073 (28 Sep 1996)
Resolution 1081 (27 Nov 1996)
Resolution 1095 (28 Jan 1997)
Resolution 1109 (28 May 1997)
Resolution 1122 (29 Jul 1997)
Resolution 1139 (21 Nov 1997)
Resolution 1151 (30 Jan 1998)
Resolution 1169 (27 May 1998)
Resolution 1188 (30 Jul 1998)
Resolution 1211 (25 Nov 1998)
Resolution 1223 (28 Jan 1999)
Resolution 1243 (27 May 1999)
Resolution 1254 (30 Jul 1999)
Resolution 1276 (24 Nov 1999)
Resolution 1288 (31 Jan 2000)
Resolution 1300 (31 May 2000)
Resolution 1310 (27 Jul 2000)
Resolution 1322 (07 Oct 2000) deplored Ariel Sharon's visit to the Temple Mount and the violence that followed
Resolution 1328 (27 Nov 2000)
Resolution 1337 (30 Jan 2001)
Resolution 1351 (30 May 2001)
Resolution 1397 (12 Mar 2002) the first resolution to explicitly call for a two-state solution.
Resolution 1435 (24 Sep 2002) demanded an end to Israeli measures in and around Ramallah, and an Israeli withdrawal to positions held before September 2000.
Resolution 1559 (2 September 2004) called upon Lebanon to establish its sovereignty over all of its land and called upon Syria to end their military presence in Lebanon by withdrawing its forces and to cease intervening in internal Lebanese politics. The resolution also called on all Lebanese militias to disband.
Resolution 1583 (28 January 2005) calls on Lebanon to assert full control over its border with Israel. It also states that "the Council has recognized the Blue Line as valid for the purpose of confirming Israel's withdrawal pursuant to resolution 425.
Resolution 1648 (21 December 2005)
Resolution 1701 (11 August 2006) called for the full cessation of hostilities between Israel and Hezbollah.
Resolution 1860 (9 January 2009) called for the full cessation of war between Israel and Hamas.

Anonymous has left a new comment

2012-01-11T11:52:00.005+10:00

I think we should call this SHEEPLE WATCH!

1/ this world has gotten enough shit going on already. if you wanna worship the white race, better worship all races together since we all evolved from Africa if you think what you are doing deserve a place for happeing, then show the place and let those who are against it have a place to voice their opinion as well!

The out of Africa Theory is just that a THEORY. There is plenty of scientific debate for and against this THEORY.

Under QLD legislation it would be illegal to hold any public meeting that would or could offend a minority. So get the legislators to introduce freedom of speech and you can have your wish. Now we know that isnt going to happen.

2/ i CANNOT BELIEVE IN THIS DAY AND AGE THAT YOU ACTUALLY EXIST! WHY DO YOU HAVE TO HATE EVERYONE? I AM WHITE STRAIGHT AND CHRISTIAN AND CANNOT BELIEVE YOU IDOLIZE A MAN WHO KILLED MILLIONS OF INNOCENT PEOPLE AND ALSO WHY DO YOU WORSHIP VIKINGS? THEY PROBABLY KILLED HEAPS OF YOUR ANCESTORS? I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL WE ALL BREED ONE CARAMEL COLOURED RACE AND YOU WILL HAVE NOTHING TO WHINGE ABOUT!

Yes I find it hard to believe that the European Race has managed to survive. Africa for Africans, Asia for Asians, White Countries for Everybody.

You are a White Christian? Well maybe you should spend some time learning how it was White Christians that helped destroy the European Cultures. Or how about the White Christians who now take us perilously close to another world war. "I CAN'T WAIT UNTIL WE ALL BREED ONE CARAMEL COLOURED RACE" Genocide is genocide no matter what color you are. To advocate the destruction of a race or culture is Genocide. Not very Christian of you. Now go to Israel and shake your Christian fist.

We could go on for ever here folks. The amount of responses we have had here is over whelming. Many stating we are the haters. Yet we do not advocate hate, we advocate peace love and respect for our people and culture. We advocate the right of all peoples of the world to secure their borders. The only hate we now see on this site is from the so called opposition. Do not doubt for a second they wouldn't be the first to raise their hand to round up anybody and imprison them on the command of the State.

The funny thing was the amount of comments screaming that we should be killed or gaoled for our beliefs after following a link from the MSM to Whitelaw Towers. Although the article had nothing to do with Hate and all to do with political correctness the comments only proved these people cant even read. One can only wonder at the stupidity of the brain washed hand lead masses to blindly carry out evil deeds on behalf of the State. They are everything they hate.

Petition to introduce more laws against our freedoms!

2012-01-11T10:01:00.006+10:00

Book burning next?

Source.

A PETITION to stop the controversial neo-Nazi Hammered Music Festival from being held in Brisbane in April has been launched by Member for Burnett Rob Messenger.

"If the laws aren't up to the task to stop the neo-Nazi gatherings, then we've got to change the laws."

The Stark Truth: Keith Preston on Fascism

2012-01-11T09:31:00.004+10:00

Robert Stark and returning guest Keith Preston discuss:

When fascism was on the Left;
Misconceptions about fascism, such as those who label our current regime as fascist, and the idea that the fascists were puppets of the internationalist elites;
The myth of the rule of law and the future of repression.

Listen and download HERE

"The conventional left/right model of the political spectrum holds Fascism and Marxism to be polar opposites of one another. Marxism is regarded as an ideology of the extreme Left while Fascism supposedly represents an outlook that is about as far to the Right as one can go. A title recently translated into English by Portugal’s Finis Mundi Press, Eric Norling’s Revolutionary Fascism, does much to call the perception of Fascism, conceived of as it was by Mussolini and his cohorts, as an ideology of the extreme Right into question.

The reality of Fascism’s origins was quite different. Its creators were an assortment of leftist intellectuals and political figures whose common reference point was their realization that Marxism was a failed ideology.

The early Fascists were former Marxists who had come to doubt the revolutionary potential of class struggle, but had simultaneously come to regard revolutionary nationalism as showing considerable promise.

Fascism subsequently abandoned class struggle for a revolutionary nationalist outlook that stood for class collaboration under the leadership of a strong state that was capable of unifying the nation and accelerating industrial development.

It would appear that the historic bitter rivalry between Marxists and Fascists is less a conflict between the Left and the Right, and more of a conflict between erstwhile siblings on the Left. This should come as no particular surprise given the penchant of radical leftist groupings for sectarian blood feuds. Indeed, it might be plausibly argued that leftist ”anti-fascism” is rooted in jealously of a more successful relative as much as anything else"

Now being more of a National Socialist myself, (National Socialism and Fascism are two totally different ideology's) I find the above article rather interesting. When you read some of the hateful comments recently concerning Hammered you can be left wondering who the real Fascists are?

Meet the opposition "anti fascist Australia" better know as Fascist Anti Fascist Australia.

Maintain the Hate?

2012-01-09T17:03:00.016+10:00

There is NOTHING more ‘hateful’ and evil than any Human who would wish the extinction of any other distinct Race, sovereign group, or ethno-nation. It is a constant source of both exasperation and amusement for White Nationalists that Leftist fools will agonise over the plight of ‘endangered’ plant and animal species and other environmental features, citing their ‘uniqueness’ and ‘world heritage’ importance yet wish the precise opposite for one particular Race of Mankind, the White Race. It is no mere coincidence that Conservatism and Conservationism are such similar terms. Racial Nationalists, be they White or otherwise, are the ultimate ‘conservationists’. Unlike the 'AntiFa', we do not define ourselves with a negative self descriptor. We fight to PRESERVE our people and culture.

Anonymous said...
“Are you guys against all ethnicities? Because the Gregorian chant used to mood your Vimeo clip is from Italy. I wonder how much collective ethnic blood is in the organisers of you (sic) festival - lol!”
Are you guys against all ethnicities?
Is WHITE not an ethnicity? Are you being deliberately ignorant or does it come naturally? Italy, like all European nations, is a source country of indigenous White European people. Who suggested, anywhere, that ‘we’ are ‘against’ ‘all ethnicities’? We are FOR White European peoples. It is YOU who define your very identity by what you (think you) are against by supposedly being so-called ‘ANTI-Racists’. (Code for Anti-White).

"I wonder how much collective ethnic blood is in the organisers of you (sic) festival”
Definitely a HUGE blend of various ‘ethnic’ bloods as there would be at any gathering of descendants of ethnically indigenous White European Folk. You are obviously labouring under the misapprehension that there are no sub-ethnicities or cultures among White Europeans. This proves you are an idiot. Even the British Isles alone has many distinctly different ethnic cultures including English, Irish, Scots, Welsh and the now largely subsumed Pictish, Cornish and Manx, all with their own peculiar folklores and traditions. Now THAT is true ‘Multiculturalism’. What you obviously endorse is Multi RACIALISM and Race Mixing. Something totally different that hides behind the mendacity of a more benign term such as Multiculturalism. We already HAD that, you morons! There is more variety WITHIN the White Race in regard to complexions (pale, ruddy, olive), eye colour, (blue, green, grey, brown) hair colour, (blond, brown, black, red) hair type (straight, curly, wavy) height, build, bone structure etc than there is between Whites and all the other Races. Study some anthropology and History and LEARN!

When “moarons” attack…

2012-01-08T17:27:00.006+10:00

Anonymous (funny that, innit?) said:
“Carefully worded ignorance is still ignorance. Why do you carefully disect (sic) a blog comment from a 'random' person? Carefully dissecting one sentence and replying in an essay format does not enforce your point. Congratulations on being White-Nationalist or What(sic)-Seperatist (sic). Continue to live your life in self created fear.”
“Carefully worded ignorance is still ignorance.”

ALL of this writer’s posts are “carefully worded”. He knows no other way. “Ignorance” of WHAT precisely? Even the most casual and “random” perusal of this site will reveal a plethora of well researched and studied aspects of Race, Religion, Culture, History etc. It is YOU sir/madam/otherwise who is “ignorant” because you do not know what you are talking about.
“Why do you carefully disect (sic) a blog comment from a 'random' person?”
Your kindly Old Uncle Victor is doing nothing that any other blog author doesn’t do, particularly Leftist ones, in analysing and responding to aggressive political adversaries.
There is nothing “careful”, selective or otherwise, involved in the process of responding to a commenter on this blog. We welcome ALL comments but we also reserve the right, as the administrators of this site, to respond when and how we see fit.
“Carefully dissecting one sentence and replying in an essay format does not enforce your point.”
Au contraire, it “enforces” our point very much. We made the decision, long ago, to not give you insipid, lame and pathetic Leftoids so much as a MICRON of space within which to work and disseminate your toxic Humanist/Utopianist bullshit. No easy beat ‘redneck’ stereotypes here or a free ride to insult and offend and lie. Get used to it or FUCK OFF!
Congratulations on being White-Nationalist or What(sic)-Seperatist (sic).
It’s a little pointless, wouldn’t you agree, to congratulate someone on being something you not only don’t understand but can’t spell either.
"Continue to live your life in self created fear.”
“Self created fear”? Really? Truly? “Self created”. Hmmm. Don’t read the reports or studies or statistics or empirical evidence much? Don’t walk around with your eyes open much? If you are not concerned there can be only two reasons. Either you are insulated by income, location or class from the worst ravages of the MultiKult or you are an active element (graffiti vandal/gangsta/anarchist/miscegenator/mud monster) in the criminal cabal of One Worlder arseholes.

Rob Messenger you are everything you stand against. You aint fooling us!

2012-01-08T11:50:00.003+10:00

The Origins Of Political Correctness

2012-01-08T11:25:00.005+10:00

For the enlightenment of the likes of Michael Borg and other clueless Leftoids your Old Uncle Victor is posting the essay below. The author examines the origins of the cult of 'Political Correctness' in a starightforward and succinct manner that should even be able to be comprehended by the barely literate Marxist Zombies that emerge from the political indoctrination sausage factories the Sytem calls 'Universities'. Enjoy.

The Origins of Political Correctness
Bill Lind, February 5, 2000
An Accuracy in Academia Address by Bill Lind
Variations of this speech have been delivered to various AIA conferences including the 2000 Conservative University at American University. Where does all this stuff that you’ve heard about this morning – the victim feminism, the gay rights movement, the invented statistics, the rewritten history, the lies, the demands, all the rest of it – where does it come from? For the first time in our history, Americans have to be fearful of what they say, of what they write, and of what they think. They have to be afraid of using the wrong word, a word denounced as offensive or insensitive, or racist, sexist, or homophobic.
We have seen other countries, particularly in this century, where this has been the case. And we have always regarded them with a mixture of pity, and to be truthful, some amusement, because it has struck us as so strange that people would allow a situation to develop where they would be afraid of what words they used. But we now have this situation in this country. We have it primarily on college campuses, but it is spreading throughout the whole society. Were does it come from? What is it?
We call it “Political Correctness.” The name originated as something of a joke, literally in a comic strip, and we tend still to think of it as only half-serious. In fact, it’s deadly serious. It is the great disease of our century, the disease that has left tens of millions of people dead in Europe, in Russia, in China, indeed around the world. It is the disease of ideology. PC is not funny. PC is deadly serious.
If we look at it analytically, if we look at it historically, we quickly find out exactly what it is. Political Correctness is cultural Marxism. It is Marxism translated from economic into cultural terms. It is an effort that goes back not to the 1960s and the hippies and the peace movement, but back to World War I. If we compare the basic tenets of Political Correctness with classical Marxism the parallels are very obvious.
First of all, both are totalitarian ideologies. The totalitarian nature of Political Correctness is revealed nowhere more clearly than on college campuses, many of which at this point are small ivy covered North Koreas, where the student or faculty member who dares to cross any of the lines set up by the gender feminist or the homosexual-rights activists, or the local black or Hispanic group, or any of the other sainted “victims” groups that PC revolves around, quickly find themselves in judicial trouble. Within the small legal system of the college, they face formal charges – some star-chamber proceeding – and punishment. That is a little look into the future that Political Correctness intends for the nation as a whole.
Indeed, all ideologies are totalitarian because the essence of an ideology (I would note that conservatism correctly understood is not an ideology) is to take some philosophy and say on the basis of this philosophy certain things must be true – such as the whole of the history of our culture is the history of the oppression of women. Since reality contradicts that, reality must be forbidden. It must become forbidden to acknowledge the reality of our history. People must be forced to live a lie, and since people are naturally reluctant to live a lie, they naturally use their ears and eyes to look out and say, “Wait a minute. This isn’t true. I can see it isn’t true,” the power of the state must be put behind the demand to live a lie. That is why ideology invariably creates a totalitarian state.
Second, the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness, like economic Marxism, has a single factor explanation of history. Economic Marxism says that all of history is determined by ownership of means of production. Cultural Marxism, or Political Correctness, says that all history is determined by power, by which groups defined in terms of race, sex, etc., have power over which other groups. Nothing else matters. All literature, indeed, is about that. Everything in the past is about that one thing.
Third, just as in classical economic Marxism certain groups, i.e. workers and peasants, are a priori good, and other groups, i.e., the bourgeoisie and capital owners, are evil. In the cultural Marxism of Political Correctness certain groups are good – feminist women, (only feminist women, non-feminist women are deemed not to exist) blacks, Hispanics, homosexuals. These groups are determined to be “victims,” and therefore automatically good regardless of what any of them do. Similarly, white males are determined automatically to be evil, thereby becoming the equivalent of the bourgeoisie in economic Marxism.
Fourth, both economic and cultural Marxism rely on expropriation. When the classical Marxists, the communists, took over a country like Russia, they expropriated the bourgeoisie, they took away their property. Similarly, when the cultural Marxists take over a university campus, they expropriate through things like quotas for admissions. When a white student with superior qualifications is denied admittance to a college in favour of a black or Hispanic who isn’t as well qualified, the white student is expropriated. And indeed, affirmative action, in our whole society today, is a system of expropriation. White owned companies don’t get a contract because the contract is reserved for a company owned by, say, Hispanics or women. So expropriation is a principle tool for both forms of Marxism.
And finally, both have a method of analysis that automatically gives the answers they want. For the classical Marxist, it’s Marxist economics. For the cultural Marxist, it’s deconstruction. Deconstruction essentially takes any text, removes all meaning from it and re-inserts any meaning desired. So we find, for example, that all of Shakespeare is about the suppression of women, or the Bible is really about race and gender. All of these texts simply become grist for the mill, which proves that “all history is about which groups have power over which other groups.” So the parallels are very evident between the classical Marxism that we’re familiar with in the old Soviet Union and the cultural Marxism that we see today as Political Correctness.
But the parallels are not accidents. The parallels did not come from nothing. The fact of the matter is that Political Correctness has a history, a history that is much longer than many people are aware of outside a small group of academics who have studied this. And the history goes back, as I said, to World War I, as do so many of the pathologies that are today bringing our society, and indeed our culture, down.
Marxist theory said that when the general European war came (as it did come in Europe in 1914), the working class throughout Europe would rise up and overthrow their governments – the bourgeois governments – because the workers had more in common with each other across the national boundaries than they had in common with the bourgeoisie and the ruling class in their own country. Well, 1914 came and it didn’t happen. Throughout Europe, workers rallied to their flag and happily marched off to fight each other. The Kaiser shook hands with the leaders of the Marxist Social Democratic Party in Germany and said there are no parties now, there are only Germans. And this happened in every country in Europe. So something was wrong.
Marxists knew by definition it couldn’t be the theory. In 1917, they finally got a Marxist coup in Russia and it looked like the theory was working, but it stalled again. It didn’t spread and when attempts were made to spread immediately after the war, with the Spartacist uprising in Berlin, with the Bela Kun government in Hungary, with the Munich Soviet, the workers didn’t support them.
So the Marxists’ had a problem. And two Marxist theorists went to work on it: Antonio Gramsci in Italy and Georg Lukacs in Hungary. Gramsci said the workers will never see their true class interests, as defined by Marxism, until they are freed from Western culture, and particularly from the Christian religion – that they are blinded by culture and religion to their true class interests. Lukacs, who was considered the most brilliant Marxist theorist since Marx himself, said in 1919, “Who will save us from Western Civilization?” He also theorized that the great obstacle to the creation of a Marxist paradise was the culture: Western civilization itself.
Lukacs gets a chance to put his ideas into practice, because when the home grown Bolshevik Bela Kun government is established in Hungary in 1919, he becomes deputy commissar for culture, and the first thing he did was introduce sex education into the Hungarian schools. This ensured that the workers would not support the Bela Kun government, because the Hungarian people looked at this aghast, workers as well as everyone else. But he had already made the connection that today many of us are still surprised by, that we would consider the “latest thing.”
In 1923 in Germany, a think-tank is established that takes on the role of translating Marxism from economic into cultural terms, that creates Political Correctness as we know it today, and essentially it has created the basis for it by the end of the 1930s. This comes about because the very wealthy young son of a millionaire German trader by the name of Felix Weil has become a Marxist and has lots of money to spend. He is disturbed by the divisions among the Marxists, so he sponsors something called the First Marxist Work Week, where he brings Lukacs and many of the key German thinkers together for a week, working on the differences of Marxism.
And he says, “What we need is a think-tank.” Washington is full of think tanks and we think of them as very modern. In fact they go back quite a ways. He endows an institute, associated with Frankfurt University, established in 1923, that was originally supposed to be known as the Institute for Marxism. But the people behind it decided at the beginning that it was not to their advantage to be openly identified as Marxist. The last thing Political Correctness wants is for people to figure out it’s a form of Marxism. So instead they decide to name it the Institute for Social Research.
Weil is very clear about his goals. In 1971, he wrote to Martin Jay the author of a principle book on the Frankfurt School, as the Institute for Social Research soon becomes known informally, and he said, “I wanted the institute to become known, perhaps famous, due to its contributions to Marxism.” Well, he was successful. The first director of the Institute, Carl Grunberg, an Austrian economist, concluded his opening address, according to Martin Jay, “by clearly stating his personal allegiance to Marxism as a scientific methodology.” Marxism, he said, would be the ruling principle at the Institute, and that never changed.
The initial work at the Institute was rather conventional, but in 1930 it acquired a new director named Max Horkheimer, and Horkheimer’s views were very different. He was very much a Marxist renegade. The people who create and form the Frankfurt School are renegade Marxists. They’re still very much Marxist in their thinking, but they’re effectively run out of the party. Moscow looks at what they are doing and says, “Hey, this isn’t us, and we’re not going to bless this.”
Horkheimer’s initial heresy is that he is very interested in Freud, and the key to making the translation of Marxism from economic into cultural terms is essentially that he combined it with Freudism. Again, Martin Jay writes, “If it can be said that in the early years of its history, the Institute concerned itself primarily with an analysis of bourgeois society’s socio-economic sub-structure,” – and I point out that Jay is very sympathetic to the Frankfurt School, I’m not reading from a critic here – “in the years after 1930 its primary interests lay in its cultural superstructure. Indeed the traditional Marxist formula regarding the relationship between the two was brought into question by Critical Theory.”
The stuff we’ve been hearing about this morning – the radical feminism, the women’s studies departments, the gay studies departments, the black studies departments – all these things are branches of Critical Theory. What the Frankfurt School essentially does is draw on both Marx and Freud in the 1930s to create this theory called Critical Theory. The term is ingenious because you’re tempted to ask, “What is the theory?” The theory is to criticize. The theory is that the way to bring down Western culture and the capitalist order is not to lay down an alternative. They explicitly refuse to do that. They say it can’t be done, that we can’t imagine what a free society would look like (their definition of a free society). As long as we’re living under repression – the repression of a capitalistic economic order which creates (in their theory) the Freudian condition, the conditions that Freud describes in individuals of repression – we can’t even imagine it. What Critical Theory is about is simply criticizing. It calls for the most destructive criticism possible, in every possible way, designed to bring the current order down. And, of course, when we hear from the feminists that the whole of society is just out to get women and so on, that kind of criticism is a derivative of Critical Theory. It is all coming from the 1930s, not the 1960s.
Other key members who join up around this time are Theodore Adorno, and, most importantly, Erich Fromm and Herbert Marcuse. Fromm and Marcuse introduce an element which is central to Political Correctness, and that’s the sexual element. And particularly Marcuse, who in his own writings calls for a society of “polymorphous perversity,” that is his definition of the future of the world that they want to create. Marcuse in particular by the 1930s is writing some very extreme stuff on the need for sexual liberation, but this runs through the whole Institute. So do most of the themes we see in Political Correctness, again in the early 30s. In Fromm’s view, masculinity and femininity were not reflections of ‘essential’ sexual differences, as the Romantics had thought. They were derived instead from differences in life functions, which were in part socially determined.” Sex is a construct; sexual differences are a construct.
Another example is the emphasis we now see on environmentalism. “Materialism as far back as Hobbes had led to a manipulative dominating attitude toward nature.” That was Horkhemier writing in 1933 in Materialismus und Moral. “The theme of man’s domination of nature,” according to Jay, ” was to become a central concern of the Frankfurt School in subsequent years.” “Horkheimer’s antagonism to the fetishisation of labour, (here’s were they’re obviously departing from Marxist orthodoxy) expressed another dimension of his materialism, the demand for human, sensual happiness.” In one of his most trenchant essays, Egoism and the Movement for Emancipation, written in 1936, Horkeimer “discussed the hostility to personal gratification inherent in bourgeois culture.” And he specifically referred to the Marquis de Sade, favourably, for his “protest…against asceticism in the name of a higher morality.”
How does all of this stuff flood in here? How does it flood into our universities, and indeed into our lives today? The members of the Frankfurt School are Marxist, they are also, to a man, Jewish. In 1933 the Nazis came to power in Germany, and not surprisingly they shut down the Institute for Social Research. And its members fled. They fled to New York City, and the Institute was re-established there in 1933 with help from Columbia University. And the members of the Institute, gradually through the 1930s, though many of them remained writing in German, shift their focus from Critical Theory about German society, destructive criticism about every aspect of that society, to Critical Theory directed toward American society. There is another very important transition when the war comes. Some of them go to work for the government, including Herbert Marcuse, who became a key figure in the OSS (the predecessor to the CIA), and some, including Horkheimer and Adorno, move to Hollywood.
These origins of Political Correctness would probably not mean too much to us today except for two subsequent events. The first was the student rebellion in the mid-1960s, which was driven largely by resistance to the draft and the Vietnam War. But the student rebels needed theory of some sort. They couldn’t just get out there and say, “Hell no we won’t go,” they had to have some theoretical explanation behind it. Very few of them were interested in wading through Das Kapital. Classical, economic Marxism is not light, and most of the radicals of the 60s were not deep. Fortunately for them, and unfortunately for our country today, and not just in the university, Herbert Marcuse remained in America when the Frankfurt School relocated back to Frankfurt after the war. And whereas Mr. Adorno in Germany is appalled by the student rebellion when it breaks out there – when the student rebels come into Adorno’s classroom, he calls the police and has them arrested – Herbert Marcuse, who remained here, saw the 60s student rebellion as the great chance. He saw the opportunity to take the work of the Frankfurt School and make it the theory of the New Left in the United States.
One of Marcuse’s books was the key book. It virtually became the bible of the SDS and the student rebels of the 60s. That book was Eros and Civilization. Marcuse argues that under a capitalistic order (he downplays the Marxism very strongly here, it is subtitled, A Philosophical Inquiry into Freud, but the framework is Marxist), repression is the essence of that order and that gives us the person Freud describes – the person with all the hang-ups, the neuroses, because his sexual instincts are repressed. We can envision a future, if we can only destroy this existing oppressive order, in which we liberate eros, we liberate libido, in which we have a world of “polymorphous perversity,” in which you can “do you own thing.” And by the way, in that world there will no longer be work, only play. What a wonderful message for the radicals of the mid-60s! They’re students, they’re baby-boomers, and they’ve grown up never having to worry about anything except eventually having to get a job. And here is a guy writing in a way they can easily follow. He doesn’t require them to read a lot of heavy Marxism and tells them everything they want to hear which is essentially, “Do your own thing,” “If it feels good do it,” and “You never have to go to work.” By the way, Marcuse is also the man who creates the phrase, “Make love, not war.” Coming back to the situation people face on campus, Marcuse defines “liberating tolerance” as intolerance for anything coming from the Right and tolerance for anything coming from the Left. Marcuse joined the Frankfurt School, in 1932 (if I remember right). So, all of this goes back to the 1930s.
In conclusion, America today is in the throes of the greatest and direst transformation in its history. We are becoming an ideological state, a country with an official state ideology enforced by the power of the state. In “hate crimes” we now have people serving jail sentences for political thoughts. And the Congress is now moving to expand that category ever further. Affirmative action is part of it. The terror against anyone who dissents from Political Correctness on campus is part of it. It’s exactly what we have seen happen in Russia, in Germany, in Italy, in China, and now it’s coming here. And we don’t recognize it because we call it Political Correctness and laugh it off. My message today is that it’s not funny, it’s here, it’s growing and it will eventually destroy, as it seeks to destroy, everything that we have ever defined as our freedom and our culture.

Attempting to discuss astrophysics with insects…

2012-01-08T10:44:00.008+10:00

The learned 'Anti-Racist' scholar that is Michael Borg

Sorry, but your Old Uncle Victor simply can’t resist.
In the Comments section on the post Hammered Music Festival - Australia 2012
Michael Borg said:
“There's nothing better then being multicultural. I guess that's why so many white supremacists have low IQ's, generations of in-breeding ya (sic) know what i (sic) mean?”
“There's nothing better then being multicultural” Oh, really? For who precisely and based on what evidence? Where did you learn that word? What is your understanding of what it means and what is intended to occur under the imposition of its regime? Do you not realise the destructive effects this ‘Multiculturalism’ (in reality Multi-Racialism’ and Race Mixing) concept has had in an Historical context, going all the way back to Ancient Egypt and Rome? Your surname is Borg. That is a Maltese name. Look at how that once great culture of Melita on the very edge of European Civilisation with hundreds of impressive megalithic sites and evidence of a once mighty past has been degraded and the gene pool muddied over the centuries by successive waves of dusky invaders to the point where most Maltese are now little more than Racial mongrels with Arabic and Negroid blood in their veins.
“I guess that's why so many white supremacists have low IQ's, generations of in-breeding” Where is the evidence to back this wild claim of low intelligent quotient values pertaining particularly to so-called ‘white supremacists’? Why do you need to employ such an emotive, and quite frankly largely incorrect, term as ‘supremacist’ in your criticism? Again, what is your understanding of the term’s etymology and its appropriateness for such a discourse? Why not use the far more accurate terms White Nationalist or White Separatist? Do you seek only to provoke and offend? By the term 'inbreeding' do you mean staying within one's own species? One's own Race? One's own Tribe? One's own local community? Or do you mean marrying your toothless, retarded hillbilly cousin as you've seen in countless hateful Hollywood propaganda movies?

You see, we don't understand how you square off that 'inbreeding' slur with those lovely, quaint, 'noble savage' tribes of Native American Indians living in the thick, impenetrable jungles of the Amazonian basin or those beautiful Black tribesmen isolated in the misty mountains of Papua New Guinea. And there are many others. Would you go about spouting insults about THEM? No, of course you wouldn't. Why? Because they are not White and your so-called 'Anti-Racism' ONLY extends to WHITE people. Therefore, you are NOT 'Anti-Racist'. You are Anti-WHITE!
“ya (sic) know what i (sic) mean?”
Why do you write in an ‘ebonic’ fashion? Is it simply yet another distressing feature of the Gen ‘Y’ patois that you now even write or type ‘phonically’ or do you perhaps intend to convey the impression you are some sort of Negroid street ‘gansta’? Is this supposed to intimidate normal people? Is this a deliberate ploy or are you indeed incapable of normal speech? Have you read any books lately? You know, ones without pictures. It is a little rich, don’t you think, for you to leave commentary on our website insulting we White Nationalists with accusations of low intelligence when it is abundantly clear that you are scarcely the stuff of genius yourself. Feel welcome to put your case in writing and state your position clearly and your Old Uncle Victor will post it up on WLT for the world to see. Somehow though, we suspect your intent was never to seek the truth through rational and logical debate. We would probably be correct in assuming you are no more honest or learned than all the other Leftoids we have encountered over the years. Still, the offer stands. We can’t do fairer than that.

@ndy the consummate ‘politician’

2012-01-07T21:47:00.015+10:00

It would appear that @ndy is becoming more and more like the politically expedient creatures in the organised political parties he pretends to despise. As an ‘Anarchist’ who believes in no formal government one would naturally presume @ndy eschews the routine mendacity of party politics yet, here he is, in the below comments taken from his website, behaving precisely like your common garden variety career politician, feigning ignorance (perhaps) about historical events, offering no explanation, verification or references for his own claims while boldly demanding of others that when they make a similar general observation they virtually back it up with CCTV footage and DNA samples.
It reminds your Old Uncle Victor of the Concentration Camp joke where, to gain their freedom, the inmates must answer a simple question. There is a lengthy lead up to the final punchline but the American P.O.W. correctly identifies the ocean liner that sank while on its maiden voyage on 15th April 1912 as the Titanic, the British P.O.W. correctly gives the death toll of 1,514 but when it comes to the Jew he is asked “And what were their names and addresses?” Boom-tish!
@ndy, it won’t surprise our regular readers, is hardly on a quest for the truth and, to utilise his own peculiar terminology, couldn’t be ‘arsed’ about what is right or just or fair, he simply wants to, or at least appear to, WIN the argument. Victory in debate is ALL that matters. Weight of evidence is quite inconsequential. After all, as we have said before, this is a battle if IDEAS. Like any career political maggot he engages in discourse for only one purpose, to promote his own twisted socio-political agenda and bamboozle his adversaries with blatantly contradictory statements, infuriatingly contrived faux misunderstanding and confusion or, at times, cynically and expediently designed convoluted phraseology and rhetoric.
That’s why you’ll never see @ndy outraged, raging against the machine and pissing and moaning about the awful injustice of White Genocide in South Africa and Zimbabwe or the intimidation, bashing, rape, murder and ethnic cleansing of Whites from urban precincts the world over, particularly in the United States. You see @ndy is NOT “Anti-Racist” he is simply ANTI-WHITE.
Outside of the Internet, Google search and wikipedia and away from his handful of fawning acolytes who egg him on, he would be the typical barber’s cat, all piss and wind, with no common sense, let alone substantial knowledge base or moral fortitude to back up his harebrained Humanist Marxist Universalist claptrap. But, operating in his own chosen theatre of battle, the Internet, he appears far more effective and knowledgeable than he really is.
9 Responses to nazi-leaks.net brings lulz #OpBlitzkrieg
Herbert Danz says:
January 4, 2012 at 3:38 am
You kind of people missed to ban Voltaire first. So a lot of people don´t like your ways of stopping people having a own opinion. Like Voltaire says: I don’t like the way they talk, but I fight for their right of a own free thinking. The old leftwing bunch banned Voltaire first and after the right of free opinion. By the way, I´m no Neonazi. Remember, “Red Front” in “Weimar Republik” killed 44000 people for having a own opinion (source: Deutsches Institut für Zeitgeschichte). So it is also the fault of those people, having so many people voting for the Nazi party, as they believed the lesser evil leftwing party.
@ndy says:
January 4, 2012 at 11:26 am
G’day Herbert,
First, Voltaire never actually said “I disagree with what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it”.
Okay, so being French he probably said:
“Je désapprouve ce que vous dites, mais je me battrai jusqu'à la mort pour que vous ayez le droit de le dire”
…or perhaps Stephen Tallentyre said it but Voltaire will forever be CREDITED with it.
Secondly, I’m unaware of the works of Voltaire being banned — when and by whom?
The Catholic Church banned and censored several of his works, most notably ‘Candide’ over the years. He also got into some shit for ‘disrespecting’ Mohammed…apparently…
Thirdly, I don’t know how many people the Red Front murdered in Germany during the Weimar Republic, but whether it was 44 or 44,000, I don’t see its relevance.
Well, it’s fucking RELEVANT to the 44,000 victims and their families, you TWAT! Red Terror Good, Fascist Terror Bad. Four legs good, Two legs bad. Baaa! Baaa!
Peter Watson says:
January 4, 2012 at 1:47 pm
I think he is referring to the totalitarian nature of the left. Political Correctness is totalitarian because it seeks to silence unapproved opposition. If the anti-racists really believed in what they believe in then they would abolish all racial vilification laws and introduce unlimited rights to free speech.
What are you people scared of?
@ndy says:
January 4, 2012 at 4:51 pm
Peter,
“I think he is referring to the totalitarian nature of the left.”
It’s an implication, perhaps, but not a sustained argument.
Huh??? WHAT the fuck? What sort of comment is that?
References to Voltaire, the murderous Red Front and the reasons Germans voted for the Nazis do not add up to much of anything and certainly bear little relationship to #OpBlitzkrieg.
Yeah, yeah, yeah! Stick to the script Pete. Don’t generalise, make broad sweeping statements or say silly stuff like the Left. Y’know, stuff like… “Hitler was the worst and most evil man who ever lived” or “There’s no such thing as ‘Race’. It’s all a ‘social construct’” or “Diversity is strength” or “We're all the same under the skin" blah, blah, blah...
“Political Correctness is totalitarian because it seeks to silence unapproved opposition.”
What makes something ‘totalitarian’ is not its oppositional perspective but its extent: total.
By @ndy’s logic then, there can never have been a ‘totalitarian’ political regime, not even the National Socialists, the Communists or the Fascists at the peak of their power, because every one of these regimes had its dissidents and enemies within right to the very end of their reigns.
In any case, in ordinary usage, ‘political correctness’ has little to do with #OpBlitzkrieg. A more appropriate consideration would be ‘privacy’ and it’s this which forms the basis of possible legal action regarding the nazi-leaks site.
Yet again @ndy quite deliberately and pedantically deals with the terminology only insofar as it relates to the scope of the original story. He is behaving like a crooked judge who decides quite arbitrarily, for his own purposes, what is permissible evidence and what falls outside the parameters of the permitted area of discussion.
“If the anti-racists really believed in what they believe in then they would abolish all racial vilification laws and introduce unlimited rights to free speech.”
This is a nonsensical proposition as well as being irrelevant to the case at hand.
A ‘Nonsensical proposition’… but Multicultural Universalism isn’t?
First, ‘anti-racists’ adopt a variety of positions with regards ‘racial vilification’ laws and the fact that these vary does not lessen the depth of commitment to the principles of anti-racism by those who propound them. The same applies to ‘freedom of speech’, rights associated with this concept and its legislative framework.
Well, there you go, ‘legislative framework’. Firstly @ndy claims/admits that so-called 'Anti-Racists' have no agreement on what actually constitutes 'Racial Vilification' then admits that this nevertheless has no damping effect whatsoever on the reckless enthusiasm to steam full ahead with total, fanatical commitment to an, as yet, unagreed upon set of 'principles'. And to sum up, in his comment on 'free speech' he reveals he and his Leftist fellow travellers still actually believe there can be DEGREES of 'Freedom of speech' like a woman can be half pregnant. Twaddle, gobbledegook and claptrap. This twerp could talk himself into a corner, do a double backflip and disappear up his own arse in a cloud of smoke.

Finally, these debates have little to do with #OpBlitzkrieg.
“What are you people scared of?”
#OpBlitzkrieg kicked off with the following statement:
Neo-Nazis
Your incomprehensible actions, and your reluctance to accept the Freedom and Equality that every single human being possesses by right from birth, causes the birth to hatred and worldwide Racism.
After the first World War, your ideology plunged the world into chaos. You took over a plague, known as anti-Semitism, and made sure that racism was drilled into our collective consciousness, in order for humanity to accept this crude ideas as given, mostly without ever questioning them.
Your misdirected politics and your hate filled crusade against humanity have not only blurred your perception, but also affected countries worldwide. You have robbed irretrievable evidences of history as well as valuable art objects and architectural structures which belong to mankind, or were part of the cultural heritage of humanity. You were anxious to cause trouble between continents, which involved a collapse of political dialogues. The result, the cold war, lasted for years and its voice still echoes today. The holocaust against the Jewish, the sinti and the roma, your so called “euthanasia” imposed on disabled people, all of them are considered the cruel climax of the Second World War, to a cost of 6.000.000 innocent people’s lifes. You have combined the ideals of industrialization with the abomination of mass murder, a circumstance that led to destruction of human life, in a scale never seen before.
All this are known facts and yet you are still following and spreading such ideals, in order to enhance the symbolism of this despicable hate further. You are still causing injuries and killing people, people who have that done nothing against you, and yet you do it partly out of disgust or simply for your own personal pleasure.
You intimidate people that go on the streets protest for their ideals, and attack your political opponents, thus you deny them the right of free speech. Yet you hypocriticaly demand this exact same right of free speech for yourself, and throw the dirt in the form of agitations and “art around you”. You attack journalists and the media in general, you attack members of the opposing parties and equally you attack refugees and immigrants, who live and work in your “home country”. This people simply had to leave their native countries because of suppression and misery.
This behaviour can no longer be tolerated. You have convicted yourself to many crimes against humanity. With this hypocritical attitude and your drive to become a mirror of your inspirational criminals, you have brought the attention of the collective known as Anonymous upon yourself.
In this case, this attention implies the taken of crucial actions against your actions.
We are Anonymous.
We are Legion.
We do not Forgive.
We do not Forget.
Expect Us.
Peter Watson says:
January 4, 2012 at 7:48 pm
Let[']s have a track record of the anti-racist movement in the [W]estern world.
Anti-racist organisations like Fight Dem Back! and Searchlight have hounded people causing them to lose their jobs and some are unable to regain employment.
Anti-racists have taken people to court resulting in people going to jail or being fined for simply speaking their mind on matters concerning multiculturalism/racialism.
Anti-racists have committed cyber-terrorism against legal organisations and people going about their lawful business. Examples include the theft of membership lists of One Nation, National Front and the British National Party. As a result, people have lost their jobs and some have been physically assaulted by anti-racists.
Anti-racists have physically attacked nationalists on many occasions. One example would be how a man back in the 1980s was killed when an anti-racist threw a brick at him which hit his head. Other examples include Trotskyists who threw human waste at One Nation members back in the late 1990s.
Evidence has indicated that certain members of the anti-racist movement are in fact agents of state security organisations (ASIO, FBI, SIS) or provide state security organisations with information.
Certain high profile figures of the anti-racist movement have received police support and/or protection. An example would include [Mathew] Henderson, high profile figure of Fight Dem Back!, when he was protected by the NSW Police from nationalists.
The racial vilification laws make any attempt at criticising Cultural Marxism illegal. It is illegal under the racial vilification laws to publish facts about non-white crime.
As for the statement about “neo-Nazis” and National Socialism and White Racialism has murdered millions and “plunged the world into chaos” that is slightly hypocritical.
Humans are [in]equal. The movements of the 19th and 20th centuries that attempted to enforce human equality resulted in the deaths of over a hundred million people in the space of less than one hundred years. Every attempt at creating human equality has failed because it is not natural. Most problems in Australian, and indeed [W]estern societies, have been created by Cultural Marxism which is in fact a creation of the left.
The Zionist Jews have been the major players of the left since the 19th Century. Jews played a key role in the creation of Marxist Socialism and of Cultural Marxism. The twin ideologies of Marxist Socialism and Cultural Marxism have lead to the deaths of over a hundred million people during the 20th Century. Thousands of mainly White people have died because of multiculturalism in South Africa, Rhodesia and in many [W]estern countries through interracial murders and violence. Cultural Marxism is supported by many people in the leftist movement and by anarchists such as yourself, @ndy.
Cultural Marxism is of course anti-White Racialist but has no problem with other races being proud of their race. For example White Racial power or pride is denounced by people such as yourself but you have no problem with Australian Aboriginal power or pride. You claim that [it] is justifiable because it is “reverse discrimination” or “positive racism”. But it is racism and discrimination nonetheless and undermines your claims that races don’t exist and that all people are equal. The Black Empowerment Programme in South Africa and the anti-[W]hite policies of the Mugabe government have plunged millions of White Africans into poverty but the policies have not improved the lives in general of black people in South Africa or Zimbabwe.
In reality, Cultural Marxism and Marxist Socialism along with all ideologies based on the perception of human equality are disgusting and are dangerous.
Now go and suck cock, faggot!
@ndy says:
January 4, 2012 at 11:52 pm
“Anti-racist organisations like Fight Dem Back! and Searchlight have hounded people causing them to lose their jobs and some are unable to regain employment.”
Really. Who are these people?
“Anti-racists have taken people to court resulting in people going to jail or being fined for simply speaking their mind on matters concerning multiculturalism/racialism.”
Really. Who are these people? I don’t know of any person in Australia who’s been sentenced to prison after ‘anti-racists’ have taken them to court “for simply speaking their mind on matters concerning multiculturalism/racialism”. There are two recent cases of possible relevance. The first (January 2011) relates to Brendon O’Connell, “the first person in Western Australia to be convicted under the state’s racial vilification laws”. That case was brought by WA police and O’Connell represented himself. The other case (August 2009) involves Uncle Fred (Töben). In this instance, Uncle Fred went to jail for contempt of court. Neither case involved ‘anti-racists’ taking court action; neither O’Connell nor Uncle Fred were merely expressing an opinion on multi-culturalism and/or multi-racialism.
“Anti-racists have committed cyber-terrorism against legal organisations and people going about their lawful business. Examples include the theft of membership lists of One Nation, National Front and the British National Party. As a result, people have lost their jobs and some have been physically assaulted by anti-racists.”
Nonsense. What on Earth is “cyber-terrorism”?
One Nation’s membership list was not published by ‘anti-racists’ but by AIJAC (July 1998), an act that was considered to be highly controversial, both within and outside of local Jewish communities. (The publishers of the Review also claimed the infos was provided to them by disgruntled senior members.)
I’m not aware of the UK NF’s list being leaked, tho’ a coupla years ago the tiny email list of the NZNF was published online. That wasn’t a case of theft but the party’s inability to BCC.
As for the BNP, yes, on at least two or possibly three occasions of late (that I’m aware of) their membership lists have been published online (October 2009, November 2008). Responsibility for the last leak has not, to my knowledge, been established; an ex-BNP member was found guilty of leaking material in the November case. In any event, I’m not aware of anybody being assaulted following or as a result of the publication of these lists, and the only person (that I’m aware of) to have lost their job as the result of the leaks was a DJ named Rod Lucas. Finally, the list published on Wikileaks in 2009 appears to be substantially similar to the one originally leaked in 2008 and published on a blog (presumably by the guy what got done for it).
“Anti-racists have physically attacked nationalists on many occasions. One example would be how a man back in the 1980s was killed when an anti-racist threw a brick at him which hit his head. Other examples include Trotskyists who threw human waste at One Nation members back in the late 1990s.”
Anti-racists have assaulted ‘White nationalists’ yes, but in Australia such assaults are extremely rare: feel free to provide examples of convictions for assault committed under these circumstances. As for the death of a man in the 1980s, I’ve no idea. You’re free to elaborate. So too regarding Trots throwing shit at ON members; I do remember NA throwing shit on protesters during the same period but.
“Evidence has indicated that certain members of the anti-racist movement are in fact agents of state security organisations (ASIO, FBI, SIS[?]) or provide state security organisations with information.”
What evidence? Otherwise, yes of course: when thought appropriate, the state infiltrates anti-racist groups. (And racist groups. And any other group believed to pose a threat to social order.) A notable recent example is former police officer turned academic Bob Lambert infiltrating the Socialist Party front Youth Against Racism in Europe in the 1990s. He was exposed as a spy by London Greenpeace in October 2011.
“Certain high profile figures of the anti-racist movement have received police support and/or protection. An example would include [Mathew] Henderson, high-profile figure of Fight Dem Back!, when he was protected by the NSW Police from nationalists.”
Uh-huh. Presumably, you’re referring to a newspaper article from 2005 (‘Race-hate campaigner unmasked’, Greg Roberts, The Australian, August 22, 2005) in which it’s written that:
THE man behind a race-hate campaign in southern Queensland has been identified as a professional kangaroo shooter from the Darling Downs town of Crows Nest. Police are tracking the movements of Jim Perren, 38, after anti-racism campaigners contacted them to register concern about his activities. Mr Perren has posted hundreds of race-hate messages on the internet under the pseudonym stug111 — a type of German assault gun.
IIRC, at the time Jim made some blah about coming down to Sydney and showing Mathew who’s boss.
“The racial vilification laws make any attempt at criticising Cultural Marxism illegal. It is illegal under the racial vilification laws to publish facts about non-white crime.”
Transparent nonsense. Read the legislation.
Really? It’s a pity the agenda of the legislators is not ‘transparent’.
Later hater.
That’s pretty funny too. @ndy utilises that trusty old label ‘hater’ like only non ‘Anti-Racists’ can ‘hate’, and we all know that’s ‘transparently nonsensical’ don’t we kiddies?
Aussie says:
January 5, 2012 at 12:09 am
Peter, sorry to butt in.
But, I just want to make a simple point to you.
There is truth to what you say, if you were to generalise about the left.
Does this mean you approve of the right? Disapprove of the right yet still find it necessary to defend them? Or do you dislike the left for ‘other’ reasons?
It just doesn’t make sense when you fight hate, yet appear to defend it at the same time.
@ndy says:
January 5, 2012 at 1:19 am
As for the statement about “neo-Nazis” and National Socialism and White Racialism has murdered millions and “plunged the world into chaos” that is slightly hypocritical.
Hardly. First, the statement is directed at neo-Nazis. Secondly, the Nazis and the puppet regimes they installed throughout Europe did indeed murder millions of civilians: Jews, Roma, Sinti and others, in accord with their ideology and their crazed desire to cleanse the continent of these ‘sub-human’ populations. Finally, the statement would be hypocritical only if those responsible for issuing it claimed the same mandate, which they expressly do not.
“Humans are [in]equal. The movements of the 19th and 20th centuries that attempted to enforce human equality resulted in the deaths of over a hundred million people in the space of less than one hundred years. Every attempt at creating human equality has failed because it is not natural. Most problems in Australian, and indeed [W]estern societies, have been created by Cultural Marxism which is in fact a creation of the left.”
More nonsense. What were these movements and whom did they kill? The movements against slavery did not ‘enforce equality’, they resisted racial oppression. By the same token, equality before the law and movements for women’s rights did not emerge in the 19th and 20th centuries but (in Europe at least) as the logical extension of liberal Enlightenment values: citizens did not obtain the right to legal representation and women did not obtain the franchise through committing mass murder. In any case (and in summary), to collapse several hundred years of social struggle into such fatuous propositions as you do above is simply idiotic.
“The Zionist Jews have been the major players of the left since the 19th Century. Jews played a key role in the creation of Marxist Socialism and of Cultural Marxism. The twin ideologies of Marxist Socialism and Cultural Marxism have lead to the deaths of over a hundred million people during the 20th Century.”
Further stoopid. ‘Zionist Jews’ constitute a tiny fraction of movements of the left,
erm…so what? It is well understood that most political movements are controlled and led by the top one or two of the general membership just as any society is manipulated by the five or six percent that is considered ‘critical mass’ for any special interest ‘minority’ to gain a controlling influence over national affairs.
and Jewish nationalism has assumed diverse forms; many of the most prominent Jewish intellectuals of the nineteenth century (Marx for example) opposed Zionism —
@ndy is deliberately misconstruing what Mr. Watson means when he refers to ‘Zionists’ and mischievously milks this for all it’s worth. He surely understands that, although technically incorrect, the term, as Watson and also White Nationalists employ it in ‘ordinary usage’, has a pejorative meaning referring to Jewish extremists in general and not specifically only those ‘nationalist’ Jews who demand a homeland in Palestine. Some people have selective memory. It would appear @ndy has ‘selective comprehension’.
an ideology whose growth was to a large extent the result of the failure of other emancipatory (sic) movements of the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries…
As for the rest, I couldn’t be arsed. You’re an ignorant, ill-mannered, racially-obsessed pissant, and will no longer be gracing my blog with your ill-informed diatribes.
Paul Justo says:
January 5, 2012 at 9:15 am
Peter, your only chance now is to revert back to your former role as General Secretary of the Stalinist League of Australia (Warwick) and fighting the Anti-Normal People’s Alliance at the tuck shop.
It is all very well for the likes of @ndy and his fellow travellers to simplistically smear any who value Racial reality politics and Jew awareness with hackneyed epithets like “Neo-Nazis” with the obvious implication that this ethno-nationalistic concern is simply a hateful continuation of the legacy of German National Socialism and Italian/Spanish Fascism that emerged in Europe less than a century ago, but no lesser a document than The Magna Carta (The Great Charter) of 1215 made provision to protect the indigenous English from the predations of the Jew. And we quote:
10. If any one has taken anything, whether much or little, by way of loan from Jews, and if he dies before that debt is paid, the debt shall not carry usury so long as the heir is under age, from whomsoever he may hold. And if that debt falls into our hands, we will take only the principal contained in the note.
11. And if any one dies owing a debt to Jews, his wife shall have her dowry and shall pay nothing on that debt. And if the said deceased is survived by children who are under age, necessities shall be provided for them in proportion to the tenement that belonged to the deceased; and the debt shall be paid from the remainder, saving the service of the lords. In the same way let action be taken with regard to debts owed to others besides Jews.
It is an insult to one’s intelligence to suggest that such an eminent document as this would make such carefully specific declarations regarding the behaviour of Jews merely to satisfy base desires of envy, hatred, jealousy and ‘Racism’ with no foundation.
Later, in 1290, the hard and heroic King Edward The First of England, known as ‘Longshanks’, and carrying the fearsome title of ‘Malleus Scoti’ (Hammer Of The Scots) issued the ‘Edict Of Expulsion’ whereby all Jews were expelled from England. It would be over 350 years before it was overturned in 1656 by the self appointed English dictator (Lord Protector) ruthless iconoclast, apostate and traitor Oliver Cromwell whose ‘New Model Army’ was largely funded by Dutch Jews. The readmittance of the coin clippers and usurers to England was a payback for services rendered.
Cromwell though was a creature so comprehensively despised and hated by his own fellow countrymen that on 30th January in 1661, (the 12th anniversary of the execution of Charles The First), his body was exhumed from Westminster Abbey, and was subjected to the ritual of a posthumous execution. The rotting corpse was then hanged in chains at Tyburn. Finally, as the ultimate act of disrespect, the beheaded corpse was thrown into a pit, while his severed head was displayed on a pole outside Westminster Hall until 1685. THAT folks is how traitors to their people USED to be treated in the good old days, unlike today where they seem to be REWARDED with cushy jobs at the ‘United Nations’ and other criminal organisations.
Again, are we to believe that Edward ‘Longshanks’ was as simplistically evil and intrinsically wicked as he has been portrayed in many a Hollywood movie, and particularly the extremely nasty version we saw in the Mel Gibson movie ‘Braveheart’? Is this how we ‘study history’ and receive wisdom? The main root of our problem today, particularly with this current generation, and the previous one, of Uni grad ‘student’ types is that they do not even know the most rudimentary methodology and rules of study and research and many leave University with Degrees while remaining barely functioning illiterates. There are Doctors and Lawyers out there who cannot even construct a letter. As Jonathan Bowden says; “There is no need to ban books in a society where forty percent of the population can’t even read!”
To paraphrase @ndy himself… seriously, read a book.

"Racist South Africa" all whites barred from JOB MARKET: anc-paper

2012-01-07T11:19:00.008+10:00

The UN Genocide Convention defines genocide as … any of a number of acts committed with the intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial or religious group: killing members of the group; causing serious bodily or mental harm to members of the group; deliberately inflicting on the group conditions of life calculated to bring about its physical destruction in whole or in part; imposing measures intended to prevent births within the group, and forcibly transferring children of the group to another group. http://www.un.org/millenniu/law/iv-1.htm

Source Censorbugbear Reports. Book Mark it!

White women ‘the biggest losers’ under latest new anti-white job-exclusion laws in South Africa – white men have been excluded for past decade: women kept the pot boiling…

"White women guilty of ‘fronting’ as ‘labour brokers’ could be jailed for 10 years"

Jan 6 2011 – Although their children consistently obtain the highest educational pass-rates, it’s especially the 3,5-million-strong Afrikaner community which will effectively be completely barred from the South African job-sector under the ANC regime’s new employment amendment bill.

“This is a victory for the black business lobby, which has been fighting to exclude white women from the job market’… writes ANC’s own newspaper, access the article at New Age: (or click on the page-view below)

The ANC's own newspaper, New Age, reporter Gaongalelwe Tiro, reports with considerable joy that 'white women would be the biggest losers" -- once the broad-based black economic empowerment amendment bill was enacted as expected early next year, BEE specialist Andile Tlhoaele said on Monday.

The proposed changes meant they (white women) would no longer be entitled to benefit from empowerment programmes as has been the case till now.

“This represents a victory for the black business lobby, which has been fighting for their exclusion.” White women would no longer be regarded as legitimate beneficiaries of black economic empowerment once imminent new laws come into effect, a member of a subcommittee of the presidential BEE advisory committee, Andile Tlhoaele, said in an interview.

‘ The new amendment bill now ELIMINATES all white people including disabled ones: ‘

The Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) Amendment Bill eliminates all white people including the disabled. “The definition of black people is now clear and aligned with the Constitution,” Tlhoaele said.
There has been widespread criticism that white women were "benefitting disproportionately" from black economic empowerment with their black counterparts relegated to the bottom rung of the drive to redress societal inequalities. The Black Management Forum has been leading the calls for white women to be excluded after it came to light that they were the fastest rising category of people in terms of employment equity.

“Inclusion of white women had been abused…’

Tlhoaele said the inclusion of white women "had been abused. This had defeated the aim of true inclusivity."
Now that the B-BBEE Act would take precedence over other legislation relating empowerment, enterprises would no longer be able to claim employment equity points for white women. Employment equity is a key element of the B-BBEE scorecard used to rate empowerment credentials.

The Employment Equity Act now still has white women as a designated group for “affirmative action purposes”. Tlhoaele said proposed changes to BEE legislation would “go a long in ensuring that growing numbers of previously disadvantaged South Africans were drawn into the mainstream economy…” (Question: by excluding the entire Afrikaner minority? )

Trade and Industry Minister Rob Davies gazetted the Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment (B-BBEE) Amendment Bill two weeks ago and gave members of the public 60 days to make submissions. Another highlight of the amendments has been the criminalisation of the practice of misrepresenting BEE credentials, known as “fronting”.

Women found guilty of ‘fronting’ could face jail terms of up to 10 years…

In terms of the proposed amendments, those involved in fronting could face jail terms of up to 10 years or be fined 2%-10% of annual turnover depending on the seriousness of the incident. In addition, contracts awarded to guilty companies could be cancelled.

Further, the amended law requires the government and its agencies (and its tender companies) to comply. The auditor-general will audit and report on BEE compliance for government departments.

Stock exchange-listed companies will be required to submit annual reports to the B-BBEE Commission, which the amendments propose. The commission’s function would include supervising adherence to the act.

It would further receive and investigate complaints relating to B-BBEE, and maintain a registry of major empowerment transactions. “The proposals are a bold move and demonstrate government’s commitment to ensure successful implementation of BEE,” Tlhoaele said.

“The Broad-based Black Economic Empowerment Amendment Bill closes many loopholes in the current BEE Act – a move that is long overdue.” article in New Age by: gaongalelwet@thenewage.co.za

The Jew World Order Is Upon Us, Beware!

2012-01-06T15:02:00.004+10:00

THE RULE OF the Talmudic Jew in modern times is nearly one of an absolute monarch of a country. The Jews, through their complete domination of world finance and banking — through their malignant monopoly of the mass media of America, Britain, France, Canada and other Western powers — through their influential and vast network of subversive “lobby groups” — through their dominion over the courts and law profession in general — not to mention their pernicious presence inside the highest levels of government of the most powerful countries — have thus taken full control of the entire planet, as was foretold in ancient Jewish religious texts.

Even though anti-Semitism became a capital crime punishable by death after the revolution of 1917 (as you shall see), Jews now ludicrously assert that they were “persecuted.”

Please read the full article HERE at ZionCrime Factory. BOOKMARK IT!

Strange Bedfellows? No its just the Jews and the Australian Protectionist Party.

2012-01-06T10:45:00.009+10:00

When Storm Front "Nazis" go bad.

Fuck me WLT staff picked this one a long time ago. The Nation Wreckers and the Nationalist Party Wreckers certainly do work hand in hand!

Mean while Australian White Nationalist Political orgs like Australia First cop a pizzling from the anti white state sponsored anarchists over at Slackbastard, not a word about the Jewish co operation with the Blind rage/swallow the pill party the APP. I wonder why?

A picture tells a thousand stories. This one Six Million.

Click on image, what will you see? Jew Jew Jew, Australian content?

Darrin Hodges and the Australian Protectionist Party interviewed by Bnai Brith/AJN. Strange anti-bds bedfellows - (230911)

GROUPS with hardline policies against multiculturalism and immigration or linked to fringe political ideologies have not traditionally aligned with the Jewish community on common causes. But in the wake of the recent number of anti-Israel Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions (BDS) protests outside Max Brenner chocolate shops, political entities, such as the Australian Protectionist Party (APP) and Australian Tea Party have come out and sided with Israel and the local Jewish community. The APP believes in a zero-net immigration policy – one in, one out – with migrants sourced from Europe, opposes multiculturalism and calls for an end to emigration from developing and Muslim countries. The party’s NSW state chairman Darrin Hodges said there were several reasons why he, together with his party, staged a counter-protest outside Max Brenner in Newtown on September 10. “We see the protests of the proBDS protesters [as] an interruption of trade, of a legally trading business selling a legal product,” he said. “We don’t like some of the fairly extremist views coming from the pro-BDS [camp], some of them seem to be using the BDS as a fig leaf for their anti-Semitism. And we oppose those sort of ideologies.” Hodges said he also opposed the protesters demonstrating in Australia about disputes overseas. “They’re bringing in what is essentially a foreign conflict and they’re trying to cause divisiveness in Australia with it,” he said. Hodges said the APP opposed socialists in general.“It seems to be in socialism, anti-Zionism has always been a feature of Marxism, and I think it’s being driven by groups like the Socialist Alliance and the Socialist Alternative and those sort of little fringe groups that seem to be driving it,” he said.

“They’re bringing in what is essentially a foreign conflict and they’re trying to cause divisiveness in Australia with it,” he said.

Oh are they now? Look at this little gem from the Bnai Brith run AJN.

Hodges said "the APP opposed socialists in general.“It seems to be in socialism, anti-Zionism has always been a feature of Marxism" Socialism is the movement of the Jewish Masses you idiot.

Hodges you are either one massive dumb shit or you are a traitor. Either way the Jews will love you for it.

More slaughter, more white genocide, no media coverage.

2012-01-06T09:31:00.007+10:00

– Phillip Marlowe

"These anti-White crimes are now happening all the time. I can only write about a few stories here and there, since the Jewish political and cultural destruction of America and the White race is now in full swing."

You know folks we could go on forever posting these truly sad and disgusting stories of the butchering of European peoples from around the world. But you will be hard pressed to find comment from the main stream media or the state sponsored Anarchist/anti racist movements.

Source. Incogman BOOKMARK IT!

Jew-Instigated White Haters Killing Our Race

This past New Year’s eve, an 18 year-old White girl in Chicago couldn’t get into a nightclub for a concert because she forgot her ID, so she went back out to the curb to wait for her ride home. But she never made it: A gang of black thugs soon dragged her off into a nearby alley and took turns beating and brutally raping her for 30 minutes.

Almost dead and comatose, her bloody body was dumped back out on the sidewalk like a sack of garbage (she survived). Reports say at least 6 blacks did this to her; 3 were apprehended by club bouncers and turned over to police. Yet after questioning, the Chicago PD released the animals without charge, even though they were said to still have blood on their clothes.

The local Chicago media completely censored any mention of either race and you sure as hell won’t hear anything on the story nationally.

This is the kind of thing White people are now experiencing on a daily basis all around the country (click continue for a story that will surely piss you off). America has now been turned into a Third World hell hole by the selfish and paranoid, Ashkenazim Talmudic Jewry. The Jews and their multicult minions are now doing everything they can to keep our race in the dark, no matter the crime.
When will YOU get the deal?

These are NOT occasional, “garden variety” crimes, as the Jew media blithely likes to call it. No way. This is an ever-growing hate assault on our race by increasingly violent, militant, anti-White black animals, taking out decades of hate against White people instilled in them by the Jew media and intellectuals. No doubt at all. But there’s even more to this situation, sorry to say.*

Another recent but more deadly example: The monday after Christmas, Beverly Hope Melton, a popular and married 30 year-old White woman stopped by a convenience store in South Carolina for gas. On the way though the door to pay, she walked past Nickolas Miller, who followed her as she drove off. Down the road, he used his car to run her off the road, abducted her, took her to a remote location, raped her and then drove to another remote spot where he beat her to death with a baseball bat.

The victim and black animal were seen on this surveillance video, before he followed and ran her car off the road to do his thing. He then senselessly and brutally killed her.

Imagine getting the life beaten out of you with a baseball bat out of the blue just for going to the local convenience store? Make note this happened in rural, small town America, not Detroit or Philadelphia.

Oh, I’m sure all these violent and spoiled blacks are just so downtrodden and oppressed by Whitey that they have to go out and get some payback. And I’m sure if White people go along with whatever the hell they want, they might act nicer and kill us a little less.

You know it’s us Whites who deserve this kind of thing, right?

As part of the Jewish agenda, White haters and multicult intellectuals have been getting all kinds of exposure and money over the last few decades.

The popular magazine “Psychology Today” (heavily staffed by Jews), openly promotes anti-White multiculturalism. They recently published an article by university professor Monnica Williams, which basically said Whites need to kiss the ass of “people of color” just to prove we’re not harboring “racist attitudes.”

To her, being “colorblind” is actually a form of denigration since we’re ignoring just how wonderful and great non-Whites have been to the planet, as compared to all us slavery and racist-prone White people, of course.

Now, I don’t really know exactly the race of “Doctor” Williams is here (above), but she’s obviously some sort of mulatto half breed (they hate those terms so I use them with relish). She looks to be half Jewish – check out her nose and that peculiar smug smile so common to Jewish females. Regardless of whatever bizarre mix the White-hating ugly mutt is, Williams sure has the right instinct in this day and age to milk the anti-White business for her own personal gain.

Sorry to say, they are plenty of Whites doing the exact same thing. This Jewish corruption of our people for multiculturalism is the root cause of our race’s demise in the formerly White Western world.

This is dear little Monnica’s answer to “the big problem” of all us hateful Whites:

The alternative to colorblindness is multiculturalism, an ideology that acknowledges, highlights, and celebrates ethnoracial differences. It recognizes that each tradition has something valuable to offer. It is not afraid to see how others have suffered as a result of racial conflict or differences.

Now, just imagine if any White person were to “celebrate” White differences and tradition? What do you think might happen? That person would immediately be branded as a “White Supremacist;” maybe a half dozen other anti-White slanders thrown in for good measure. Hell, they might even get fired and investigated by Jewish White-hating, self-elected intelligence organizations like the SPLC (who literally work with the FBI and police to finger Whites who dare to speak out).

You see, they just can’t allow White people to take pride in our own race. That’s too dangerous to these race hustlers and professional victims. But it’s most importantly dangerous to the quiet and methodical Jewish agenda of destruction to our race in our own lands.

No, I’m not saying the “Jew powers” have secretly instructed Williams to write her crap. She’s just taking advantage of the PC head job foisted on White people in our countries to advance her theories and career. The real powers that be want to keep Whites screwed up so we don’t come together enough to ruin their long-running agenda for Global governance and financial parasitism.

Not only have the Jews jacked up the other races to hate us, they’ve worked to get White people to think our own race doesn’t even exist. That’s right. According to these White hating Jews, European Whites are nothing to the world; we don’t have family, any real history — none of our cultures and traditions make any difference.

Just picture the utter gall of these nefarious, astoundingly subversive Jews to purposefully work these kinds of ideas into our present culture, trying to eliminate the possibility of “evil White pride” and even our race altogether.

Think of all the technology and civilization European Whites have created for humanity – hell, most of the planet would have long starved to death by now if it wasn’t for our agricultural breakthroughs alone.

Running in tandem with all the Jewish NWO ”globalism” business, is the slow genocide of our racial numbers (due to Jewy social and sexual meddling) and the daily influx of non-Whites into our lands. Not only that, they constantly push interracial sex in the media so we breed ourselves away. They aim to marginalize our racial demographics to the point where we can’t do much about it, when the time comes.

If you stand back and look at it, you’ll see that this all fits everything happening over the last fifty years or so. In fact, it’s becoming more and more obvious by the day. Turn on the TV and in 5 minutes you’ll see something that backs me up.

Just take a look at what’s happening to White Afrikaner people in South Africa, for crying out loud. Of course, you’ll have to find out on your own, since the Jew media in the US is staying silent. Just go to this website: Afrikaner Genocide archives

And it’s not just in America, either. Most White countries have been systematically invaded by non-White race immigration, fostered by Jewish multiculturalism and NWO forces, resulting in horrific crimes of all sorts; just in Norway, for example, every single rape for the last five years have been committed exclusively by Muslim blacks from places like the Sudan.

The end game is rapidly approaching and the Jews know most of us Whites will finally get what’s being done to us. The real question is: Will it be too late for our race to fight back?

Isn’t it time for you to grow a pair and start talking openly to all those around you, at least so they know what’s really now going on in America?

Thank you.

These bastards have truly mastered the art of mass murder via deception and control of the State. Why get your hands dirty when someone else will do your dirty work for you. As the Western World increasingly begins to mimic the Golden Days of the Jewish/Communist Empire, the harder it will be to discover the truth!

‘Outlaw’ Justice…

2012-01-06T08:14:00.011+10:00

Sometimes, much of the time in fact, it is not easy being a White Nationalist. It is increasingly difficult to resist the feelings of despair when confronted, on a daily basis, with the many and varied vile abominations of the MultiKult. We must take inspiration and morale boosting encouragement wherever we can and sometimes that includes the, admittedly imperfect, world of entertainment media.
Recently, over the Christmas Holidays, your Old Uncle Victor re-watched one of his all time favourite movies, Clint Eastwood’s 1976 film ‘The Outlaw Josey Wales’ based on the book ‘Gone to Texas’ by Forrest Carter and whose main character and storyline is in turn based on the life of a real life Missourian ‘bushwhacker’ named Bill Wilson. Okay, so it is true that Eastwood is not exactly ‘one of ours’ having been a long time industry man, miscegenator (preferring dusky ‘Latino’ types over White Women) and weaving in the ‘noble savage’ and even ‘oppressed Black’ into the Western theme as well as his other categories of film.
Nevertheless, he has given us much entertainment and pleasure over the years with his various heroic and even anti-heroic characters and, let's face it, there are so few movie characters that embody the sort of qualities we White Nationalists admire, like bravery, courage, determination, loyalty, honour, truthfulness, that we tend to perhaps over romanticise these rare examples. But seriously, what White Nationalist has not imagined being a Josey Wales or even a Dirty Harry? There are no 'grey areas' in these stories. Only Black and White, Good and Evil. The simple morality, basic storylines, minimalist dialogue and iconographic imagery of his so-called 'Spaghetti Westerns' is actually quite refreshing in contrast to the deliberately contrived ethical ambiguity, moral relativism and politically correct sophistry of more supposedly ‘clever’ cinema. In fact, your Old Uncle Victor would go so far as to say that, particularly on a purely visual level, the Sergio Leone movies in particular were truly ‘Art’ films.
Forget the fact that ‘Josey Wales’ is a well produced and directed ripping yarn full of wry humour, dry as dust, deadpan acting from Eastwood, that it has the obligatory evil villains, the required body count, acts of wickedness, retribution and revenge etc. What is truly stunning about this film is how much plain and simple truth managed to make its way into the finished product. Whether or not this was down to, or in spite of, Eastwood and/or his researchers/writers/producers etc is unknown to this writer. It is certainly not intended to be a ‘docu-drama’ but, in some ways, it almost is. Set during the immediate aftermath of Lincoln’s hateful war of Genocide against the Southern Whites many of the characters are based quite closely on real people and in and around real events.
It is well documented that as well as foreign mercenaries, the North deployed bands of ‘irregulars’ as terror troops to subjugate the Southern civilian population with guerrilla type raids and scorched earth tactics. Among the most notorious of these bands were ‘Jenison’s Jayhawkers’ (the 7th Kansas Cavalry) and the ‘Kansas Red-Legs’ who are shown in the movie as the main villains.
Their favourite hunting grounds were in the so-called ‘Outlaw State’ of Missouri where they raped, looted and murdered their way to a supremely barbaric notoriety. Their riders were fond of scalping their victims and attaching the scalps, and other grisly trophies, to their saddles. In response to these marauding Kansas criminals, and in reality that is all they were, the Missourians formed their own, equally ruthless vigilante guerrilla brigades like ‘Quantrill’s Raiders’ led by William Clarke Quantrill (31st July 1837 6th June 1865). The ‘Raiders’ rode under the Black Flag which indicated that they neither asked nor gave quarter during combat. Any encounter with a ‘Black Flag’ unit, and both sides had them, was a fight to the death, period. The ‘Captain Fletcher’ character played by actor John Vernon in the ‘Josey Wales’ movie is based on the Raiders’ Captain Dave Poole or, alternatively, depending on which you choose to believe, perhaps Charles Fletcher ‘Fletch’ Taylor.
One of Quantrill’s senior lieutenants was a man named William ‘Bloody Bill’ Anderson (1838 – 26th October 1864) who had a massive axe to grind with the hated Yankees. The well known Western actor John Russell plays his character in the film. His parents and sisters had been massacred by the Red Legs and, according to legend, he would literally foam at the mouth with rage as he went into battle roaring his rebel yell, so intense was his fury. The so-called ‘Civil War’ was anything but civil.
It is a magnificent testament to the bravery and stoic tenacity of the Agrarian South that they withstood the onslaught of the Industrial North, with its technological advantages and capacity for mass production of weaponry, for as long as they did. A people with a lesser degree of Racial/Cultural identity and a lower moral character would surely have succumbed much sooner.
Hateful Hollywood and TelAvision propaganda streams endless caricatures of illiterate, toothless hillbillies and ‘Rednecks’ when, in reality quite the opposite was the case. But this is so tiresomely typical of Jew/Liberal/Humanist/Marxist hatemongering to utterly invert reality in the most arrogant, brazen and shameless fashion. We know it as insolence, the Jews proudly call it Chutzpah.
Quite to the contrary, the South had a very proud and time honoured tradition of education, civic pride, community duty, social etiquette and chivalry. This makes the propaganda we have been fed all the more obscene but, considering these ‘histories’ were created by the victors and their lickspittles, somewhat understandable. What is not understandable is that these cruel lies and parodies of History have stood for so long and, in the cases of the current U.S. Government seeing to it that the school curriculum reflects this ‘North good. South Evil’ version of reality and the continuing removal of monuments and statues in public parks dedicated to Southern heroes,
Other Southern so-called ‘Partisan Rangers’ included ‘Mosby’s Rangers’ (43rd Battalion, 1st Virginia Cavalry) led by Commander John Singleton Mosby, nicknamed the “Gray Ghost”, (6th December 1833 – 30th 1916). John Hunt Morgan (1st June 1825 – 4th September 1864) of the Kentucky Militia’s ‘Rebel Raiders’ who was murdered by Union Cavalry forces after surrendering in Greeneville Tennessee. Samuel “Champ” Ferguson (29th November 1821 – 30th October 1865) born in Clinton County Kentucky on the Tennessee border, he was a Partisan Captain who was falsely promised a pardon at war’s end, only to be betrayed and hanged after a kangaroo court found him guilty of 53 counts of murder.
This sort of treatment, trickery, betrayal and summary execution (murder) of Confederates is not only similar to events portrayed in ‘Josey Wales’ and typical of Northern war crimes but is indicative of what the present Federal U.S. regime is capable of. Infamous Federal crimes such as Ruby Ridge, Waco etc should remind all White dissidents of what is in store for them if they do not prevail in their struggle.
Captain Edward Terrill was a turncoat who had originally ridden with John Hunt Morgan’s Rebel Raiders but had switched sides to hunt down Southern guerrillas for money. He is portrayed in the movie by the actor Bill McKinney. Terrill is a parallel for all the other Race Traitors and scum who sell out their former comrades to the ZOG for a handful of shekels. We all know at least one ‘Terrill’ and we also know there is a very special corner of Hell reserved for such filth.
The ‘prequel’ to all this of course though was the war, its true causes and its instigators. An insane, Abolitionist Race Traitor, bleeding heart renegade and 33rd Degree Freemason John Brown earned himself and his sons everlasting fame with the people in the Northern States for his antislavery crusade in Missouri. The more White people he and his sons hacked to death with swords in Missouri, the louder the sick Race Traitors in the North cheered him on. But Brown did not act alone. He was financed and directed by six vile Race Traitors from Massachusetts, all 33rd Degree Freemasons like himself. They were George Luther Stearns, Franklin B. Sanborn, Gerrit Smith, the ‘Reverend’ Thomas W. Higginson, Dr. Samuel Gridley Howe and the vile ‘Reverend’ Theodore Parker, the most famous ‘preacher’ of his day who turned against Christianity in favour of Unitarianism. These six Racial turncoats, known as the Secret Six, were responsible, along with Abraham Lincoln and the Masonic Lodges, both North and South, for the incredibly bloody so-called ‘Civil War’.
But there IS Justice in the end as the following illustrates. It may not be as good as official trials and executions for the perpetrators but it gives one hope that there is a God up there settling the accounts.
A few years after the war, Charles ‘Doc’ Jennison came down with a long and painful illness that emaciated and killed him. Near the end of the war he was cashiered from the Army, leaving in disgrace. Senator Jim Lane, chief of the Kansas Red Legs, went insane after the war and blew his own brains out. In 1896, Union General Ewing, who enforced the infamous Order No.11, was hit by a streetcar and killed instantly. Dr. Samuel Gridley Howe, one of the Secret Six, whose abolitionist wife wrote “The Battle Hymn Of The Republic” was struck blind and dumb in 1876. He slowly lost his mind from his stroke and in 1882, he wandered aimless and lost in the rain, catching pneumonia from which he died. John Brown, the infamous Masonic Race agitator, was hanged for his crimes at Harper’s Ferry Va, before the war. He would become the North’s greatest martyr and patron saint. The Reverend Theodore Parker sank into melancholia and died miserably in Rome in May 1860. Gerrit Smith endured the humiliation of a Chicago Tribune exposé of his role as a conspirator at Harper’s Ferry and as a coward and a liar in the raid’s aftermath. He was a lawyer who knew the rules of evidence and the laws against being an accessory to murder and treason. His reputation was ruined and he and his wife were confined to a lunatic asylum before the war. George Luther Stearns died just after the war in 1867. The great warmonger himself, Abraham Lincoln, himself a Melungeon, (a Negroid, Native American and Eurasian blend also referred to as ‘Atlantic Creoles’) hence his coarse skin and ‘dirty’ complexion, (telangiectases are a common dermatological manifestation evident in mulattoes, the Negroid actor Morgan Freeman is one example) also suffered from ataxia, a well known hereditary genetic disorder. Your Old Uncle Victor has often referred to this as ‘Lumpy Gravy’ Syndrome, where poorly blended genes result in a form of mosaicism. Lincoln was mercifully euthanized by John Wilkes Booth (10th May 1838 – 26th April 1865) an outspoken Pro-Confederacy advocate who was enraged at Lincoln’s ruthless tyranny and War of Genocide on the South.
And the point in telling you all of this? Well, gentle reader, you would certainly be aware of the sayings that “What goes around comes around”, “The truth will always out”, “nothing stays the same forever”, “the wheel turns”, etc. Well, one day, the ‘Outlaws’, the ‘dissidents’ (that’s you and me) will be the ones settling the scores and dispensing the justice. Just stay true to the cause and be patient. Our time will come.
Additionally, by way of illustrating how deeply ingrained the slander toward the South is and has been maintained, the following letter from February 2000, written by a Canadian subscriber to a White Nationalist magazine, is most informative:
“Hollywood's Dixie. Everything I know about the South I learned from the Silver Screen. I have never travelled throughout the American South and yet I feel I know it as well as my own home turf. I know its people, how they think, their attitudes, morals, lifestyle and their outlook on the world. In fact, I would go so far as to say that there is no group of Americans with which I am as well acquainted as the denizens of Dixie.
Over the years, a clear and distinct image of the Southerner has been formed in my mind. Even though I have never met these people, I feel that I am well acquainted with all of them. What do I know? Well for instance, even though the South contains some large cities most Southerners live in small towns where the middle class is almost nonexistent. If you're a poor dirt farmer, you walk around in bib overalls and a straw hat. If you've got money, you wear a white suit and smoke fat cigars. Southern women come in two types-the old ones are nosey, gossiping snoops. The young ones are sluttish, oversexed teases. Both speak with irritating whiny drawls.
Wealthy old Southern men are powerful, greedy and ruthless and are usually called “Daddy” or “Colonel.” Their sons are young Hell-raisers who drive fast cars and regularly get into trouble as they break all the rules trying to impress some young girl. The sons of poor farmers simply drink too much and wind up in jail.
Southern towns are run by politicians who are grasping and corrupt and are usually the same types who operate the feed store, the used car lot and the farm implement dealership.
The law, such as it is in the Deep South, is dispensed by a pot-bellied, tobacco chewing sheriff, a sadistic evil brute who is probably the living descendant of some whip-wielding plantation overseer. No one ever talks about it but most townsfolk suspect that the sheriff and the gang of low-lifes who hang around the local pool hall all day are actually members of the Klan. Running afoul of the law anywhere in this region, even for a minor infraction, might very well get you sentenced to a year on the chain gang where you'd be at the mercy of a demented prison warden and his cruel guards. Their idea of fun is to chain a black man and white man together to see if they'll tear each other apart. Talking back to the bossman will get you a flogging.
For black people life in the South is an even grimmer proposition. Old black women are very religious and look forward to getting dressed up for church on Sunday. They adore children and love to take care of them, even white children. Old black men spend most of their days whittling pieces of wood or trying to catch catfish on the riverbank. Life for a young black male, however, is a daily encounter with danger. For simply smiling at a white woman, he can be arrested, beaten up by that pot-bellied sheriff and thrown into the hoosegow. From there he will be hauled up before a judge and charged with rape. Regardless of his innocence, an all-white jury will convict him. Before he can be taken away to the county prison, an unruly mob or the Klansmen will break into the jailhouse, drag him out and lynch him.
A young black woman, if she is attractive, the threat of a sexual assault from a white man or group of white men is ever present. Even the most prejudiced of white males is not averse to “a bit of the dark stuff,” if he is given the opportunity. Such is the image I have of every town in the South. White men are all corrupt, drunk and evil, and their womenfolk are simple-minded tramps or busybodies. Blacks, on the other hand, are noble, courageous and long-suffering.
Where did I get all these ideas, you ask? From the movies, of course! Starting with I Am A Fugitive From A Chain Gang and on through A Streetcar Named Desire, Cat On A Hot Tin Roof, The Defiant Ones, In The Heat Of The Night, To Kill A Mockingbird and Cool Hand Luke right up to Deliverance and Mississippi Burning, Hollywood has carefully moulded the pattern for all Southern characters which still persists to this day. Through film after film we have been led to believe that Dixie is a land dominated by degenerate, illiterate, dishonest cretins that most of us would shun on sight.
Tinseltown also has nothing but contempt for the Southerner's mountain-dwelling cousin, that retarded, inbred subhuman known as the Hillbilly. Earlier films depicted him as a toothless, gun-toting clown always feuding with some other mountain family. More recent films have shown his darker, sexual predatory side. The one admirable member of the hilltop dwellers seems to be the young moonshine runner who turns out to be a pretty good stock-car driver as he careens around mountain ledges in his souped-up Chevy with the revenooers in hot pursuit.
Why after all these years does Hollywood still give us nothing but distorted images of those who live below Mason-Dixon line? Probably because screenwriters are running short of villains and every good story needs a bad guy. In this politically correct, racially sensitive age, they cannot show blacks, Hispanics, native Indians or Orientals in a bad light. Immigrant groups, such as the Italians, Greeks, Irish and Poles, have enough clout to make sure they are not cinematically defamed. God forbid we should ever see a Jewish villain in our lifetime! If he's making a WWII movie, any producer can get lots of mileage out of those hideous Nazis, but if the film is set in the good old U.S.A., who can he safely cast as the baddies? Southerners, naturally. Those sweaty, trashy Dixie whites are stereotypes that we have all grown up with and which few people question to this day. Sambo, Rastus and Uncle Remus are gone forever but that nasty, grinning redneck and his hot-to-trot daughter are still with us and still going strong.
A film set in Boston, New York or Los Angeles shows us people that we can all relate to. But any film set in Mississippi or Alabama will be filled with characters that seem to be from another world. The slow-witted, slow-talking inhabitants of this hot and White men are all corrupt, drunk and evil, and their steamy backwater of civilization as normal people. So we are prepared to believe them capable of any wickedness. For those who would argue the point, simply ask yourselves: Is there any other region or any other population group in the U.S. that has been so constantly ridiculed, maligned, pilloried and dehumanized by generations of filmmakers as the inhabitants of the American South?
One of my favourite contributors to this magazine, N. B. Forrest, writes about the South with great pride and often mentions gallant Southern gentlemen, well-bred genteel Southern ladies and the courageous soldiers of the Confederacy.
I cannot believe that the descendants of those people have all disappeared. Yet when do we ever see normal Southerners portrayed in the movies? I can think of only a very few examples. If you would like to see some decent and uplifting sons and daughters of Dixie on your home TV screen, let me suggest that you rent the video version of ‘Gone With The Wind’ and watch only the first hour. This film may have been made by a man named Selznick, but the images he provided us of this gallant race of people was one of the finest portrayals of Southern nobility ever shown to the world. Until someone forms a Southern Anti-Defamation League, it will probably be the last honest film Hollywood ever gives us.”

Yet again, it kinda makes you wonder about everything you think you 'know' don't it? THINK!

More wholesale slaughter. More White Genocide.

2012-01-05T21:49:00.005+10:00

More cover ups from the media. Still no comparison with the dribble the luny left/State run anarchist assett "@ndy" attempts to pass off as "Shocking Neo Nazi Crimes". Its all in his head folks, those evil Nazis are watching from every corner dont ya know.

Anti racism is a code word for anti white!

Courtesy of North West Nationalists. Book mark it.

Richard Everitt victim. Killed by anti white Racism. Ignored by and covered up by Media.

The below letter has been e-mail this evening (Wednesday 4th January 2012) to all main BBC & ITV radio and TV news intake addresses; the editors of the letters section of all national daily and Sunday newspapers; and to the editors of the letters pages of major national magazines.

As you see, this letter contrasts the way in which the police, the judiciary and the media have handled the prosecution and conviction at the Old Bailey today of two of the gang alleged to have attacked and murdered the West Indian Stephen Lawrence nearly 20 years ago with the way the authorities and media “managed” the Bengali gang murder a year later of 15 year old white lad Richard Everitt.

Please feel free to give onward circulation. Thanks!

--Martin.

=====================================================================

Sir:

All murders are to be deplored; all murderers should be brought to justice; and the media should give coverage to all such crimes.

This said, I note the different treatment accorded by the Metropolitan Police, the judiciary and the media to the murders by teenage “racist gangs” of 18 year old Stephen Lawrence in Eltham, SE London, in April 1993 and 15 year old Richard Everitt in Somers Town, Camden, north London, in August 1994. Stephen was of West Indian origin; Richard was white.

The circumstances of the murders were similar. Both were attacked by gangs of teenagers who before and after the murders expressed violent racial hatred. Stephen was murdered by a white gang. Richard was murdered by an Bengali gang. Neither victim behaved in any way to provoke even verbal abuse, let alone being stabbed.

Massive media publicity, sustained over nearly two decades, followed Stephen’s case. There was a visit by the Home Secretary to the murder scene where a public monument was erected. A public judicial inquiry was conducted in which the police were denounced as “institutionally racist”. Money was found to fund a private prosecution, which failed.

As we now know, two men, Gary Dobson and David Norris, have been convicted after a second trial at the Old Bailey of Stephen’s murder and sentenced to life imprisonment of which they must serve a minimum 15+ years and 14+ years respectively. The judge called for Stephen’s other attackers to be brought to justice because they were engaged in a “joint exercise”. This has been echoed by the entire media and political establishment.

With all this, “Stephen Lawrence” has become a household name. Richard Everitt’s name was never in the headlines for long enough for the public mind to retain it.

Eleven Bengali youths (one as old as 20) were arrested in connection with Richard’s murder. Only two came to trial, Badrul Miah and Showkat Akbar. There were no calls for all the attackers to be prosecuted on a “joint enterprise” basis. Akbar was found guilty of violent disorder and sentenced to three years, of which he served 18 months. Miah was sentenced to life but let out on licence after 11 years despite the trial judge describing it as an “unprovoked racist attack”. The media tried to pressure Richard’s parents to say the murder was not racially motivated.

There was no visit by the Home Secretary to Somers Town, no public monument; no public judicial inquiry; and virtual silence from the local MP Frank Dobson.

I will not attempt to second-guess the jury in the Dobson and Norris trial. I simply wish to suggest that the verdict against them should not be taken as proof that the population of this country — at least, the white working class section of it — is getting justice from the police, the judiciary and the media because they all subscribe to the notion that in Britain only white people and never black people commit offences motivated by racial hatred.

Yours faithfully,

Martin Webster.

=========================================================

Jewish agitation behind Lawrence campaign

Letter published in the Evening Standard 4th Jan 2012

"In January 1997 I had the privilege, as executive director of the Anne Frank Trust, of introducing Doreen Lawrence to Tony Blair. At that time, the racist murder of Stephen Lawrence was a four-year-old unsolved crime, hardly mentioned in the press.

The occasion was the launch of a new Anne Frank travelling exhibition, A History for Today, at Southwark Cathedral. As owners of the new exhibition, we chose to include a panel about Stephen, to show that hatred could destroy another talented teenager's life, right here on the streets of London.

I was told a few years later that Blair had been so impressed and moved by Doreen's description of Stephen's life and death that he vowed on that morning that should he become Prime Minister he would commission a proper inquiry into the handling of the investigation of Stehen's murder. As a result we saw Lord MacPherson's inquiry, which changed so much in British institutions.

I would like to pay tribute to the Lawrence family, to their resilience and determination. Stephen's adulthood will never be lived, and as with Anne Frank we can only speculate what his life choices would have been. But from my experience of working with both his parents, he would have been a terrific and caring young man. How cruel a thing is racial bigotry.

Gillian Warnes MBE, Anne Frank Trust UK.